• Report: #1002510
Complaint Review:

Exposing the Cyberpaths & Predators

  • Submitted: Thu, January 24, 2013
  • Updated: Wed, May 22, 2013

  • Reported By: Gary Stone — Peabody Massachusetts U.S.A.
Exposing the Cyberpaths & Predators
Internet United States of America

Exposing the Cyberpaths & Predators EOPC vigilantism, anonymous defamers, hackers Internet

*Author of original report: All Mary, Try again Babs

*General Comment: Federal Warrant

*Author of original report: Barbara Camwell (fighter of eopc) Impersonates Briesis

*Author of original report: EOPC, Cyberpaths.org, Send's Spam

*Author of original report: The illusion of EOPC

*UPDATE Employee ..inside information: Someone Forget To Take His Anti-Obessive-Kook Pills

*Author of original report: EOPC is Celebrating Nothing, and attack a business frivolously

*Author of original report: EOPC is Acting up Again.

*UPDATE Employee: Gary Stone - Conspiracy Theorist

*Author of original report: Exposing The Cyberpaths & Predators ,EOPC, update

REBUTTAL BOX™ | Respond to this Report! | Consumer Comment

What's this?
Corporate Advocacy Program

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

What's this?
What's this?
Is this
Ripoff Report
About you?
Ripoff Report
A business' first
line of defense
on the Internet.
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™

Set the record straight:
Arbitration Program

SEO Reputation Management at its best!

The Alice in Wonderland of The Cyberpath blog:
and The wolves in sheeps clothing.

The methods of the cyberpath blog were questioned  for their role in the Meghan Meir's case and lori drew. That case was their one claim to fame. One they obstructed more than helped. From that point on, it's been down hill.

What was suspicious about them at that time for their methods..., over the course of four years has... surfaced.

The core Fighter, and her assistants are criminals. 

This is a very dangerous anonymous band of cyber thugs. They are not a vast network of concerned Internet citizens. The group, is not connected to the FBI. The articles in the past that appeared to be written for the group, are stolen from the internet. Their contract they use for profiles is an an indictment of both it's author
Barbara Camwell Ness and anyone who signs it.

They are not certified to do what they do, as self appointed Internet police. Anymore than the former file clerk on mental disability since 1995 Barbara Camwell is qualified to do domestic violence counseling. 
The cyberpath blog is run by one individual Barbara Camwell Ness, with assistance from a Michelle Comford Jones in Britain. (Jones is a hacker and a militant extremist.)

What  you will read from these links is is my experience with them in 2008 - 2009.  2010, and 2011.

They have come at me again after 2009's blogs were taken down.  This time much more was revealed about them and their main fighter Barbara Camwell Ness. The link to the updated information is here as well as some history. A summary of their 2008 - 2009 attacks

I would like to add, that they have attacked a whole business because they failed to censor me. The link to that attack on Bravenet is here on The Rip Off Report.

They were trying to censor a simple paragraph which said they were smearing me again dated in June at Bravenet, when they'd renewed their attacks before in April 2011. 

It provided a link to my answer. Bravenet didn't yield so they were "punished." The working people there by people who live their lives on the dole.

Ness and wrecking crew attacked a whole business, primarily based on one argument that Ness is not "Fighter" where and when accounts. She is.

Ness claims Michael Roberts wrote me and proved she was not fighter. Did he? Or did she spoof him as she does everyone else? If he wrote me, and he may not have, Ness and co, may have spoofed him, he saw what ness wanted him to see.

He was misdirected And he first wrote me under the premise that he had people who wanted to sue fighter and EOPC. I don't believe he did write me. But he or someone spoofing him, came to the conclusion that Ness was not fighter in three days. That was the wrong conclusion. Barbara Camwell Ness is Fighter. She's affected a new personality called Frenchie, and has altered her accent to mislead people. Within her group, she can assume multiple anonymous personalities. The server evidence proving Ness is fighter 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012, is irrefutable. EOPC is Ness's blog, period. No matter what people put on her fighter mask and claim otherwise to cover for her. 

