Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #434061

Complaint Review: 411 Tax Relief - Culver City California

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Sunnyvale California
  • Author Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • 411 Tax Relief 10559 Jefferson Blvd, Suite C Culver City, California U.S.A.

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

411Web is the defendant; I originally hired 411 Web Directory in August 2008 to assist me in mitigating some back tax issues. Services were NEVER delivered. I have sent at least 6 letters and emails to 411 Tax Relief to try to settle this dispute, my original letter was sent 10/06/08, I have hired an Independent EA locally to handle my tax issues. My issue with the state of California was settled in 1 week by this new firm. I contacted Paul Chessman of (411Web) by phone and email to discuss my case with the FTB. I made it very clear to Mr. Chessman that I did not owe the FTB $43,000.00 and I had sent proof of this to Emerald Marroquin (411Web). I waited another 2 weeks and contacted Mr. Chessman again, he told me he was trying to work out a payment plan. At this I replied, "I did not want a payment plan, I do not owe the money" I did not hear back from him for another 2 weeks. In the mean time my wages were being Garnished, so I contacted him again, only to be told that I waited too long to deal with this and he could not do anything about it.

This now is 2 months into my engagement with 411 Web. During all this I contacted Precious Blakely (at 411 Web) 2 times by phone and requested to be assigned a new Agent, she told me that she would process my request and have the COO of the company call me, well 10 days went by and I never received a call from the COO. To this day I have not received a call from the COO.

My next move was to find someone locally that could help me and I did that. Also, I contacted David Thompson (@ 411Web), he also promised to help find out what the problem was, days went by and I never heard from him either so I cancelled the Debit Card from Washington Mutual so no more charges could be made to my checking account because I was not getting what I paid for from 411 Web. On October 6, 2008, I wrote a letter to 411- att: Michael Moeller (Salesman @411), requesting that 411Web cease and desist any work on my behalf and to rescind the existing "Power of Attorney", destroy my credit Card and Debit Card information, Refund the $2,050.00 that I had paid them so far.

I NEVER heard back from 411 concerning this letter. On November 1, 2008, 411Web, fraudulently charged my Wells Fargo 1808 credit card for $550.00 because they couldn't get money from the Debit card that I cancelled @ Washington Mutual. The Wells Fargo card was only authorized for the $1,500.00 down payment, nothing more! As a result of Wells Fargo's investigation, my account was refunded the $550.00, (I have a letter from Wells Fargo stating this) and 411Web was found guilty of fraudulently using the card number. I subsequently spoke with Ms. Blanch Richardson(Accounting @ 411) about the unauthorized charge and she assured me that I would be refunded the $550.00 and that she would have the COO and CEO call me that very day, that day came and went, I did not receive a call from anyone @ 411. I repeatedly made calls to 411 and no one EVER called me back. That part of the case is closed.

I am seeking the refund of the $1,500.00 down payment from Wells Fargo Account that has been closed and $650.00 charged to WAMU Debit card ending 8017.
My tax issues have both been mitigated by another firm back in October and 411 Tax did absolutely NOTHING to assist me in mitigating these issues.


My reasons for severing my relationship with 411 Tax Relief are incompetence, poor communications and fraudulent behavior that is well documented in my previous correspondence dated October 6, 2008. I have asked that 411 return my intellectual property and personal information, but have received no response.


Respectfully submitted,

Jerry
Sunnyvale, California
U.S.A.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 03/13/2009 09:19 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/411-tax-relief/culver-city-california-90232-3513/411-tax-relief-took-215000-of-my-money-and-did-not-deliver-any-services-promised-culve-434061. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author
6Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#6 UPDATE Employee

Name calling is not civilized discourse

AUTHOR: Steve - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Thursday, June 04, 2009

Like a playground bully, this client would rather resort to name-calling than address the facts of the case. We presume that his sole purpose here is to bad-mouth the people who tried to help him, in an effort to avoid paying the amount he owes under the terms of the contract he signed. Please note that he not not addressed any of the facts presented in our rebuttal. Instead, he repeated his name-calling. His complaints are without basis, and the facts are not on his side. Anyone who pays any attention to him is wasting their time.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#5 UPDATE Employee

Name calling is not civilized discourse

AUTHOR: Steve - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Thursday, June 04, 2009

Like a playground bully, this client would rather resort to name-calling than address the facts of the case. We presume that his sole purpose here is to bad-mouth the people who tried to help him, in an effort to avoid paying the amount he owes under the terms of the contract he signed. Please note that he not not addressed any of the facts presented in our rebuttal. Instead, he repeated his name-calling. His complaints are without basis, and the facts are not on his side. Anyone who pays any attention to him is wasting their time.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#4 UPDATE Employee

