Enhanced Human Tony Babarino ADA Violations Dana Point, California

This short and fake report was written by an individual I never met and posted here by this website blindly, one-sided, and without a single shred of evidence of any kind provided neither by the submitter nor the website. (Please note below my long list of evidence that clearly supports my rebuttal.)

Where did this fake information for the 'report' come from, and why?

This report was a personal, immature attack and fraudulent report by a persistent and aggressive advertising telephone-based sales person for the Yellow Pages Ads online (possibly an independent contractor or work-from-home individual). They continued to call me on my private number for several days, even though I was consistently polite and clear that I did not want to advertise in the Yellow Pages Ads online and to please permanently remove me from their 'calling list'. On their 5th phone call to me, they became upset and defensive because, apparently, of my refusal to purchase advertising, so I bid them a 'good bye' and hung up. Shortly after this, this fake and strangely vague statement appeared on this website behind my back (no attempt has been made to contact me by neither any one nor any organization. Zero communication). It is clear to me this was the sales person's attempt at striking out at me, perhaps in order to get some sick sense of revenge or creepy satisfaction as a result of their failed attempt to convince me to purchase Yellow Pages Ads online. Had they simply honored my declining of their services and stopped calling me after I asked them to stop, they would not put themselves into a position to feel the need to write a report full of lies.

Note my supporting evidence against this fake, false report:

1) Error: The Address in the report does not belong to me: it appears to belong to a restaurant in Dana Point, CA.

2) Error: The WCDAC is far away in Anaheim, CA, not Huntington Beach, CA as the report claims.

3) Missing: There is no specific date of this incident.

4) Missing: There is no specific name of the person reporting this (false) information.

5) Missing: There is no mention of the alleged person's name in the story.

6) Error: Neither I nor the business, as indicated in the report, have ever owned or used the phone number posted in the report: We do not know who this phone number belongs to.

7) Error: The business listed here was never an owned or operated  physical store (as indicated in this report). I am simply an independent, working individual, not a store or a store owner, so there is no place for this incident to occur!

8) Error: The article mentions "...they have refused to read it." The author must be confused...or lying. The false/fake report is about me, but then it refers to the plural "they" instead of "he".

9) Error: How can anyone ever tell they are lying to you by simply their 'tone of voice' on the phone, especially since the phone conversation never happened?

10) The website presenting this reputation-damaging report… also sells 'reputation repair services'

11) The use of English and grammar is vague and rather poorly written. While I'm not the world's finest writer, I like to believe that truthful events often have clearly presented facts and details which should be proven (or at least validated) before publishing.

12) I have captured a screenshot of this website's report for documentation and my protection.