This group is led by Ness and a few others who think like her. What should be obvious from this 2009 essay is: 
EOPC exposing the cyberpaths & Predators...is a dangerous group. They are the cyberpaths/.  The primary means of controlling their rep and preventing anyone for seeing this: is censorship. They have censorship methods honed to a science.  If OSP's don't cooperate with their censor ships demands. after they swamp them with phony pathos, they threaten them with law suits. Their threats are empty.

I have given my blog the same name as theirs...because there "the ex posers" are the proved culprits. The Ex posers are EXPOSED. In fact fundamentally they are a marauding band of hacking criminals and shysters - putting on the the false face of helper just to exploit people

Here is the link to my 2008 experience. It is called:
Google doesn't Answer the Phone

Here is the link to my renewed battle with them
Let's call it: 
The Alice and wonderland of EOPC.

This group, has managed to destroy a civil case in the US, my civil employment case, one that they had nothing to do with them, by anonymous action from the Internet. They have hacked every account I have. And, their primary problem with me is: I have their number. But so do others. Many others. And the list of people who have information on Ness and her illegal activities and her psychology, is growing.
The internet culture should be made more aware of cyberpaths.blogspot.com, just to avoid it. My aim is to absolutely discredit it, and it's insane lead fighter, and flying monkey acolytes.
The cyberpath blog hopes you will not take the time to study the blog and think about the implications of my expose, prove them wrong. The real emotions underlying their attacks are bitterness, revenge, no matter what layer of psychopabble they copy and paste from the internet. The mix in a few real cases of problem people on the internet with made up ones, and personal vendetta pages. The real ones, they steal from other sources.

Don't be fooled. Their ambition in 2010 was to situate themselves on facebook, but they needed
to harass me and have me complain to get me kicked off. That didn't work out so well, as their
application was removed. Ness has more pages on facebook than anyone is aware of, but the official EOPC application was removed.  They see facebook as a cash cow.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 01/24/2013 09:32 AM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/exposing-the-cyberpaths-predators/internet/exposing-the-cyberpaths-predators-eopc-vigilantism-anonymous-defamers-hackers-internet-1002510. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.

Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on Exposing the Cyberpaths & Predators

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Search Tips
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?
7Author 3Consumer 0Employee/Owner
Updates & Rebuttals

#1 Author of original report

All Mary, Try again Babs

AUTHOR: - ()

No Babs, from 2008 to 2009 you tried to destroy my life with your bogus Elaine May Smith story.  You published it again in 2011 after it was ordered down, and you did this knowing her story was a lie.  Mary was involved as well. But as you know, her blog was Another Hollywood Cockroach. Yours was The cyberpath blog.  As for your lawyers, and your forensic experts. Nonsense, you only had Michael Roberts tell people what you wanted them to hear.  The proofs are unbiquitous.  People should search your name  Barbara Camwell Ness.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 General Comment

Federal Warrant

AUTHOR: LegalEagle - (USA)

There's a Federal Warrant out for your friend Mary McGrannahan, Mr. Stone.  If you google her name it will come up on scribd.  Ms. Kester's attorneys found zero wrongdoing on Ness' part after a forensic computer investigation.  It was all your friend McGrannahan. 

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#3 Author of original report

Barbara Camwell (fighter of eopc) Impersonates Briesis

AUTHOR: Gary Stone - ()

Briesis is credited with a report here. But Briesis is Bink. Bink is the target of Barbara and Mary's vendetta (eopc). She didn't make this post - Barbara Camwell Ness did. Barbara impersonates people. I have lots of emails from Briesis.

Barbara may want to recall the "Orange Judas incident." In brief it is this: Mary Mcgrannahan Branham and Melissa
Kester were together on a movie project in 2010 Barbara comes barging to their website one day and they have an exchange; Mary, Camwell and Kester, Barbara proposes to impersonate Kim Stewart (Briesis/aka Bink) and credit her for a defamatory blog on Lisa Scott, owner of vain encounters, whom Barbara (fighter) has vowed to destroy.

This is the exchange. The meat of this page is mid way down the page, the faint yellow area, it is recommended that section be high lighted.


How many people have you impersonated now Barbara? Does Melissa Kester validate this conversation occurred? Yes, she does. When will you realize you blew your credibility ages ago Ness, your corruption is too well documented to continue.