Name calling is not civilized discourse

AUTHOR: Steve - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Thursday, June 04, 2009

Like a playground bully, this client would rather resort to name-calling than address the facts of the case. We presume that his sole purpose here is to bad-mouth the people who tried to help him, in an effort to avoid paying the amount he owes under the terms of the contract he signed. Please note that he not not addressed any of the facts presented in our rebuttal. Instead, he repeated his name-calling. His complaints are without basis, and the facts are not on his side. Anyone who pays any attention to him is wasting their time.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#3 Author of original report

411 Tax Relief, Culver City, California Tax Assistance Ripoff

AUTHOR: Jerry crump - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Monday, June 01, 2009

It is now June 2009, 411 Tax Relief not only lied in their rebuttal to this site they now are trying to collect and additional $2,000.00 from me. This company is working under the illusion that they are helping people, much like the Mortgage Ripoffs that are going around these days. Please, anyone out there that has IRS or State Tax issues, I beg you DO NOT employe 411 Tax Relief for any reason, they are a rip off. If you are reading this, obviously you have seen the other complaints from individuals that all sound very much the same. You have to ask yourself, how and why would these different individuals all have the same type of complaint about this company? I think you have your answer, because they are a RIPOFF!

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 Author of original report

411 Tax Relief, Culver City, California Tax Assistance Ripoff

AUTHOR: Jerry crump - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Tuesday, March 24, 2009

I have continually tried to contact 411 Tax Relief and no one at the company will return my calls. All be aware what you are signing when they try to bumrush you into sending money or giving them credit card information over the phone. 411 Tax Relief is a SCAM, do not give them any personal financial information, their EA's are a bunch of incompetent b***s.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 UPDATE Employee

NEWS FLASH: NON-FILER STIFFS COMPANY, BLAMES FIRM FOR TAX PROBLEMS HE CREATED

AUTHOR: Steve - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Saturday, March 14, 2009

1) On 8/4/2008, Jerry hired us to deal with IRS and California income tax problems. He paid his $1,500 retainer and promised to make six payments of $550. He made his first monthly due on 9/1/2008 but no payments after that. Jerry was suspended 10/1/2008 for failure to make payments as agreed.

2) On 8/5/2008, our CEO interviewed Jerry, and determined that he had just been levied by the state. He expedited the file so that our tax staff would treat his case as a priority.

3) On 8/6/2008, the state (California Franchise Tax Board) collector left a business card taped to his front door. The client informed us immediately. At this point the state levy process had already started.

4) The history of the state issues include: 1) Jerry never filed a required 1987 state income tax return, 2) the state made up a 1987 tax liability for the Jerry and tried to collect on an alleged tax debt of $43,000, 3) Jerry did not respond, so the state went into forced collection, and 4) Jerry hired us to deal with the problem.

5) On 8/11/2008, our tax manager called Jerry and requested specific information about 1987, so that we could address the underlying issue. On 9/15/2008 we eventually received word that he had this information, and on 9/22/2008 he told us that he was going to file the required 1987 return on his own.

6) Any good tax representative has two primary goals: a) to protect the client from involuntary collection, and b) to reduce or eliminate the liability.

7) To protect the client, we gathered financial information from Jerry and faxed it to the state on 8/26/2008 with a request to reduce or eliminate the levy, pending the filing of his original 1987 state return. The state representative told us it make take as much as 10 days to respond to our request.

8) On 8/28/2008 Jerry called our tax staff and demanded a guarantee that no further levies would come from the state. We quite honestly told him that we could not make such a guarantee, but that we were working on the problem, and would hear back from the state within a few days. At that point Jerry started complaining to management.

9) On 9/22/2008, after several calls to the state collector, we were eventually told Jerry's wage levy of $444 per month would be lifted if he agreed to a monthly installment of $1,200. The client understandably refused this deal, and chose to leave the wage levy in place. He then on his own finally went to work on the underlying problem, the non-filing of the 1987 return.

10) We are informed by the complaint on this website that Jerry did follow through with the filing of his 1987 return, which would have eliminated his liability. We are happy he did that. We were talking to him about doing this literally seven days after he hired us.

SUMMARY: Jerry's tax problem built up over 20 years. We promptly told him exactly what was needed to eliminate the problem, and then over the next month tried to reduce the harm done by state collections. Our timely advice and our efforts were unappreciated, and Jerry complained to management about not receiving guarantees that could not be reasonably made. After he stopped making payments as specified by his contract, he followed our advice, and the tax problem was eliminated.

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now