Report: #1167127

Complaint Review: International Animal Rescue Foundation, Animal Buddy, Michele Brown, John Williamson, Amber Donoghue

  • Submitted: Sun, August 03, 2014
  • Updated: Mon, January 11, 2016
  • Reported By: Mary Robbins — trinity Texas
  • International Animal Rescue Foundation, Animal Buddy, Michele Brown, John Williamson, Amber Donoghue
    3 blazer court Northumberland St
    United Kingdom

International Animal Rescue Foundation, Animal Buddy, Michele Brown, John Williamson, Amber Donoghue Joseph Dimitri, Jean Marie, Harvey Allmendinger, Karen Cole, Lorraine Price, Craig Eibeck Jose Calos Depre Donation Fraud, Plagiarized, Cyber Bullying/Stalking/Harassment, Libel/Defamation Norwich London,England

*General Comment: To Justice Seeker

*Consumer Comment: IARF Director Jose Depre Found Guilty and Sentenced Norwich Crown Court 7 January 2015- Michele Mary Brown Arundel Queensland Faces Trial for Money Laundering

*REBUTTAL Individual responds: REPUBLISHED RECORDINGS TO REFUTE ALLEGATIONS: A spurned Julia de Cadenet, CEO of 'No To Dog Meat’, begs CEO of 'IARF' to return to her

*General Comment: The irony is not lost

*Author of original report: Redundantly Repetitive.

*Consumer Comment: Your attack on me has WHAT to do with the original report either?


*Author of original report: Marla Is my cousins name: She was never around JON: Response to Marla

*General Comment: Mary Makebelieve

*REBUTTAL Owner of company: Response to Jon (Sorry RAJ)

*Consumer Comment: Response to Raj

*General Comment: Corrupted report

*REBUTTAL Individual responds: Mary - Fantasy and Delusions


*Author of original report: Karen Alters Photos and Conversations

*REBUTTAL Individual responds: THERE’S SOMETHING ABOUT MARY, and it’s not nice

*General Comment: Karen, what are you on?

*Author of original report: Karen is the Only Liar


*Author of original report: Response to Karen Cole Again

*Consumer Suggestion: Naughty Naughty Karen Cole. Pull those Knickers Up!

*General Comment: Response to Karen Cole

*Author of original report: Karen proves me correct everytime

*Author of original report: Karen Cole Twists information

*REBUTTAL Individual responds: Mary Robbins - STOP HARASSING ME & MY DAUGHTER

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

International Animal Rescue Foundation is ran by one man who lives in an apartment at 3 Blazer court Northumberland St. Norwich United Kingdom. His organization only exists on Facebook, which is over 30+ pages which is admin’d only by him to our knowledge at this time.

An amended and updated list of all IARF FB pages:"> (Georgia in Russia) (believed to be active but not visible to UK) (Not updated any more) (latest page that is a copycat page to discredit the Legit No to dog meat page and still supporters) (there to copycat No to dog meat’s global march page and still supporters.) (IARF affiliated)



If you have liked any of these pages it is best to unlike, it is also wise to report any money donated to International Animal Rescue Foundation to action fraud and to your pay pal/bank accounts for a full refund.

Also note that many of these pages have blocked countries from viewing it.

Action Fraud and The EU transparency registrar list have denounced International Animal Rescue Foundation. Animal Liberation Front have Denounced International Animal Rescue Foundation. Negotiation Is Over have Denounced International Animal Rescue Foundation.
Anonymous have denounced International Animal Rescue Foundation. In addition, the legit International Animal Rescue has denounced International Animal Rescue Foundation.

Back in 2011 2012 he started the Facebook page called Operation Benue State Zoo and tried to steal donations away from Cee4Life. Cee4Life were there to help Benue and Nat Apir. Nat Apir never received any donations from John Williamson or IARF, yet Jon would have people believe otherwise.

We often question where those Donations went, yet he will not say. Nor will he show the appropriate receipts.

2013/2014 He tried to steal donations from PETA who were collecting said money for Sunder. Although Sunder is now free, we question where the donations went that John/IARF collected, because it did not go to PETA or toward Sunders’ release.

2013 to now- he has been sabotaging a UK Based charity called World Protection for the dogs and cats in the meat trade, otherwise known for their campaign arm, No To dog meat. However, he is not alone in this endeavor. Amber Donoghue, Karen Cole, Craig Eibeck, Michele Brown-Price and others have been helping him with a hate campaign directed at No to dog meat and myself along with several others whom have an affiliation with No To Dog Meat.

They have stolen photos of volunteers and supporters and posted it on their Facebook pages with volatile statements of slander, defamation and libelous degree’s. They have also went as far as to make a rip-off report to continue their harassment; everything stated in their report is fabrication with no validated proof behind it.

2014 John Williamson harassed the No To Dog Meat CEO Julia Cadenet with early morning/late night phone calls. While doing this he recorded her without her knowledge and his friend altered the conversation to make Julia appear suspect. The videos were however taken down from youtube.

If you have listened to those clips, then know this, John Williamson did not put the whole conversation up, and because of this people have turned against No To Dog Meat. Without knowing the full truth of what led to certain things being said.

We believe John gave the audio to Amber Donoghue for her to alter, as she has experience in Photoshop and audio due to her expertise in marketing for the BDC in Sussex. Where she makes advertisements, audio and digital graphics. her company -


John Williamson and Amber Donoghue on several occasions has violently harassed me online and even on my local police departments Facebook Page. John Williamson was warned by Andrew McDonnell not to mention Julia Cadenet or any of the No To Dog Meat supporters/Volunteers, which includes myself. Amber Donoghue was also told not to speak of No To Dog Meat etc. However they have continued.

These people have posted personal details and addresses out into the public view and have targeted people with disabilities. These people claim to be animal rights advocates and activists, yet I ask you what kind of Animal advocates and activists would stoop so low into sullying a legit charity and other advocates/activists?

Julia had no control over those old pages, as Michele and her two buddies Jon and Craig kicked her off as admin and took over her facebook accounts. Julia entrusted Michele Brown with passwords and in doing so, led to that moment, of complete chaos.
Julia thought she could trust Michele Brown. Only later did she find that Michele was in bed with Jon and had a shady history.
The blame cannot solely be placed on Julia as she was only doing what she thought was right... That being to help Michele Brown have access to the internet since Michele's internet was not working. So Julia being the kind hearted individual gave the password to the Film and Business Network, which ironically was the same password for Julia's accounts.
Michele Brown and Jon Williamson (Joseph Dimitri) had a field day, and took photos, key information and contact addresses from the accounts. And you can only imagine what happened from there. They posioned penned each contact, they started their copycat page "Say no to dog" and are now trying to collect donations under the guise of being a charity, when they are not.
Say No to litterally dangles the stolen information in front of everyone. 
Animal Buddy/Amber Donoghue and company are, indeed part of IARF. It is obvious and plain to see. As they stick up for IARF and Jon Williamson daily. While sullying us every chance they get. 

IARF/Animal Buddy should not be trusted. As nothing they have state have any credibility and or proof to back it up.

Links to proof of Animal Buddy and IARF's harrasment:

IARF warnings-


---Original Message-----
From: Cotman Office Mail <>To: ' Sent: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 16:42 Subject: 3 Blazer Court Dear I write with regard to your comments made to the Association online on 25/7/14 concerning Mr Williamson I can confirm that the Association have informed the Police of the allegations relating to Mr Williamson and they have confirmed that investigations are ongoing. The Association will consider this matter further after the police have completed their investigation. Yours Sincerely, Pat D.....


Is this Ripoff Report About you?
Ripoff Report A business' first line of defense on the Internet.
If your business is willing to make a commitment to customer satisfaction Click here now..

Does your business have a bad reputation? Fix it the right way. Corporate Advocacy Program™

Set the record straight: Arbitration Program

SEO Reputation Management at its best!

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 08/03/2014 08:15 PM and is a permanent record located here: The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
Also a victim?
Repair Your Reputation!

Updates & Rebuttals


#1 General Comment

To Justice Seeker

AUTHOR: Eileen Lang - (USA)

To Justice Seeker or should I say, Julia Carter Cadenet or Maybe it's Debbie Dunn. You're surely not one for using your real name, are you. We all know about Jon Williamson's Arson charges since it's made the news. However, your accusation claiming that Michele Brown is charged with "Money Laundering" is a fabrication. There is no court docket number nor is there any news report on this or any police record. Ms. Cadenet, I believe you owe an apology to the public for your devious actions, I also believe you owe Mrs. Robbins an apology as well. Since you withheld the truth from her for 3.5 years.

As well as making fabricated WP journals about her through your troll Alice Susan Harding. I would point out to others as well is that Mrs. Robbins was actually set up by Ms. Cadenet with this Rip Off Report. The only thing that Mrs. Robbins wrote was the parts about Jon Williamson. If Mrs. Robbins had known that Ms. Cadenet added on allegations of others, she would not have allowed any of this to be published in the first place. I also want to point out that it was indeed Ms. Cadenet who wrote to Donohue's boss. and attempted to sabotage the rescue.

It was also Ms. Cadenet who forged Mrs. Robbins name on the police report. Anything Ms. Cadenet says should be taken with a grain of salt. She is not trustworthy and has tarnished the reputation of Mrs. Robbins, Ms. Ling as well as others. Ms. Cadenet almost destroyed Baia Mare and has been trying to Destroy Soi Dog, as well as Dogs Trust. Whichever the case may be this feuding is pointless. The only people that should be placed behind bars at this moment is Jon Williamson and Cadenet.


Respond to this report!

#2 Consumer Comment

IARF Director Jose Depre Found Guilty and Sentenced Norwich Crown Court 7 January 2015- Michele Mary Brown Arundel Queensland Faces Trial for Money Laundering

AUTHOR: Justice Seeker - (USA)

January 7th 2015 Jon Justin Williamson aka Jose Depre from IARF was found guilty of criminal charges and sentenced a Norwich Crown Court UK. Michele Mary Brown from Arundel QUEENSLAND faces fraud and trial for her part in the 3 year long money laundering scam. 

Respond to this report!

#3 REBUTTAL Individual responds

REPUBLISHED RECORDINGS TO REFUTE ALLEGATIONS: A spurned Julia de Cadenet, CEO of 'No To Dog Meat’, begs CEO of 'IARF' to return to her


Please click the link to hear the recordings at


Amongst the many other lies in this ripoff report written by Mary Robbins aimed at my daughter, is the following accusation that could not be properly refuted at the time since the recordings referred to were unpublished:


Mary Robbins writes: “2014 John Williamson harassed the No To Dog Meat CEO Julia Cadenet with early morning/late night phone calls. While doing this he recorded her without her knowledge and his friend altered the conversation to make Julia appear suspect. The videos were however taken down from youtube. If you have listened to those clips, then know this, John Williamson did not put the whole conversation up, and because of this people have turned against No To Dog Meat. Without knowing the full truth of what led to certain things being said. We believe John gave the audio to Amber xxx for her to alter, as she has experience in Photoshop and audio due to her expertise in marketing for the xxx in xxx. Where she makes advertisements, audio and digital graphics.” 


The recordings have recently been republished, allowing the public to decide whether anybody could have doctored the shocking recordings to put words in the mouth of Ms Julia de Cadenet CEO of 'No To Dog Meat' as she, amongst other things, pleads with and propositions Jose Calos Depre, CEO of IARF, to reject Michele Brown in favour of herself.


Important to note that Julia de Cadenet is heard in one of the recordings requesting her words be recorded.


For the record - Amber is my daughter and she has no association or affiliation whatsoever with IARF, NTDM, or SNTDM; she has not at any time been in communication with Mr Depre, Ms de Cadenet, or Ms Brown.

Respond to this report!

#4 General Comment

The irony is not lost

AUTHOR: Another victim - ()

It is interesting and quite ironic to note that pathological liars Jetz Maddox and Mary Robbins have now taken up position of UK charity 1154524 'No To Dog Meat' gatekeepers, presumably to attack any person who raises concerns about the charity's activities and statements; a role previously held by Jose of IARF who resigned when he could no longer reconcile being an animal lover and holding the position.  