Again nobody should give anyone called fighter, or "the eopc team," any information. These are very dangerous
people. Your website is washed up Barbara. Finished.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#4 Author of original report

EOPC, Cyberpaths.org, Send's Spam

AUTHOR: - ()

I guess they didn't like my comment

The pattern of sending this type of spam, "just after," they are pinned down, is very well established after one year. A description of that pattern is sent to brit authories.

This spam: Lasik Vision care,a Mockery of my blindness, I am legally blind  There's hundreds of spams like this, sent to Brits after they send them to me.  And they are always sent in reponse to being reported about something. A hack, or spam. They are very much triangulated for them. Hundreds  since last year.

They know in Britain what end of EOPC is doing this: The Smith/ Kline/ Jones end. (see below)

Considering the utc time is four hours ahead of EST, it would have arrived at 17:59 est. And visits to your arizona servers, would coorelate that this came "AFTER" they saw my reply. This is exactly the pattern for one year. The sender, based on the synatax which id'd Kline on their Bravenet post, I'd wager this poster was Rick Kline. And so is the spammer.

Ricko, EOPC was about me because my name was on it. Then it was about all the others you've smeared. Now, it's about you. I think the video player on my sites shows this particular vision spam and other classic spam they've sent.

It's one of Kline and Smith 's favorites. Jones uses IPV6 servers. Still using Romanian servers Rick? I thought you switched to AIM?


Respond to this report!
What's this?

#5 Author of original report

The illusion of EOPC

AUTHOR: Anon - ()


Let me spell this out for you.
On this page (url to your Bravenet attack,) you attack Bravenet in August of 2012
for something that was deleted
in 2009?

Then you claim victory?

No, you attacked them for a paragraph that said you were attacking me again,
published two months after you smeared me again on your site (first time in 2008 -2009,) in April of 2011. The paragraph
at Bravenet was published in June of 2011.

You attacked first at the hub pages,
and you were on a censorship roll using
the tactics you used in 2008 - 2009.

You got nowhere with Bravenet. So you smeared them here:


As for the identities of the people doing it, it's set in stone. As for the character of those doing it, it is proved. As for the people they need to smear to shore themselves up? Typical. As for the logic, "if you can be smeared or conned, you deserve it?" Inverted values.

The EOPC are a cover story for cybercrime. Anyone giving any information to anyone at cyberpaths.org, their new site, is a fool. Nothing could be more simple.

Why do you say you are an EMPLOYEE? What exactly are you doing there? Here's what you are doing:

You are hoping the name "gary stone," and "employee" will filter into google. That is what you were doing in 2008 (See?) You have a site
here, attacking an innocent company, go play there, or on your scam site, Exposing the cyberpaths (cyberpaths.org, moved from cyberpaths.blogspot.com, in January 2013, because Barbara's smear buddy, Mary was sued for her role in "Another Hollywood Cockroach,"
by Melissa Kester. Kester won the suit. A blow for anonymous con artists like Barbara.
Barbara "is" Fighter. EOPC is Babs, with a little help from some new Brit friends. )



Respond to this report!
What's this?

#6 UPDATE Employee ..inside information

Someone Forget To Take His Anti-Obessive-Kook Pills

AUTHOR: Cheerio - ()

None of the "intel" Stone posts repetitively about is fact.
All of it comes from known whack-jobs.

Stone either makes it up as he goes along or cherry picks nonsense from others who are as crazy as him.

Stone isn't the focus of our site and what he says makes zero difference because we know we have helped many people.  We haven't made a dime from our site. 

Poor Stone - nothing to do but sit online all day and make up a dark force who is trying to ruin him.  Truthfully - he shoots himself in the foot every time he hits send.

Anyone who would post his home address and phone where he and his family live - online - for all the world to see - deserves what he gets.


Back to work for us

visit us at http://cyberpaths.org

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#7 Author of original report

EOPC is Celebrating Nothing, and attack a business frivolously

AUTHOR: Gary S - ()

This was removed (link below) by me when Scott Powers ordered all blogs down in 2009 what you see posted here at rip of report, are emails showing them trying to censor the articles of 2009 - there were quite a few, made in response to theirs (2009) 

they threw those emails into this post,old emails and added them to new ones Thfrom August 2011.  This Created the illusion all were recent exchanges and that they were not attacking trivia.

