Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #456547

Complaint Review: Tony Van Hoorebeke, UPS Store Owner, - San Franciwco California

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: #307 California
  • Author Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • Tony Van Hoorebeke, UPS Store Owner, 660 4th Street San Franciwco, California U.S.A.

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

I sent a $3,240 Sony viao laptop (they packaged it all up)- they added the wrong person to the return address, then sent it to a different address than on my receipt (and Tony claimed this was all UPS's fault not theirs), then confirmed Sony accepted it, never called to let me know it had been lost until I finally heard back from sony. 2 months later they're trying to tell me they don't have an estimated amount on their copy of the receipt so only owe me $100 - I gave them a copy of the original which clearly has the estimated amount clearly written in -but they tried to take my original copy when I went to show it to them today. I was so worried I almost called the police but ended up just leaving...filed small claims - anyone else dealt with Tony?

Kathryn
#307, California
U.S.A.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 05/29/2009 10:32 AM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/tony-van-hoorebeke-ups-store-owner/san-franciwco-california-94107/tony-tony-van-hoorebeke-ups-store-owner-ups-store-stole-3242-soma-san-francisco-cal-456547. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
1Author
2Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#3

Perhaps common sense would have also prevented problems.

AUTHOR: Dana - (USA)

POSTED: Tuesday, August 25, 2009

If Sony was liable, then Sony received the package to a proper address. The Address Correction feature may have modified or updated the address.

The return address was also correct, as it would be the address from the shipping location - not the home address of Kathryn.

At our facility, we ask all customers if they need insurance over $100. Just like at the Post Office, we offer insurance to generate revenue. It is NOT a resposibility to offer insurance. It is, however, rather absurd to assume that one may, for example, send a diamond watch for, say $6.50, then expect $25,000 to be given to you if it is lost. All without paying a cent for insurance? Does that not defy all common sense??

In nearly ten years at our facility, we continue to get calls each week from customers stating, "The company says they haven't seen my shipment." With absolutely no exception, the tracking information shows when that company had received it and who at that company signed for it. I would say it is apparent, since the judge said Sony was liable instead of The UPS Store, that Sony had it in their posession but did not record it properly into their records. Many times, also, this is fault of person because they forgot to mark the company Return Authorization number on the package.

Somewhere along the lines, there was a communication breakdown. Luckily, the police weren't irrationally involved, or embarassment would have been subjected to the source of the problem.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2

Correction: Van Hoorebeke, UPS Store did not "steal" from me

AUTHOR: Kathryn - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Friday, August 21, 2009

After taking Tony to Small Claims a judge determined that Sony was responsible for "losing" this device, despite UPS store adding the wrong shipping address, return address, failing to let me know it had been delivered to the wrong address for a month, and failing to explain that I would have to pay for insurance or I would be limited to a $100 reimbursement.

That said: None of this would have happened if Tony's UPS employee had simply taken the time to explain the insurance policy/costs, and Tony had been forthright in explaining this to me when I called for reimbursement. In small claims court, Tony stated, "everyone knows" UPS policy -but that's not the case. I was never made aware that without buying insurance I would only be refunded $100 for a $3,200 laptop - the price of insurance was less than the cost of the mouse. I think this is a bad business practice, and it felt like $3,200 had been stolen from me, especially considering they knew exactly how valuable my shipment was having just packaged it up.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 UPDATE Employee

Would like to help; please contact us with more information

AUTHOR: Becca, The UPS Store - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Monday, June 01, 2009

Hi Kathryn,

I work at The UPS Store corporate headquarters and would like to get more information from you regarding this shipment. When you have a moment, please send an e-mail to pr@mbe.com and a member of our customer relations team will follow up with you to see what assistance we can provide.

Kindest Regards,
Becca A.
The UPS Store

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now