Complaint Review: The Results Group - Phoenix Arizona
- The Results Group 3219 E. Camelback Road, #838 Phoenix, Arizona U.S.A.
- Phone: 800-226-3150
- Web:
- Category: Internet
The Results Group, Ripped me off royally, even had a payback guarntee Phoenix Arizona
*Consumer Suggestion: Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. The Results Group, L.L.C.,
*Consumer Suggestion: Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. The Results Group, L.L.C.,
*Consumer Suggestion: Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. The Results Group, L.L.C.,
*Consumer Suggestion: Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. The Results Group, L.L.C.,
I was told I had to wait 6 months if money wasn't coming in, there would be money back refund of a certainn percent. Zilch cant' call confienly there ios no phone number in service. I was scammed BAD. Remember when it sounds to good to be true, It usually is.
Linda
Caledonia, Michigan
U.S.A.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 03/01/2007 11:02 AM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/the-results-group/phoenix-arizona-85018/the-results-group-ripped-me-off-royally-even-had-a-payback-guarntee-phoenix-arizona-237577. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:
#4 Consumer Suggestion
Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. The Results Group, L.L.C.,
AUTHOR: Dennis - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, March 01, 2007
Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. The Results Group, L.L.C., an Arizona Limited Liability Company, Edward R. Longoria, individually and as a manager of The Results Group, L.L.C., and Amber R. Halvorson, individually and as a manager of The Results Group, L.L.C., Defendants (United States District Court for the District of Arizona)
Civil No. CV 06 2843 PHX JAT, FTC File No. 062 3205
http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0623205/index.htm
December 12, 2006
Complaint for Injunctive and Other Relief
Temporary Restraining Order Freezing Assets and Providing Equitable Relief, and Order To Show Cause
Why A Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue
===============================
The FTC today announced nine new cases:
The Results Group Working out of a boiler room in Phoenix, the operation charged between $99 and $599 to build and host Web sites affiliated with the Web sites of Fortune 500 retail companies such as Amazon.com and Overstock.com. Consumers would make money when those retailers paid commissions for sales made through the consumers' Web sites. In fact, the large retailers were unaware of any such affiliation, and consumers made no money. The FTC charged that the operation falsely represented that purchasers would receive substantial income as well as substantial assistance from an expert staff, and used false and misleading statements to encourage consumers to buy the business opportunity.
#3 Consumer Suggestion
Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. The Results Group, L.L.C.,
AUTHOR: Dennis - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, March 01, 2007
Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. The Results Group, L.L.C., an Arizona Limited Liability Company, Edward R. Longoria, individually and as a manager of The Results Group, L.L.C., and Amber R. Halvorson, individually and as a manager of The Results Group, L.L.C., Defendants (United States District Court for the District of Arizona)
Civil No. CV 06 2843 PHX JAT, FTC File No. 062 3205
http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0623205/index.htm
December 12, 2006
Complaint for Injunctive and Other Relief
Temporary Restraining Order Freezing Assets and Providing Equitable Relief, and Order To Show Cause
Why A Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue
===============================
The FTC today announced nine new cases:
The Results Group Working out of a boiler room in Phoenix, the operation charged between $99 and $599 to build and host Web sites affiliated with the Web sites of Fortune 500 retail companies such as Amazon.com and Overstock.com. Consumers would make money when those retailers paid commissions for sales made through the consumers' Web sites. In fact, the large retailers were unaware of any such affiliation, and consumers made no money. The FTC charged that the operation falsely represented that purchasers would receive substantial income as well as substantial assistance from an expert staff, and used false and misleading statements to encourage consumers to buy the business opportunity.
#2 Consumer Suggestion
Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. The Results Group, L.L.C.,
AUTHOR: Dennis - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, March 01, 2007
Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. The Results Group, L.L.C., an Arizona Limited Liability Company, Edward R. Longoria, individually and as a manager of The Results Group, L.L.C., and Amber R. Halvorson, individually and as a manager of The Results Group, L.L.C., Defendants (United States District Court for the District of Arizona)
Civil No. CV 06 2843 PHX JAT, FTC File No. 062 3205
http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0623205/index.htm
December 12, 2006
Complaint for Injunctive and Other Relief
Temporary Restraining Order Freezing Assets and Providing Equitable Relief, and Order To Show Cause
Why A Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue
===============================
The FTC today announced nine new cases:
The Results Group Working out of a boiler room in Phoenix, the operation charged between $99 and $599 to build and host Web sites affiliated with the Web sites of Fortune 500 retail companies such as Amazon.com and Overstock.com. Consumers would make money when those retailers paid commissions for sales made through the consumers' Web sites. In fact, the large retailers were unaware of any such affiliation, and consumers made no money. The FTC charged that the operation falsely represented that purchasers would receive substantial income as well as substantial assistance from an expert staff, and used false and misleading statements to encourage consumers to buy the business opportunity.
#1 Consumer Suggestion
Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. The Results Group, L.L.C.,
AUTHOR: Dennis - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, March 01, 2007
Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. The Results Group, L.L.C., an Arizona Limited Liability Company, Edward R. Longoria, individually and as a manager of The Results Group, L.L.C., and Amber R. Halvorson, individually and as a manager of The Results Group, L.L.C., Defendants (United States District Court for the District of Arizona)
Civil No. CV 06 2843 PHX JAT, FTC File No. 062 3205
http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0623205/index.htm
December 12, 2006
Complaint for Injunctive and Other Relief
Temporary Restraining Order Freezing Assets and Providing Equitable Relief, and Order To Show Cause
Why A Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue
===============================
The FTC today announced nine new cases:
The Results Group Working out of a boiler room in Phoenix, the operation charged between $99 and $599 to build and host Web sites affiliated with the Web sites of Fortune 500 retail companies such as Amazon.com and Overstock.com. Consumers would make money when those retailers paid commissions for sales made through the consumers' Web sites. In fact, the large retailers were unaware of any such affiliation, and consumers made no money. The FTC charged that the operation falsely represented that purchasers would receive substantial income as well as substantial assistance from an expert staff, and used false and misleading statements to encourage consumers to buy the business opportunity.
Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.