Report: #575548

Complaint Review: Dr. DOuglas Hauck

  • Submitted: Sun, February 28, 2010
  • Updated: Tue, July 22, 2014
  • Reported By: annonymous — Corona Del Mar California United States of America
  • Dr. DOuglas Hauck
    2121 PCH
    Corona Del Mar, California
    United States of America
  • Phone:
  • Web:
  • Category:

Complaint Review: Dr. DOuglas Hauck | Notice: Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration Decision: A neutral and independent Arbitrator has determined that the following Report contained one or more false statements of facts. The false statements have been redacted as ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)) | Furthermore, the Arbitrator was unable to determine if the Author of the Report was a patient or a competitor. | Dr. DOuglas Hauck In my opinion, he is a terrible dentist Corona Del Mar, California

*Consumer Comment: Notice

*UPDATE Employee: We do not hound our patients. Patients seek out Dr. Hauck.

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...



Douglas J. Hauck, Complainant


Anonymous, Author of Ripoff Report #575548


Complainant Douglas J. Hauck (the “Complainant”) has challenged the truthfulness of 3 specific statements (each, a “Statement”) posted by Author Anonymous (the “Author”) on the Ripoff Report website at on February 28, 2010, identified as Ripoff Report No. 575548 (the “Report”). The Author accused the Complainant of providing non-satisfactory dental services. The Complainant denies all allegations contained in the Report, contending that the Author is a competitor. The Author did not submit a response to the Complainant or any contact information. Therefore, in accordance with the Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration Rules (the “Rules), the Author waived their right to participate in this Arbitration.


In accordance with the Rules, the Arbitrator was asked to decide whether the challenged Statements were an opinion or a fact. If, and only if, the Statement was determined to be a statement of fact, the Arbitrator was asked to further decide if, by a preponderance of the evidence, the Statement was true or false. If the statement identified by the Complainant is determined to be an opinion, no determination will be made as to that particular Statement because an opinion cannot be determined to be true nor false.


The Arbitrator was further asked to decide whether the preponderance of the evidence submitted to establish if the identity of the Author of Ripoff Report No. 575548, shown as “annonymous” was a patient or a competitor.  Complainant essentially believes the Author who posted Ripoff Report No. 575548 is a competitor.  Although given all of the evidence in this case, the Arbitrator is unable to determine if the Author of Report No. 575548 is a patient or competitor.


In this case, the Arbitrator had only the evidence submitted by the Complainant to consider. The evidence submitted included a Witness Statement, Superior Court of California County of Orange search results, Dental Board of California search result for Dental License, and Patient Pictures.


Each Statement challenged by the Complainant has been considered, together with any Witness Statements and Documents provided by the Complainant for determination of the truth or falsity of the Statement.  The Author did not provide a response to the Complaint. 


The Arbitrator determined that the statements challenged in the Report were false. Therefore, according to the VIP Arbitration Rules, those statements have been redacted.


Decided July 12, 2013


Bruce E. Meyerson, Arbitrator


* A copy of the full Arbitrator’s Decision is available upon request.  Please e-mail with the name of the Complainant and Report number.

In my opinion, he is a terrible dentist. ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)) and his office staff is like dogs on meat. The girls hounded me to do the work. I wish I had never done it. ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). Do not go here!!! I was a bad experience. ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). In my opinion, run away fast and do not let them sweet talk you into fixing anything in your mouth.

Is this Ripoff Report About you?
Ripoff Report A business' first line of defense on the Internet.
If your business is willing to make a commitment to customer satisfaction Click here now..

Does your business have a bad reputation? Fix it the right way. Corporate Advocacy Program™

Set the record straight: Arbitration Program

SEO Reputation Management at its best!

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 02/28/2010 08:59 AM and is a permanent record located here: The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
Also a victim?
Repair Your Reputation!

Updates & Rebuttals


#1 Consumer Comment


AUTHOR: David - ()

Please take notice that Dr. David Eggleston (Dr. Eggleston) has issued subpoenas in the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, in the County of Maricopa, Case No. OCSC 30-2012-00592583 (the “Arizona Action”).  In the Arizona Action, Dr. Eggleston seeks to subpoena Xcentric Ventures, LLC (“Xcentric”), the company that owns and operates, for your contact and identifying information. Dr. Eggleston is a party in an action in the Superior Court of the State of California, in the County of Orange, Case No. 30-2012-00592583 (the “ California Action”), and seeks this information in connection therewith.

Arizona law requires that you be provided notice of the discovery request (i.e., the subpoena) via the same medium that the false and defamatory statements were originally published. By this post, notice is hereby given to you of Dr. Eggleston’s pending discovery request.

You have a right to timely and anonymously file and serve a response to the subpoena.  Such a response can include an objection to the subpoena.  Any response to the subpoena should be mailed by February 10, 2014, to Katherine M. Harwood, Esq., Ford, Walker, Haggerty & Behar, LLP, 1 World Trade Center, 27th Floor, Long Beach, California 90831. If a response is not received, Xcentric may respond to the subpoena and produce the records as outlined above. 

This notification is being provided to you pursuant to the Court of Appeals, State of Arizona, Division One holding in the matter entitled Mobilisa, Inc. v. John Doe 1, et al., 217 Ariz. 103, 170 P.3d 712 (Ariz. App. 2007).

Respond to this report!

#2 UPDATE Employee

We do not hound our patients. Patients seek out Dr. Hauck.

AUTHOR: doug - (United States of America)

In rebuttal to the report listed above.  We attempted to locate a patient with the above referenced name and city, and are unable to locate a patient of record with that information.   This claim is erroneous, and please feel free to contact us personally with your questions at 949-729-9950.
Respond to this report!
Ripoff Report Recommends
ZipBooks Accounting Software

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.