SO readers out there,

 

It appears that Dain is finally out of hot air?

After several attempts to try to lie his way out of all of this it appears that  he and J Mark Heldenbrand are going to finally stop kicking snd fighting and let the State Bar finish  their 9 month long investigation into this matter.

Funny, a former employee of IDR recently contacted me and requested that I drop the complaint against J Martk Heldenbrand with the Arizona State Bar

I simply will do no such thing and when the bar completes their work, I will be following through and putting IDR ouyt of its misery, in a court of law.

Then there will certainly be a huge spike in felons out tryong to find nrw jobs and IDR will no longer be able to do to others, what they have done to me.

 

Dain, don't worry you can always get a job at Burger King, if you can squeeze into the polyester. you may finally have a job that you can handle...

 

In the meantime prepare for battle followed by a  judgment and a firstrst class  dissolution of this god forsaken collection agency- your DONE SON !

 

 

Dain I guess some people are as dumb and ignorant as they look.
Sounds like you are having a hard time telling the difference between catpoop and applesauce, there mister.

Number 1  I do not do meth, but I am sure many of the felons at your office do. The story you came up with aboput the trash can and my getting stabbed is a good one too, you have a vivid imagination but are trying to spread false information. Desperate I guess because I keep puling your pants down and giving that big fat fanny a spanking.. Guess it is time to let the world see about your employees criminal records. MANY of them felons....

Number 2 WHat type of drug are you smoking, inhaling or ingesting? I have never had a felony in my life like the MANY people that work for you, including CHuck LaPose who was convicted of forgery. DO not forget about the felons at your office that have discused their problems with me and one in fact that just had his home raided out in Gilbert for wacky tabaccy and some powder? Dain you operate a haven for active and heavy drug users and that is a solid fact.

3. you contradict yourself from my never being associated wiith you to the last email where you suggest that "my services" were in fact being used at IDR. SO whaqt was it? SUcks when you box yourself in a corner with lies.

I wil wait to post comments about proving my case as per the state bar  as of

ALSO lets talk about my bar complaint with The state bar against J  Mark Heldenbrand if anyone wants to verify the case with the stae bar here is the information:

Heldenbrand, State Bar File No. 14-1010

and speak to:

Jessica Oliverson, Legal Secretary

to Shauna R. Miller and Hunter F. Perlmeter

AREA CODE ( SIX ZERO TWO) 340-7278

OR

Jessica.Oliverson@staff.azbar.org

 

SHE WILL TELL YOU WHAT TIME IT IS..... and IT isw what it is.....

And then tell me who is full of it and who is telling the truth. I wont need to file a civil action against your buddy the attorney because the bar will handle al of that for me - particularly if there is fraud involved. And  when the state bar takes a look at your cloud drive, the evidence  will clearly and irrefutabaly  debunk your story with some cold hard facts. ANd then you will be " DONE SON"  so go borrow some more money from your mommies sugar daddy and your brother and keep doing what you are doing running that company straight into the ground.  I don't have to do anything but sit here and watch what is left of IDR  self destruct while under your helm.

 

I will get great pleasure walking into a MC Donalds someday and seeing the enormous amount of  butt crack you will  be displaying in the undersized tight polyester out fit you will be wearing as you and your partner in Crime get a chance to do some real work in your lives instead of preying on the people that you can bully.

 

So,  I wonder how   your clients feel about the fact that your Director of Operations and main person in charge of collections is a supersized ( probably the steroids) felon that was charged with Felony Forgery Charges? I bet they are real excited to know that  he is consistently handling debtor payments and has access to credit card and checking account information.  SOunds like quite the operation of FElons you have working for you.. KInd of like the land of misfits on Rudolph the rednosed raindeer. BUt the red nose is caused by something a little different over at IDR.

 

SO now that you are married and settled down instead of out there running around on your girlfriend that was treating for cancer, perhaps you can  man up enough to realize that once I and the state bar prove that you and your partner in crime did in fact rip me off and in fact have violated several laws that you will be sorry that you ever tried to rip me off. The fee splitting all of it Dain... IF you don't mind looking like a big dummy, then  it will be my pleasure in updating the followers here and letting them know the outcome of the bar investigtsation - you and J MArk Heldenbrand may not be available for comment.

 

 

 

 

Search Results

1.    Stansberry v. J. Mark Heldenbrand, P.C. :: Justia Dockets ...

Doyle Fowler v. Law Office of J. Mark Heldenbrand PC - Justia

05-3656 - Brand v. Law Firm of Heldenbrand Cohen et al

http://htmlimg2.scribdassets.com/4tb9hdu3cw3t68s3/images/1-1cfd2b1663.jpg

Villalobos v. Heldenbrand & Assoc, et al :: Arizona District ...

4:13-cv-00100-CKJ - U.S. Courts

www2.azd.uscourts.gov/azd/.../e51dac432c887a4707257cbc0050bf0a?...

Apr 21, 2014 - United States District Court, District of Arizona. Raquel Martinez v. J. Mark Heldenbrand PC et al 4:13-cv-00100-CKJ .

J. MARK HELDENBRAND

Bar No. 011790; File Nos. 04-0495

Supreme Court Nos. SB-08-0021-D

By Arizona Supreme Court judgment and

order dated Feb. 21, 2008, J. Mark

Heldenbrand, 7737 E. Indian School Rd.,

Scottsdale, AZ 85251, was censured and

assessed the costs and expenses of the disciplinary

proceeding.

Mr. Heldenbrand was retained by a property

management company to sue a defaulting

tenant. The property management company

acted as the agent for the real parties in interest.

When the suit went to court, Mr.

Heldenbrand acted as attorney for both the

property management company and the owners.

The defaulting tenant filed a counterclaim,

Innovative Debt Recovery Inc. - Innovative Debt Recovery Inc. Dain DeFelice J Mark Heldenbrand did not pay me for my sales commissions as promised and wrongfully terminated me.

 

RFC Case Number:	1:2012cv04137
File Date:	Friday, August 17, 2012
Plaintiff:	Jason J. Garcia
Plaintiff Counsel:
Defendant:	J. Mark Heldenbrand, PC
Cause:	15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Court:	New York Eastern District Court

 

14th of Aug, 2009 by   AZ Fraud Buster

J. Mark Heldenbrand doesn't even pay his own bills! Look at the AZ Secretary of State's office for his name. His old corporation was dissolved because of his failure to file corporate minutes. On record is also all the years that show "delinquent" including 2009. Not only is he delinquent in filing Annual Reports, he's failed to pay fees and penalties. He's received a number of disciplinary actions and has had to pay fines for bad behavior. Heldenbrand still pretends he works for Larry H Parker, but Heldenbrand's small office of collection hacks are liars and scam artists who threaten and rip people off without any legal verification of debt. In a word, they are thieves. Report them to the Arizona Attorney General's office, the Federal Trade Commission and the AZ Bar Association. ! Report Spam

Villalobos v. Heldenbrand & Assoc, et al
Arizona District Court, Case No. 2:04-cv-00454-JWS
District Judge John W. Sedwick, presiding
docket://gov.uscourts.azd.2-04-cv-00454 (What is this?)