Nope, they attacked Bravenet over a paragraph which simply said they were at it again. Think about it EOPC: If I had a big reponse there at Bravenet in 2011. I would have linked to it in that paragraph, Instead my link was outbound to blogger.

Bravenet allowed that intial defense in 2009. They allowed paragraph (2011) posted long after the intial articles were removed on both sides, by agreement with Powers and my lawyer (they weren't totally compliant either)

The paragraph they attacked simply said, they were defaming me again.

. The 2009 defense was a smaller version of what I had on

blogger at that time,.(what was on blogger was removed when Powers came along.

But when Scott Powers came along, he ordered it all down both sides. There were some 4 or 5 pages of rebuttal at Bravenet then.

EOPC smears and my rebuttal in removed in 2009. Renewed in 2011. So this came down in 2009.

http://toylanders.bravenet.com One can almost derive that from exchanges here, but Bravenet would confirm.

What was left was one page that said "War is over."

And, it is very clear Bravenet has no clue what they are talking about, indicated by some recent emails (Aug 2011) mixed in. with old 2009 articles...where they were trying to censor my rebuttal)

All Bravenet saw was this paragraph Because, that's all that was there.

So, at the end theu applaud Bravenet for doing nothing. They shouldn't have done anything. This simply states they are at it again. It was put up in June of 2011. They were at it again in April of 2011.


(This above is what they were attacking)

This is because they are about appearances Bravenet still doesnt know what they are talking about. Except they are not taking that paragraph down.

The bravenet articles were already long gone by two years when EOPC attacked them. That is precisely how sick they are.

I think rip off report should remove their bravenet complaint. Consult with Bravenet to verify I am telling the truth. There was nothing to attack. Except the announcement they were attacking me.

There is no FBI, no Mass Atttorney General, it's all EOPC horsesh*t

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#8 Author of original report

EOPC is Acting up Again.

AUTHOR: Anon - ()

Your existence as an internet fraud has been completely exposed. Let's ask a rhetorical question though:

Who are you?  Why don't you name yourself. When willl you use your real ip?  Sorry to spoil your party. But on that site - you've run your last scam


Respond to this report!
What's this?

#9 UPDATE Employee

Gary Stone - Conspiracy Theorist

AUTHOR: Briesis - ()

The crazy never ends with Gary Stone.
Every email, spam message or text he gets is somehow a plot to get him?

EOPC is all about going after Gary Stone?

What a joker.  Stone's upset that no one gives a crap about him and every time he makes a post it's to bring attention to himself.

Look at his blog, he got information from a known con woman, spoofer, extortionist named Mary Mcgranahen and a known internet kook named Betsy Ashby.  He cherry picked what he wanted to hear and glued it together to be a big conspiracy against poor Gary Stone.

This is crazy on level that's off the charts.  Someone send the straight jacket brigade to Stone.



Respond to this report!
What's this?

#10 Author of original report

Exposing The Cyberpaths & Predators ,EOPC, update

AUTHOR: Anon - (U.S.A.)

An update and Elaboration of my experience with The cyberpath blog.
If the image of the paragraph eopc attacked does not upload to Rip off report I believe it can be viewed by following this link

Barbara Ness and her troglodytes at (cyberpaths.blogspot.com (EOPC) : Elaine May Smith, Michelle Comford Jones, Rick Kline
- have taken an evasive maneuver...they are migrating their site off of Blogger - which is now on a California Google
server - to a unique domain on a Malaysian server.

They used a Panamanian proxy to register the domain very recently. This, as of January 1 2013. The seem to think they migrate their liability. That is a delusion.If they placed that nonsense on a server on the moon it wouldn't
 matter, the same people are "still" involved in personal attacks on many people. Many of Ness's personal enemies, Smith's and Jone's are on EOPC..and they make them look like Most Wanted notices at the post office. EOPC is "filthyiar.com"
 with a psychobabble face. But it's much more.

The Whois registration of cyberpaths.org is located  on my page as an update here:

Incidentally, their claim on their attack of Bravenet page on the Rip Off Report - that the Mass Attorney general is
"working with them" is a bald faced lie (their connection to the FBI is also false. They have always maintained they have
those connections, added to connections to local policing. The articles they steal from the internet, add to the air
that that are official.  It's all a lie. They are simply pretending they're the next Rexxfield.org, indeed, that is
their ambition. The reason they post on behalf of Michael Roberts so often, hoping he will notice them.