For reference see

It is clear in the tape recordings now in police possession that Jose did not want to return to the position despite many personal pleas and incentives being offered.


So Jetz Maddox, shall we get a few things on the record then before you give us all a migraine?

1 You are stating, in support of your associate Mary Robbins (who you have never met) that you are responsible along with Mary Robbins for the multitude of revolting lying blogs spanning September 2013 to present day made to harass Donoghue and Cole.

2 You are stating that you run a business from your premises in Ashley House, St Saviour Hill, Jersey, Channel Isles, and that the nature of that business is broadcasting



3  You are stating that your business has nothing to do with this RipOff.

  • Reader's note* Jetz Maddox has broadcasted from the business premises location to harassed Donoghue & Cole.
  • Reader's note* Jetz Maddox endorses that Donoghue & Cole’s unrelated livelihoods have been put on this RipOff.

4  You have stated that your online begging note has nothing to do with this RipOff.

  • Reader's note* Jetz Maddox clearly states in one of her blogs that she used for attacking Donoghue and Cole I don’t beg for money under any circumstance. I don’t need too”.

5  You state in the same blog that “I don’t have to resort to childish language ”.

  • Reader's note* Jetz Maddox then goes on to call someone a ‘needledick’ in the same blog.

6  You state that you are a ‘spiritualist’, a ‘white witch’, a ‘good person’.

  • Reader's note* Jetz Maddox has been harassing many people from her business premises in Jersey for at least 2 years.

7  You state that you are “a minor genius, with an IQ of 136”.

  • Reader's note* Jetz Maddox uses that IQ to assassinate the characters and disturb the well-being of her victims.

8  You state that you have “an eye disease, which I will go blind from, and I have a heart condition”.

  • Reader's note* Jetz Maddox and Mary Robbins both claim these conditions, when requiring a sympathy vote. Jetz Maddox also claims to be Bi-polar and in the care of a counsellor.

9  You state on the internet that Donoghue and Cole are part of IARF.

  • Reader's note* Jetz Maddox and Mary Robbins hatched this vengeful insinuation plot together with no evidence to support it. They have written many scurrilous blogs and posted to many scandalous websites about Donoghue and Cole. Donoghue and Cole have not written any blogs about Jetz Maddox and Mary Robbins. One would hardly blame them if they do.

10 You state you don’t put out personal information about yourself, and have not advertised your fundraiser "I am not sure HOW she found the page though, given that I don’t advertise it. I can only surmise that she has been Googling me. Again.

  • Reader's note* Jetz Maddox runs numerous Facebook pages and advertised her fundraiser on each of them.
  • Reader's note* Jetz Maddox tells the public quite a bit in just one blog entry before using that blog site to perform actions that are the complete opposite of how she likes to present herself to the unsuspecting public.


Ok, this is my first attempt at doing a blog, but I thought it would be really nice to have a place to go, outside of Facebook, were I can just put what I want, without people saying ‘you can’t say that’.

I am open minded. I am direct. I like to say exactly what is on my mind. I know that, in today’s society, people tend to pussyfoot round the feeling’s of other people, whether they know them or not, but I don’t have the time. I figure that if we were more open and honest, we would be a much better society. We would certainly be far more evolved than we actually are today.

This is not to say that I am just going to moan about everything, or say nasty things about people, because that’s simply not me, but I will generalise about things that affects me to blog about it, and well who knows?

I am a white witch. I am a spiritualist. I am the biggest advocate for the rights of ALL animals around the gobe. I am a poet and an artist. I am also a Bi-Poliac. I have an eye disease, which I will go blind from, and I have a heart condition. I am also a minor genius, with an IQ of 136. My friends tell me that I am not JUST sarcastic, but I have many layers of sarcasm.

There. Thats all my labels. I dont like labels, but I know there are loads of people in society who cant live without them. People who can’t judge others for themselves, without said information.

I love talking :-) I adore people leaving me comments that I can reply to, and I really enjoy intellectual conversations from like minded people.

Predominately I love cats. I have 3 ex feral rescues. I don’t have children, but my babies are my ‘kids’.

So that’s me. this is my first blog. I hope its not my last. Its my intention to post once a week all the ‘stuff’ both good bad and strange, that I have experienced through the week.


Finally, Jetz Maddox tells us in her blog entry 


"My doctor says I cant stop the meds, in case I have a ‘psychotic’ episode". 

We're begging you Jetz, keep taking the meds. Oh, and happy birthday ;-)


Respond to this report!

#5 Author of original report

Redundantly Repetitive.

AUTHOR: Mary Robbins - ()

Question are you not tired of all this? I know my friends are. I know I am. I know we have been tired for a long while now, and yet repeatedly we asked that you leave us alone, yet here we are still answering your questions. Still being open about everything you throw at us from health, to money, to posts we do not even remember making, yet still, we have the details on demand, because you demanded it. 

 When are you going to realize we have answered every single question you put forth to the whole team?

Randomly throwing out questions about this and about that, hoping to make us slip up on something, yet still we reply to you. Still we answer your questions within 24 hours, sometimes quicker. When is it enough? I will answer that, Now. Right now is enough.

  I am going to waste more of my time and health, plus energy answering your question one last time. Having had a long discussion with the team, (look at that, I said TEAM) they have decided they are no longer interested in beating round the same old bushes, answering the same questions repeatedly and over again. So hear and Listen carefully now. Because I will not repeat it again.

 I am going to answer your questions about me one last time. If Julia chooses to answer questions about her and/or NTDM, that is on her. If Jetz wishes to answer more questions on her health or her business, that is on her too, but know this Karen, I am NOT responsible for anybody else choosing to post a rebuttal. That is on them and you. I do not control anyone nor direct him or her to respond. I do not have super powers, nor am I a GOD.

 So let this be an end to it. For the last time:

Your latest Rebuttal:

Please do take note of this information at the bottom of my original Rip Off Report:


6 Author 7 Consumer 7 Employee/Owner

Your questions and comment. All of the ones that are directed at me only:

#2 REBUTTAL Individual responds


1 - I have got this right haven't I? The author of this 'Report' is clearly shown as


Reported By: Mary Robbins — trinity Texas ?

Answer: Submitted: Sun, August 03, 2014 Updated: Sat, September 27, 2014

Reported By: Mary Robbins — trinity Texas

Stated near the top of the Rip Off Report. I think that is the answer you seek, correct?


2 - As no-one other than Mary will put their names to the filth being written

Answer: Names dates post numbers and titles below. Not including yours.


#1 Consumer Comment

Your attack on me has WHAT to do with the original report either?

AUTHOR: Jetz - ()

SUBMITTED: Saturday, September 27, 2014


#3 Author of original report


Marla Is my cousins name: She was never around JON: Response to Marla

AUTHOR: Mary - ()

SUBMITTED: Wednesday, September 24, 2014


#4 General Comment

Mary Makebelieve

AUTHOR: Marla - ()

SUBMITTED: Tuesday, September 23, 2014


#5 Consumer Comment

Response to Raj

AUTHOR: Anonymous - ()

SUBMITTED: Monday, September 22, 2014


#6 REBUTTAL Owner of company

Response to Jon (Sorry RAJ)

AUTHOR: Anonymous - ()

SUBMITTED: Sunday, September 21, 2014


#7 General Comment

Corrupted report

AUTHOR: Raj - ()

SUBMITTED: Saturday, September 20, 2014


#8 REBUTTAL Individual responds

Mary - Fantasy and Delusions

AUTHOR: Anonymous - ()

SUBMITTED: Friday, September 19, 2014


#9 Author of original report

Karen Alters Photos and Conversations

AUTHOR: Mary Robbins - ()

SUBMITTED: Wednesday, September 17, 2014


#12 General Comment

Karen, what are you on?

AUTHOR: Anonymous - ()

SUBMITTED: Tuesday, September 16, 2014


#13 Author of original report

Karen is the Only Liar

AUTHOR: Mary Robbins - ()

SUBMITTED: Monday, September 15, 2014


#14 Author of original report

Response to Karen Cole Again

AUTHOR: Mary Robbins - ()

SUBMITTED: Monday, September 15, 2014

#16 Author of original report

Karen proves me correct everytime

AUTHOR: Mary Robbins - ()

SUBMITTED: Monday, September 15, 2014


#17 General Comment

Response to Karen Cole

AUTHOR: Anonymous - ()

SUBMITTED: Monday, September 15, 2014


#18 Consumer Suggestion

Naughty Naughty Karen Cole. Pull those Knickers Up!

AUTHOR: A Friend - ()

SUBMITTED: Monday, September 15, 2014


#19 Author of original report

Karen Cole Twists information

AUTHOR: Lisa - ()

SUBMITTED: Monday, September 15, 2014


#20 REBUTTAL Individual responds


AUTHOR: Percy Cuted - ()

SUBMITTED: Monday, September 15, 2014

3 - an educated guess would lead any reader to surmise that Mary is still playing silly buggers writing these blogs


Quote from blog: Bonjour! For those who are expecting Mary to post (and I know some of you are waiting with eager anticipation) sorry to disappoint, but I have news you WILL rejoice over.

In the early hours of Saturday 22nd September 2014, Mary was taken into hospital. I called to see how she was but, not being family, they were unable to help me. I spoke to the husband some people would have you believe she isn’t married to, and he informs me that she is doing well. She is comfortable. I have not spoken to her husband today, but I hope that she is home now. Naturally this is why she has not been able to defend herself I have been watching however and as I am an author of this blog, I thought you might like to see what is happening. I will be writing TWO blogs myself today, as two issues have arisen that need to be addressed. The title of this blog is a line from a song called ‘Stupid Girl’ by Garbage:

Quote from Blog: I just had an email from 'Joshua'. Remember him? He is Marys brothers' dads' uncles' sisters' former room-mates' (now deceased) pet chinchilla, by all accounts. Anyway, he tells me (from the grave, no less) that Mary was allowed home today, though she is on strict bed rest for the next 7 days.

So, where was I? Oh yes. The title of this particular blog is from the song 'Falsely Accused' by Carl Brown. Pretty apt, don't you think?

-        I believe the 22 September was a Monday right and not a Saturday when I was admitted. At 2 am on Monday I wrote in my Livejournal, not the WordPress, as stated before there are 3 writers in total. Jetz, an Anonymous person and myself.

-        Look at the way this person writes and compare it to my writing. It is nothing like mine. Sorry Try again that was not me writing in that blog. When have I written Bonjour in my blogs Karen?

-        Also note Karen, the laptop I borrowed did not have the capability of loading the WordPress site. Note Karen, the writer had contact with my husband; I was released on Monday during the eve, on Wednesday 24 September I came here and defended myself against a person claiming to be Marla, whom wrote in a high school manner. You can see that just by looking at the dates I have provided you with.


4 - Mary writes from her hospital bed, on the same day the blogs were posted, reporting that "at 10 am they want me to do that yoga class"

Answer: You seem to forget that Yoga classes also focus on breathing. I went to a class to teach me how to breathe through my panic attacks. I know you offered to help, yet you also poked fun at my weight. Why should I accept help from someone who pokes fun at me?


5 - are these women by any chance hoping that a defense of ill health will exonerate them?

Answer: I will not speak for Jetz but on her behalf, I will show you this. Please read the blog. Look at the date of the first blog and then tell me has she really done this to upset you?

As for me, I was born with my disabilities. You were not around when I was born. Please do not try to claim I did this for you. In addition, Karen If you care to look at your question (number 2) you will see the dates of all the rebuttals. Take a closer look at mine.


Monday, September 15, 2014 x4

Wednesday, September 17, 2014

Friday, September 19, 2014

Wednesday, September 24, 2014


There appears to be a gap between FRIDAY and WEDNESDAY and MONDAY AND WEDNESDAY.


6 – I thought Mary wanted the rip off report removed; now she says thank goodness it is still here.

Answer: I changed my mind; I am after all a HUMAN BEING. In addition, this report is serving in our favor seeing that YOU have chosen to come back here defiling my name and being in every way possible. Why should I save all your rebuttals on my laptop and then place it in a blog which you refute when Rip Off has it right here for everyone to see?

Respond to this report!