 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Ashley Brand,

Plaintiff,

vs.

Law Firm of Heldenbrand Cohen; Law

Firm of Heldenbrand & Associates, P.C.;

Mitchell E. Cohen; and J. Mark

Heldenbrand,

Defendants.

))))))))))))))

No. CV 05-3656-PHX-MHM

ORDER

TAMMIE ROBINSON v. INNOVATIVE DEBT RECOVERY, INC. and J. MARK HELDENBRAND, PC,

 

They are even used in examples of Case Law Studies – because of their being sued for FDCPA violations….

4. Act applies to bad check debts, condominium assessment fees, residential rental payments, municipal water and sewer service, and other non-credit consumer obligations - Bass v. Stolper, Koritzinsky, Brewster & Neider, S.C., 111 F.3d 1322 (7th Cir. 1997); FTC v. Check Investors, 502 F.3d 159 (3d Cir. 2007); Charles v. Lundgren & Associates, 119 F.3d 739 (9th Cir. 1997), cert. denied sub nom Checkrite Ltd., Inc. v. Charles, __ U.S. __ (Dec. 15, 1997); Snow v. Jesse L. Riddle, P.C., 143 F.3d 1350 (10th Cir. 1998); Ladick v. Van Gemert, 146 F.3d 1205 (10th Cir. 1998); Romea v. Heiberger & Associates, 163 F.3d 111 (2d Cir. 1998); Brand v. Law Firm of Heldenbrand Cohen, 2006 U.S. Dist. Lexis 6114 (D. Az. 2006); Ryan v. Wexler & Wexler, 113 F.3d 91

And here is Heldenbrand in one of his MANY censures from the state bar:

CENSURES

Name Date Issued Number of Charges in

each Censure

 

Gregory, James T. 11/04/08 1

Gutierrez, Francisco X. 10/29/08 1

Heldenbrand, J. Mark 02/21/08 1

Hersch, Robert M. 03/25/08 1

Hineman, Phillip

 

800notes.com/Phone.aspx/1-602-254-3400

 

whocallsme.com/Phone-Number.aspx/6022543400

 

 

Attorney J. Mark Heldenbrand of Phoenix; repeat offender

 

The state of Arizona presented J. Mark Heldenbrand with a law license in 1973 after he graduated from Arizona State University Law School. 

 

The Arizona State Bar found Mark guilty of the following misconduct.

Mark’s 1^st bite at the Attorney Misfit Apple Tree

 

Failed to communicate with clients

Failed to act with due diligence (slacker)

Failed to communicate with clients

 Failed to properly supervise of non-attorneys in his office

 

As a consequence of his misconduct, the cheerleaders of Attorney Misfits sitting on the Arizona Supreme Court punished Mark by gifting him with a complimentary censure.

 

Mark’s 2^nd bite at the Attorney Misfit Apple Tree

 

In one matter, Mark was hired by a property management company to sue a defaulting tenant. When the suit went to court, Mark acted as attorney for both the property management company and the owners.

 

The defaulting tenant filed a counterclaim, which created a conflict of interest for Mark because representations made to the defaulting party were made by the property management company as agents for the owners, not by the owners directly.

 

Mark failed to disclose the conflict as required and continued to represent both parties.

 

As a consequence of his misconduct, the cheerleaders of Attorney Misfits sitting on the Arizona Supreme Court punished Mark by gifting him with a 2^nd complimentary censure.

 

As we speak (ca. September 2013) Mark practices at 2532 East University Drive in Phoenix, Arizona.

Complaints

1. Ct reported 602-254-3400 as a Collection Agency

Apr 23rd 2014 - 2:22:19pm PDT

This caller is harassing me for no reason, I will turn this number into the fcc.

Report this comment as spam

2. Call The FTC reported J Mark Heldenbrand PC from 602-254-3400 as a Collection Agency

Jan 5th 2012 - 1:45:14pm PST

This seems certain to become a problem. Just received a phone call from them, and I have only had this phone number for a week. My telephone is a pre-paid, "burner" phone, the number has not been given out to anyone, so my name and address are not in any way associated with the number. And since it is a pre-paid number, the caller must be looking for the previous number holder. (As I understand it, pre-paid numbers are not recycled for at least 60 days...) According to what Ive been able to determine from an on line search this company is a debt collector acting under the auspices of an attorneys office. J Mark Heldenbrand, PC. 1616 East Indian School Road Phoenix, AZ 85016 (602) 254-3400. collections, civil litigation, attorney, law firm, lawyer, landlord law, tenant Law Found at: http:www.7mainstreet.combksphoenix-az-85016civil-litigation

google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=46&ved=0CFIQFjAFOCg&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.azcourts.gov%2FPortals%2F36%2F2008_scanned%2FJOandOrders%2FHeldenbrandJO.pdf&ei=QoOKU5fOOYO1yASQ0oD4AQ&usg=AFQjCNFeRibYJvCWU0Bul2tm5eJdzvH5dQ&sig2=6xImseWzVhjNpI57ZZID4Q

Raquel Martinez v. J. Mark Heldenbrand PC et al
4:13-cv-00100-CKJ

 

 

 

To whom it may concern,

 

If in fact any person is interested enough to read the nonsense that Jeff Jackson posts on this website, please allow me to help you understand his motive.

 

Jeff Jackson is disgruntled ex-salesperson that we foolishly entertained the idea of using to promote our services. Unfortunately, what we did not know was that he was hiding an extensive criminal background and years of meth use. As we began working with Mr. Jackson he slowly started to disclose his past to include stories of his selling of drugs and how he was stabbed and thrown into a trash can in a mall parking lot by his druggy buddies left for dead. All of which he disclosed was in his recent past. We also became concerned of his current behavior because of how volatile he was becoming over trivial things.  For these reasons we chose not to utilize his services.   

 

Jeff Jackson is upset and is attacking our company, myself and staff because he somehow believes that has some money coming to him for his limited efforts while we were utilizing his services. If any of this were true, he would have filed some sort of lawsuit against us. It’s been several months and we are still waiting for him to fulfill his threat to do so. However, we all know that Jeff Jackson is just upset because we elected not do business with him and his actions thus far are a clear example of why. Jeff Jackson would rather attempt to smear people and companies on the internet in an attempt to extort money from them. This is why Jeff Jackson spends so much time posting on this website.

 

To Jeff Jackson,

I said it before and I’ll say it again: Jeff, rather than rant on the internet like a spun out raving lunatic, why don’t you come get your justice by filing a lawsuit against us? How about bringing your fight to a courtroom? It would seem as if that would be a much better way to be compensated for your alleged commissions. All The time and effort you put into trying to discredit people should be spent building a case because you continue to look like a fool I have never seen anyone get so angry for so little except people with mental instability. And boy you make a great case for that on this forum.

 

Instead of posting erroneous things about my staff and trying to discredit people, here’s a challenge for you:

 

-       Post something with merit that can substantiate your claims

-       Share a contract with everyone that proves that I owe you anything

-       Post a recording that I ever promised you anything

-       Show some proof of any commissions that are owed to you

 

Can you produce even one small item that would prove or validate your claims? Anything? No?

