Daniels and Norelli will do anything they can to get money,and thy reason they can is the local Judge is in on it. Daniels and Norelli has presented documents dated April 31, to a civil court Judge Orland Marrazzo in richmond count civil court and was granted a salary garnishment. To add insult to injury an authentic document was submitted to the Judge from original creditor Chase Bank USA executive offices that they have nothing to do with collection efforts,since May O7,also 7 mos after judge rules and these scam artists win they manually alter April 31, doc and add amendment again notorized on Chases lketter head In August 2010 again addressed to judge and ignored,evan asked for hearing on record from judge and was told no.Daniells and Norelli in official court documents signs and states they are attorneys for plaintiff,being Chase Bank on official court doc,then in other documents claim they are attorneys for third party debt collector. Stating in a court hearing them being third party debt collector and Chase Bank being one of the same the judge clearly was addressed what they said and ignored it. The worst and most damnning thing a judge can do was throughout the whole proceeding in several orders to show caused and motions to reargue I was never served,also they would never prove usury law I do not owe this debt and these scamsters never proved i did, but with a judge on the take they could say anything. I put in orders to show cause in August of 2010 stating for the 5th time i was never serverd from original creditor Chase Bank USA who originally recieved judgement by default. I did the mailing as told by court return receipt,certified mail to Chase Bank USA and received back signature card of receipt from Chase,so i know they were notified,noone shows from Chase,The judge Ajourns it says he need to notify them i explained i did and showed proof,ignored me and ajourns it.
Next court date the original Chase bank doesnt show the third party debt collector shows Daniells and Norelli (IRA SITZER) to speak on a judgment from Chase Bank he knows nothing about. How can a third party speak on a judgement that was obtained by defaut fromOriginal creditor 3years before be able to defend? how? when the judge says its ok! So Daniells and Norelli has presented 5 frudulent documents on Chase bank letterhesd and notorized from Chase bank,manually alter civil court documents pretend to be attorney for Chase Bank evan after Chase executive offices is stating nothing to do with collection efforts since May 07 and judge says it ok! This is grave abuse! of civil court,its Judges and Daniells and Norelli! Oh and lets not forget how a judge ajourns something after paper proof Chase Bank was Notified via US postal service certified mail return receipt,who notified Daniels and Norelli after ajournment I didnt they had no business i called out Chase the one who supposely recieved judgement what happend to them.This is a big scam,anyone interested i have all the paperwork to prove this the biggest scam ever they dont deserve to practice law they should be shut down! Altering a civil court document is a crime,presenting fraud and a judge ignoring it is a scam!