The blog cyberpaths.blogspot.com has always been Barbara Camwell Ness East Elm hurst NY, now it's Ness and Brit Michelle Comford Jones - along with Kline and Smith) But the attorney general lie is a manipulative ploy: See my email to Mass Attorney General with the response from the state office contained in my letter to Bravenet legal (headers available
on request): http://garystonepeabody.blogspot.com/2013/02/letter-to-bravenet-legal-department.html

The Mass attorney general has "never" been contacted. It stands to reason he would not be, as - the complaints to
bravenet were anonymous..No attorney general would listen to anyone who would not identify themselves, either by name,
or by location (They use proxy servers.) And, they wouldn't name themselves, nor would they lie to the Mass Attorney
general after filing a bogus Ic3 complaint in 2009. This type of sensationalism has been used by them for years. Their main traits are grandiosity with arrogance admixed with gross stupidity,glaringly obvious in everything they post.
It stands out on analysis.

The statement makes no sense logically, and the evidence proves the logic as the response from the attorney shows, from the above link.

Refer to these outrageous statements here at ripoff report  regarding Bravenet

Each statement is a lie designed to manipulate Bravenet. "The punishment" is a rip off report for non compliance with their
empty threats and demands. Even the statement they contacted me about the bravenet blurb (pictured above) is a lie.
They've always used this stratgey to effect censor ships. As an example: the hub article, The Malignant Power of
Anonymous defamation - I imagine the same strategy was used as at Bravenet to get it down. This is because the hub froze
the article from ratings for three months before it was finally deleted, they were hammered by EOPC.
They didn't go gently into eopc's good good night. It was the most popular of my hub articles  

The hub editors were however, duped by eopc's finnessed strategy. Barbara has it down to a science. MIchelle
has learned it well, it works.  

 Progressively, they use : pathos, wild allegations and claims, lies - finally, empty legal threats.) A copy of that
article is here - a story in itself: http://garystonepeabody.blogspot.com/2012/08/the-malignant-power-of-anonymous_20.html
The Hub story is a story in itself. Extraordinary.

Their claim they have an active Ic3 case is false. Nor are they working with the FBI (a claim they've always made since 2005 designed to give their blog an air of "officialdom" (verfied by checking their history at archive.org) Their  "release" form creates the same impression they refer to it in their Bravenet attack. It is an outrage, concocted by Ness herself in 2005, a fired file clerk since 1995, on disability in NY under questionable circumsstances (some believe she scammed disability)
 see here:  http://garystonepeabody.blogspot.com/2013/01/eopc-and-social-security-numbers-her.html

 Despite what they say - they will extract any and all identifying information on prosepective targets.) They will also hack every one of their accounts. (see email hacks from my site)

That contract is worthless. It virtually indicts anyone who signs it for violations of privacy laws, HIPAA laws. It also
fails to inform that they will be breaking laws.
When they "say" they  haven't collected social security numbers,they are lying.

When they say they make no money, they are only saying it now, because attention was drawn to it in 2011, in the past they
have had ads on their site, and paypal buttons. (see archive.org) Obviously this is a tax
issue  A fighter (the name they give themselves) won't identify as eopc or a fighter on a tax form. Nice tax dodge. Ness has had a hundred of similar sites with similar ads and donation buttons. Abuse sanctuary  is the site where she names herself, if she declared that income, she didn't declare eopc income, from the other attack sites she has trolls and flame wars where she poses as Katie fairchild, or The Exposer ... long with EOPC these all had ads and pay pal buttons. (see archives)

Thier "case" filed by Scott Powers, after they manipulated him into filing it in 2009, cost him his license for my
answer to it. Their case was dismissed in 2010. I do have an active Ic3 case, and have had, since 2009.