#6 Consumer Comment

Your attack on me has WHAT to do with the original report either?

AUTHOR: Jetz - ()

Well well well. Now if that isn't concrete solid evidence of you attacking people and NOT complaining about this report I do not know what is. How perfectly clear is your intention to slander every person you know just because you can? You complain that two blogs came out about you and then you do something like this in retaliation? As you directed your last pile of vomit at me, I will most definitely DEFEND myself. My business on Blog Talk Radio is exactly that. My business. It has nothing to do with you, Jon, Amber, Mary, Julia or anybody connected with this report. Let me prove it. Show me a show that is about ANY of you?: It seems clear to me at least, that the shows are focused around doing good things for animals and the atrocities that are befalling the USA and the rest of the world. How very conceited of you. But let's never forget, that you brought this up first. So you will not be surprised when I DEFEND myself, will you? Of course, you only did this to draw me out. That is also very clear. I received a message today: Jetz, you need to check this out. Karen has gone crazy. Good! At least you are not focusing so much on Mary now. Okay, so first. Please tell me what having a spirit guide has to do with this report? You obviously don't know that everyone has a guide and that a very large amount of people choose to believe their guide is called JESUS or GOD. I don't because I am not religious. So come on now, tell me what is so very wrong with people believing in GOD, JESUS or GUIDES? What is the connection with GOD and this report Karen? I also imagine that in condemning me for having a guide, you are also condemning all religions. Now, you have decided to attack me for having a rare and incurable brain disease?? How very mature of you. I can see where Amber gets it from. Just one or two things about this. "FHM signs overlap significantly with those of migraine with aura. In short, FHM is typified by migraine with aura associated with hemiparesis and, in FHM1, cerebellar degeneration. This cerebellar degeneration can result in episodic or progressive ataxia. FHM can also present with hemiplegia,nystagmus and coma. Aura symptoms, such as numbness and blurring of vision, typically persist for 30–60 minutes, but can last for weeks and months. An attack resembles a stroke, but unlike a stroke, it resolves in time. These signs typically first manifest themselves in the first or second decade of life". Now because I can see that you are not very good at research, let me break it down further for you: Now, whilst I fully expect you will not read a single d**n thing here (because its not about the original report is it?) I wonder if you would be surprised to note I actually don't want to go through this? I wonder if you stopped to consider a couple of things here (and I already know the answer otherwise you wouldn't have decided to make a mockery out of a rare and incurable disease that affects quite a few people in the most heinous of ways). Did you even discover that FHM simulates: Epilepsy, Meningitus, Coma, Stroke and Alzheimer's? I know you will only focus on that last one. Your 'Animal Buddy' focused rebuttals are proof of that. But that's okay. I am glad I can amuse you with this. At least one of us is getting some enjoyment out of it, eh? Yes, I did raise a go fund me account. So what of it? Do you even care why? Well I shall tell you regardless. Many of my friends want to help me with this. Surprisingly they actually care about me. So, rather than hand out my bank account details over the internet (a really stupid thing to do, I am sure you will agree on that one at least), I set up this page. Yes, it's true that it doesn't have much on it, but you know why? Because my friends and I are all in the same boat. We have to BUDGET. I still have no idea what that has to do with the report though? I have been open about it. But thanks for sharing it on a site that is notorious for NOT REMOVING things. Secondly, you claim to be this big animal advocate yet you can't seem to comprehend that this EXPERIMENTAL supplement, has NOT been tested on animals? I have always been vocal about NOT testing on animals, so why would I not offer myself up for this EXPERIMENTAL treatment? If I am dying anyway, what does it matter? Or rather, what does it matter to you? Better that I am the guinea pig than a rat, or rabbit or dog? Clearly you don't agree. How big of 'Animal BUDDY' to refrain from considering any knock on effects towards our sentient friends. It obviously never occurred to you that should I offer myself up for this and it works, then I will have contributed to helping others and animals alike. No? Of course not. Your ignorance on this subject leads me to suggest that you stop advertising yourself as a 'friend' to the animals. I love the way you have tried to associate your dementia (a natural age related condition) with this rare DISEASE. Do the words 'band' and 'wagon' mean anything to you? Aside from you Karen, I don't believe there is a single person in the world who would begrudge me the opportunity to slow down this nasty, extremely painful and debilitating condition and to help STOP ANIMAL TESTING at the same time. But then that's you all over isn't it? Having read all the rebuttals (and just that's enough to trigger an episode) I note that you have copies of a couple of shows that you are also attempting to use as a weapon against me and that you believe they ARE related to this report. I note that you were asked to provide those right here, but you seem to have missed them out of your rebuttals. I clicked on the 'this link' words you underlined and put in bold, but nothing happened. You do know that you actually have to insert a 'hyperlink' yes? You cant just type 'this link' and hope that will suffice. Please send me those recordings, so that I might have an opportunity (once again) to defend myself and my show from your accusations. Lastly, Just one final question: What has ANY of this got to do with the original report? You claim the world and its mother are attacking you, yet in your last rebuttal the most you could find to talk about was me, my show, my condition and my Go Fund Me page. Somebody put on here 'way to go' and I am going to use that to say: Way to prove Marys point. Big up to you.

Respond to this report!

#7 REBUTTAL Individual responds


AUTHOR: Karen - ()

I have got this right haven't I? The author of this 'Report' is clearly shown as

Reported By: Mary Robbins — trinity Texas ?

How very extraordinary then that yet more blogs have appeared complaining that I am picking on her?

The problem with liars is that even should they very occasionally tell the truth no-one will believe them. As no-one other than Mary will put their names to the filth being written, and we know categorically that Mary is the leader and main instigator in all this harassment, an educated guess would lead any reader to surmise that Mary is still playing silly buggers writing these blogs whilst incredulously sending out a ‘cease and desist’ to her victims when they dare to rebut her lies. Perhaps when Mary is otherwise preoccupied, her nefarious sidekick ‘Jetz’ may take the helm, but it is a silly notion to expect any truth when dealing with either duplicitous woman 

Well we now have Mary hospitalised for 'heart failure' needing complete bed rest. Strangely Mary writes from her hospital bed, on the same day the blogs were posted, reporting that "at 10 am they want me to do that yoga class": (this is where Mary also posts her Cease And Desist ORDER). Good grief, complete bed rest and yoga classes...and they call me confused.

  Mary with the utmost sympathy, panic attacks are not to be lightly dismissed, they can be completely debilitating. You have suffered from panic attacks going way back. Nobody can 'give you heart failure' in one year. You have been attacking stranger/friends/family for years, as well you know. Has it occurred to you, that if indeed you have a tired heart, that it is time to quit trying to be somebody you are patently not. Like most of us, Mary, we need to come to terms with ourselves. You know you are your own worst enemy, deal with it. I can help you with panic attacks ifyou will allow it? There is a simple exercise that works. 


Jetz is also extremely confused. She runs a blog radio show called She claims to have a spirit guide, and recently has told her 'public' that her brain is being eaten away. A month ago Jetz decided that the public should cough up for a monthly supplement (DNA Force™) to 'cure' her brain disease. The cost is approximately £80 a month so she created a fundraiser for herself called 'Barmy For My Brain' Perhaps I should create a fundraiser for geriatric diapers in case I pee myself as I sit staring vacantly at the walls in the 'virtual' old folks home you have so kindly suggested in your blog is now my home. If you raise the money Jetz I hope you will share your health supplement with me, since you, and your equally nutty friends, have decided that I too have dementia. 

 Seriously the condition Jetz describes, akin to dementia, hardly seems likely in view of her scoffing at the elderly for declining mental agility. So which is it? Is she scamming for money or does she find her own condition something to poke fun at?

  After running amok on social media with their nasty accusations, are these women by any chance hoping that a defense of ill health will exonerate them? Since they are huge fans of lies, assumptions and spreading rumours I am sure they agree that it is fair if I repeat a rumour that their mentor relies on a condition called Lyme disease to explain away what might appear to most as being too drunk to function as a rational person (link to recorded conversation).  

 So there we have it, three batsh*t crazy women desperately attempting to bluff their way through mental illness, aided and abetted by other disturbed women and a very weird derelict character named Mermet. They scream "police" when they are caught out. Just a small observation, where does the information you supply come from, that Amber was called in for questioning accompanied by a lawyer; that she reported a police officer? You do have proof of this I hope? No silly question, forgive me, you don't deal in proof do you. 

 As a radio broadcaster surely Jetz realises that audio broadcasts can be saved as MP3 files? I can assure Jetz that I do have the recording of Julia de Cadenet being interviewed on your show (link to recording), why that should worry her and/or Mary is strange. Why on earth did you disable the broadcast Jetz? This was the show where you and Mary claim that Ms de Cadenet vindicated herself (by blaming others for her misfortune) to your complete satisfaction. Please save us the eternal protest that you three 'ladies' rely so heavily on, that you were hacked. 

 I wish I could say that this venue is fun. It is not. It has become a 'freak show' as a friend recently remarked. This report and rebuttals cannot be deleted. Thankfully somebody bought it to my attention and I have the opportunity to question the source/sources. If this report is a conspiracy then it is to your shame that you hung Mary out to dry, not mine. If any of you conspirators give a d**n about Mary, a seriously mentally ill person, then show your names in the spirit of solidarity with her and stop wriggling out of it in silly anonymous blogs. Mary has been crowing about this RipOff being up forever to libel us and lead others to lies, but then in one of your latest blogs (there really have been so many) you state she has been trying to take it down for days, whilst on her death bed would you believe. Now she is back from the brink but claiming chest pains and glad this asinine report is here. Wow, I think I have whiplash with all these comings and goings, all this ducking and diving, really ladies please put a bit of effort into getting your stories straight with each other at the very least. 

 Mary, Ms Feary of: Really? Who else are you dragging into your soap drama? 

 Oh, nearly forgot to mention for any unwary reader of this farce of a report, for FB readers the UK charity No To Dog Meat Foundation has recently been exposed as opportunistic and cruelly callous. They exploited the trust of a struggling Romanian shelter with a donation of 300 euros then left them high and dry after firm promises of continued support. 

 To accuse us of waging a 'hate campaign' against the No To Dog Meat Foundation is ridiculous. They ask the animal loving public to give them money and then call it hateful when anybody asks them to explain their misleading rhetoric and what they are actually doing with the money.

 That NTDM wasn't registered as a charity was concerning only because they said they were registered. That they pretended they were registered in UK, US, and Europe when they were definitely not was a huge red flag. Even today their new US chapter is claiming that No To Dog Meat (World Protection for dogs and Cats in the Meat Trade) is registered as a 501(c)(3) charity. But if we mention that is untrue we are called trolls and haters. Would it be considered trollish and hateful to point out that in May 2013 Julia was claiming she was already registered in 4 states of the US, while interestingly not answering what her UK charity registration details were at the same time? 

 That NoTo Dog Meat claimed to be supporting an animal rescue in Wuhan, China, then refused to name it and deleted the posts about the shelter when questioned is just one example of their strange behaviour. That they disparaged highly respected animal welfare organisations and advocates to inflate their own importance was appalling behaviour from 'wet behind the ears' new-comers to the world of animal welfare. Bringing animal charity into disrepute by loutish behaviour(link to recorded conversation) inevitably leads to donors loss of confidence and animals suffer as funds are withheld.

 The UK Charities Commission has been exposed as 'not fit for purpose' in parliament. Anybody with in excess of £5000 can buy their way onto the list and then squander donors money. For instance, the 'No To Dog Meat' management, on Ms Brown's 2013 visit to S. Korea, chose to use donors money to purchase an elixir made from boiled dogs and have it sent back to the UK. Nothing more was heard from them about what they wanted it for or indeed what they did with it? Ms Brown had the decency to post her 'No To Dog Meat' income and expenditure on her website where she showed the cost of that bizarre purchase request from the charity's CEO. Since the inauguration of No To Dog Meat (WPDCMT), in May 2013, only 300 euros for a Romanian shelter and £1,130 for a Chinese dog rescue vaccination programme have been shown to have been given as help for dogs. Where the rest of the money received from donors was spent will never be known by the public; no accounts will be published by the UK Charities Commission.

