Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #753578

Complaint Review: Jolene Cardinali, Medical Technologist - Hartford Connecticut

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: anonymous — Hartford Connecticut United States of America
  • Author Not Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • Jolene Cardinali, Medical Technologist 80 Seymour Street Hartford, Connecticut United States of America

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

After graduating college, I interviewed at several hospitals in the Greater Hartford Area, Boston Area, and Phoenix. At the time, I lived in Phoenix. I was offered an exciting position in flow cytometry at Hartford Hospital. During my two hour plus interview, I met Jolene Cardinali.

The position seemed interesting and new, not mundane as med technology had become. I also felt I found a job where I could constantly learn new things and work with intelligent pathologists. I was very excited and enthusiastic.

To ensure I was making the correct choice, I discussed my employment with Marge Abels in HR at CLP and Tina Dibble, CLP HH's Lab Hematology Manager. I was informed that I would be given a sign-on bonus upon hire and that I could use that to move across country. I spend approximately $2500 moving from Arizona to Connecticut. When I went to orientation, I was informed I would not receive the sign-on bonus until after my 90 day review. Neither Tina Dibble or Marge Abels informed me of this over the phone or via email after I specifically asked if there was anything I needed to be aware of before moving.

Regardless, I entered the special hematology laboratory after orientation. Tina Dibble informed me that Jolene Cardinali was responsible for my training on Monday Feb. 7th 2011. Jolene was very obnoxious and difficult to understand. She talked incredibly fast and unprofessionally with her hands, giggling and making remarks like, "oh, you don't know how to do that?". Because Jolene was responsible for training me, I needed to ask her repeated questions about what to do. I had no previous flow cytometry experience and this was verified with Tina Dibble and Marge Abels during the phone conversations, interviews and emails.

After a few days, Jolene refused to train me any more. She said Tina expected me to know the processes and I needed to ask other techs. She said she had other things to do, so I was left on my own. At the time, I had confidence and did not see this as a set-up for failure, assuming the Procedure Manuals were well-written. I went into the Standard Operating Procedure Manuals and found them incredibly disorganized and outdated. However, Tina instilled in me that I needed to follow them word for word. When I had a question, Jolene seemed annoyed, frustrated and as if I were interrupting her. Still, the other personnel answered my questions and showed me how to process specimens and run them. 

One Saturday when Jolene was working on her own, I believe she intentionally mixed up running specimens on the analyzer. Because I had set-up these specimens, Jolene recognized her own mistake, threw away the evidence, and blamed me for "mislabeling". The reason I believe Jolene did this is because not only did she feel threatened but also because she knew she could get away with it. In any other fair and equal opportunity laboratory, when someone makes a mistake like that, most people would keep the tubes and show the evidence. Instead Jolene disguised the mistake and "threw them away". I have never mislabeled a specimen before and continue to believe that I am accurate and precise and follow HIPAA to the tee. On another incident, I was watched when labeling iron stains during training with the incorrect marker, then Jolene blamed me for the names rubbing off after they had a methaline fix. Tina decided she could see some of the names still, but neither would listen when I could read all of the names. These mistakes, that could have been easily prevented by a good trainer or someone who was not "out to get you" caused me to have a poor review.

Extending my probationary period, Jolene continued to mis-train me then nit-pick my mistakes. Apparently, there were two techs before me who Jolene did the same thing to. She apparently caused someone else to have a nervous breakdown when Jolene acted like her friend then went behind her back. She caused another employee to hate her job and loose it as well. Needless to say, I did not stand a chance. Without updated procedure manuals that made sense or a proper trainer in the department (who was supposed to be Jolene) plus Jolene nit-picking and exaggerating all of my minute mistakes, I was out in a few months.

After I left a few days ago, I realized that Jolene was playing games with Tina at my expense. I was not there to fulfill a job role as much as I was there to satisfy Jolene's psychotic needs. Because Jolene is "in" with very intelligent pathologists, she is not at risk for loosing her job. Because she gets away with so much,  I advise anyone wanting to work in Special Hematology at HH to give it another thought. If you think you want to work with her, you will be her next victim. She cannot work with other people, and I believe if she had a really good psych eval she would be found to b be a true psychopath. She will warm up to you and stab you in the back. She will say one thing but mean another - for her own benefit. You do not want to work in this department. It cost me credit card debt and loss of a job. There was poor, if any training from Jolene and she was always available when I made a mistake.

