Report: #796310

Complaint Review: Edmundo Espinoza Bojorques

  • Submitted: Tue, November 08, 2011
  • Updated: Tue, November 08, 2011
  • Reported By: Rudy — Lompoc California United States of America
  • Edmundo Espinoza Bojorques
    5139 Quail Lake DriveDallas, Texas. 75287
    Dallas, Texas
    United States of America

Edmundo Espinoza Bojorques Edmundo Espinoza, Law Offices of Edmundo Espinoza, Edmundo Bojorques, Espinoza-Bojorques, Edmundo Edmundo Espinoza Bojorques is a Crooked Lawyer, a Fraud and a Cheat Dallas, Texas



Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE OF THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA.  ATTACHMENT TO STIPULATION OF FACTS, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DISPOSITION IN THE MATTER OF: RUDY HOOPER vs. EDMUNDO ESPINOZA BOJORQUEZ CASE NUMBER(S): 05-0-02996. FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW: Respondent, Edmundo Espinoza Bojorques, with address at 5139 Quail Lake Drive, Dallas, Texas.  75287. Tel. 214 -475- 3015,  admits that the following facts are true and that he is culpable of violations of the specified statutes and/or Rules of Professional Conduct: 1. In January 2004, Respondent

was employed by Rudy Hooper ("Hooper) to represent him in a criminal matter while Hooper was incarcerated. At the time of employment, Hoopers father gave Respondent $37,000. These funds were to be used for both Respondents legal fees and for future expenses that Respondent was to pay on behalf of Hooper per "pay orders" that Hooper would submit to Respondent. The parties did not enter into a written fee agreement.  2. On January 29, 2004, Respondent paid himself $5,000 as his legal fees and deposited the remaining $32,000 of the $37,000 paid by Hoopers father into a money market account, account number 09858-03231 at Bank of America (the "money market account). 3. In

February 2004, Respondent paid himself an additional $6,000 in legal fees from the money market account. The balance in the money market account became $26,000.  4. In March 2004, Respondent

transferred $22,000 from the money market account to a general account, account number 0958-09990 at Bank of America (the "general account"). Respondent withdrew the remaining $4,000 in the money market account as his fees. 4. In March 2004, Respondent issued a total of $1,300 in money orders to various people per pay orders submitted by Hooper from the general account.  5. In March 2004, Respondent paid $2,000 in costs on behalf of Hooper and paid himself $4000 in legal fees from the general account. The balance in the general account became $14,700. 6. Between March

2004 and September 2004, Respondent paid $11,953 in expenses per "pay orders" submitted by Hooper. Respondent paid these expenses by first electronically transferring funds from the general account to another general account, account number 10395-14334 at Bank of America (the "second

general account"). Respondent then issued checks from the Attachment Page 1 second general account to pay the $11,953 in expenses. Respondent paid the remaining $2,747,  that was still in the general account to himself in legal fees.  LEGAL CONCLUSION: By failing to deposit the initial $37,000 in a client

trust account and by subsequently depositing the remaining client funds in the money market account, the general account and the second general account, Respondent failed to deposit client funds in a trust account.  PENDING PROCEEDINGS:  The disclosure date referred to, on page one, paragraph A.(7), was by letter dated July 12, 2006.  AUTHORITIES SUPPORTING DISCIPLINE:  Vaughn v. State Bar (1972) 6 Cal. 3d 847:  The attorney received a Public reproval for misconduct that included repeatedly allowing his client trust account to fall below the minimum balance he was required to maintain in it.  Fitzsimmons v. State Bar (1983) 34 Cal. 3d 327:  The attorney was found to be grossly negligent in handling estate assets by failing to maintain proper records. The court imposed a Public Reproval. Respondent was negligent in handling client funds by depositing such funds in multiple bank accounts that were not client trust accounts.  AGGRAVATION:  Respondent maintained client funds in several bank accounts that were not client trust accounts. OTHER CONDITIONS NEGOTIATED BY THE PARTIES:  Within eighteen (18) months of the effective date of discipline, Respondent shall provide proof of attendance of the State

Bar Client Trust Accounting School to the Office of Probation of the State Bar. For More information on Edmundo Espinoza Bojorques go to:
Is this Ripoff Report About you?
Ripoff Report A business' first line of defense on the Internet.
If your business is willing to make a commitment to customer satisfaction Click here now..

Does your business have a bad reputation? Fix it the right way. Corporate Advocacy Program™

Set the record straight: Arbitration Program

SEO Reputation Management at its best!

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 11/08/2011 06:25 PM and is a permanent record located here: The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
Also a victim?
Repair Your Reputation!

Updates & Rebuttals


#1 REBUTTAL Owner of company


AUTHOR: amanda - (USA)



The maker of these malicious falsehoods, lies, libelous and disgusting postings on this page against attorney Edmundo Espinoza have been written by a sociopath by the name of MARCUS ARTHUR FONTAINE. He is a very well known federal and state convicted felon who has spent lengthy sentences in the State of California federal and state prisons. The reader should review federal cases, United States v Marcus A. Fontaine (Case No. 90-CR-0158-ER) (Case No. 94-CR-0386-CBM) and People v Marcus A. Fontaine (Case #BA-240328)(Los Angeles Superior Court. He has been attacking attorney Edmundo Espinoza on the internet for many years in an illogical and mentally sick way. He is an individual without scruples and morality and who has taken it upon himself to harm attorney Espinoza only to satisfy his mentally sick distortions as the attorney has never published anything against him before this Alert. After so many years of internet abuse Edmundo Espinoza has decided to divulge through this same medium that Fontaine is the one who has posted all of these sick lies against the attorney. Fontaine has hurt the attorney mentally and financially as the attorney has lost numerous cases from prospective clients who after readings these sick and false internet postings decided not to professionally hire the attorney. It is obvious that this was the intent of this felon. This has to stop.

