- Report: #1098114
Report - Rebuttal - Arbitrate
Complaint Review: Wikipedia
Wikipedia149 New Montgomery Street Third Floor San Francisco, California USA
Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Unjust, Baised, Frauds, Censorship, Free Speech Violators, Criminal Supporters. San Francisco California
*Author of original report: I DO Have Rights! Wikipedia Was Wrong!
*General Comment: Rights??
A business' first
line of defense
on the Internet.
If your business is
willing to make a
Click here now..
Most people by now realize just what sort of place "Wikipedia" is on the web but there are deeper issues left unexplored. What many might not know is how "Wikipedia" selectively censors contributors to their website with the help of free speech violators. These violators will censor or speedily delete your articles simply because they don't agree with the content and if you dare to protest, they threaten to ban you from contributing in the future. In addition, they will censor out any valid edits you make to other articles on their website if they don't agree with your statements.
They make false claims that you are in violation of their so-called "rules" and when you speak out in protest, more threats from them follow. The top offenders of these acts go by the user names: C.Fred, Largo Plazo, and 220 of Borg. A friend of mine for example attempted to write an article about me at my request and the "Wikipedia" gestapo were right there to interfere with it. He protested against their unjust actions and they deleted the article quick as a flash. Then, they made false claims that there wasn't enough "reliable sources" to corroborate certain statements within the original article when in fact there WAS sufficient sources noted by the author.
The reason I wanted a "Wikipedia" page of my own is because I felt it was necessary to put something out there which would be in contrast to libelous statements a stalker has made against me. I wrote my first report here about this stalker who's name is Dennis. Unfortunately, the "Wikipedia" gestapo decided to support and protect my stalker rather than permit my friend to submit something that would shed a positive light on me. It has become abundantly clear they would rather support a criminal instead of allowing an article submission that would essentially help to repair an innocent victim's reputation. It is also apparent they care nothing for the decent contributions of others outside their little circle and only THEIR words are good enough for publication on the website.
Regardless of how many valid points you make or concrete facts you have, the "Wikipedia" censors will prohibit an opposing point of view whenever they feel like it simply because they assume they can. To make matters worse, they will bend the rules for certain people they favor while others whom are unfavored are forced to toe the line. For example, they have a policy against people writing articles about themselves because it supposedly is a "conflict of interest" but someone like my stalker who HAS created an article about himself is exempt from this rule. I guess this just goes to prove that money talks regardless of who you are.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 11/09/2013 08:05 AM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Wikipedia/San-Francisco-California-94105/Wikipedia-Wikimedia-Foundation-Inc-Unjust-Baised-Frauds-Censorship-Free-Speech-Vio-1098114. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:Search Tips
In order to assure the best results in your search:
- Keep the name short & simple, and try different variations of the name.
- Do not include ".com", "S", "Inc.", "Corp", or "LLC" at the end of the Company name.
- Use only the first/main part of a name to get best results.
- Only search one name at a time if Company has many AKA's.
Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.