 The reason that I refuse to be intimidated into shuffling away on my virtual walking frame by the people behind this report, and the multitude of blogs etc., is because they obsessively enjoy bullying; better me than a more sensitive individual falls prey to their insatiable lust for character assassination.

Freak show this undoubtedly is, but while Mary and her morally corrupt colleagues continue to host lies on blog sites I will continue to rebut here when appropriate.

Respond to this report!

#8 Author of original report

Marla Is my cousins name: She was never around JON: Response to Marla

AUTHOR: Mary - ()

You know I just got out of the hospital because of all this idiocy you all are putting me on. My heart could stop at any time now, Do you understand this? You all are pushing me to the grave. And it is quiet obvious you wish me dead since you continue to LIE on me like this. Let me straighten this out for you.

1. I don't know who Anella is

2. My brother was never around we hardly ever talked. I never lived with him he is a half brother.

3. I was never at a bake off nor have I ever stolen any money whatsoever

4. I never attacked my father, he was jumped on the way home from a Bar, which is the norm in that town since it was a bad neighborhood.

5. My friends didn't live in the same town I did, so they didn't know I left until I came down here. Furthermore in the cover of darkness? I left that town bright and early after I said good bye to my family.

The whole reason I left that Town JON, was to escape the noise pollution, to live on my own with my husband, for my husband to find a job. Was I supposed to live with a family member for the rest of my life JON?

6. My car? I don't have a "car" I'm not even allowed to drive I am legally blind.

What guy are you talkling about? Why are you trying to put a fabricated auto-biography of me on the internet when no one cares?

You got Maryanne's name from my blog, Maryanne is the one who used drugs, who stole my name the woman is 41 years old and in Jail still for what she did. Keep trying Jon.

Who IS JAY!? I don't even know any of these people you mentioned JON.

I never did drugs, still don't. And I never will.

I volunteered at PAWS in Philly on the weekends, I rescued on my free time. When I moved down here I still did rescuing. In total I have rescued 7 dogs, 3 I kept 3 went to a no kill rescue. 1 died of seizures, the vets couldn't do anything for him. I AM STILL MOURNING OVER. But thanks Jon for bringing this b******* up.

I rescued 10 cats, most went to the no kill rescue or went into a loving home. I am still looking for a non full no kill rescue and or home for a majority of the cats that keep being dumped on our property or at parking lots down here.

If you want JON I can get my REAL FRIENDS HERE who actually know WHO I AM to set you more straight.

WHO SAYS MY LOT IN AMERICA? It would be me and "my crew" or me and my friends, Lot? seriously? Just because I say it JON doesn't mean the rest of America does, Remember Jon I pick up the slang from my UK friends.

And you know what JON I did not bother with people around my neighborhood I KEPT TO MYSELF. Went to school came home, went to work, came home.  I'm lucky I met my Husband ffs.

Now you're going to mess with my Birth? Holy hell Jon you are demented. When I WAS born Jon I was dead. So thanks for that as well. I was in the intensive care unit for quiet awhile when they revived me. My mom had a stroke when I was born. I had issues with my liver and heart. Still do. There is nothing mentally wrong with me.

This is how I know it's you Jon. You give yourself away by attacking my mental status. Or attacking my weight because apparently 180 is fat? or you using aliases, such as Jose C Depre, Moja Bakrhan, Simone Depre, Jean Marie, Raj or maybe that's Mrs. Feary who the hell knows anymore with you Dispicable Monsterous people. 

Marla? nice. Using my cousins name who lives in Florida by the way. Who hardly came up for a visit. 

JON. I'm not on Anymore AND STILL I'M GETTING ATTACKED. Gee thank goodness Ripoff doesn't remove their reports huh Jon and crew? Thank god people will see the reality now.

I'm done, thanks to you I'm going back to the hospital. Thanks for the chest pains.

Respond to this report!

#9 General Comment

Mary Makebelieve

AUTHOR: Marla - ()

I know Mary from where she used to live and I can vouch for her character. She don’t have one. tell you the whole town was glad to see the back of her when she ran off. Under a cloud of darkness because of what she did to Maryanne using her name and doing drugs and blaming maryanne. when she was young she got the name Mary Makebelieve because of all her lies and fantasies. Then she got bigger and bigger and so did the lies. then she became Scary Mary. I swear I never known such a mean tongue girl or woman, and the lies, yea, you have no idea the lies. I think she had to leave town because she told one to many and people was so sick and tired of the trouble she caused and wanted her gone. She has no friends here any more. me and my lot once had a run in with her, and her brother had to step in, he said she had something wrong with her mentally from when she was born so we shouldnt be so hard on her but every one was mad as hell because she wasn’t even sorry for trying to mess up our cousin. what she did was just pure wicked. She attacked her own dad, put him in hospital, so she was sent to juvinile and that gave us all a break for a while. no one liked her coz she picked on every one smaller than her which was every one really, you could see she was messed up, even back then, she didn’t even care when that man died. the town was in mourning coz he was from a good family and dying so young was a shock for every one. all mary cared about was the damage to her car. She may have mental problems but I don’t think god even gave her a heart how mean she was to people. and animals nearly forgot to tell you. she never seemed like an animal person to us. I reckon opposite. Anella said to me after mary left, that she knew it was the best for the town, yea, her own kin said that. Its her mom I feel for. when we were kids I saw her bait a dog and lead it off to her place. he weren’t hers and when Jay whose dog it was went looking for him Mary said she didn’t know the dog. I knew it was a lie and no one ever saw that dog again. Jay was devastated coz he loved that dog more than any thing. I was scared of mary then coz she was so evil in getting back at you but i told jay years later. she told jay she sold the dog. just the meanest thing. that’s why Mary went for my cousin. she holds a grudge worse than any living person I ever known. It festers in her and comes out in such hate even though she is in the wrong every time. if they run her out of her new town she better not come back here. To many bones to be picked here. Im going to tell every one what she has been up to now lying about more people. Mary you are a low belly liar and we all know it here. Bet they all know it in your new town too. Oh and that money you stole from the bake off for the respite fund when you ran off, that was lower than a snakes armpit.

Respond to this report!

#10 REBUTTAL Owner of company

Response to Jon (Sorry RAJ)

AUTHOR: Anonymous - ()

"Anonymous (used as a mass noun) is a loosely associated international network of activist and hacktivist entities. A website nominally associated with the group describes it as "an internet gathering" with "a very loose and decentralized command structure that operates on ideas rather than directives" Jon - How can you say: "Mary Robbins is a typical keyboard warrior with limited intelligence, unsound reasoning, and vengeful intent. She is vindictive and corrupt. Mary Robbins spreads defamation about private people relying on deceit to smear and attack. She embroils other vacant-minded individuals to cyber assault targets she perceives as her enemy in an attempt to silence her victims. She cries to the police when she is criticized and rebutted for her false statements. Mary Robbins is not Anonymous, she is just another pain in the a* loonitune. Leave the job to the big boys Mary." this is SO not what Anonymous does. They do not get involved with petty squabbling.

You are an idiot and I say that in the truest possible way. Look at what they do: In its early form, the concept was adopted by a decentralized online community acting anonymously in a coordinated manner, usually toward a loosely self-agreed goal. Beginning with 2008's Project Chanology—a series of protests, pranks, and hacks targeting the Church of Scientology—the Anonymous collective became increasingly associated with collaborative hacktivism on a number of issues internationally. Individuals claiming to align themselves with Anonymous undertook protests and other actions (including direct action) in retaliation against anti–digital piracy campaigns by motion picture and recording industry trade associations. Later targets of Anonymous hacktivism included government agencies of the US, Israel, Tunisia, Uganda, and others; child pornography sites; copyright protection agencies; the Westboro Baptist Church; and corporations such as PayPal, MasterCard, Visa, and Sony. Anons have publicly supported WikiLeaks and the Occupy movement. Related groups LulzSec and Operation AntiSec carried out cyberattacks on US government agencies, media, video game companies, military contractors, military personnel, and police officers, resulting in the attention of law enforcement to the groups' activities. It has been described as being anti-Zionist, and has threatened to erase Israel from the Internet and engaged in the "#OpIsrael" cyber-attacks of Israeli websites on Yom HaShoah (Holocaust Remembrance Day) in 2013. - And YOU think they are going to be bothered by an online squabble between 4 people?? But that's you Jon. You always DID have ideas above your station.

"Dozens of people have been arrested for involvement in Anonymous cyberattacks, in countries including the US, UK, Australia, the Netherlands, Spain, and Turkey. Evaluations of the group's actions and effectiveness vary widely. Supporters have called the group "freedom fighters" and digital Robin Hoods while critics have described them as "a cyber lynch-mob" or "cyber terrorists". In 2012, Time called Anonymous one of the "100 most influential people" in the world. Wow look at how busy THEY are! Makes you wonder how they even had time to find this 'RipOff Report' let alone spend time thinking up an intellectually based rebuttal. Jonny, you don't need to be Anonymous to know that ONCE AGAIN you have broken the terms of your bail conditions to come here and harass Mary. Not to worry though, you are back at the police station on 26th October, so you will answer to that then. - Not So Smart After All - More Threats From Jon From: Subject: RE: Request for Information Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 21:25:06 +0000 Dear Thank you for the email. To update you Williamson has been bailed until 26/10/2014, for some further enquiries to be conducted and then a decision. I hope to obtain a decision before that date. I will update you in due course. I can try and phone you tomorrow evening, if you wish to discuss the matter further. Regards PC McDonell Funny, I don't think its going to be terribly difficult for PC McDonell to 'obtain a decision before that date' do you?

Respond to this report!

#11 Consumer Comment

Response to Raj

AUTHOR: Anonymous - ()

  To the people vilifying Mary Robbins I only have a few words to say. First to Raj, suspected to be Mr. Williamson. The Anonymous collective has and will continue to build with like minded individuals, a common goal to bring corrupt people to justice. It is therefore my belief that you are not part of said collective since you would make inciteful claims about Mary Robbins not being part of the collective, when there are thousands of people joining the movement daily. You also claim Mary Robbins could not possibly be Anonymous whilst using her real identity, yet on previous occasions 'Mr Williamson' has posted so called 'evidence' that Mary Robbins is a fake name in itself. Further to this you post a rebuttal and your opening lines are your name and your affiliation to Anonymous. You condemn Mary Robbins, whilst doing the very thing you condemn her for? As the other person stated before why would the Anonymous collective jump in when it is between individuals who have been fighting for a year and in some cases longer? Anonymous does not get involved with petty issues and they would not tell another 'Anonymous' member that they are not an “Anonymous” either. Bare in mind if Mary Robbins was not part of “Anonymous” her blog and accounts would have been taken down by them a long time ago ago. Even Mr Williamson has failed to do that. Mary is part of the collective as a whistle blower, and she will be under constant fire from the opposing sides.

I must also point out that being a whistleblower does mean at a certain point in time names of those doing the exposing can and will be revealed. What I do not understand is you seem to be claiming yourself as an Anonymous? If this is the case then you also know Mary has been with the “collective” for 3 years and has been on marches and protests in her state. If this is the case then you know Anonymous is not a group. They do not have leaders and they do not use Wikipedia for a source of reference to who they are. Each member has always defined who they were and are from the heart soul and mind. You appear to be just repeating what a website made by the authorities such as the FBI CIA and NSA have written there. Some members do have directives 'Jon', it coincides with their ideas and plans to expose corruption. You would know this if you were not such a fool in your little delusion of grandeur. If you were a true member of the Collective, you would also know that it is not just one person that “collects” information, that it is a group effort to expose others. Members work together to accomplish the impossible. Many members think outside the box and march to their own drum, which is what Mary does. “Mary cries to the police.” Now 'Jon', you said Norwich never emailed Mary. Are you now admitting that they are corresponding 'Jon'? Which means you are fully aware of your bail conditions, that you are not allowed to directly or indirectly have any correspondence with Mary Robbins or mention her name. That includes on your aliases and through your liaisons and Facebook pages and here.