 

I didn’t think so. 

 

 

 

Ladies and Gentlemen,

 

Please allow me to introduce Chuck LA Pose ( Charles Alexander LA Pose)

 

Innovative Debt Recovery's Director of Operations - Seriously???

11/13/2001	MTD - Motion To Dismiss	11/29/2001	Defendant(3)
NOTE: RULE 12  Charles Alexander Lapose Status: Booked State: AZ Arrest Date: 2012-11-16 0:01 am Booking Facility: Maricopa County Sheriff Office Height: 6'00 Weight: 295 Gender: Male Date of Birth: 1/5/1971 Age at Booking: 41 Age now: 43           Charles Alexander La PoseJr. - (2)   Defendant  M   Hart, Barry   Miles  CR1997-000580-A   Terry Ladon BurtJr. - (3)   Defendant  M   Bond, Brian   Miles  CR1997-000580-B   Clerk Of The Court - (4)   In The Matter Of (IMO)  N/A   To Be Determined         Disposition Information Party Name ARSCode Description Crime Date Disposition Code Disposition Date Charles Alexander La Pose Jr.  13-2002 (F4)  FORGERY  5/9/1995  Pled Guilty As Charged  Pled Guilty As Charged  4/21/1997  Terry Ladon Burt Jr.  13-2002 (F4)  FORGERY  5/8/1995  Dismd Pros Mot  Dismissed By Prosecution Motion  5/23/1997  Terry Ladon Burt Jr.  13-2002 (F4)  FORGERY  5/4/1995  Dismd Pros Mot  Dismissed By Prosecution Motion  5/23/1997    Case Documents Filing Date Description Docket Date Filing Party 1/14/2004  FID - Federal Information Disclaimer - Party (B)  1/28/2004    10/10/2000  OVJ - Order Vacating Judgment - Party (A)  10/10/2000    NOTE: GRANTED VACATE JUDGEMENT/DISMISS CHARGES/GRANTED CIVIL RIGHTS/GRANTED GUN RIGHTS 9/1/2000  AVJ - Application to Vacate Judgment / Dismiss Charges - Party (A)  9/11/2000    NOTE: TO VACATE JUDGEMENT/DISMISS CHARGES/TO RESTORE CIVIL RIGHT/ 8/17/2000  PTP - Petition Early Termination Probation Order - Party (A)  9/20/2000    8/17/2000  ODP - Order of Discharge of Probation - Party (A)  9/22/2000    10/8/1997  DRE - Disposition Report - Party (A)  10/16/1997    8/28/1997  109 - ME: Sentence - Probation - Party (A)  9/2/1997    8/22/1997 9:44:00 AM  JOR - Judgment And Order - Party (A)  8/22/1997 9:44:00 AM    NOTE: This docket was added by the conversion for a judgment 8/22/1997  NOT - Notice - Party (A)  8/25/1997    NOTE: RIGHT TO APPEAL 8/22/1997  PSR - Presentence Report - Party (A)  8/26/1997    7/18/1997  176 - ME: Continuance - Party (A)  7/28/1997    6/16/1997  169 - ME: Sent/Dispo Reset - Party (A)  6/16/1997    6/10/1997  DRE - Disposition Report - Party (B)  6/10/1997    5/23/1997  111 - ME: Dismisal/Per Plea Agreement - Party (B)  5/29/1997    5/8/1997  169 - ME: Sent/Dispo Reset - Party (B)  5/13/1997    4/25/1997  105 - ME: Plea Agreement/Change Of Plea - Party (A)  5/5/1997    4/21/1997  PAG - Plea Agreement - Party (A)  5/2/1997    4/2/1997  106 - ME: Motion To Dismiss Pending - Party (B)  4/4/1997    4/1/1997  064 - ME: Trial Continued/Reset - Party (A)  4/3/1997    3/14/1997  064 - ME: Trial Continued/Reset - Party (B)  3/20/1997    3/3/1997  RQH - Request For Hearing - Party (B)  3/31/1997  Plaintiff (1)   NOTE: RULE 609 3/3/1997  NOT - Notice - Party (B)  4/1/1997  Plaintiff (1)   NOTE: OF DISCOVERY 3/3/1997  ALG - Allegation - Party (B)  4/1/1997  Plaintiff (1)   NOTE: OF OFFENSES COMMITTED WHILE RELEASED FROM CONFINEMENT 3/3/1997  ACO - Allegation of Historical Priors - Party (B)  4/1/1997  Plaintiff (1)   2/12/1997  NOT - Notice - Party (A)  3/26/1997  Plaintiff (1)   NOTE: OF DISCOVERY 2/6/1997  064 - ME: Trial Continued/Reset - Party (B)  2/10/1997    2/5/1997  152 - ME: Not Guilty Plea Arraign - Party (A)  2/6/1997    1/28/1997  152 - ME: Not Guilty Plea Arraign - Party (B)  2/5/1997    1/23/1997  173 - ME: Arraignment Reset - Party (A)  1/30/1997    1/21/1997  INF - Information - Party ()  1/27/1997  Plaintiff (1)   NOTE: CT 1: FORG CL 4 FEL (A ONLY); CT 2-3 FORGERY CL 4 FEL (B ONLY) 1/16/1997  COM - Complaint - Party ()  1/21/1997    NOTE: (A,B); CT 1: FORGERY CL 4 FEL (A); CT 2,3: FORGERY CL 4 FEL (B); DR 95-129086 CR 96-785A,B FE DOC: ON OR BTWN 5-4-95/5-9-95 1/16/1997  BIN - Bindover - Party ()  1/21/1997    NOTE: (A); WPH/ARR: 1-15-97/1-22-97 REL ORD: O/R 12-29-96; DEF ATTY: BARRY HART IA: 12-29-96; TRANSMITTAL CERTIFICATION 1/16/1997  BIN - Bindover - Party ()  1/21/1997    NOTE: (B)_; WPH/ARR: 1-15-97/1-23-97 REL ORD: BOND $1200; DEF ATTY: GEORGE GAZIANO IA: 1-15-97; TRANSMITTAL CERTIFICATION--------------------------BEGIN SUPERIOR CT PLEADINGS---------------------------   AND « Return to search results Criminal Court Case Information - Case History Case Information Case Type: Criminal  Location:  Downtown     Party Information Party Name - Number Relationship Sex Attorney Judge Case # State Of Arizona - (1)   Plaintiff  N/A   Hernandez, Rachel       Charles Alexander La PoseJr. - (2)   Defendant  M   Hart, Barry   Miles  CR1997-000580-A   Terry Ladon BurtJr. - (3)   Defendant  M   Bond, Brian   Miles  CR1997-000580-B   Clerk Of The Court - (4)   In The Matter Of (IMO)  N/A   To Be Determined         Disposition Information Party Name ARSCode Description Crime Date Disposition Code Disposition Date Charles Alexander La Pose Jr.  13-2002 (F4)  FORGERY  5/9/1995  Pled Guilty As Charged  Pled Guilty As Charged  4/21/1997  Terry Ladon Burt Jr.  13-2002 (F4)  FORGERY  5/8/1995  Dismd Pros Mot  Dismissed By Prosecution Motion  5/23/1997  Terry Ladon Burt Jr.  13-2002 (F4)  FORGERY  5/4/1995  Dismd Pros Mot  Dismissed By Prosecution Motion  5/23/1997    Case Documents Filing Date Description Docket Date Filing Party 1/14/2004  FID - Federal Information Disclaimer - Party (B)  1/28/2004    10/10/2000  OVJ - Order Vacating Judgment - Party (A)  10/10/2000    NOTE: GRANTED VACATE JUDGEMENT/DISMISS CHARGES/GRANTED CIVIL RIGHTS/GRANTED GUN RIGHTS 9/1/2000  AVJ - Application to Vacate Judgment / Dismiss Charges - Party (A)  9/11/2000    NOTE: TO VACATE JUDGEMENT/DISMISS CHARGES/TO RESTORE CIVIL RIGHT/ 8/17/2000  PTP - Petition Early Termination Probation Order - Party (A)  9/20/2000    