Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #118202

Complaint Review: Art Houser's Rear End Service & High Performance Parts - Mertztown Pennsylvania

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: scottsdale Arizona
  • Author Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • Art Houser's Rear End Service & High Performance Parts 264 Chestnut Street Mertztown, Pennsylvania U.S.A.

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

If you are considering buying a rear end from Art Houser's Rear End Service & High Performance Parts,
READ THIS FIRST:

I first found Art Houser's Rear End Service & High Performance Parts on an internet search for a Chevy 12 bolt rear end. I liked what Art Houser had to offer because his expertise was supposed to be in early model Chevys. I called his shop and left a message inquiring about a rear. This was the only time the man ever returned any call of mine (before he received my money). While talking with him on the phone, he explained all of the features of his rear ends and what I would get for the price. During the conversation I asked if the rear would make noise. He humorously stated: If you want it to make noise, you'll have to pay extra.

I ordered a 12 bolt rear end with a disc brake conversion on 5-21-2003, for a price(with shipping) of $2,700. Included in this price was supposed to be a parts list of the necessary items to adapt the brakes to my car as well as the proper spring u-bolts for the rear. He does not take credit cards so it had to be a check. The check cleared eight days later on 5-29-2003. He told me that he typically takes ten days to two weeks to deliver a rear. Sounded fair enough.

After three weeks of not receiving anything, I began calling his shop and leaving messages to find out status. Once again, the man never returned a single call of mine after he received my money. I then emailed his shop and was told repeatedly that they would check on it. After numerous emails, I finally received rear on 7-25-2003.

So instead of two weeks, it took two months. When I picked up the rear from the freight company, there were no parts, no parts list, just the rear end. Another email to which they responded: Art is sending itemized list and bolts - which were torn away from the package. He can follow up with you about other details.

Again, after several weeks of not receiving anything, more useless phone calls to his shop and several more emails. I finally received these parts at the end of November, 2003, a full FOUR MONTHS after promised!

Now for the good part. As I began installing this rear in my car I noticed it was leaking fluid from the cover. $2,700 for this rear end and it leaks! I emailed his shop with a couple photos of the leak to which they responded:
I showed the email and photos to Art. The rear may have been roughed up in transit. Art will send new cover, gaskets, and fluid at our expense. You can replace yourself.

I never received anything! I had to purchase a new gasket and fluid myself; the cover was not damaged. When the installation was complete, I test drove the car only to find a few more surprises. It began leaking from the front pinion seal. This I could not fix myself. In addition, the rear made a loud pronounced whine. At first I thought I might be more sensitive to noise because it was my car. So I had a quality mechanic drive it. He said: This doesn't just make noise, it makes a lot of noise! He referred me to a local rear end expert, and suggested having him drive it. He concurred that it whined much too loudly.

I contacted Art Houser with this information. He assured me that his rears are guaranteed and he would make good on fixing this problem. Since I lived in the Phoenix area and his shop was in PA, he directed me to have it fixed locally and he would reimburse me for it. I went ahead and authorized the local rear end expert to perform the repairs. The rear end work was completed on 3-26-04, for a cost of: $837. I sent a copy of the paid invoice to Art Houser for reimbursement. He said it would be no problem and he would take care of it.

At this writing eight moths later, I HAVE RECEIVED NOTHING! Once again I spent many calls to his shop and many more emails to no avail. Some of the many responses were:
I spoke to Art. He will get reimbursement to you shortly.

I relayed to Art that you had not received it yet. The reimbursement check went out long already, and we are surprised you have not received it. Art will send a replacement to you.

I just spoke to Art moments ago. He had sent it but will check into it. We regret any inconvenience, and we aim to resolve ASAP.

I cannot understand why you have not received it. It will be brought to Art's attention.

After eight solid months of being told the money went out and it would be checked into, it is obvious that they are not going to reimburse me. This means I have paid $3537. for a 12 bolt rear end from Art Houser. If I knew it was going to cost me this much for this rear end when I first contacted him, I would never have considered buying from him. Would you?

Rich
scottsdale, Arizona
U.S.A.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 11/16/2004 01:12 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/art-housers-rear-end-service-high-performance-parts/mertztown-pennsylvania-19539/art-housers-rear-end-service-high-performance-parts-delivered-leaking-and-whining-12-bo-118202. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author
3Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#3 Consumer Suggestion

It already costs a ton of money to own a muscle car. Why add in the price of fraud, too?