On analysis what you get from these people are lies and nothing but... my Ic3 complaint number:  I0909301848070182

Since Barbara Ness's primary argument is that she is not fighter. Lets review the proof:

When Barbara Ness proudly goes back to the Cassiopeia forum,  where in 2009  she'd deleted her Smith story and
announces she's republished it, the Elaine May Smith fairy tale, she did it in violation of an agreement with my lawyer.
See Ness at Cassiopaea in 2011 - calling herself Purple Haze, just as she did in 2008 And observer Guardians id of Ness.
The rest of the 38 pages are an extraordinary revelation on Ness's character A psychpath.


But on her ID evidence on my page, you should see shes been a former member in 2009 , 2010, 2011, 2011 and 2012.
She's a former member whenever she's asked.

Step wise you should see as proofs: a/ her ip on cassiopaea matches Jdog of datingspsychos id of her by ip and email. (her cassiopaean IP in 2008) b/ 2011 Ips recorded on Cassiopaea servers match her ip as Barbara Camwell in emails to Sandra Brown,and Melissa Kester (much more evidence is on that page and on the Cassiopaea thread.) On my page, notice
Jeff Bulter computer PI emailed fighter and Barbara in 2010 both replied, ips matched. All IPS tracked to East Elmhurst
Corona NY. Mary Mcgrannahan also Id'd Barbara.

Since Ness has taken such an active role in promoting this story all over the internet, and now she takes it to
Malaysian server... She cannot say "I am not responsible for what these people say ." (Jones repeats this party line
on her Rip off report on Bravenet) in fact, Ness reviewed their story (Smith and KLine's) evaluated it, in early 2008 but
did not research it.  Smith and Kline did not write it, Ness did.

Ness claims to be able to discern victim from victimizer. Across an ocean of 3500 miles, Smith and Kline are from Scotland.
She was duped by two sociopaths more skilled than she is.

This is the difficult task of every court in the land. When she attempts it on the internet, holding court online -
she is also rendering judgement, and executing sentence: Character Assassination. An attack by a gang of cyberthugs on every aspect of a persons life.

In 2010 they finally destroyed a civil employment case, Smith forwarded all details to Ness in 2008, and contaminated the case so badly by 2010, it had to be pulled from the courts. This is an attack on Jurisprudence and civil rights. Taken with their censorship tactics their actions become a major concern for everyone. What they did to it, should be of interest to the NY state Attorney general, indeed I've written him...

That event should be reviewed by constitutional lawyers. Not because it was done to me but because it was done at all. What is the potential it will be done by them again and or done by others, see link here: http://garystonepeabody.blogspot.com/2012/09/how-eopc-attacked-my-civil-case-from.html

You can See Elaine May Smith's taunting Auntie Audrey image there on facebook. Ness Smith and Kline, came up
with "Audrey" on soundclick in May of 2010, after their case died...they wanted to revive it, so smith, a scottish woman
I had an affair for one year with, started uploading the most perverse attacks, in recordings  uploaded to soundclick using coded snide smears and digs absolute vileness...

The above named went to Ally Byrd of soundclick to host it. They wanted smith to be falsely accused. She was identified.
and when she was, they moved that filth to facebook. Smith used a false image masked her voice and used symbolism
from our 2007 relationship - attacked me and my wife in those recordings. Ness was right there with her.

The move to facebook was about dominion for EOPC on facebook.Smith was supposed to annoy me there and if I'd complained
they attack my computer, report my complaints. The Auntie Audrey story is here:

More bizzare than Ness's involvement with the Another Hollywood Cockroach blog with Mary Mcgrannahan.
(a scatological smear of Mellisa Kester, created by Ness.)

Ness and Mcgrannahan still haven't complied with a federal order to remove it. The anonymous defamation link
has a link to another hollywood cockroach and a link to the federal order is posted there. The case is also discussed at Cassiopaea.

A blow for anonymous defamation, which Ness doesn't talk about on her eopc blog.

Ness was ordered to turn over her hard drives in that case, and refused. She's currently stiffing two
federal orders. Elaine Smith and Ness, with Auntie AUdrey (named nicked from Mary's Auntie Pestilence
pseudonym, used on Twitter to attack Kester) were trying to manufacture an harassment case at soundclick in the summer of 2010, and aside from the facebook ambitions, it's purpose was to manufacture a stalking case when the
 soundclick trick failed. The involved Ally Byrd of Soundclick Support.  (details from provided links. The Audrey image is stolen from the internet. Smith looks nothing like that.)