 But instead of signing his name in support of these postings he hides behind anonymity or false identities. Fontaine has even used the names of former clients of attorney Espinoza, like Zolp and Roblee. Additionally, Fontaine has used many aliases while committing crimes, like, Bob Mato, Robert Mc Conihay, Mike Furlong, Robert Matoni, John Grossman, Jack Miller and William Mc Quinton. His true Cuban name is Camilo Mendez but he changed his name to MARCUS ARTHUR FONTAINE after he arrived in the United States. The reader can verify this by just cliking his name in Google and his prior record will jump out.


 ALERT – he now goes by the name of MARCUS FONTAIN and prides himself of being the President and CEO of UNIMUNDO TV – a respected online business. The fact remains, however, that he continues to be MARCUS ARTHUR FONTAINE a felon who was sentenced to over 20-years in federal custody for Fraud, Money Laundering, Theft and Forgery and who was released right after the “Los Angeles Times” published an article on August 22, 2000, warning the public of his release. In that article it was said that FONTAINE had defrauded Medi-Cal out of millions of dollars.


This FONTAINE or FONTAIN is the same individual and he will not be able to shake off his past as a criminal. The reader will notice that after the publication of this Alert, Fontain will renew his online attacks against Edmundo Espinoza with a vengeance. However, if his attacks had a rational basis, then he should not be able to hide his true identity by using aliases or made up names, or by anonymity, but should use his true name of either Camilo Mendez or Marcus Arthur Fontaine or even Marcus Fontain. Attorney Espinoza professionally represented Marcus Arthur Fontaine many years ago and it is believed by the attorney that these online attacks resulted from a refusal by the attorney to represent FONTAINE for free in a Trademark Case. It should be noted that attorney Espinoza has always had a great reputation as a criminal defense attorney. 

Respond to this report!

#2 General Comment





El autor de estas asquerosas calumnias, falsedades, mentiras, difamaciones y porquerías que están en esta pagina en contra del abogado Edmundo Espinoza han sido escritas por un sociópata de nombre MARCUS ARTHUR FONTAINE, un cubano que llego a las tierras de Estados Unidos hace muchos anos en las flotillas entonces llamadas, “Los Marielitos.” El es un convicto federal y estatal que ha estado por muchos anos en prisiones federales como también estatales en el estado de California. Ya tiene anos atacando por internet al Lic. Espinoza sin motivo lógico alguno. Es una persona sin escrupulos y sin moral y que ha optado por danar al Lic. Espinoza solo para satisfacer sus intenciones enfermas y no porque el abogado lo haya atacado in ninguna forma. Es por este motivo que ciertas verdades se tienen que exponer al publico para que los leyentes entiendan quien es esta persona. Es una persona sin credibilidad y que inventa malicias en contra del abogado sin ningunas bases reales. Su nombre cubano es Camilo Mendez.


Esta persona no tiene ni escrupulos ni moral. Para esconder y encubrir sus calumnias y falsedades nunca incluye su nombre verdadero e inventa nombres, como Nicolas Roblee, Zolp y otros . Tambien ha usado Bob Mato, Robert Mc Conihay, Mike Furlong, Robert Matoni, John Grossman, Jack Miller y William Mc Quinton. Porque no firma esas falsedades con su nombre? De que tiene miedo?


Su nombre verdadero es Camilo Mendez y lo cambio a Marcus Arthur Fontaine despues de que ingreso a Estados Unidos. El lector puede entrar al internet y poner Marcus Arthur Fontaine y se dara cuenta de todos los casos penales en su contra.


Tambien para esconder su verdadera identidad ahora usa solo MARCUS FONTAIN y se anuncia como Presidente de UNIMUNDO TV – pero el es el mismo convicto y defraudador.


El periodico “Los Angeles Times” escribió un articulo en Agosto 22, 2000, cuando iba saliendo de la cárcel, donde divulga que Fontaine defraudo al Medi-Cal por muchos millones de dólares y que recibió una sentencia de mas de 20 anos por esos delitos. Esta es una persona de la cual el publico tiene que cuidarse y no tenerle confianza en lo mas minimo.


Este FONTAINE o FONTAIN es el mismo y nunca se le quitara lo falso y lo defraudador y lo enfermo. El Lic. lo represento muy bien hace muchos anos y ya no quizo tener nada con el y ahora este monstruo lo acusa de tantas falsedades. Este FONTAINE tiene que entender que con sus falsedades hiere la reputación del Lic. Espinoza pero eso lo llena de gozo. Es un enfermo.


El Lic. Edmundo Espinoza nunca había tenido ninguna mancha en su Curriculum o

Resume hasta que llego este monstruo lleno de odio y defamacion y ahora lo acusa de mil mentiras Ojala que todos los lectores vean en realidad quien es esta persona.


The author of these disgusting slander, falsehoods, lies, defamation and filth that are on this page against lawyer Edmundo Espinoza have been written by a sociopath named MARCUS ARTHUR FONTAINE, a Cuban who arrived in the United States many years ago In the flotillas then called, "Los Marielitos." He is a federal and state convict who has been for many years in federal as well as state prisons in the state of California. He has been attacking the Internet Espinoza for no reason at all. He is a person without scruples and without morals and who has chosen to harm Lic. Espinoza only to satisfy his sick intentions and not because the lawyer has attacked him in any way. It is for this reason that certain truths have to be exposed to the public so that the lawyers understand who this person is. He is a person without credibility and who invents malicias against the lawyer without any real bases. His Cuban name is Camilo Mendez.

Respond to this report!
Ripoff Report Recommends
ZipBooks Accounting Software

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.