I think Mary Robbins has a right to report diatribe libelous statements and harassment to the police due to these circumstances. If you were truly Anonymous, which I am finding hard to believe especially with your attitude, you would know that in extreme circumstances such as this it would be imperative to cooperate with the authorities. This rip off report was put here as a warning to not donate to the International Animal Rescue Foundation because the International Animal Rescue Foundation or “IARF” has not been registered anywhere since the first appearance of Jean Marie back in 2011. Claiming on a blog called “Enough is Enough” that the IARF is a 501c3 environmental NGO collecting donations to help Rhinos in South Africa. Jean Marie also goes on to write on behalf of “Jon”. That the IARF is part of the E.A.L.F (Eastern Animal Liberation Front). This I know does not exist! Later on in 2011, everyone who was watching the IARF found that many of the names that showed out of nowhere are aliases of Jon Williamson, including Jean Marie. “Leave it to the big boys”. Okay, let Mary Robbins and I know when they get here so we can leave it to the “big boys”. All I see is children in front of me trying to intimidate and vilify a woman toward the grave. I say children loosely because you all are acting like high school “Prima donnas”. Jon you give yourself away every time when you accuse Mary of being someone else and vice versa, Mary has not commented on here as Anonymous she has been using her real name to make every rebuttal. No Jon, you do not know me but I know you and the Animal Buddy crew I have been watching for a very long time. Let us just call me “a true friend” of those who you are victimizing. “Mary attacks private people”. Yet everything you and the others have done was in public view. You and the others have even tried to clean up your pages and blogs (whilst claiming those pages were taken down by Mary Robbins, in fact). No worries we have all the screen shots, to prove our case fully. “Raj” are you saying there are no women in the Anonymous collective? Are you saying it’s all males? Many women have joined the collective, many women have even went to prison for being a part of the collective.

Take notice 'Jon', Mary has not been online for a couple of days now, yet you are still verbally assaulting her everywhere you can. If you truly are a data collector for Anonymous, then explain why you never came forward before when people sent information to the Anonymous news site and the groups about IARF? Explain why you never tried to get in contact with the victims who came to Anonymous for help. Explain why Mary Robbins was the only one who would take on this caseload and deal with the defense of the allegations put forward. Explain it Raj, explain why it seems Mary Robbins is the better Anonymous member here than you? Show proof of the data you collected, I can guarantee all that data came from the Occupy Blog or an old GAWDS Wiki file. Which you had no hand at creating or helping with, I can guarantee Mary Robbins and Jetz Maddox Gr E have done more “data” collecting and work than you have.

As for Karen or Amber, I cannot tell anymore with you two since you are so alike in so many ways right down to your facial features. Who knows? Maybe Karen and Amber are one in the same. Seeing as you both have used aliases such as Kym Zacnyte, Johnathan Cole, Eva Ford, Mandy Frende, and Amanda Frende, and so on. Didn’t you do this with Mary Robbins before in private conversations? Didn't you threaten to put her details in public view? Yes, you did and I am a witness to this since she forwarded everything to me that night. You even went as far to get her husband involved and you say she is the one bullying you and dragging family into issues. Excuse me, but your daughter has been in this issue and was not dragged into anything. Your daughter is the one that set up the page “A Friend” which then you both re-branded to Animal Buddy. Yet, you state that Mary and others stole the name Animal Buddy? Animal Buddy is a well-known name in the United Kingdom, France, Japan, Korea and Italy. You also tried to pin blame on another Animal Buddy page for slandering a legitimate UK organisation. When in reality that page only shared inspirational pictures with quotes. People see your game Karen and Amber; they know you twist information and facts just so you come out with clean hands. You had this planned since day one of meeting people from a group of whistle-blowers. Make Mary Robbins and Jetz Maddox Gr. E take the rap for everything you have done to NoToDogMeat.

Incidentally, NoToDogMeat is still standing, and still gaining supporters for all the good they have done and will do in the future. Repeatedly Jetz Maddox Gr E and Mary Robbins have proven your arguments to be invalid with backed up screen shots. These shots have shown exactly where monies have gone and where they will go. I do see the screen caps you provided Karen, even of Mary Robbins' personal blog. Karen you realize this confirms the cyber stalking offense. Mary has placed each one of you on block yet you still can see her timeline? That too confirms you have more aliases and people stalking her. Rip Off Report claim that they will not remove this entire report as it is there to not only to encourage bad businesses to clean up their act, but also to protect the person/s who have made the report, to avoid abuse, harassment, bullying and/or intimidation. Your rebuttals clearly prove why this practice is a requirement. Also you seem to be forgetting that should anybody choose to look you up (such as rescues and the like) on a Google search THIS report will come up, with ALL your rebuttals. I wonder how many people will accept your help when they see you are not in the slightest bit concerned with animal welfare? Still at least you can relax knowing Rip Off Report NEVER remove a complaint. Period. Come now Karen, coming here repeatedly to coerce others into joining a hate campaign? Especially since you claim, you are so afraid of people finding you, yet still have your number on a public website. Ah and there is just one more lie uncovered about you Karen. Always playing the victim. Tell me do you bring your own chalk outline with you. Everything you have stated on your Animal Buddy page, blog or personal timeline is a fallacy, and everything you do from this point on, will never be taken seriously. Especially when you have given all your tactics away on this public irremovable forum. I truly think it is time to go out into the pasture Karen. In other words, bow out gracefully.

Respond to this report!

#12 General Comment

Corrupted report

AUTHOR: Raj - ()

My role within Anonymous is research. I am one of a key collators of data relating to I.A.R.F. We are well aware of Mary Robbins’ public attempts to discredit I.A.R.F. We are also aware of her associates who join her in her personal agenda under the misguided notion that Mary Robbins holds any position within the Anonymous collective. She does not.


Anonymous oppose internet censorship and we hold a rigid moral stance on issues and rights. Our core mission is to identify governments, organizations, and corporations that censor. It does not include attacking private members of the public for their beliefs or opinions and their right to free speech. We do not liaise with the Police.


One of our few rules include not disclosing our identities and not talking about the collective - Mary Robbins fails on both counts. That she preys on weak minds to extol her own is a concern. We advise all associates to have a good look at the words of Mary Robbins and consider her glaring contradictions and hypocrisy. She does not embody the Anonymous ideals.


Whilst we do not criticise Mary Robbins for attempting to make the public aware of certain issues that surround I.A.R.F. we strongly criticise her for using deceit to mislead the public about various factors. We are also in direct opposition to her embroiling innocent members of the public in the matters surrounding I.A.R.F. Cole, Donoghue and Price are not part of I.A.R.F. That Mary Robbins falsely implicates these people weakens any case that can be brought through our endeavours to expose the truth.


Mary Robbins now calls herself a ‘whistleblower’. However, that would infer inside information. Mary Robbins does not have inside information. She is simply a person who has chosen to go on public record, with very limited information and resources, to state her opinion. Whereas she is entitled to her opinion, there are very few facts, if any, in what Mary Robbins writes. She relies heavily on innuendo and implication. The result of any investigation Mary Robbins personally conducts is flawed when she makes giant leaps of assumption. Her findings are further corrupted by her crazed lust for revenge.


In summation

Mary Robbins is a typical keyboard warrior with limited intelligence, unsound reasoning, and vengeful intent. She is vindictive and corrupt. Mary Robbins spreads defamation about private people relying on deceit to smear and attack. She embroils other vacant-minded individuals to cyber assault targets she perceives as her enemy in an attempt to silence her victims. She cries to the police when she is criticized and rebutted for her false statements. Mary Robbins is not Anonymous, she is just another pain in the a*s loonitune.


Leave the job to the big boys Mary.




We are Anonymous.

We are Legion.

We do not forgive.

We do not forget.

Expect us.

Respond to this report!

#13 REBUTTAL Individual responds

Mary - Fantasy and Delusions

AUTHOR: Anonymous - ()

Mary O' Mary when will you shut up. Your constant crap talk and nonsense is boring. Your lies never-ending. 

(((rudeness redacted)))

Respond to this report!

#14 REBUTTAL Individual responds


AUTHOR: Karen - ()

Mary Robbins of Trinity, Texas, writes a RipOff report falsely implicating collusion with others and tagging, Karen Cole and Amber Donoghue, in her accusations in the report. That is an open invitation to rebuttal. 


My name is Karen Cole and I am the mother of Amber Donoghue. Mary is a compulsive liar; when she publishes lies about me, or a member of my family, I have a perfect right to refute those lies and to comment on the character of the author. I will continue to expose the character of the author of this report, which goes to the source of the veracity of her information, with any information available to me until she stops her online vendetta of lies. I reserve the right to do the same about any of her cohorts who have colluded in libel against me or a member of my family. Only a moron would name people in a RipOff report and not expect retaliation from at least one person named by her. She is the author but to all intents and purposes this report is clearly in defence of Ms Julia de Cadenet, CEO of a new and very small UK charity called - World Protection for Dogs and Cats in the Meat Trade - otherwise known as NoToDogMeat or the No To Dog Meat Foundation. See and for very little information.


Some background to the charity and its CEO can be found on these links: and  


In this RipOff report, and in her subsequent comments and screenshots, Mary Beth Wallace Robbins (born 11 October 1983, previously of Bridgeport and Norristown, PA, and more recently Willis, TX) has opened the door to responses about Ms Julia de Cadenet, her charity, and her business - see her published image in her last response to me (


I have noted that images here are not displaying correctly in sequence of comments therefore in each of my responses to Mary's and her friends' lies I will confine myself to 3 images at a time.


I strongly believe that two of the people seeking to join her here in defamation of my daughter and me are:


Ms Julia de Cadenet, UK (and sometimes Paris, France) and 

Ms 'Jetz' Maddox, Jersey Channel Islands, UK


Their writing styles are well known to me from blogs they have written and the many malicious online comments they have made.


Ms Julia de Cadenet, in particular, appears to find my age highly relevant and much to be despised in her online attacks. Age is obviously a problem for Ms de Cadenet as can be seen on the blog site. This year, Julia celebrated her birthday on her Facebook page in May but curiously welcomed a second set of birthday congratulations from her friends on FB in August. She had the same problem when registering as a UK company director for two different companies in the month of May 2013 (screen shots of this anomaly can be seen on the linked site above).


Julia de Cadenet is an unregistered lawyer and an unregistered barrister in the UK. How this makes her a public figure is a mystery only known to herself but, since she insists that she is, when she is shown to behave badly she should expect public comment.


Julia de Cadenet, also known as Julia Carter de Cadenet, appointed herself as a public figure on FB this year (although she shows 2011 as the start date) with an overnight 2000 likes but virtually no interaction -


Ms de Cadenet had her charity brought into disrepute over what has become known as the 'EganGate' affair (again that is explained in detail on the blog site She has pleaded that the crapulous posts on her charity FB and Twitter pages about Mr Peter Egan, a much respected English actor and dedicated animal rights advocate, were by unknown admin. This has been disputed by one of her fellow admin at the time, Mr Craig Eibeck, as I showed previously in a screen shot of his public FB comments, says he was so concerned that a civil action would be filed by Mr Egan that he closed both the No To Dog Meat FB and Twitter accounts down immediately upon seeing the malicious and libellous rants about Mr Egan. Some of Ms de Cadenet's colleagues then reopened the FB page and made a foolish attempt to retrieve the situation. This led to such a great deal of confusion that they rapidly threw in the towel and deleted the charity's official page completely from Facebook.


The blog site chronicles events between May 2013 and September 2013. Much more information has been revealed since then and doubtless the site will be updated when police enquiries into complaints are brought to a conclusion.


In particular, Ms M Brown's role in the events until her resignation as trustee and director of Ms de Cadenet's charity company certainly needs to be fairly addressed. The online attacks on Ms Brown by Ms de Cadenet, Ms Robbins and Ms ‘Jetz’ Maddox have been outrageous. Knowing how these three women have lied about us, it is impossible to believe what they say about Ms Brown or others. Ms Brown now lives her life in fear after listening to recordings published on YouTube in which Ms de Cadenet screams that she will hire a hit man to put bullets into the head of Ms Brown and her elderly father. Ms Brown knows intimately the voice of Ms de Cadenet from the many telephone and Skype conversations they shared.