8/17/2000  ODP - Order of Discharge of Probation - Party (A)  9/22/2000    10/8/1997  DRE - Disposition Report - Party (A)  10/16/1997    8/28/1997  109 - ME: Sentence - Probation - Party (A)  9/2/1997    8/22/1997 9:44:00 AM  JOR - Judgment And Order - Party (A)  8/22/1997 9:44:00 AM    NOTE: This docket was added by the conversion for a judgment 8/22/1997  NOT - Notice - Party (A)  8/25/1997    NOTE: RIGHT TO APPEAL 8/22/1997  PSR - Presentence Report - Party (A)  8/26/1997    7/18/1997  176 - ME: Continuance - Party (A)  7/28/1997    6/16/1997  169 - ME: Sent/Dispo Reset - Party (A)  6/16/1997    6/10/1997  DRE - Disposition Report - Party (B)  6/10/1997    5/23/1997  111 - ME: Dismisal/Per Plea Agreement - Party (B)  5/29/1997    5/8/1997  169 - ME: Sent/Dispo Reset - Party (B)  5/13/1997    4/25/1997  105 - ME: Plea Agreement/Change Of Plea - Party (A)  5/5/1997    4/21/1997  PAG - Plea Agreement - Party (A)  5/2/1997    4/2/1997  106 - ME: Motion To Dismiss Pending - Party (B)  4/4/1997    4/1/1997  064 - ME: Trial Continued/Reset - Party (A)  4/3/1997    3/14/1997  064 - ME: Trial Continued/Reset - Party (B)  3/20/1997    3/3/1997  RQH - Request For Hearing - Party (B)  3/31/1997  Plaintiff (1)   NOTE: RULE 609 3/3/1997  NOT - Notice - Party (B)  4/1/1997  Plaintiff (1)   NOTE: OF DISCOVERY 3/3/1997  ALG - Allegation - Party (B)  4/1/1997  Plaintiff (1)   NOTE: OF OFFENSES COMMITTED WHILE RELEASED FROM CONFINEMENT 3/3/1997  ACO - Allegation of Historical Priors - Party (B)  4/1/1997  Plaintiff (1)   2/12/1997  NOT - Notice - Party (A)  3/26/1997  Plaintiff (1)   NOTE: OF DISCOVERY 2/6/1997  064 - ME: Trial Continued/Reset - Party (B)  2/10/1997    2/5/1997  152 - ME: Not Guilty Plea Arraign - Party (A)  2/6/1997    1/28/1997  152 - ME: Not Guilty Plea Arraign - Party (B)  2/5/1997    1/23/1997  173 - ME: Arraignment Reset - Party (A)  1/30/1997    1/21/1997  INF - Information - Party ()  1/27/1997  Plaintiff (1)   NOTE: CT 1: FORG CL 4 FEL (A ONLY); CT 2-3 FORGERY CL 4 FEL (B ONLY) 1/16/1997  COM - Complaint - Party ()  1/21/1997    NOTE: (A,B); CT 1: FORGERY CL 4 FEL (A); CT 2,3: FORGERY CL 4 FEL (B); DR 95-129086 CR 96-785A,B FE DOC: ON OR BTWN 5-4-95/5-9-95 1/16/1997  BIN - Bindover - Party ()  1/21/1997    NOTE: (A); WPH/ARR: 1-15-97/1-22-97 REL ORD: O/R 12-29-96; DEF ATTY: BARRY HART IA: 12-29-96; TRANSMITTAL CERTIFICATION 1/16/1997  BIN - Bindover - Party ()  1/21/1997    NOTE: (B)_; WPH/ARR: 1-15-97/1-23-97 REL ORD: BOND $1200; DEF ATTY: GEORGE GAZIANO IA: 1-15-97; TRANSMITTAL CERTIFICATION--------------------------BEGIN SUPERIOR CT PLEADINGS---------------------------   And a great example of a collector calling another person a “ debtor”   « Return to search results Civil Court Case Information - Case History Case Information Case Number: CV2001-017532 Judge: Cunanan, David File Date: 10/9/2001 Location: Southeast Case Type: Civil     Party Information Party Name Relationship Sex Attorney The Roomstores Of Phoenix Ll   Plaintiff  None  Brian Mueller  Guardian Products Inc   Defendant  None  Mark Wesbrooks  Chuck Lapose   Defendant  Male  Pro Per  Kathleen Lapose   Defendant  Female  Pro Per    Case Documents Filing Date Description Docket Date Filing Party 5/10/2007  ODI - Order Of Dismissal  5/15/2007    NOTE: WITHOUT PREJUDICE  5/8/2007  019 - ME: Ruling  5/8/2007    4/26/2007  RES - Response  4/30/2007    NOTE: TO MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION FOR GRANTING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO DISMISS  4/18/2007  906 - ME: Response/Reply Times Set  4/18/2007    4/17/2007  MFR - Motion For Reconsideration  4/20/2007    NOTE: OF ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS  4/9/2007  MFR - Motion For Reconsideration  5/17/2007    NOTE: OF ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS  4/2/2007  NOT - Notice  4/4/2007    NOTE: OF LODGING FORM OF ORDER OF DISMISSAL  3/29/2007  042 - ME: Case Dismissed - Full  3/29/2007    2/7/2007  REL - Reply  2/12/2007    NOTE: IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS  1/29/2007  RES - Response  2/16/2007    NOTE: TO MOTION TO DISMISS  1/19/2007  029 - ME: Status Conference  1/19/2007    1/16/2007  MTD - Motion To Dismiss  1/19/2007    NOTE: WITHOUT PREJUDICE  1/16/2007  STA - Statement  1/19/2007    NOTE: DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S PROPOSED JOINT PRETRIAL  1/8/2007  NSD - Notice of Service Re: 26.1 Disclosure  1/12/2007    NOTE: PLAINTIFFS' INITIAL  8/8/2006  028 - ME: Status Conference Set  8/8/2006    7/26/2006  003 - ME: Hearing Reset  7/26/2006    6/16/2006  028 - ME: Status Conference Set  6/16/2006    6/2/2006  NOB - Notice Of Filing Bankruptcy  6/7/2006    5/16/2006  MSE - Motion To Set & Cert/Readiness  5/31/2006    3/19/2002  311 - ME: 150 Day Minute Entry  3/19/2002    2/19/2002  ANS - Answer  2/22/2002  Defendant(2)   NOTE: AND COUNTERCLAIM  12/4/2001  ODI - Order Of Dismissal  12/28/2001  Plaintiff(1)   NOTE: AND SUBSTITUTE PROPER DEF/ WITH PREJUDICE AGAINST DEF CHUCK LAPOSE AND KATHLEEN; LAPOSE DBA GUARDIAN SOUTHWEST INC  11/27/2001  SFD - Stipulation For Dismissal  12/11/2001  Plaintiff(1)   NOTE: AND SUBSTITUTE PROPER DEF  11/19/2001  NOT - Notice  12/5/2001  Defendant(2)   NOTE: OF REMOVAL TO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WITH REQUEST FOR REFERRAL TO THE; UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
11/13/2001	NOB - Notice Of Filing Bankruptcy	11/29/2001	Defendant(3)
NOTE: SUGGESION OF BANKRUPTCY/ FILING AUTOMATIC STAY AND CO-DEBTOR STAY
10/25/2001	AFS - Affidavit Of Service	10/26/2001	Plaintiff(1)
NOTE: P3 SERVED 10-22-01
10/25/2001	AFS - Affidavit Of Service	10/26/2001	Plaintiff(1)
NOTE: P4 SERVED 10-22-01
10/25/2001	AFS - Affidavit Of Service	10/26/2001	Plaintiff(1)
NOTE: P2 SERVED 10-22-01
10/9/2001	COM - Complaint	10/15/2001	Plaintiff(1)
10/9/2001	CCN - Cert Arbitration - Not Subject	10/15/2001	Plaintiff(1)

