Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #808408

Complaint Review: Geico - San Diego California

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: EmEl — California United States of America
  • Author Not Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • Geico San Diego, California United States of America

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

I'm not going to complain about Geico making me pay my deductible even when they found me "100% not at fault." Instead I'll complain about the semantic games they play to avoid protecting their customers.

My car was hit and, after a way-too-long battle with the other party's insurance (AAA), I decided to use my own. Geico arranged for my repairs, but I expressed concern that my car would not be finished in time to drive it on a trip I'd planned. I asked Geico if, should this happen, they would cover my rental for the entire time. The claims specialist told me she would run the request by her supervisor.  When she returned to the phone, she stated: "we will cover your rental until you're back." I even asked for clarification, and she again repeated it. Geico would pay for my rental car for the duration. I acted accordingly, and rented a car the next day when I checked mine in for repairs.

When I came back from the trip, I received a call from Enterprise asking for payment. I called Geico, where they were surprised to hear I believed Geico would pay for my rental. "No, we're not paying...a rental is not covered under your policy." I discovered that this is true, my policy does not cover rentals. I freely admit that I was not aware of this. Geico claims they notified me of this "several times," but then specifically stated that they would pay for my rental.  It's even in their notes. They have the date and the name of the person who told me. 

Here is Geico's explanation: supposedly, the note left by the claims specialist only says "Told customer OK to stay in rental until back from vacation." They claim this is "too vague" to definitively say that she told me Geico would pay. Apparently I somehow misinterpreted "we will cover your rental until you're back."

Since Geico refuses to acknowledge there may have been some context to the "vague" note entered by their claims specialist (she must have had a reason for entering this noteotherwise, it basically states that Geico was giving me permission to rent a car; why would she note that?), I asked them to give me the last date on which they notified me that my policy did not cover insurance, and then confirm the date on which the vague note was entered. The last reminder was several days prior to their agreement to cover the car.  In other words, the last thing Geico said to me about a rental was that they would pay for it. But it's my word against their bad note. They are effectively calling me a liar.

I've heard that Geico is great until you need them, a sentiment only reinforced by my experience. Not only are they outright dishonest, but they wear down their customers and abuse them until they have no fight left in them. I have spent countless hours and far too much emotional energy disputing Geico's statements. I should not have to defend myself to my own car insurance company, only to be mistreated.
Purchasing Geico insurance is one of the worst decisions Ive ever made.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 12/12/2011 05:48 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/geico/san-diego-california-/geico-sematic-games-san-diego-california-808408. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
1Author
1Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#2 Author of original report

Yep, it's semantic games

AUTHOR: EmEl - (United States of America)

POSTED: Friday, December 16, 2011

"So, basically, they had told you that you didn't have rental coverage earlier but then another employee made a mistake and implied that you did have rental coverage by stating you could keep the rental through your trip?
 
I don't see how that equates to "semantic games they play to avoid protecting their customers" at all."

Well, the semantic games were played in their interpretation of  that vauge note: insofar as the note didnt specifically say "we will pay for the rental," despite this being exactly what the agent told me on the phone, Geico chooses to interpret that they were merely telling me that I could keep the rental through my trip like any one else who rents a car. But not that they were saying they would pay for it.

It's their unwillingness to look at the context of the note that has turned it into a semantic game.

Interestingly, this practiced is utilized time and time again when I call to discuss the matter.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 Consumer Comment

Comment

AUTHOR: Inky - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Thursday, December 15, 2011

"I discovered that this is true, my policy does not cover rentals."

"I asked them to give me the last date on which they notified me that my policy did not cover insurance, and then confirm the date on which the vague note was entered. The last reminder was several days prior to their agreement to cover the car. " - I'm assuming here that you meant to write "rental" not "insurance".

So, basically, they had told you that you didn't have rental coverage earlier but then another employee made a mistake and implied that you did have rental coverage by stating you could keep the rental through your trip?
 
I don't see how that equates to "semantic games they play to avoid protecting their customers" at all.


Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now