When I listened to the YouTube recordings of the numerous telephone conversations between a woman named as Julia and a man named as 'Jose’, I was also able to identify, from her previous interviews with amateur blogshow host Jetz’ Maddox, that the woman’s voice in the recordings is that of Ms de Cadenet. Amber and I have been slandered on those shows and I have downloaded them as evidence of harassment. I realised that Ms de Cadenet would move heaven and earth to have the recordings of her violent drunken conversations removed so immediately downloaded copies as MP3 files. My reason for doing that was hearing Ms de Cadenet discussing her stalking of my daughter to her place of work and her 'clever' plan to force Amber's employer to fire her. The barrage of coercive and then blackmailing emails sent to Amber's employer by Ms de Cadenet and her colleagues are with the UK police.


I am absolutely confounded at the antics of a CEO of an animal charity and her disreputable sidekick Mary Robbins. The more I read the more incredulous I become.


I, like many others, have been pointed in the direction of the online so-called 'evidence' about IARF, and of a person named as Jon Williamson. I freely admit that I, along with many others, believed it all. Now since discovering who the authors of the 'evidence' are I have no alternative but to reserve judgement on the issue. If these women and their friends lie so dreadfully about us then I have to give their other targets the benefit of doubt.


It needs to be pointed out that quite clearly from emails that Ms Robbins has recklessly published online from the UK police to Ms Robbins and to Ms de Cadenet, that Mr Williamson is not being investigated for fraud. He is being investigated for harassment of the women who continue to hound him online.


I have read a very recent missive from Mary Robbins in which she writes: "Williamson known for his violence macarbly runs a missing children's bureau from his dirty bedsit in the notorious Blaser Court which has been busted many times for drugs." [sic] The absence of commas leads the reader to interpret that the flat of Mr W itself has been raided. ‘Violence’? Mary has written many FB communications to encourage her stupid acolytes (I have proof of the communications, and of the stupidity) that Mr W is not known for violence. So which is it? As for ‘dirty bedsit’; has she flown from Texas to UK to check that out? Mary is on welfare and relies on food banks on occasions so I doubt she has visited Mr W in the UK.


I have absolutely no idea if Jon W and 'Jose', or any other aliases attributed to him, are one and the same person and I refuse to join a virtual lynch mob to publicly hang, draw and quarter any target of the very strange and disturbed women who have shamefully and deliberately lied through their gnashing teeth about everything and anything to do with me and my family. 


Whatever the truth is about IARF and associated pages it will never be discovered through these reprehensible tactics. I have now started to read the pages and if one man is running them single handedly he deserves a medal. If I am being (paraphrased) scammed, I at least require a bit of passion and from what I can see, the admin of the pages I have viewed to date offer their supporters that in abundance.


I make one observation; if Mr Jon Williamson is pulling in big bucks to line his own pocket why is he not being investigated for fraud? The day charges are brought to that end and he is found guilty will be the day that his pages will come crashing down and there will no longer be any confusion. The police, as Mary has published with relish, have his communication devices after all. A young policeman & his sergeant have committed highly expensive resources of a cyber team to investigate his communication devices on the charges of harassment brought by Ms Julia de Cadenet, Mary Robbins, ‘Jetz’ Maddox, and friends. To insist that one man can single handedly run the volume of FB pages referenced here on the scam report from a cyber cafe does demand a huge stretch of the imagination.


In case you missed it in your green haze, my daughter Amber is no longer an admin of the Animal Buddy Facebook page and hasn't been for some time now. I make decisions on that page with my fellow admin Lorraine Price. We, as admin of Animal Buddy FB, have received threats of repercussions from certain individuals. If the past 15 months have not taught you anything Mary, it should at least have indicated to you that we don’t run from threats, we do not submit to intimidation, our opinions cannot be purchased and we will not be silenced by harassment.


Mary, Julia and Jetz… I will be back with other screen shots, three at a time, until the cows come home if needs be. I may be old but so far dementia is not my problem.
Respond to this report!

#15 Author of original report

Karen Alters Photos and Conversations

AUTHOR: Mary Robbins - ()

You just cannot get enough can you. Why would Ali speak with you, after all the bullying you did to her and the Volunteers? You love the attention admit it. Yes you did tag me in those blogs, every time I google my name, it pops up in your blogs, and on blogs

So what if I wrote for NoToDogMeat, it had nothing to do with you. It was updates on events and news about petitions, and TACN/Duo Duo rescue etc. Yet, because I was a writer for them, you continuously hounded me. Which made me resign because I could not take it anymore, yet you continue to attack me. You are doing it here now. Singling me out. You seriously have a hard on for me. I do have a heart condition and you keep pushing it. So ergo, you want to see me six feet under.

You continue to pull me into your antics and hate campaign against No To Dog Meat. You continue to alter snapshots of conversations from last year, you continue to slander no to dog meat. A responsible person, which you are not, would have called the CEO of an organization to get their questions answered. Which you did not, Julia had to call you and what did you do? “Oh Julia we had enough of you go away”. If you had enough the Hate campaign against the LEGIT organization would have been put to a halt. Now you are trying to pin me up against Ali Dolloso? I know for a fact Ali would never say any of that, especially not to you.

As for my "temp" job, I was fired for coming in late too many times. Because of my panic attacks. Yet, you would not understand none of that. I do not lie, nor do I deny anything. However, you on the other hand have to alter and edit everything said, instead of showing the WHOLE conversation that lead up to certain points. Why not tell the people how you pissed me off to the point of exploding, why not tell the people how you harmed the Chum and Champ case, why not tell the people how you harassed Bobbie Isbell and all the other group members. No, you will not mention that now will you.

You have no idea what I do 24/7 365 days a year, you do not even live here. Are you saying you have people spying on me in my hometown Karen, are you admitting to offline stalking now? You already admitted to be conspiring with Craig Aka Craash Beck and Jon.

This whole rip off report was mainly targeting Jon, with only a few mentions of you and your daughter. Seeing as you are all buddy, buddy and in the same bed with him. Defending him and his fake organization, which is not even, registered anywhere.

I can only assume you are being paid off or other by Him. Cons of a feather Karen. Aligning yourself with the IARF when many of the Animal Rights community and other organizations are against him. Cannot be helpful for your reputation Karen.

The whole reason you are slandering me everywhere you possibly can is because I will not stand down from my position of supporting No To Dog Meat, and it’s killing you. We gave you the answers of where the money went, and what it’s being used for, yet you could not handle the truth.

Craig knows exactly who JCD is and knows exactly who Jon is; they are one in the same person. Even, MS told you that. Even, MS warned you about the IARF yet you still joined up with the IARF to continue to attack Julia, Jetz and myself. With a jab at Fiona Munro on occasion.

The sad part here is you even attacked Animal People because of Merritt Clifton. Then you align yourselves with Merritt Clifton, a not so friend to animals, who wishes to see all pit type dogs dead. Boy, you sure are picking a bang up type of crowd to follow and be friends with Karen.

Yes Karen, Julia did say that because it is true. John Hughes is fighting cancer, and you keep defaming and being libelous against NTDM, YOU even attacked John Hughes, He is on his DEATH BED FFS. You have no respect, no morals, and no soul.

Again, you are throwing Craig out there to the wolves. He must be so proud to have a backstabbing friend like you. We already knew Craig and Jose had control of NTDM’s old pages. We already knew that they kicked Julia off. Why do you think Julia had to speak to Facebook legal and to the authorities about this situation?

He did not have control of Jose/Jon at all.

Julia is not Odious/Odin but Craig does know who he is, he just will not tell you the truth about that.

Does anyone else see how that conversation is staged?

I can tell you this, Odin like Jon threaten Julia via skype/phone Conversation and in private messages.

Drunk Julia? No and I have proof of that. Land Macs did all that. Aka Craig.

I will not be responding again, I don't have time to debate or argue with you, nor will I put my life and health on the line for anyone, that includes You Karen. I won't be your Victim anymore. I will be talking to the Sussex, and French police of your area. I will be showing them everything from day 1 to present day.

Respond to this report!

#16 REBUTTAL Individual responds


AUTHOR: Karen - ()


Good evening ladies, I use the term advisedly, I want to sincerely thank you for turning your very own Ripoff report into what has now become a ridiculous farce. I see that the crapulous Ms de Cadenet has joined in the fun as, 'A Friend'.


Well done Mary for using your dictionary, you should do that more often, when I use words I know exactly what they mean. By the by, if you are going to continue to file complaints to the police about people, you really do need to know the difference between libel and slander. Remember to ask yourself before each blog, 'did they say it or did they write it? I have taught you a lot of new words over the period you have been venting your spleen in your viperous blogs; I noted that you particularly took an obsessive shine to the word vilify. By my laughing at your attempts at grasping the rudiments of the English language it seems you were persuaded, thankfully, into sometimes using an editor/proof reader. If you wish to continue your little hobby as a writer I would suggest you take a correspondence course in English language. Unlike you, I don't pretend to be a 'writer' Mary. As you and your friend Julia so gleefully point out, I am just a little old lady to be despised by young women like you, so when I make grammatical errors it really doesn't matter.


So embarrassing to read grown women sneering at age as if it is an infirmity. What would your mothers say? I do understand, however, that you regard my admonishments of your bad behavior as child abuse since it seems that you retain a school yard mentality. While we are on the subject of an 'old woman' educating silly children; Mary the reason your online store is failing has nothing to do with us. The fact that the standard of your ‘creations’ is akin to the absent-minded doodles a 7 year old brings home from school for mother to magnet to the fridge may play a part.


Mary, I have always believed that 'big can be beautiful' but you appear to have a problem with your size? If the only thing that comes out of this squalid vendetta of yours is that you truly have stopped eating meat, after claiming 15 years of being an Animal Rights Advocate, then I feel it has all been worthwhile. You may now find that the weight starts to drop and you will not feel the need to be so bitter about your size. Certainly, with 'heart failure'...I am never sure what that means exactly...losing weight must be advantageous to your health. 


It has been nice having a motherly chat with you Mary, but time flies and I need my sleep so down to business.


Ah yes, your sordid secret group. Enlighten me, who is Lynne? Who is Dawn? I may be very old and frail and b***h slapped to hell and back but I am pretty sure I can count more than 13 people on this list (attached) of your group members who, excluding Lorraine, all watched you maliciously hatch and plot to destroy me and my daughter. For what, not wanting to associate with you? I believe anybody reading your unfortunate rants here will sympathise with our predicament.


Amber could not stomach your online company and for that you attempted to sabotage one of her dog adoptions, attacked her in her workplace trying to get her boss to sack her, slandered her on inane radio shows, libelled her in a multitude of blogs etc. Even going so far as colluding to use the death of her father to hurt her and me. You have never met her yet your hatred is palpable. How did you and your online 'friends' become so corrupt? To attempt to put a woman, who rescues dogs and regularly donates to animals, out of work is unconscionable conduct.


You refer to Amber writing blogs? Amber doesn't write blogs.


Both you and Julia are fully aware that the OPEXPOSENTDM blog was written by a friend of a Ms Feary, of the organisation AAR, Ms Feary received a very nasty twitter attack by No To Dog Meat and it caused quite a stir. Hence the retaliatory OPEXPOSENTDM Blog, Twitter and FB.


To insist we are party to the ripoff report you refer to is ridiculous. Neither Amber nor I would collude with something so badly written. We do have our pride after all and if we do write one it will have at least a modicum of finesse.


Neither the extremely poorly written OPEXPOSENTDM blog nor the blog named or tagged you Mary Robbins (nor any of your family) so how on earth can they have had any impact on your life or your precarious physical & mental health? Now you on the other hand, Mary, have only recently posted Amber's home address publicly on your FB page.


The only relationship with your nemesis I recall is with Julia de Cadenet, who admits it in the taped recordings, and further more begs to get back into bed with him. Hmm...I wonder if I could upload copies of those recordings here?


Please do tell how we became FB moderators in order to 'take down' your pathetic pages? More to the point why would we even bother? They were no threat to us and in truth wanted them to remain as a testament to how demented you have become.