 

Case Calendar
Date	Time	Event
7/25/2006	9:00	Pre-Trial Conference
8/1/2006	8:30	Status Conference
1/17/2007	8:45	Status Conference

 

 

Here is his buddy and former business partner

(courtesy of azcentral.com)
by Elias C. Arnold
The Arizona Republic
Nov. 7, 2007 01:57 PM

A 48-year-old Buckeye mortgage broker and president of the Arizona Association of Mortgage Brokers was arrested Tuesday on suspicion of sexually assaulting a woman, police said.

The incident occurred nearly two years ago, but the case against Stanley Lund required extensive investigation with “multiple interviews and a lengthy analysis of forensic evidence,” Buckeye officials said in a written statement.

Lund, owner of Peoria-based Lund Mortgage, assaulted a 35-year-old woman on Dec. 11, 2005, at his Verrado home in the 20800 block of West Lost Creek Drive, police said.

Lund was arrested at his home Tuesday morningon suspicion of one count of sexual assault, a felony. The circumstances of the alleged assault were not immediately available.

Read more at http://thedirty.com/2007/11/mortgage-brokers-leader-accused-of-sexual-assault/#IeflxShFAEKS34AD.99

 

 

Here are some comments online about what happened – guess Chuck and his wife may have been doing some blow and decided to play “let’s have a swinger party” but I guess the other gal was the only one that objected. ( strongly objected I am quite confident… Ish - J that makes me sick  ) interesting…

 

Here are some of the online postings about this matter. GO to http://thedirty.com/2007/11/mortgage-brokers-leader-accused-of-sexual-assault/  to see all 44 comments

 

 

 

YIKES –

 

• · 

Reply

Lucky not to go November 19, 2007 at 6:26 PM

I urge you to read the p0lice report. The victim called the police immediately after being found one mile away from the home by a stranger. She was nude in 39 degree weather.She was brusied and said she had been drugged and raped and went right to the ER. What more do you want from a victim? When being questioned by the detective his response was What were swingers maybe her kicking and saying no should have been a hint. Get a clue! If you think he’s such a great guy Christmas is coming send your wife to the party. If your swingers you could both go.

Read more at http://thedirty.com/2007/11/mortgage-brokers-leader-accused-of-sexual-assault/#IeflxShFAEKS34AD.99

 

 

 

Reply

charles November 14, 2007 at 2:49 PM

I just don’t see why dumb bitches feel the need to accuse innocent men with sex charges from 2 years ago to ruin their reputation and get money…let alone invole their family that has nothing to do with the matter. All charges are dropped so leave them alone.

Read more at http://thedirty.com/2007/11/mortgage-brokers-leader-accused-of-sexual-assault/#IeflxShFAEKS34AD.99

 

 

 

 

• · 

 

Reply

Tim Lund June 4, 2014 at 1:18 PM

No they did not turn there backs on my brother. Like a lot of you did. Everything was drop and the city paid him for there wrong doing.

 

 

vote

Reply

Not So Fast November 12, 2007 at 2:07 PM

Birdie says:

Both couples were out partying had a good thought it would be cute to switch partners (SWING) and after a few drinks and even more blow the fix was in… After it went down one of the party goers got cold feet… And here we are ! this dudes life is F&cked because someone felt ashsamed after the fact.

Guy was a dirty p***k but not a rapist just in to having a really good time.

 

Reply

Not So Fast November 12, 2007 at 2:07 PM

Birdie says:

Both couples were out partying had a good thought it would be cute to switch partners (SWING) and after a few drinks and even more blow the fix was in… After it went down one of the party goers got cold feet… And here we are ! this dudes life is F&cked because someone felt ashsamed after the fact.

Guy was a dirty p***k but not a rapist just in to having a really good time.

 

 

vote

Reply

michelle November 12, 2007 at 3:31 PM

Hey you asswholes, ever heard of innocent until proven guilty. Listen to the news there was no rape involved. Don’t be so quick to assume. No one knows what happend but them. Even if the lying b***h told someone else who know if she is credable. People lie about this s**t all the time. You alway’s see stuff like this in papers and all over the news. It is peope like her that make it hard for the real victems. She is not a real victem she is just a dumb a*s who wants attention and like the last guy said ” is just ashsamed for what she did ” Oh ya if before you call someone you don’t know a dirty p***k why don’t you take a long look in the mirror. I’m sure you’ll see another one right in front of you. “lucky not to go you don’t know s**t”

 

 

vote

Reply

Not So Fast November 12, 2007 at 5:26 PM

I’ll stand by my dirty p***k statment!

Many in the business knows this is true.

He is dirty in the manner he speaks in many situations.

And michelle its not like no one knows his daughter does some questionable posing and post it all over her myspace (apple does not fall far from the tree)

Read more at http://thedirty.com/2007/11/mortgage-brokers-leader-accused-of-sexual-assault/#IeflxShFAEKS34AD.99

 

Read more at http://thedirty.com/2007/11/mortgage-brokers-leader-accused-of-sexual-assault/#IeflxShFAEKS34AD.99

 

Reply

charles November 14, 2007 at 2:49 PM

I just don’t see why dumb bitches feel the need to accuse innocent men with sex charges from 2 years ago to ruin their reputation and get money…let alone invole their family that has nothing to do with the matter. All charges are dropped so leave them alone.