AUTHOR: Paul - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Friday, February 18, 2005

After reading the original report, and the company's rebuttal, I have to say that the complainant is the more credible of the two.

Many of the complaints were not even addressed in the rebuttal.

A claimed two week delivery turns into two months.
The shipment is missing parts that are needed.
Pinion and rear cover leaks.
Gear mesh specs way off, causing noise.
No refund on needed repairs.

It sounds like this was a complete ripoff. What did the customer receive? A 12 bolt housing and a ring and pinion gear. Oh, and axles. He would have been better off buying parts rather than an assembled unit.

As it was, the unit needed to be taken apart and redone.

I hate to paint all internet sellers as fraud, but in this case it's justified. A company like this couldn't do business locally. After a few bogus deals like this, the word would get out and they could kiss new sales goodbye.

All that's left is the option to hustle their trash off on the internet. Big promises, high prices, and products that fail to perform as advertised.

If it was just a rear cover leak, I could excuse this as minor. But, when you add it all together, it can only equal fraud.

It appears the company cashed the check, and then went out and bought a good core. They obviously have no expertise in differentials. The pinion depth or the backlash settings were way off. They obviously don't understand how to set up a rear end. If they did, it wouldn't have howled.

They couldn't install the pinion seal correctly either. Hell, they couldn't even manage the back cover. All that requires is a simple gasket installation. They even screwed that up! That's obviously amateur hour.

Way too many faults here. No refund for defective assembly. Missing parts. Then, string the customer along with lies.

That certainly has all the makings of fraud to me, as well as any other prospective buyer looking for a performance differential for their car.

It's easy to see why these frauds ended up hustling their trash on the internet. Thanks to this site and this complaint, it looks like those sales will be drying up soon too.

This company should change their name to Art Houser's Car Wash and Wax. Perhaps, they may have better luck with something that requires considerably less skill.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 Consumer Comment

Art Houser's 12 bolt rear end ripoff - update

AUTHOR: Rich - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Friday, February 18, 2005

This is interesting. Art Houser's organization said, The owner sent at least three reimbursements, which had not been received or had been refused. and Makes me wonder if someone else has been intercepting his mail.
If that is the case then, surely, they must have proof that someone else cashed any reimbursement check. They do not.
When they asked me to confirm my address and to provide an alternate address, this is the exact response that I returned to them, with the exception that I blanked out my last name and street address because this is a public domain:

Yvonne,

My address is and has been:
RICH *******
**** * ********* AVENUE
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85257

I get all my bills and all other correspondence without any misses.

Rich J

Does this sound argumentative and rude? I could not provide an alternate address because I do not have one. I have lived at this address for 20 years and have never missed receiving a bill or item sent to me.

In regard to reimbursement I never requested a full refund, only reimbursement for the money I paid to have the defective rear end repaired, which Art Houser himself directed me to do. They also mentioned try working with the company. I did just that for eight solid months to no avail.
Also, if telling the exact truth is picking fights and bad-mouthing the company on the Internet, that really tells you a lot about the company!

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 UPDATE Employee

Non-receipt or refusal of reimbursement

AUTHOR: Yvonne - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Friday, December 10, 2004

We regret that any problem occurred, whether caused by shipping or other. The owner sent at least three reimbursements, which had not been received or had been refused. When I asked the customer to confirm address and to provide an alternate address (as the information was correct), he responded argumentatively and rudely. And he did not provide an alternate address. Makes me wonder if someone else has been intercepting his mail.

We cannot be responsible for third party problems, such as waiting on parts orders or waiting for shipper to get item to customer. Also, most of us receive packages with the paperwork attached as our shop does. I do not understand why it is "wrong" only when we do it.

Consumers, when a problem exists, try working with the company instead of picking fights and bad-mouthing the company on the Internet. Furthermore, if you want full reimbursement, you arrange to send the order back - and then get a refund. Don't keep the merchandise AND demand all the money too. And don't exaggerate or embellish the complaint - reader sympathy doesn't help and slander/libel is illegal.

Problems are very uncommon at our shop. When they arise, we do our best to help. I have boxloads of testimonials, but only a handful of complaints.

NOTE TO RIP-OFF REPORT - I never received a notice that this was posted. You should alert someone when you post about their company. Again, lack of productive communication does more harm than help.

Best wishes to all of you.

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now