Mary, if you wrote a cease and desist notice, I am perplexed as to why you are still flaming Amber? If you truly believe yourself to be a victim, then why do you continue to pepper her name on the internet attached to cretinous lies hoping for it to stick. Fortunately, your writing is for the most part meandering and pretty incomprehensible. I suggest you spend time trying to regain some self respect instead of making a public spectacle of yourself.


Mary you have remained the juvenile delinquent; yes I know about your time in the correctional institution, and unfortunately age has only served to darken your failing heart. Although I have paused to wonder if you have a heart in reading how you expressed your outrage at your birthday being ruined by the death of the motorcyclist who impacted your husband’s car. Without wanting to appear over familiar Mary, might I suggest some cognitive behavioural therapy to maybe help alleviate some of your anger management issues and obsessive addictive disorders?


Finally I thank you yet again 'ladies' in aiding me to turn what might have been a damaging report into a silly game.


Respond to this report!

#17 General Comment

Karen, what are you on?

AUTHOR: Anonymous - ()

Hey karen,

I see that age hasn't just messed up your memory, but clearly you need glasses too honey.

Just because I choose the name Anonymous does NOT mean I am Mary. Come on now? Is that why you think Mary is responsible for every single tiny thing on the net? Because people choose not to use their name? why would Mary use different names for these comments AS WELL as her own? You don't make sense.

Two things about my name. I CHOOSE not to give it to you because you already know who it is (and that's my right). You may well claim to have forgotten but, again, that's what dementia does, isn't it? Very convenient.

Secondly, you already posted my name AND address. And on a Rip off report of your own no less. So whilst I have sympathy for your diminishing mental abilities, I absolutley refuse to give you my name every time we 'talk' or you don't remember. You will just have to learn to start writing things down darling.

You said that Amber 'found herself unwittingly into your sordid, secret group? HUH?? SORDID? What are you blathering about? 


adjective \ˈsȯr-dəd\

: very bad or dishonest

: very dirty


Full Definition of SORDID

:  marked by baseness or grossness :  vile <sordid motives>
a :  dirty, filthy
b :  wretched, squalid
:  meanly avaricious :  covetous

Really?? It's a Facebook GROUP not a BROTHEL. Perspective Karen - get some. Also, you were there too as was Lorraine AND Dawn. Why didn't any of you stop her? Bit willful is she? Like her mum? The only thing you can blame Mary for is opening the door. You and Amber are the ones who chose to walk through it, that's on you. Can't take the heat - get out of the kitchen. But you do make me laugh. When you were in that group, along with Amber, Lorraine, Lynne and Dawn, there were only 13 people. Myself, Jetz and Mary make up 7 out of the 13. Hardly a militia now, is it?

I bet you if you showed MY comments to JW, he would be able to tell you straight off who this is. I am almost insulted. I say almost, because until you commented, I had forgotten you existed. I can't help but wonder why uou are posting now.

You and Jon are cut from the same cloth you know? Neither one of you can just SAY what you want. Instead you have to 'rage' and 'attack' and 'lie'. I think I will change your group name to Jackanory (there now, how could Mary possibly know about that?).

I suspect you are doing this because your page is losing likes. I think you want us to respond, so you can cut little bits out and edit those bits so it looks like something completely different, just like you did with a certain email and a certain Facebook event page. I note that you never once place any links with those shots, so people can click that link and read the whole story.

Of course, IF you were so certain that you were right, you WOULD do that wouldn't you? So that the people you are trying to reach can look and agree with you. Yet...... you don't? Curious.

"you couldn't resist trying to again embroil us" 

What do you mean 'again'? You came here! Look at the date of the original report. You waited OVER A MONTH and when it all began to die down, you came here and stirred it up again. Dementia - Clear and simple.

How many languages do YOU speak Karen? I speak French and Portuguese. I am currently also learning German. But then again, experts do say younger people have a better capacity for languages than older people do.

What proof do you want to see Karen? What proof do you want to see (that we haven't already posted) that would satisify this personal vendetta you have against just ONE woman in a world of 7 BILLION people? Tell us - we keep asking but you never answer. Could it be that you have no answer? Could it be that, as one of our writers stated, you are just after Facebook fame after all? 

YOU Karen (and Jon) could have ended this months ago, possibly years, JUST by answering that one question. Bit too much though eh? After all you have probably forgotten what that proof is by now.

By the way Mary, since I have the advantage of knowing first hand that you have no concept of truth and wallow in mucky lies, everything you have written in this report and elsewhere needs to be taken with a massive pinch of salt.

Brilliant. If thats the way you feel Karen WHY do you keep coming back??? Can't take you own advice eh? You know I have heard that a spoonful of sugar helps with that. I strongly suspect we have not heard the last from you though. Incidentally, why isn't Amber here defending herself? Maybe she has more sense than you. Possibly Amber was beginning to see that when you stopped attacking, we stopped defending.

Just one last thing Karen, I am deliberately changing my 'State' because I see that stuff like that is a bug bear of yours.

Respond to this report!

#18 Author of original report

Karen is the Only Liar

AUTHOR: Mary Robbins - ()

Wow you don't know how to read Karen, I did explain in my second post that our blog is sometimes out there. THIS IS MY THIRD RESPONSE, and only 3 reponses from me. The rest you can guess whom they are from. You know the people you attacked. More will be coming soon, and no Karen I don't do the identities like you Percy Cuted.

That's okay hun, keep blaming everything on me. A person who is a thousand miles away from you whom is also 40 years younger than you, which was pointed out by a friend of ours. 

Must make you feel all big and gushy inside bullying me huh? Feel big and bad don't you?

No Karen I don't have the obssession YOU AND HER KEEP PULLING ME BACK IN, you and her keep mentioning my name, you and her keeping bullying me. You are the ones with the obsession it is all over your ANIMAL BULLY PAGE.

I told you before I do not retailiate unless provoked. And you two nad your friends are doing exactly that. 

No matter how many times you come back here Karen to spout your frabrication no one will believe you. They see everything, the truth. I am no stranger to it either.

Okay thanks we will keep turning out blogs. Don't like it? Don't read it. Infact do us all a favor Stay out of Animal rights.

Because you are Animal Abusers point blank.

You reported everyone of the NTDM volunteers and CEO as fake, You reported animal awareness pages, You had facebook remove pages I DON'T EVEN ADMIN as well. Proof is on my support dashboard, and on the pages I do admin. Which I have shown multiple times.

I already proved where you write about me Karen, YOUR ANIMAL BUDDY PAGE, THE RIP OFF REPORT, And OPEXPOSENTDM.

Woo snap shot of blog woo. I think people can read it for themselves don't you? I think they get what I mean. No need to post a snap, It's already there for public view duntz.

Sorry to piss in your cheerios. Remember the saying If you're pissing someone off must be doing something right. WAHEY! I'm pissing you off little darling, Good keep going. More evidence for my lawyer. THANKS!

I'm laughing at you. I do find you amusing :)

Want me to stop talking and exposing y'all? Leave me and NTDM alone and I will. It's as simple as that.

Respond to this report!

#19 REBUTTAL Individual responds


AUTHOR: Karen - ()

Mary you are an inveterate liar. Posting several rebuttals under different identities with identical silly screen shots does not help your case. That you have listed some of the multitude of blogs you have written about us proves your harassment of us. To prove your case against us, please supply at least one link to any blog, naming or tagging you, that I or my daughter have written about you. Since you rely so heavily on spurious screen shots surely you must be able to provide at least one screen shot of a blog, any blog, part of a blog, naming/tagging you that can be sourced to us? No...didn't think so since none have ever been written. 

You operate on the basis that if you churn out blog after blog, packed with your completely unsubstantiated accusations and tagged with our names for search engines, that the defamation will stick in spite of your semi-literate rants. At one time, this summer, you were so manic you were posting one a day.

You appear to have a particular obsession with my daughter who found herself unwittingly in your FB sordid secret group. Some friends had asked us both to join your group, but in a very short time we realised that it was a bad place to be. Our problem was, we knew full well that if we left the group you would come after us in the same way we witnessed you attacking others. Well we did leave the group, but thanks to one of the only decent members of the group I was able to remain a fly on the wall. I was able to watch as you and your acolytes plotted to destroy us. This is not the forum to show screen shots of that plotting, but if you insist I will oblige. 

You accuse us of making your life hell, of making you ill, fearful of being attacked in your home?(I supply a screen shot of the recent blog making those accusations). On what basis Mary? If you are now in a state of acute anxiety it is because, as is clearly shown in the screen shot, you are consumed with rage that your lies are falling on deaf ears. That you are conspiring with others to pervert the course of justice by lying to police forces must also fuel your anxiety state. Even you, at your most manic, must fear that you will not get away with wasting precious police resources in your demented vendetta.

The main thrust of this report you have posted is an attack on an organisation you have been hounding for years but you couldn't resist trying to again embroil us. I suppose you imagine that two birds with one stone was a good plan. Just because you write repeatedly that we are somehow part of this organisation doesn't make it true, will never make it true. That is one of your major problems Mary, you are lazy. You can't find dirt on us so you decide to muddy the waters in the hope that 'Joe Public' is pretty stupid.

Mary, you remind me of somebody who won't learn a foreign language but thinks if they shout loud enough in their own language they will be understood. Doesn't work that way Mary. To be understood you need put in some work and you are simply to d**n lazy to do that. So I ask again, show us some real proof to prove your case against us.

By the way Mary, since I have the advantage of knowing first hand that you have no concept of truth and wallow in mucky lies, everything you have written in this report and elsewhere needs to be taken with a massive pinch of salt.

Respond to this report!

#20 Author of original report

Response to Karen Cole Again

AUTHOR: Mary Robbins - ()

Karen please explain how I am not an artist in my own way? Are you saying cartoonist are not artists? Are you saying Abstract pixel art and so on is not art?

Maybe to you but others and myself we consider that art. So ergo I am not lying.

Asking a question on a blog I co write in about suicide does not mean I am suicidal, far from it. Of course some of our writing is out there and sometimes it's hard for small minded people to comprehend the vast amount of information - meaning YOU. So, we're stuck dumbing down our writing just so you can understand it.

Even doing only photos so people can get the point. THAT Animal Buddy LIES and then passes on these lies via private messages to other groups. You only show one side of the issue, we show both.

Now if we were liars (which we aren't) We would do what you do, show one side.

Correct me if I am wrong but just a month ago you asked "Did She Jump, or was she pushed?" 

What does that say about you? Ergo you want to see me six feet under.

Never said you hacked my accounts. I said Jon tried to gain access. There you go thinking everything is about you and your daughter, surely isn't me whom has the MEME ego.

Didn't publish my details? Then prey tell why did I have to speak to a lawyer and get my details removed from RipOff report? Jetz, Mine, Fiona and Julia's address were plastered on the ripoff report you did with JON.

He also tried to plaster them in a comment section of my friends blog. Yes Who gave him my address KAREN? You did, you and your spoiled rotten daughter.

Who went digging on the internet for a year straight trying to find any type of dirt they could find on me? YOU, JON, AMBER and your friends. What did you find? An old blog taken over by a thug, my old update blog about my writing, which does not hold my writing in it. Which has not been written in since 2008 or 09?

This doesn't help your case does it? There is only two blogs I write in from time to time. that being WARONARA and the ANON blog. Like the other person said there are 3 writers on these blogs now. Not all of it is by me. Yet you continue to single me out.

Want to explain to the public why you do that?

Alledgedly paid by certain people.. Karen READ correctly deary. Obviously you are being paid if that bit upset you so. So who's doing the paying, Jon? SD AA which is it? Only someone being paid would continue on for this LONG with a hate campaign.

Don't forget to clean up your Animal Buddy Page Karen, we wouldn't want people going there seeing that you ARE SLANDERING No To Dog Meat. Along with your pal from International Animal Rescue Foundation and SayNoToDogMeat.Net.

IARF SCAMS PEOPLE, and again I think you have a guilty concience since you are making this all about you and your daughter. 

You don't pick on the disabled, or steal photos. Should I publisize the photo you stole of an elderly woman who supports NTDM? Should I also show people that you did post personal details on a blog that's.. Wait for it... Called OPEXPOSENTDM?