 

 

vote

Reply

don November 17, 2007 at 8:05 AM

HA HA FAT STAN LUND!!! BYE BYE MY GAY LITTLE PORSCHE, BY BY MY MORTGAGE COMPANY, BYE BYE MY WIFE, AND # 1 BYE BYE PRESIDENT OF AZ MORTGAGE BROKERS!!! HAVE FUN LOOKING FOR A NEW JOB. LOOKS LIKE YOU AND BARRY BONDS WILL BE IN THE SAME SITUATION!

 

 

vote

Reply

Tim Lund June 4, 2014 at 1:20 PM

f**k you Don like to meet up with u some day take this add stick it up your a*s.

Read more at http://thedirty.com/2007/11/mortgage-brokers-leader-accused-of-sexual-assault/#IeflxShFAEKS34AD.99

 

1.  

Reply

Amie November 26, 2007 at 2:50 PM

The Lund’s and the LaPose’s know what they did and God knows the truth!I can understand why his family rather blame the vitim instead of him. They have hurt the victims family and friends and their own.Just because it’s easier to blame her doesn’t make it right.This is the reason it is so difficult for victims to find the courage to fight for justice.You should all look for the real facts in the case and you should be ashamed of the horrible things you are saying about the victim.Your ignorance is not a good excuse!P.S. this is a criminal investigation the victim doesn’t make a dime!

 

 

vote

Reply

Amie November 27, 2007 at 10:55 AM

Hey, Charles does your last name happen to be LaPose. If it is you must be stressed, your about to be arrested!Ha!Ha! You thought you were going to get away with it to. I hope you and Stan have a Merry Christmas! Might want to be on your best behavior at any Christmas parties!

 

 

vote

Reply

Hugh Jass November 28, 2007 at 12:25 PM

Lets face it, the police are not going to prusuit a case for two years if there is not really good evidence against the Lundinator. He is going to get his just deserts. Plus, he is a major league blow hard and was primed for a fall like this. The higher the profile the further the drop.

 

 

vote

Reply

bad press December 4, 2007 at 7:44 AM

Don’t you people have anything better to do? Wait for the trial before you convict the guy or condem the girl. This is bad for the community and bad for lenders / brokers everywhere.

 

 

vote

Reply

not guilty December 7, 2007 at 11:32 PM

I don’t think there will be a trial bad press

 

 

vote

Reply

Joe D December 8, 2007 at 4:27 PM

The guy looks like his Father and Mother were Brother and Sister, typical for Arizona White Tras

 

 

vote

Reply

what a joke May 22, 2008 at 5:05 PM

so this bi*ch goes to a party and thrashes her husband who is a home the whole night babysitting while wife is out whoring it up. so from what i hear this is not her first attempt at bringing someone down, she has tried this before and to no avail nothing. i guess she is trying to prove something to her hubby about her past. talk about poor excuse this woman is a nut job and needs help. she could be a threat to society and her children.

 

 

vote

Reply

Michelle July 3, 2008 at 7:19 AM

Hey, What a joke, you have some pretty interesting info. Why don’t you share.Where did you hear she has done this before is there any proof,cases filed, reports etc. that we can all read about or are you just trying to sound important? How do you know her husband was at home with the kids that wasn’t in the news.How are you so confident that she is lying where you there? Makes me think you are directly involved. I wonder if your a pervert!Please enlighten us all with your wisdom!

 

 

vote

Reply

Michelle says July 3, 2008 at 7:25 AM

Hey, What a joke those are some interesting comments.Why don’t you share you info. are there any case files , reports, etc. of her donig this before that we can all read about? Or are you just trying to sound important.How do you know where her husband was that info was’nt in the news?Enlighten us with your wisdom!

 

 

vote

Reply

Michelle July 3, 2008 at 7:26 AM

That’s alot of money Stan’s trying to get.

 

 

vote

Reply

just a note July 10, 2008 at 2:39 PM

so I hear this woman involved in considered a total joke of the community.

 

 

vote

Reply

Leave her alone... July 11, 2008 at 4:40 PM

It’s funny because after over 2 years, you people are still talking about something you know nothing about. The victim has been working diligently with the DA and police department on this case ever since the incident happened. There IS evidence, substantial evidence in this case or the police would not have made an arrest. There are witnesses and dna evidence as well as physical evidence from the scene. The victim is not a joke in this community, she has NEVER made any other claims in the past and wants to move on with her life. This ordeal has damaged she and her families well being. Stan will pay for what he’s done… whether it’s here on Earth or on judgment day.

 

 

vote

Reply

you're a fool July 13, 2008 at 6:44 PM

You have no idea what you are even talking about, as it was stated in th papers no charges were ever filed, check your facts. Proof positive there is nothing and they have nothing.

 

 

vote

Reply

Proof Positive July 14, 2008 at 9:12 PM

THERE IS ALL KINDS OF PROOF IT WILL BE POITIVE.HE’S GUILTY!!!!

 

 

vote

Reply

WHO"S THE FOOL July 14, 2008 at 9:24 PM

The investigation is still open it said in the paper from the MARICPOIA COUNTY ATTORNEY’s OFFICE.Maybe somebody has a comprehension problem. Don’t be so ignorant the reality is sexual assault cases are one of the hardest to prove.His DNA can be on her and all the guy has to say is she wanted it and she likes it rough. IT is a numbers game for the DA since he is elected to office he wants cases that our a guarenteed win. SO when he runs again all you see our his wins he appears so successful.Don’t be so quick to judge the victim. There is no vaild info. that the victim has questionable character.Stan on the other hand in his statement he said he was a swinger.He thought that was what she wanted.There’s some questionable character for ya!

 

 

vote

Reply

Anonymous October 11, 2011 at 12:14 PM

what ever happened with this case?

 

 

vote

Reply

Hdjdk January 25, 2012 at 7:33 PM

I know the woman invilved and she was indeed raped by this man and he should die slow and burn in hell for what he did..

 

 

vote

Reply

Anonymous February 21, 2012 at 10:29 AM

Ask the town of Buckeye how the case went. They actually paid Lund in the 5 figure range for wrongful arrest and dropped all charges. That’s tax payers money from the city of Buckeye.

 

 

vote

Reply

Will P February 27, 2014 at 10:21 AM

Stan T Lund,
I one of the most honest people with the highest level of integrity that I have been fortunate to be acquainted with. This hog wash is pure nonsense. Stan has no need to assault any women and the fact is, it is he who needs to protect himself from these type of opportunistic women that pursue a man like Stan T Lund,
Sincerely
Will P

 

 

vote

Reply

Tim Lund June 4, 2014 at 1:22 PM

Thanks Will…

 

 

vote

Reply

Tim Lund June 4, 2014 at 1:22 PM

thanks Will

 

Whats a matter Dain,

I guess when it comes to putting your money where your mouth is things become so quiet you can hear a pin drop.