Unfortunately, there is no separate title for Jolene, for if there was then it would be easier to explain the complaint. She is not the manager or trainer, but she gets to call the shots.

Because I moved out here on credit and took a pay cut when comparing the cost of living (I was doing it for the interest) I feel responsible to let anyone else know that you do not want to work with Jolene Cardinali. If you are intelligent, have flow experience, love learning about antibodies cancers and cells, like working with your hands, and think this job will be great. Forget it! I am positive that because I was enthusiastic about learning, I was a threat to Jolene (because Jolene also does special research projects on the side and probably either gets compensated for them or gets more authority in the department). She knows that because I don't have kids or too much outside responsibility, I have time on my own to read and research and learn flow. In fact, that is what I was doing. There are excuses for letting me go, but they are not good enough. Excuses include: Jolene believed they needed to have someone from the "inside"; Tina believed they needed to have someone with more hematology? experience (like regular clinical hemo has anything to do with spec. heme, right?); And Tina remarked that one of the pathologists believed I did not have enough background knowledge.

Instead of any type of remedial training, education, or proper training at all, after my initial performance review, I was made to work everyday, just like any other tech there. I was even left alone one evening from 6pm until 11:30pm where I made two very minor mistakes. These again were exaggerated from Jolene to Tina and the pathologist in the office and because she acted the way she does - unprofessional, silly, giggly, waving her hands around and whatever- she made a huge deal about minute things while telling me they were very minor mistakes. At one point, Jolene even said, "Well, [my name] is on the fast track here!" While she was really just waiting to get me fired.

Luckily, it was somewhat of a relief not to have to deal with that political mess in there. Too bad because the work itself was pretty interesting and the pathologists are really smart, educated and super nice to be able to work with. Its too bad that Jolene has to run the show. There is so much potential for that lab if she wasn't there. I can understand why she is there though - because she had absolutely No! people skills whatsoever and only a good manager would be able to notice the difference in how nice it can be working in a Team Environment versus working with a psychopath aka Dictatorship Jolene.

Can I have my money back now?

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 07/15/2011 04:57 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/jolene-cardinali-medical-technologist/hartford-connecticut-/jolene-cardinali-medical-technologist-tina-dibble-lab-manager-do-not-work-in-her-departm-753578. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
3Author
5Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#8 Author of original report

For more like this...

AUTHOR: Karin W. - (United States of America)

POSTED: Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Oh Yeah. If you liked what I wrote, don't forget to check out my reviews of restaurants and places around the area on Yelp! and TripAdvisor.com.

Hope you enjoyed!

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#7 UPDATE EX-employee responds

Leave me out of it.

AUTHOR: Darren Brown - (United States of America)

POSTED: Sunday, January 15, 2012

 I just became aware of this web nonsense.  Whoever you are, since you don't have the guts to sign your name to anything, just know that your IP address can be tracked, internet provider records can be subpoenaed and slandering the other party while you are in a court proceeding is ill advised.  I did not write the previous rebuttal attributed to me.  Please leave me out of it.


 


Darren Brown

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#6 Author of original report

Jolene's test

AUTHOR: Karin W. - (United States of America)

POSTED: Sunday, January 15, 2012

"Hi Darren. Its Jolene. Gosh, there is so much changing in your life. I hope U R Ok. There wasn't a dry eye when Tina told us the news. I wish I could've helped U more. I know U R a private person & I tried to get U 2 open up...I know about Karen from teh beginning. I can tell U that now. The other ting is - did you know what she wrote about me on the web? Google me. Very intrsting. Guess she was a little mad @ the time. Hope U R going to be Ok with your new life that U have chosen. call/text anytime. we will miss you. JC"

This is the kind of condescending crap anyone has to deal with when dealing with Jolene Cardinali. After D was let go, Jolene decided to text him outside of work. Nice. At this point. I'm letting it go. Karin is signing off and moving on with her life. I'm happy at home (with D) and at work. I should actually be tanking you for letting me find a place in life where I can enjoy other's company on a daily basis and enjoy my coworkers. But, just beware, if you are reading this, that JC is a wicked evil person and she generally sucks.

teh suxtor

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#5 Consumer Comment

Karin Witnauer and Darren Brown

AUTHOR: a friend - (USA)

POSTED: Sunday, January 15, 2012

The wife forgot to list the names of the two "involved".

