Ccdn did not provide me with the services they originally offered Cattaraugus New York

i have been currently reading all this information posted about the ccdn. its no surprise to me, i too was a ccdn client. i do want to state that all the dealings, with the exception of one, with mr tracy webster were pleasant. he was informative and pleasant on the phone. the service i received however was not. from november of 2006 until i separated from the so called service my opinion, and let me add that is probably the most pertinent to this incident, is that nothing was done.

unfortunately i was unaware of this up until the point at which i receive an email informing me of the split between the marketing firm, the kayden group who sold me the service and the ccdn, the provider.

when mr webster informed me that mr ken hutchings had never paid the ccdn the $5,300.00 my wife and i sent to him, i called the ccdn. mr webster sent me an email and said not to worry, they would not leave me hanging. that to me secures a very important position. it says to me as a consumer that the ccdn is genuinely concern with me and wants to help me. i spoke with mr webster again and again but the situation seemed to worsen. when i called him with information regarding a judgement he stated no information had ever been received by his office.

now if mr hutchings decides to keep my money as payment for their services to me, that secures another very important position. it says to me as a consumer that they trust mr ken hutchings and are willing to work with him on good faith. i do not fault them as in my field i have done that as well.

however, i would not wait for a year to transpire before i make mention of that the fact. and if i had any concern for my reputation would certainly continue to provide service, especially since i failed to mention i hadnt been paid and obviously didnt think it was important to bring up for a year. that is apparently not how the ccdn operates. i remember someone once told me , poor planning on your part does not constitute and emergency on my part. i offer this to the ccdn. as a consumer, and a ccdn client, i suffered because of a business relationship gone bad, and thats if it really did, and thats not right, nor is it relevant to me. had the ccdn been paid by this alleged thief, i would be in the program. they werent and i was told that my money never made it to the ccdn. what concerns me more than anything with regards to the ccdn is why would they have me believe they were working on my case, receiving my information, contacting me when they received that information, provide direction and then 12 months later tell me i have not paid for their service and conveniently they have accomplished nothing.
now i did receive letters to contest the debt and instructions on how to trace the chain of ownership of the accounts but why am i doing that.

seems like i paid for some snot nosed intern to handle that. apparently not and in my opinion it was smoke and mirrors pay no attention to the man behind the curtain, just keep doing this until you loose permanently. additionally, mr webster explained to me that no fax had been received by his office regarding a lawsuit against me and now its reached maturation. i must state in mr websters defense he was apologetic and explained i was the eyes and ears for ccdn, so to speak and if i didnt communicate, they were unable to assist me with their services.

what also concerns me is that a company would allow someone to market a fallacy for them. i have read on numerous sites the representatives of this company consistently say we never said that we eliminate debt or we do not provide that kind of service or we never agreed to that. if thats the case why are they consistently dealing with people or companies that defraud their new clients and then do nothing to rectify the situation. i have a few theories on that but i am saving those for the proper forum. here i am simply stating fact without conjecture, anger, insults, etc. what has actually transpired.

after a very uplifting conversation with mr webster i wrote him a letter and told him that, even though that he had requested, as per that last conversation, i send him what i refer to as an additional $3,000.00, i could not afford that after sending money 12 months ago. their position of not being paid would anger me too. however, continuing to provide me with so called service under the pretense that i paid them, and that they in fact are helping me i find hurtful, stressful and infuriating. if anyone at ccdn had at least emailed me stating, listen paul we will continue to help but the kayden group has yet to paid us on your behalf, then maybe a hit at 12 months would not be so bad. thats not what transpired here.

as for conjecture, anger and insults, i hope mr lock as stated helps this britta, because i will get in line. if he welcomes my report and really has concern for the ccdn clients and how they are treated that is great. i am very optimistic and would even becom the ccdn poster child. i am not looking for a rebuttal i know the ccdn hasnt been paid and doesnt want to provide service, how about mr ken huthcings, want to provide him, seems like the right thing to do. now i dont expect that because i think all these guys are in bed together, so to speak.

in closing, if you are posting here or reading this and are a victim, look me up. i am the paul in denver with all the judgments, coincidentally judgments filed after my ccdn enrollment. with regards to the ccdn, i should not have to way the affordability, issue. you screwed up and you trusted ken to pay you and you made no disclaimer with regards to that so why am i even having to think about suffering. you made your problem mine, sort of the way i made my credit problem yours. tell you what, my charge for that is $5,300.00.

Paul
denver, Colorado
U.S.A.