 The question was "did you want me to compare your staffs criminal record with mine?" I can post everboidy's online if you want - Just like Mark and you tried to do about me with the bar and such. Particularly over the last 10 years? What in the world happened with CHuck Lapose and his partner at some Xmas party? his wife and he wanted to do a what? WOW his partner got into a little trouble there and accordong to a few people online Chuck might have been involved too? and his record along with the rest of your crew should be enough to scare away all of the clients that you do business with- not just the Federal Credit Unions...

AND I thought you stated confidently that the AZ State BAr is not listening? Seriously DAin??  Yeah how true is that, make sure you report the outcome of that when you come back and announce the outcome of all of this... Keep dreaming Dain. The answer from your buddy suggest that the bar get a chance to look into your cloud drive and if that happens - been real man have a nice trip.. See you next fall.. Because Everybody and their brother know about the fee splitting. ALl ogf your clients do I am sure. Let's see if the bar interviews them and lets see if they cover for you. snicker... Then you guys can also explaint to the bar how I hung around for a few days" and magically sent out thousands of emails back and forth and calls on the cloud drive - now I am a liar huh???

Please come back and announce that too? I even collected a bunch of money while I was there to have you guys try to stiff me.. The word key word is "try" because you may think that yu got away with it..

I guess you are that stupid huh? You should pay me and keep paying me for the 2 year period that was promised or things are really going to get embarrassing for you Dain.

 1. The bar is still not complete with their investigation and  I am asking them to obtain records from your cloud drive that will set the record straight. Once those records are obtained by the bar we will see who is running their big mouth and also lying... If they are not able to obtain those records my attorney suggested that he will definitely subpoena that information. According to the bar, they have enough information already to allow them to complete the investigation into your buddy. Remember, after you stated that I was never associated in anyway with IDR and the law firm, I proceeded to provide the bar with over 40 contracts that I sent out on behalf of both of you and that is irrefutable proof. The fee splitting everything is about to come to light Dain, so be sure to come back to this forum and announce the outcome. Once your buddy is inelligible to practice law anymore and the proof comes to light about how you really did steal my clients and not pay me, willl want to be sure and catch the update you provide this forum  about the outcome,like you promised you would do.

Here is another interesting fact - Your buddy  has had over 31 complaints filed against him now. I am complaint numbers 30 and 31. ANd if he continues to commit more violative conduct , there will be more.

2.since the bar has confirmed that they already have enough information provided  to them by me for the investigation, then I may need to have my attorney subpoena those records from your cloud drive and lets see how you can explain all of this in court and under oath. Then you are not only going to be eating your untruthfuls statements but you will also have a bigger problem on your hand, I may not only be pursuing this as a civil matter and attempt to go after you both for fraud.

3. After your buddy is inelligible to practice lawe anymore and I have obtained all of the evidence I need  from your cloud drive,then after my attorney calls all of your clients and does his investigation we should be set for litigation , and then  we will get this matter resolved.

  I am hoping that you will not make yourself out to be a liar again , and come back to this forum and provide all with an update -just as you promised and tell the world then how I am a liar and trying to wreck your reputation? How can I wreck your reputation? the affair that YOU told ne about has been verified with several of your staff - some that have met with me on numerous occassions since you wrongfully terminated me and then failed to pay me. You may want to not be too fast in tooting your horn, particualrly after the several employees that confirmed the story will be brought up on the stand. Let's see if they will perjur themselves and lie for you then. I bet you will not be too excited when you know how much meaningful information that they have priovided me about you, your buddy and IDR. I have had several discussions with some of your staff that think it is funny how that I am standing up to you My attormey has all of this information and lets see if they will lie on the stand for you. I doubt it, they really did not have many good things to say about you. you say no one at IDR will confirm the truth about your affair, well Dain, they already have. I have also had sit down discussions with a few of your staff that requested to meet with me, after you wrongfully terminated me. ANd boy you are not as well liked as you may think by your staff.

I think the problem here is that you are having a hard time telling the truth. FIrst you said I never was associated with IDR / Heldenbrand Law and I guess the 30 plus clients that I signed up with your company are going to ie for you too? you must really think that people think that much about you that they would lie in court for you?

Then you said I was providing wrongful information about your affair that you had with your wife while engaged to another employee? How do you figure that? you were the first person to tell/ brag to me all about it, and then it was confirmed with over 4 of your current staff. SO lets see how this all plays out and how the clients that you stole from me and  your other clients like being questioned and recorded by my attorney. I guess we will see who is lying and running their big mouth then, huh? This is what happens Dain when you steal from someone that trusted you and worked hard for you. It is only going to get worse Dain- you posted false statements about my " criminal' record, but I have not had anything more than a traffic ticket in the last 7 years.Do you know that there are over 3 self admitted Felons in your office that  discussed their cases/ charges with me  that you currently employ and will gladly have my attorney compare my record with your staff's anytime. Lets start with your attorney/ partners first question that he asked me.

" Jeff you look familiar- have you ever been out at the tents" ( Jail) - of course I haven't but he certainly has.....

And if you would really like, I can make you eat your words and post the records of your staff. Your partner, Chuck, Christian, Oscar, the list continues.. We will see what and how many charges these guys have had in the last 7 years as a comparison.

Wouldn't it be easier than lying and putting yourself, partner, staff, family, all through this, to just tell the truth and pay me what you owe me? If this continues and my attorney starts interviewing ALL of your clients, how many of these Federal Credit Unions are going to want to endure this with you? YOU are the one causing yourself damage by simply not manning up and doing the right thing. Your buddy is already in a world of hurt and since the investigation is already ongoing now for the last 4 months, I guess some people are listening to me, huh?

So if you do not mind allowing the truth to come out in court, then it is OK with me too. I want paid and you took advanatage of me while I am sick and trying to provide for my family including 4 year old son. So be prepared for this to really get to the nitty gritty.

I dont mind and if there is one thing I hate in this world are big fat liars, so lets see who the liar really is here. The clients I signed up will not lie for you nor will many of your staff. I have provided my attorney with the names of your staff so he will find out who is lying and who is not. Then you will be sorry that you ever decided to screw me over.

 

 

 

 

 

What are you waiting for?? Let's go! Rather than run your big mouth about all the things you know NOTHING about, take me to court. File your lawsuit Jeff! Take your best shot. You've got nothing. That's why all you do is run your mouth. If you had something you could get from me you would be focused on that instead of trying to destroy peoples reputations with all your nonsense. Everything you've attempted to do so far has gotten you nowhere. Instead of talking the talk, start walking the walk Jeff. You know excactly why you were asked to leave the premisses of our building that day and your fragile little ego couldn't take it and now all this trash talking. This is all you got isn't it? Talk is cheap Jeff, which is the only thing you can afford. So get on with it! I've been listening to your threats to sue me long enough. Bring it on and let a judge decide what you are due that you haven't already been over paid for. No more talk Jeff, JUST DO IT.

 

"Oh Jeff, It is truly sad to watch a person like you so desperate to attempt ruin someone’s reputation."

