X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now
Ripoff Report | The Results Group Review - Phoenix, Arizona
Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #237577

Complaint Review: The Results Group - Phoenix Arizona

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Caledonia Michigan
  • Author Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • The Results Group 3219 E. Camelback Road, #838 Phoenix, Arizona U.S.A.
  • Phone: 800-226-3150
  • Web:
  • Category: Internet

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Ripoff Report
About you?
Click here now..

I was told I had to wait 6 months if money wasn't coming in, there would be money back refund of a certainn percent. Zilch cant' call confienly there ios no phone number in service. I was scammed BAD. Remember when it sounds to good to be true, It usually is.

Linda
Caledonia, Michigan
U.S.A.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 03/01/2007 11:02 AM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/the-results-group/phoenix-arizona-85018/the-results-group-ripped-me-off-royally-even-had-a-payback-guarntee-phoenix-arizona-237577. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author
4Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#4 Consumer Suggestion

Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. The Results Group, L.L.C.,

AUTHOR: Dennis - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Thursday, March 01, 2007

Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. The Results Group, L.L.C., an Arizona Limited Liability Company, Edward R. Longoria, individually and as a manager of The Results Group, L.L.C., and Amber R. Halvorson, individually and as a manager of The Results Group, L.L.C., Defendants (United States District Court for the District of Arizona)

Civil No. CV 06 2843 PHX JAT, FTC File No. 062 3205

http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0623205/index.htm

December 12, 2006

Complaint for Injunctive and Other Relief
Temporary Restraining Order Freezing Assets and Providing Equitable Relief, and Order To Show Cause
Why A Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue


===============================


The FTC today announced nine new cases:

The Results Group Working out of a boiler room in Phoenix, the operation charged between $99 and $599 to build and host Web sites affiliated with the Web sites of Fortune 500 retail companies such as Amazon.com and Overstock.com. Consumers would make money when those retailers paid commissions for sales made through the consumers' Web sites. In fact, the large retailers were unaware of any such affiliation, and consumers made no money. The FTC charged that the operation falsely represented that purchasers would receive substantial income as well as substantial assistance from an expert staff, and used false and misleading statements to encourage consumers to buy the business opportunity.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#3 Consumer Suggestion

Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. The Results Group, L.L.C.,

AUTHOR: Dennis - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Thursday, March 01, 2007

Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. The Results Group, L.L.C., an Arizona Limited Liability Company, Edward R. Longoria, individually and as a manager of The Results Group, L.L.C., and Amber R. Halvorson, individually and as a manager of The Results Group, L.L.C., Defendants (United States District Court for the District of Arizona)

Civil No. CV 06 2843 PHX JAT, FTC File No. 062 3205

http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0623205/index.htm

December 12, 2006

Complaint for Injunctive and Other Relief
Temporary Restraining Order Freezing Assets and Providing Equitable Relief, and Order To Show Cause
Why A Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue


===============================


The FTC today announced nine new cases:

The Results Group Working out of a boiler room in Phoenix, the operation charged between $99 and $599 to build and host Web sites affiliated with the Web sites of Fortune 500 retail companies such as Amazon.com and Overstock.com. Consumers would make money when those retailers paid commissions for sales made through the consumers' Web sites. In fact, the large retailers were unaware of any such affiliation, and consumers made no money. The FTC charged that the operation falsely represented that purchasers would receive substantial income as well as substantial assistance from an expert staff, and used false and misleading statements to encourage consumers to buy the business opportunity.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 Consumer Suggestion

Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. The Results Group, L.L.C.,

AUTHOR: Dennis - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Thursday, March 01, 2007

Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. The Results Group, L.L.C., an Arizona Limited Liability Company, Edward R. Longoria, individually and as a manager of The Results Group, L.L.C., and Amber R. Halvorson, individually and as a manager of The Results Group, L.L.C., Defendants (United States District Court for the District of Arizona)

Civil No. CV 06 2843 PHX JAT, FTC File No. 062 3205

http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0623205/index.htm

December 12, 2006

Complaint for Injunctive and Other Relief
Temporary Restraining Order Freezing Assets and Providing Equitable Relief, and Order To Show Cause
Why A Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue


===============================


The FTC today announced nine new cases:

The Results Group Working out of a boiler room in Phoenix, the operation charged between $99 and $599 to build and host Web sites affiliated with the Web sites of Fortune 500 retail companies such as Amazon.com and Overstock.com. Consumers would make money when those retailers paid commissions for sales made through the consumers' Web sites. In fact, the large retailers were unaware of any such affiliation, and consumers made no money. The FTC charged that the operation falsely represented that purchasers would receive substantial income as well as substantial assistance from an expert staff, and used false and misleading statements to encourage consumers to buy the business opportunity.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 Consumer Suggestion

Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. The Results Group, L.L.C.,

AUTHOR: Dennis - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Thursday, March 01, 2007

Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. The Results Group, L.L.C., an Arizona Limited Liability Company, Edward R. Longoria, individually and as a manager of The Results Group, L.L.C., and Amber R. Halvorson, individually and as a manager of The Results Group, L.L.C., Defendants (United States District Court for the District of Arizona)

Civil No. CV 06 2843 PHX JAT, FTC File No. 062 3205

http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0623205/index.htm

December 12, 2006

Complaint for Injunctive and Other Relief
Temporary Restraining Order Freezing Assets and Providing Equitable Relief, and Order To Show Cause
Why A Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue


===============================


The FTC today announced nine new cases:

The Results Group Working out of a boiler room in Phoenix, the operation charged between $99 and $599 to build and host Web sites affiliated with the Web sites of Fortune 500 retail companies such as Amazon.com and Overstock.com. Consumers would make money when those retailers paid commissions for sales made through the consumers' Web sites. In fact, the large retailers were unaware of any such affiliation, and consumers made no money. The FTC charged that the operation falsely represented that purchasers would receive substantial income as well as substantial assistance from an expert staff, and used false and misleading statements to encourage consumers to buy the business opportunity.

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.