Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #410350

Complaint Review: 5/3, Fifth Third, Well Fargo - Internet

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Hillsdale Michigan
  • Author Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • 5/3, Fifth Third, Well Fargo 53.com Internet U.S.A.

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

I am very careful about my bank accounts, but overdrafts still happen. I do not have thousands of dollars I can leave in my account for the bank to use for free. My wife used the wrong debit card and even though here was already a deposit made to account and debit did not clear until three days later. Fees on a $31 Overdraft = $75 3 smaller amounts were assessed even though one of the larger checks would have easily have cured the overdraft.

Second example was an Automatic budgeted withdrawal date was changed by the utility company date was changed to a 8 days earlier than the monthly date that had been used for over five years, Yes, I probably had notice, but I was not looking for a date change. Caused a $107 overdraft, they charged my account $144 the first day for four smaller checks totaling $117 when the utility check would have cured the overdraft. Since I was unaware of overdraft and the overdraft charges were deducted, 2 more small checks totaling $34.96 next day --$72 more overdraft fees

Made a normal $750 deposit 3rd day (unaware of overdraft)but balance is not available until next day 1 more check cleared for $56 for another $36 overdraft charge. I received overdraft notice for day one on day 4 (Saturday)Monday made deposit to cure overdraft but 3 more checks hit against unavailable funds, another $108.

So the end result were fees totaling $360 on a overdraft of $107 for an annual rate of interest of 7,368% for the 6 days.

In Rotary we have the Four Way Test
1. Is it the Truth?
2. Is it FAIR to ALL concerned?
3. Will it build GOODWILL and BETTER FRIENDSHIP?
4. Will it be BENEFICIAL to ALL CONCERNED?

It may be legal and per contract, but is it Ethical? I do not believe so.

If you believe this is ethical and follows Rotary's FOUR-WAY Test , then you must work for the banks or credit card industry. It amazes me that many of the responses seem to support protecting these predatory practices. Bank employees? I say if it just doesn't seem to make sense, follow the money to find your hidden agendas.

Do you agree that these predatory practices must stop? How many of you have contacted your congressman/congresswomen about these Usury tactics. If not please do so immediately. http://clerk.house.gov/member_info/index.html
http://www.senate.gov

I believe an active campaign to prevent these horrendous predatory fee practices by the banks (such as 1. charging overdraft fees on each smaller check
first rather than the one larger one, when they are not sending the checks back anyway, 2. crediting deposits AFTER debits, 3. holding deposits for days even if drawn on their bank, 4. counting debits and over drafting account even though the transaction was cancelled or never completed) of hiding rates that far exceed 7000%, far greater than Payday loans fees and charges. At least you choose a payday loan vender. But, they both prey on the poor, unlucky and uneducated.

Michigan restricts the rate of interest on personal loans to 7% per annum, most states have similar Usury statutes. However, the powerful banking lobby, funded by the 19 Billion in late charges and the 700 billion Bailout money, have convinced congress with campaign contributions and lavish trips that usury laws are not needed.

If you need help contacting your congressman/ congresswomen or would like join a possible class action suite, please call me email me (((email redacted)))

Should the RICO act laws on "loan sharking" (charging twice the state usury rate) apply to banks? If so, the 19 billion the banks made last year on excessive overdraft fees could be considered the result of Racketeering in violation of Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act of 1970 (RICO)

Aj
Hillsdale, Michigan
U.S.A.

Click here to read other Rip Off Reports on Fifth Third Bank

CLICK here to see why Rip-off Report, as a matter of policy, deleted either a phone number, link or e-mail address from this Report.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 01/10/2009 12:06 AM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/53-fifth-third-well-fargo/internet/53-fifth-third-well-fargo-preditory-overdraft-charges-internet-410350. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author
3Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#3 Consumer Comment

Where's the ripoff report on your wife?

AUTHOR: John - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Saturday, January 10, 2009

And why do you feel you shouldn't pay a penalty for stealing the bank's money? Your lack of communication in your marriage is not the bank's concern.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 Consumer Suggestion

FUNNY

AUTHOR: Billcoll01 - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Saturday, January 10, 2009

IN 20YRS OF HAVING CHECKING ACCOUNTS, I HAVE BOUNCED 1 CHECK. IT WAS A RENT CHECK & IT BOUNCED BECAUSE MY EMPLOYER WAS LATE DOING A DIRECT DEPOSIT. THE BANK WAIVED THE FEE DUE TO THE FACT THAT I DONT HAVE THE
"overdrafts still happen" PROBLEM. NOW JUST SO YOU KNOW, I DIDNT HAVE THOUSANDS BACK THEN....I DONT & HAVE NEVER WORKED FOR A BANK. WHAT I DO IS KEEP TRACK OF MY ACCOUNT. IF YOU SPEND MORE THAN YOU HAVEAVAILABLE IN THE ACCOUNT, ITS YOUR FAULT & THERE ARE FEES(THAT ARE FULLY DISCLOSED UP FRONT) TO PAY. GET OVER IT, MOVE ON & LEARN TO KEEP TRACK OF YOUR SPENDING.






Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 Consumer Comment

So...

AUTHOR: Robert - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Saturday, January 10, 2009

So this is a case of we agree with what you are saying or we must work for a bank or in the credit card industry. Wow so much for free speech. Well I do not work for these industries now or at any time in my life. I also have not paid an Overdraft fee in over 10 years, and have had my account in single digits on occasion. No, I am not bragging or saying that I am any better. But I spend the time to actually keep track of my balances. Yes it may take 30 seconds to write down a transaction when I spend it, but if that 30 Seconds saves me 1 OD fee of $36 that is like I am making $4320 an hour if it was a job(see anyone can multiply numbers out to make huge values also...)

The bank did not force you to overdraft. They were caused by your mistakes. Had you not made a mistake there would have been no problems.

You say it is not "fair" that banks post transactions from HIGHEST to LOWEST. By your statement "..charging overdraft fees on each smaller check first rather than the one larger one.." you are infering that you want your checks posted LOWEST to HIGHEST. Does that meet your test for fairness to all concerned?

"..Michigan restricts the rate of interest on personal loans to 7% per annum.."
"..Should the RICO act laws on "loan sharking" (charging twice the state usury rate) apply to banks?.."
-Overdraft fees are NOT loans, they are fees. You are charged the same amount if you OD by $1 or $100.

So some advise
1. Stop using the Debit Card
2. Write down every transaction you do
3. Never set up Recurring Transactions
4. If you do hit an Overdraft STOP using that account until you are sure everything is straighted out.
5. Don't worry about any Class Action Suits - They have been tried before with people using these beliefs before and have gone no where. If you really think you have a case go after them on your own.

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now