Hey Dain-  You are doing a good job of it all by your lonseome and here is why:

Not much of anything you have posted is the truth and I can prove that. Besides you ought to worry about the criminal records of the people that you employ - many of them Felons - cant say that about me Dain. I can prove this and will if you would like..... I can post public records on this forum - if you would really like? I wil start with your top guns and DOO's records and  that will be a laugh. And I will throw in J Mark Heldenbrands 8) Yikes he has been to the tents yeah? that was from his ears to my lips - like everything else I am about to post that will put your story to shame.

Please do not continue with your non-sense and just pay me - because I will post this stuff and you will be eating your words. You would have been better off just paying me like you were supposed too. SO if you want this to continue then " I'M Your Huckleberry" let me know and starting with Chuck Lapose and then the collectors I will start showing the world how full of it you are....

Plus what does any of that have to do with you and the attorney that you are business partners with J MARK HELDENBRAND not paying me for the work that was done. ANYONE reading I ask that you verify this non-sense with The Arizona State Bar ACAP Unit and ask them. Ask About the attorneys history and askj about the complaint that is in the works that I filed. Ask them where we are in the investigation etc. :) :) :) :) Then lets see who is full of it here>>> :):):)

Funny about Dain telling me that I am spreading fale rumors about him when in fact it was DAIN that bragged to me in his office about the the deal with his wife/ and correct ex fiance. DId you think she was going to hang around and still call you her Fiance after what happened ?? Funny again.

And when you proudly come back to this forum to announce the outcome remember the part about what happened to your buddy J Mark Heldenbrand. Also, be prepared to square off with me in court about the money that I am owed.

SO I guess if the story about you cheating on your fiance with your now wife is a lie- then that must make you a liar? your the one who told me about it- were you lying and bragging about something like that and it didn't happen?? Whoa thats really sick man....

Oh Jeff, It is truly sad to watch a person like you so desperate to attempt ruin someone’s reputation. Throwing lies around the internet about my personal life and stating things that you can't validate in any way. You are truly pathetic. The problem with your statements is that not a single soul with validate your claims not even my "ex fiancé". In fact, she and my wife will be filing an injunction for harassment against you should you email either one of them again. Both women feel threatened by you because of the disgusting emails you have already sent to them.

All of this will play itself out as it should and I will gladly share the outcome here on this website for the readers to see. You will be exposed for the person you are. Try working for a living. Or perhaps your criminal background record prevents you from that? Something I CAN PROVE. 

Dain,

 

Not only does your rebuttral not address the real issues . But it also is more than that - it is a big fat lie.

The affair that you had on your fiance with your new blushing bride is beyond proven - she sounds like the kind of gal you definitely do not want to take home to Mom.....  and was brought forth only after you bragged to me  about it in your office . EVERYBODY at IDR knows you had an affair with your wife brfore you married her- heck you told me how bad you felt about it-  your fiance was going thru Chemo then you have an affair with the then Sales Rep - now wife. The  sickest part about that accordong to several people in that office was thay your fiance was battling cabcer or had just beat cancer when you are out sleeping with the then sales rep. And how you trated her throughout that time and afterwards. Dain- IF you think that your affair was secret arounf the office - think again - I talked to about 5 peolle that brought it to MTR atenntion so I guess it is not a lie then HUH?

 

For the record and I can list all thirty plus  of them - there weere over 30 companies that signed collection contracts with IDR because solely of me during my 80+ days that I worked there, of course being promised that I would be padi commissions for 2 years/ It is illegal to have someone come to your business and work and not pay them and with mno signed contract and since I can prove without a resonable doubt that I did in fact work there- your story makes zero sense, does not cover the true complaint- wqhy I worked there and was not paid, and you cannot twust the truth and have it make an logical sense. 

 

Lets talk about your business partner J Mark Heldenbrand- All I can say about it is the bar is derfinitely listening and he now has his offical 29th lodged bar complaint- and this mat be his last hoorah. Go to thew state bar website and see for your self www.azbar.org    type in heldenrtand on the last name and hit search - you will see that he has been on probation from the bar in the past fewe censures( reprimands) from the bar. if you contact the state bar and ask for a detailed history on J Mark Heldenbrandes record - he has has a total of 29 bar complaints filefd against him during his tenure as an attorney He is probably on hios way to becoming a fry cook at BurgerKing or the like.

 

Dain you best honor my commissions or the next post will probably include a listing in Superior Court naming IDR as a defendant/ I doubt that would be the first time.....

As far as you suiong me for what you not paying me? if anyone would like validation of my report please contact me at (((redacted))) I haVE ALL OF THE PROOF YOU WILL NEED TO SHOW THIS COMPANY HAD ME WORK THERE AND DID NOT PAY ME WHAT THEY PROMISED THEY WOULD PAY ME- THAT IS THE COMPLAINT AND YOU MAY WANT TO STICK WITH THE ISSUES.

 

I do not mind going back and Forth wqith you Mr. De Felice - as everytime somewone adds to this link this post gains morew and more traction on Google- hence letting the worl know what really has happened here.

Jeff Jackson does not represent Innovative Debt Recovery, Inc. in anyway. He was considered for independent sales referrals and was never contracted with our company. After several interactions with Jeff Jackson we began to realize that he was not a good representation for our company for many reasons.

If Jeff Jackson can produce a contract outlining the obligations that Innovative Debt Recovery, Inc. owes him, we will be more than happy to honor a contract; however this will never happen because a contract doesn't exist. Jeff Jackson's volatile attitude and background is why he has no contract with our company. 

Also, we have discovered that Jeff Jackson has other troubles with companies he worked for or with. We are aware of one that he is suing and another that sued him for his behavior. In addition, we have found through public records that Jeff Jackson has a questionable past with the law. For those reasons we will not engage in business activities with Jeff Jackson. 

Since we have cut ties with Jeff Jackson he has been on a sworn mission to discredit our company by any means necessary. He has sent harassing emails to my entire staff slandering employees and spreading lies about the structure of the company and fabricates personal allegations about myself and my family.  He has contacted clients of mine that I have had for ten years and sent harassing emails to the CEO's of those companies in a effort to discredit my relationship with them. All of these issues are being handled by my corporate counsel and Jeff Jackson will have to answer to those actions. 

Jeff Jackson attempted to file a BBB complaint against us and they denied his request. He tried to file a labor board dispute and they denied his request. He tried to involve the Arizona Department of Financial Institutions and they didn't care. He has attempted to file and unemployment claim against us, which is fraud in my opinion because he was never an employee. He went as far as to file a bar complaint against our attorney when our attorney had nothing to do with Jeff Jackson.  Jeff Jackson is upset because we refused to do business with him and so the only place that won't turn him away with his frivolous claims is this forum. 

And just for the record all allegations of illegal activity is another slanderous comment. We are 100% properly licensed, bonded and insured. For the limited amount of interaction and time we spent with Jeff Jackson he seems to think he knows everything about the operations of our company. If Jeff Jackson can substantiate a single claim then why isn't anybody listening?