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#4 Consumer Suggestion

Consider this

AUTHOR: the wife - (United States of America)

POSTED: Friday, January 06, 2012

Employee number 3 states that what happened to the author was cruel. That is his opinion. As it should be, he's in a relationship with the author. This relationship started shortly after Karin W. arrived at HH. The author told me that it was because of employee #3 that she lost her job. This should be taken into consideration when reading the author's comments.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#3 UPDATE Employee

Here's a mutual opinion

AUTHOR: Too Cool for You - (United States of America)

POSTED: Thursday, January 05, 2012

First off, Jolene is selfish for writing back her own rebuttal. The original author was very distraught and hurt from the occurrences at HH and surprising wrote a long and comprehensible article about her former advisor who wasn't really doing a thorough job. Promising a single divorced woman a good sum of money, they toying with her like that is pretty cruel. Alot of people enjoyed her company and thought she would have potential, but Jolene didn't like her. After reading this, it is obvious that Jolene wrote her own rebuttal, and to think that one of her coworkers thinks she is all-that is really a laughing matter. No one cares about Jolene. I would say some things here, but I'm a professional. I'd like to remain anonymous. The point is that this former employee was hurt, and there is a reason for her dismissal but it wasn't because of her lack of potential or skills. Also, the internet is a way to let others know about what is going on. If there is a real problem and discrimination occurring, it is a safe place to let others know. I also didn't attend UConn like everyone else in that department, but I know Karin was a nice person and a good employee. I agree that if she wasn't fully educated or skilled, then Tina shouldn't have hired her. Still, Jolene is a minion and minions do get first blow.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 Author of original report

Original Author Refutes

AUTHOR: Karin W. - (United States of America)

POSTED: Wednesday, January 04, 2012

I refute any statements above. They merely show obedience, comraderie and fear of the accused. If I was not qualified, then the hiring committee should have not hired me, lied to me, and dragged me out 2500 miles away from a perfectly commendable job offer in Arizona. Instead, I was used to fulfill Jolene and Tina Dibble's needs for empowerment. I never accused my discharge being Jolene's full responsibility (if you had read the above clearly). I merely accused Jolene of nit-picking me, causing Judy to have a nervous breakdown, and of failure to train me. All of which caused my discharge, fueled Jolene's ego, and caused my discharge. Enough said.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 General Comment

Jolene Cardinali's character defended

AUTHOR: Anonymous - (United States of America)

POSTED: Tuesday, January 03, 2012

I would like to respond to the article that was written by a disgruntled former employee in which the reputation of Jolene Cardinali was slandered.  It is unfortunate that the internet has been the avenue at which untrue accusations can be made, but it is after all, free speech.  So it is with this in mind that I would like to speak on behalf of Jolene's character - to dispel any accusations and clear up any possible tendencies to think of Jolene in any other way than a person of solid character.

Jolene has been with the company for 15 years and in that time, she has worked in the Division of Hematology/Flow Cytometry and had served numerous years on the Employee Council and participating in many yearly Lab Week Committees.  I have known Jolene for several years and I know that she is NOT like the accusations that have been made against her.

Professionally, Jolene is great to work with.  She is commended by many people in her area and others of the lab that she is knowledgeable, professional and ethical.  She works hard to complete the tasks and she has been given many responsibilities (including Quality Assurance) in her department.  Other employees look to her for technical guidance and accept her feedback constructively.  She is a respected member of the team.

Personally, Jolene is a congenial and affable person.  I have seen her interact with her team, with many others in the lab and with people on the phone.  She is a warm, fun-loving person and she is always so positive that she makes people feel comfortable.  Her enthusiasm is infectious.  We should have more people around here like her.

To speak of Jolene in any other way means that you really don't know her.  You'd have to wonder why someone would have such ill feelings toward her and write such slanderous things on the internet........

To clarify, it was a GLOBAL decision, not JOLENE'S decision, that this former employee, Karin Witnauer, did not have the skills for the job and she did not make it past her probation period.   That's the end of the story.

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now