• Report: #281289
Complaint Review:

ATK Engines

  • Submitted: Sat, October 27, 2007
  • Updated: Wed, June 20, 2012

  • Reported By:Atlanta Georgia
ATK Engines
3210 S Croddy Way Santa Ana, California U.S.A.

ATK Engines Refused to Honor Warranty on Faulty Engine Santa Ana California

*Consumer Comment: take them to court

*Author of original report: UPDATE

REBUTTAL BOX™ | Respond to this Report! | Consumer Comment

What's this?
Corporate Advocacy Program

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

What's this?
What's this?
Is this
Ripoff Report
About you?
Ripoff Report
A business' first
line of defense
on the Internet.
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™

Set the record straight:
Arbitration Program

SEO Reputation Management at its best!

Here is the letter I sent ATK Engines:

16 September, 2004

Claims Supervisor
3210 South Croddy Way
Santa Ana, CA 92704
Re: Claim # 4201841


In early July, 2004, I ordered a rebuilt engine from a Quadratec catalogue, which they resell from ATK. It is a 2.5l, 4 cylinder engine for my 1989 Jeep Wrangler, # DA28, $1549 + $345 core.

The new engine was delivered on 8 July 2004 and it was installed by the mechanics at 14th Street Shell Station in Atlanta, GA. When the work was done and the engine turned over the first time, we immediately had some problems with overheating, and after a few days of new thermostats and hoses and nothing working, I finally took it to Buckhead Jeep to have them look at it. I didn't return it to the 14th Street Shell Station because of the time it would take for them to get back to it, plus, I wanted more qualified mechanics to look at the Jeep.

At Buckhead Jeep, they performed tests and checks on the engine and thought it might be the radiator, so I gave them the go ahead to install a new one. However, the engine still overheated. I finally called Quadratec and informed them of the situation and they gave me contact info to ATK. I called and was told the mechanic working on the engine had to call and open a claim, information which I passed on to Buckhead Jeep.

Over the next two weeks the mechanics dealt with Buckhead Jeep, and after a month of rental cars and hassles, it was finally ready and picked up on 3 September with a bill for $2094.02 ($1857 for the engine repair). Evidently there was an issue with the heads and they were sent off to be repaired.

When I later talked to an ATK customer sales rep, I discovered that there was something called the GoldSeal Service Agreement , of which I had no knowledge of. When I bought the engine from Quadratec, they made no effort to inform me that for an extra $185 such a warranty was available, something which I most likely would have purchased.

I am aware that under my current warranty I am only reimbursed for $45 of mechanics labor. I find this somewhat hard to believe, as in Atlanta I couldn't find any experienced mechanics under $65 an hour, and those were places I would hesitate to bring my vehicle to. I am aware that if I had been given the opportunity to purchase the extended warranty the labor would have been reimbursed up to $85, which I find to be far more reasonable. I find myself in a bad situation of being stuck with a large bill, which by the way is $237 more than the engine cost!

Anyway, after sending in all the paperwork, I was informed by ATK claims department that they were waiting on a carbon test among other things. After talking with the mechanics, who said they were never told by ATK to perform a carbon test, nor were they told to send the faulty parts in. Evidently there has been a breakdown in communication between the ATK technicians and Buckhead Jeep.

We are currently in a deadlock, as ATK is refusing to honor the claim, and Buckhead Jeep is saying they did everything ATK told them. By the way, when I first called ATK, the claims manager told me he had only three telephonic records on the claim, none from the mechanics. However, when I was in my lawyers office seeking advice, I was told much different information, as in reference to the carbon test. If there were no record of conversations between ATK and the Jeep dealer, as ATK claims, then how were the mechanics told to perform a carbon test? I think there is a serious flaw in the communication system. The mechanics did what they were told by ATK and fixed the problem. I am unsatisfied with ATK's claim procedure so far.

As it is, I find myself in a bad situation of being stuck with a large bill, which again, is $237 more than the engine cost. I am assuming you have all the copies of receipts I sent you.

Buckhead Jeep's Phone # is: 404-261-1651, Manager Larry. Thank you in advance for your help with this matter.

Just so you know, I am an E4 in the US Army with a wife, and am experiencing financial difficulties because of the problems with the engine, to include the rental car for my wife and all the stress involved. I guess you know a low ranking E4 like myself doesn't make that much money, and my wife just can't understand how I could buy an engine for $1600 and have to pay more than the cost of the engine itself just to get it to work, to include double the mechanic fees, etc. Needless to say, I don't think I would want to buy anything from Quadratec or ATK again after this.

Anyway, thank you in advance for your help with this matter.

Fayetteville, NC

Atlanta, Georgia

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 10/27/2007 02:40 PM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/atk-engines/santa-ana-california-92704/atk-engines-refused-to-honor-warranty-on-faulty-engine-santa-ana-california-281289. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.

Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on ATK Engines

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Search Tips
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?
0Author 2Consumer 0Employee/Owner
Updates & Rebuttals

#1 Consumer Comment

take them to court

AUTHOR: charlouis - (United States of America)

Take them to court we did and we won.
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 Author of original report


AUTHOR: Classic_punk - (U.S.A.)

ATK Engines Response:

From: "Russ Shiba"

Subject: claim 189890
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005

Hello James,

I received your mail dated 06/22/05 yesterday.I am unaware of any letters sent by you after November 2004. I apologize for not replying to your letters but as I stated I never received them. I do recall I responded to your letter dated November 30, 2004. I have reviewed the claim notes again and your concerns that you had per your letter dated in November. This claim (189890) was established by Lea (your wife) on 08/18/04.

We had asked that she have the shop call ATK to began the diagnostic procedure.The only other contact we had was on 09/21/04 when you and I spoke and I advised you the shop never called ATK. On that date you told me the head gasket was no longer available. I was told by you that specific instructions were relayed to the shop as far as following warranty procedure and to keep in contact with ATK.You told me they led you to believe they were in constant contact with us. This was not true, our phone records show no calls coming from the shop. I had asked why you did not return to the installing shop, your reply was lack of ability and trust.

I would like to address your concerns from your letter in November. First you state the shop had overheating issues when they first started the engine. I have to question why the radiator, hoses, thermostat and water pump were not replaced at that time. The damage to the engine may have already been done by 14th Street Shell. When the vehicle was at Buckhead Jeep, you state they performed tests and checks on the engine. I have to suspect those test came back negative as they thought possibly a radiator would solve the problem.

Next, you state at the time you went to pick up your vehicle, you were told the problem was with the head. The shop's repair order states the head was checked for cracks but the $62.50 charge doesn't reflect any repairs to the head. I am concerned with the fact that prior to removal of the head,the shop performed cooling system tests to confirm it was not the head gasket or head issue, why else would they suggest replacing the radiator. If the shop had called us as directed and if we were told there were symptoms of a possible head gasket failure,yes we would have asked for a hydrocarbon test. I would think that would have been one of the test they performed prior to replacing the radiator.

Again, we never had any contact with the shop. So, I believe the mechanics at the shop were never told by ATK to perform that test. You further state in your letter "If there were no record of conversations between ATK and the Jeep Dealer, as ATK claims, Then how were the mechanics told to perform a carbon test?" I am not clear what you meant by both statements other than this appears contradictory. I am in agreement that there was a serious communication flaw, there was no communication with the shop. I am sorry for this mishap but I regret to inform you I am not able to help in this matter. All work was not authorized by ATK, no parts were returned for the inspection and is therefore not warrantable.

Thank you,

Russell Shiba
Warranty Supervisor
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?