Would you care to explain the blog called That's yours and your daughters, even wildwest domains confirmed that.

Would you like me to get the NTDM Volunteers and CEO here to tell their side of the story. Since you seem to block and ban them from your now Animal Buddy page? I can get them here, and they can go on and on with information on how you and your daughter have been maliciously attacking everyone.

Please Karen, stop defending your daughter, you are making her look like an invalid. And we all know she knows how to speak for herself in more ways than one.

Yes I have been harassed offline and online, because of you and your daughter plus Jon, linking to my profile multiple times which you just did again, you bint.

Do you live here? Do you see what goes on everyday? Do you have access to my answering machine? No, you don't.  I think I proved well enough who harassed my police department in a post I did with Jetz, and NO WHERE DID I SAY YOU OR YOUR DAUGHTER.

Plenty of snapshots on this ripoff report proven everything you've done over, we have you BANG TO RIGHTS.

Lets get onto this investigative reporting issue shall we. Yes I am an investigative journalist, anyone with a story about corrupt orgs and or DNA'S or other issues I do report on, I do question them, and I do post up facts and I do QUOTE people. ERGO investigative journalist. 

Would you like my references?

Yahoo Contributor, Yahoo Blogger, Yahoo LIFE, and Viewshoud. All from years ago. You would have known that if your research wasn't so, what's the word. Constrained to just Google. :\

I'm sure Jetz and others have the screenshots of how their account was as you say hacked into. Which I'm sure they'll post it up here shortly.

Good Night Karen, you Merry old soul you.

Respond to this report!

#21 Consumer Suggestion

Naughty Naughty Karen Cole. Pull those Knickers Up!

AUTHOR: A Friend - ()

Please can some one tell me Who is Percy?

Surely this can't be THE Karen Cole? higher than mighty and always right and squeaky, even when she's so up to her neck in s***, no bath will ever  scrub that leathery old skin clean. PMSL.

Didn't the  daughter recently, when arrested swear under oath "neither she nor her mum have ever used alias or fake names "  Naughty, Naughty  telling porkies. What was that Kym? Amby's alter coming out? Seems our trolls have more in common with Johnny Boy than we thought?

Is it possible that these "truth seekers" are in fact mixed up with John Williamson and Price Brown? Is it possible they have backed  the old nag ( sorry  Stallion) on its way to Scotland Yard? 

Tell us though one thing "Percy"? What pleasure do you get bullying a woman 40 years your junior? Does that make you a wee bit taller? a wee bit smarter? creepy? creepy Percy. 

Maybe someone should report you Percy Cole to Jon Williamson Aka Dimitri / Depre's Child Abuse Bureau... shhh. don't tell.. Just drop your dollars in his Barclays bank account. Silly me, you have  done already promoting him each and every day. The good and the bad of " animal rescue".

Must admit can totally get why Percy Cole is hiding her identity? Pretty shameful to be caught with your stinky drawers down again isn't it? Where will that rotten old caustic tongue hide when it comes out loud and clear you have been cosying with the scammers?

Promoting them, even publicly thanking them Percy .. ooh ... naughty Cole. Going to look a sour old silly billy soon. I " almost" feel sorry for you. Laughing stock for ever more. 


Oops did I say too much Jose? sorry Simone / James Coper / Moja/ Muncher soon to be banged up Johnny. Did you want me to save the best for your newsite " Animal Bastards"?


Long live freedom of speech  Percy Cole. All in the public interest. Reporting things how we see them. This is going to be such fun. 

Bite me.




Respond to this report!

#22 General Comment

Response to Karen Cole

AUTHOR: Anonymous - ()

Karen, I know you are old (but 70 is still a great age, well done you) but I think your mind might have wandered a bit too far this time. You stated that Mary has aliases, well so do you -  Eva Ford, John Cole.

Did you forget that? In a classroom that would be 'tit for tat', so lets forget that (we shall call that one a draw) and move on.

Mary claims to be Anonymous does she? Don't you think she would have to be pretty bloody stupid to put her name on everything she does? So can you please clarify your point? Either Mary is Anonymous and therefore you can not possibly know if she has fake accounts OR she has fake accounts and therefore she is not and never has been anonymous?  OR even some-one as 'pretty bloody stupid' as that can still get under your skin?

Last year you were so very keen to be a part of the whistleblower collective, you couldnt wait to tell us everything, and yet now its a different story. You claim Mary threatened suicide? Really?? Because I co-wrote that blog, so what does that mean? I was planning to help make Marys 'death' look like  a suicide??

Anyway, lets look at the 'woah is me' section of your dreary ramblings.

This is what Mary/I stated:

And this is what AMBER posted just over a month EARLIER:


So again, I think we can scrap that arguement too. Another draw.

You have yet to show evidence of this so-called proof you have, whilst we, on the other hand, have done nothing BUT show evidence:


On the basis of evidence, I would call that 12 WINS.

Just a quick note here Karen, because I know your mind wanders a lot these days. Mary doesnt write these blogs alone. 

Anybody who reads these blogs will see CLEARLY that every single one has been in response to attacks from you and your daughter.

Now whilst I admit our writing styles are similiar, there are in fact 3 writers on that blog. Care to explain why you have only targetted Mary? You, Amber, Lorraine, Lynne, d**k, Snowleopard Lass - 6 people against ONE?

Mary has told you time and time again that she does not own that blog, yet still you attack her. Care to hazard a guess over who actually does own it?

The 'fantasies' you claim are in this blog are all made up of screen shots from YOUR pages, so that must mean it is you, that is the fantastist. Again this is a common age related condition. Its called dementia.

Audio editting LIE? Hm let me see. One of your team editted many hours of audio, did he not? Secretly recorded some-one and then posted it on both Youtube and Vimeo? He even admitted he did that, which we put in the blog:

Tell me Karen, what does 'they were though EDITED'?

However if you are referring to the work that Jetz did:

You will hear quite clearly Jon saying 'they can publish whht they want. I don't care'. that kinds blows THAT arguement out of the water too huh? I guess thats two more wins to 'Mary'.

I kinda lost you after the second 'LIE' bit. You seemed to run out of steam there, or perhaps 'raage' took over and all coherency just went right out the window.

"On your BEST day you're not as smart as I am on my worst day"


Respond to this report!

#23 Author of original report

Karen proves me correct everytime

AUTHOR: Mary Robbins - ()

Thanks Karen for proving me correct yet again. How you sit there and try to sabotage Ntdm and Myself. I never said you collected donations, but you do and it is on your Animal Buddy page that you do, just have the public scroll down a ways to see it. Oh, but wait you'll remove it, won't you.

I never said you did death threats. Guilty conscience maybe? I said Jon did the threats. See how you twist the information Karen?

I also said those who slander organizations and charities, which prevent those organizations and charities from collecting money- Are Animal Abusers. I also said if you take down pages that are there to cross post and or spread awareness, then yes you are considered Animal Abusers. Anyone who slanders and defames an org or  charity or gets an animal awareness page taken down is an Animal Abuser. Deal with it Karen you and you daughter have done those things.

You don’t poke fun at people with disabilities or whom may be overweight? Then explain why Amber consistently calls me fat and the reason for having diabetes is because I am fat. I'm not even fat, and my diabetes was due to genetics. Not the point though is it. You coming here after a month now just saying something.

Why use an alias Karen? Percy Cuted? Is it just a coincidence that you decide to attack today out of all the days, when Jon Williamson’s bail conditions are up? Still defending the con man, I see.

I would also assume the reason you are attacking again is our latest post against you. Animal Buddy Lies – Photos worth a Thousand Words. You claim NTDM never donated to Baia Maire yet there it is, in b/w, showing that Ntdm did send money to them.

Mad aren’t you because I said nothing and only showed photos? Can’t twist what people say if they say nothing.

Tell the public Karen why you did not donate to NTDM yet, staged a hate campaign to promote other big boy organizations.

Tell the public Karen and Amber, why you never contacted the CEO of NTDM even though, she placed her phone number out there for all to see and to get into contact with.

Tell the public Karen why you continue to attack me after I sent out the Cease and Desist order. Knowing full well I can now get a lawyer involved since you did not acknowledge the order and continue to attack me.

Yes report me to my police, and they will tell you all that I made a formal complaint in person about these women. Karen Cole, Amber Donoghue, Lorraine Price, G. Brown and others. They can also confirm that an investigation is happening against Jon Williamson and the women mentioned.

Linking to an old blog does what for you Karen. Is that the only thing you have? An old poem/story blog? No, you have more. Yet, that blog was taken over by my ex-mates girlfriend. 

I actually do have connections Karen; I still keep in contact with my old friends. You truly have no clue about me at all. Keep spreading the lies and misinformation, it is only proving Jetz and I correct in everything.


Note to lisa, please do not log into my account again.


Respond to this report!

#24 Author of original report

Karen Cole Twists information

AUTHOR: Lisa - ()

Yes everything said is a lie right. Then explain everything you have done on your Animal Buddy page, please explain the year long hate and bullying campaign against Mary and NoToDogMeat. Look at the date that this was written then look at Jons Ripoff report, it was in response to what he and you DID TO Them.

Maybe if you stopped harassing and showing hate toward these people they will stop retailiating.

You have many people who are fed up with your actions. And lying about a woman who is thousands of miles away from you is lunacy. You will never see her never have any chance of contact with her.

Joelene is not her alias that is my sister. A detective you are not, my sister let her use it to inform people of a 12 hour ban. You know this for a fact because you were in the group when she said it.

If you can't handle what you dish out then don't serve it. I think people can see the truth by the links and snapshots provided. I believe they can see who the real bullies are here, and it isn't Mary or NTDM.

More screenshots here will show you harassing Mary and NTDM. Try to explain to the public why you continue to drag Mary and NTDM into everything.

Besides that Linking to the anon blog will let other people see how you are the ones starting everything.

Respond to this report!

#25 REBUTTAL Individual responds


AUTHOR: Percy Cuted - ()

Incredibly tired of Mary Robbins (writer of this report) of Trinity Texas USA ( and her alias libelling people in a multitude of blogs and sites online, and then screaming that she is the victim when her lies are rebutted and she is made a fool of. In a recent temper tantrum she threatens suicide because people refuse to believe her nasty lies: Mary Robbins is a pathological liar. She appears to have some form of psychotic delusional personality disorder. She claims to be an 'Anonymous' member, she claims to have contacts in homeland security, she claims to be a writer, journalist, poet, artist, investigator... none of which is true. Mary Robbins in fact has no artistic talent (, or writing aptitude (, or connections whatsoever. She is however, sadly prolific in the drivel she churns out. She is an obsessional character assassin who fixates on a person and sets about to construct fantasies and vicious lies to ruin that person (or persons), presumably to fill her dull unemployed days. Linking the workplace of my daughter, a private individual, who has nothing to do with IARF is reprehensible. Making bogus allegations to harass me and my daughter on this ‘consumer’ site, when we do not have any affiliation with any organisation, is as devious as it is malicious. We do not ask for or receive money from anyone on social media, through fundraising or from selling merchandise/ services online; nor do we receive any benefits, unlike Mary Robbins. The catalogue of lies by Mary Robbins aimed at my daughter include… Runs a hate campaign directed at No To Dog Meat - LIE Stole photos of volunteers and supporters of No To Dog Meat and posted them on Facebook pages with volatile statements of defamation - LIE Made a rip-off report to continue harassment - LIE Received audio files and edited them - LIE Has experience in audio editing - LIE Practices audio editing at her place of work - LIE Has violently harassed Mary and others online & off-online - LIE Harassed local police departments FB - LIE Was told by police not to speak of No To Dog Meat - LIE Is part of/affiliated with IARF - LIE Scams for money on - LIE Writes blogs - LIE Makes death threats - LIE Targets handicapped people - LIE Is an animal abuser - LIE Paid by certain important (and highly reputable) animal charities to destroy No To Dog Meat - LIE Hacking - LIE Publishes peoples private details & home addresses online - LIE Mary Robbin's attention seeking meme ego is out of control and anyone being virtually assaulted by her should report it to her police department

Respond to this report!
Ripoff Report Recommends
ZipBooks Accounting Software

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.