When EOPC says says they don't collect indentifying information from people, that could be used form identities...they are lying. Being disinvolved in their stories is another lie. Sitting in judgement of the story is "involvement. Propagation is involvement. Disclaiming responsibility is a Ness delusion. Ness posted their story to datingpsychos.com..
and was indentified by the then site owner Jdog.

 The fact is , Ness is fanatically involved in all of her stories. And in this case, she knows it's a fabrication. Now her so called Victims, those who made up their story in response to my filing a welfare fraud report on them, Smith and Kline -
are fighters themselves. It is they with Michelle Comford Jones who attacked Bravenet, shilled for Barbara Ness, and punished them here, for non compliance. Supreme arrogance by until now, Anonymous thugs.

As far as the move to a unique domain...they can run but they can't hide. The image uploaded says it all. A simple
announcement that they started smearing me again, justifies an attack on a business of working people. Rich, since most
of them are on Government support.

But here's another image that nails it down, as - this is what they really are:

(If that image doesn't display, refer to the video player on my site for their legacy of cybercrime. Malware on eopc. Malware on Smith and Kline's sites. Attacks from Smith's facebook pages, and their hacking history. Michelle Jones identifies herself as a hacker as well. See the Cassiopaea thread from link I've posted. Betsy Ashby posted info on Michelle's hacking skills. )

They have a five year legacy of cybercrime.

Thus their intimation that a forensics expert backs them up, seems as senseless as the notion that a lawyer would draw up a contract for vigilantes. They've already destroyed Powers career, and even tho they imply Michael Roberts s on their side,
it would be suicide for his career to be affiliated. And, I don't think he is.  

More than likely they spoofed him in emails to me. Ness is notorious for spoofing people, but I believe this spoof was done by Michelle Comford Jones.

All legal threats, coming from these militant marauding hookers, should be glibly ignored, their illicit journalistic
brothel has been exposed, It has the intergrity of a slag rag. It should be relegated to the internet's red light district
and Blacklisted. As should Auntie Audrey on facebook My children are there. If the Audrey story is followed
you should see Smith exposed children to that filth.

Listen to her sick mp3 files imported from soundclick:facebook.com/TheAuntieAudrey Tell me any child should be exposed to that filth.
Despite the helper face EOPC , they have the morals of street walkers, and the hacking skills of safecrackers, and the manipulative skills of carnival con men.

Despite their denials, their goal is fame, power and money obtained by "both" hook and crook.

Members should check the headers of spam they receive and geolocate the source of IPS after joining, I'd wager most come from Romanian Spam servers. If something clicks, they should get out of that group and replace their hard drives  change their ips. Get a good hardware firewall, as they are being plundered  without their knowledge. Without a firewall,
it's a simple drop of a reverse access trojan and they are in your network, and they can go where you go, including, into your bank.  

Someone used the analogy that I will now steal: "They pluck a gold coin from behind your ear while picking your pockets." That rhetoric describes the moral legal ethical evolution of all of the above named.

(That is the real EOPC.)
 In short they are all criminals. As guilty as hookers in church. Madam Ness's persistent denials are as pathetic
as her relentless shapeshifting manuevers have always been.

For the Smith Kline story Search: Gary Stone, EOPC, cyberpaths.org, trolls and flame wars.

See what tumbles out. Then read the The malignant power of anonymous defamation again, and then, again.
(links above) It's about Google. Employment. Hr checks google. It's about damaging relations with friends and neighbors coworkers.  It's about endangerment, they contact everyone in your life.  They attack life's blood. They aim to Kill, and they do it as a gang of "very involved" thugs.
I take full responsibility for what I say. Will they sue me? No...they'd loose, they'd be counter sued and I'd win. And they know it -
Gary Stone
17 Calumet St
Peabody Mass 01960

Suggested Readings: Google Doesn't Answer the Phone,
Located on my server. Another article they hate.
Written originally in 2009, it didn't name anyone, now
it does. Part of the reason for Auntie Audrey facebook,
and EOPC's app placed there in June 2011, was to null
the effects of the hub article and the google article.
Plenty of reading material for consumers of EOPC's
pablum. Buyer be ware.
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?