Entertainment Publications, Consitta Russo Bought Tickets via ticket master and some how in the processing my credit card info was provided to Entertainment Publication Inc. where I was then subscribed to a monthy coupon program charging $9/ Month. I notice the charge made immediately and contacted Entertainment Publications where employees were extremely egocentric and at every angle reminded me that this is my fault. Ripoff Troy Michigan

I do not intend for this rebuttal to be long winded, however, I do feel that since no one has attempted to show the Federal Law for Electronic Signatures, this should be made known. After all, one can only claim ignorance for so long in this world. Feel free to visit http://www.law.upenn.edu/bll/ulc/fnact99/1990s/ueta99.htm to ensure that I have given you the correct information pertaining to this subject, since the few angry consumers on this website seem to think all of us are such "liars, scammers, thieves, crooks, and frauds" and especially since, "we should be shot and killed".
"Electronic signature."def.(You know, the meaning of the word?)

The idea of a signature is broad and not specifically defined. Whether any particular record is "signed" is a question of fact. Proof of that fact must be made under other applicable law. This Act simply assures that the signature may be accomplished through electronic means. No specific technology need be used in order to create a valid signature. One's voice on an answering machine may suffice if the requisite intention is present. Similarly, including one's name as part of an electronic mail communication also may suffice, as may the firm name on a facsimile. It also may be shown that the requisite intent was not present and accordingly the symbol, sound or process did not amount to a signature. One may use a digital signature with the requisite intention, or one may use the private key solely as an access device with no intention to sign, or otherwise accomplish a legally binding act. In any case the critical element is the intention to execute or adopt the sound or symbol or process for the purpose of signing the related record.
SECTION 5. USE OF ELECTRONIC RECORDS AND ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES; VARIATION BY AGREEMENT.

The Legalities:(I hope this helps you, but don't worry, I will include the quick recap in Lamen's Terms for you too)

(a) This [Act] does not require a record or signature to be created, generated, sent, communicated, received, stored, or otherwise processed or used by electronic means or in electronic form.

(b) This [Act] applies only to transactions between parties each of which has agreed to conduct transactions by electronic means. Whether the parties agree to conduct a transaction by electronic means is determined from the context and surrounding circumstances, including the parties' conduct.

(c) A party that agrees to conduct a transaction by electronic means may refuse to conduct other transactions by electronic means. The right granted by this subsection may not be waived by agreement.

(d) Except as otherwise provided in this [Act], the effect of any of its provisions may be varied by agreement. The presence in certain provisions of this [Act] of the words "unless otherwise agreed", or words of similar import, does not imply that the effect of other provisions may not be varied by agreement.

(e) Whether an electronic record or electronic signature has legal consequences is determined by this [Act] and other applicable law.

And here is the recap of "Electronic Signatures for Dummies", as promised.

1. This section makes clear that this Act is intended to facilitate the use of electronic means, but does not require the use of electronic records and signatures. This fundamental principle is set forth in subsection (a) and elaborated by subsections (b) and (c), which require an intention to conduct transactions electronically and preserve the right of a party to refuse to use electronics in any subsequent transaction.

So, as you can now see for yourselves, if you have even chosen to continue educating yourselves, this process is legal. We have people on a daily basis placing cancellation calls to our company WITHIN the 30-day free trial. (oh, yeah, they DID recieve all three"3" emails) And I would like to advise as well, that Miss Russo is a living, breathing human being with feelings, and that by admitting that you screamed at her and were rude on top of everything else, that just goes to show how parents are raising their children in the last few generations. I know I will raise my child with more respect for human life and privace than this person has. If you would just get over the fact that you did not read what was clearly in front of your face, then you would have seen just how nice Miss Russo really is. Oh, and by the way, I also did manage to retrieve the information for Yahoo's personal security settings, which, for you who have email accounts through Yahoo, will be more than able to verify.
Spam Filter
SpamGuard is ON [Turn SpamGuard OFF - What's this?]

For messages SpamGuard identifies as Spam:

Immediately delete these messages upon receipt. (Note: If you choose this option, you will not be able to review the messages before they are deleted.)

Save these messages in the Bulk Folder for 1 week2 weeks1 month

Mark Spam + Not Spam
When I mark a message as Spam, in addition to deleting the message:

Add the sender's email address to my blocked addresses list

When I mark a message in the Bulk folder as Not Spam:

Move the message to my Inbox

Image Blocking
Don't block any images

Block images in messages that SpamGuard thinks are spam

Block all images until I've had a chance to look it over
One more word of advise, please do not list our personal information if you have not taken the time to get to know us. We are able to file a law suit, and the information you provided to this site when registering is able to be sopeanad for a court of law. Next time, the agent may not show you the courtesy that Miss Russo did, as we know there was no courtesy involved on your part. Thank you sincerely.