Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #729604

Complaint Review: att/sbc - oakbrook Illinois

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Ms Fustrated in job market — Willowbrook Idaho United States of America
  • Author Not Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • att/sbc 900 jorie o oakbrook, Illinois United States of America

att/sbc ameritech 2006 let laid off their employees that as close to 30 years and keep any with less years oakbrook, Illinois

*Consumer Comment: Not On The Surface

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

I was forced to leave my job after 28 years given partial penson and then got a letter 3 years later over paid me and taking me  a collection agency.  I think they owe me that and them some. But they keep employees with less years and allow them to work.  If that had of let me work a couple of more months I would not have owe that amount.  They did give us a chose of other citys to work for we pasted the test but at the time I could not move because of family reason.  So I was put on a leave when leave was over I applied for my same job, let me go on job visit and never called back.  So I took the same test a month or two later and could not pass it haha.  I'm wondering is there some type of class action suit against this company for the way the treated their employess.  As well as against the union

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 05/15/2011 03:43 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/attsbc/oakbrook-illinois-60193/attsbc-ameritech-2006-let-laid-off-their-employees-that-as-close-to-30-years-and-keep-any-729604. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author
1Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#1 Consumer Comment

Not On The Surface

AUTHOR: Jim - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Sunday, May 15, 2011

First, a class action lawsuit would get you nothing.  Even if you were to win, the amount of the settlement would be pennies, even if you initiated it, so you would have to initiate something like this on your own.  Even so, your action would probably have to be for unjust termination, and it doesn't appear there was anything unjustified about it based on the facts as you provide them.  It would seem the union negotiated the settlement with ATT as well; I sense the union did the best they could under the circumstances.  You're going to have to provide the documents you were handed and signed at the time of your discharge to your attorney in order to figure all of it out.  I would believe that if the union negotiated your termination along with everyone else....they had their attorneys cross all t's and dot all i's before proceeding.  The attorneys would have also reviewed the seniority clauses in your CBA as well before your termination as well.  Keeping newer employees in a union environment is generally unusual unless there are mitigating circumstances to either selectively choose poor performing employees, choose employees close to retirement and offer a better pension than they would have otherwise received, or other circumstances outside the CBA.

What is worse is that your refusal to accept a job in another city has been deemed in some collective bargaining situations as a voluntary termination - doesn't matter the reason for the refusal.  Once discharged from the company, voluntary or otherwise, your past history with the company doesn't obligate the company to hire you back.

It's now also been five years.  There may some states like California where the statute of limitations has run out.  You will need to check this out in your state; it may not be an issue in your state since many other states go longer...seven to ten years.

You may wish to engage in additional training in order to get a job in a new career.  The phone business is not what you want to be in anymore....

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now