Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #1409260

Complaint Review: Jonathan Cannon - New York

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: MMCC — CHANDLER Texas USA
  • Author Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • Jonathan Cannon New York USA

Jonathan Cannon - Rising Sun Corp Limited Blatant Liar / Thief-Stole $90,000./ Misrepresents everything New York New York

*Author of original report: What a Joke Rebuttal from Jonathan!

*REBUTTAL Owner of company: COMPLETELY FALSE STORY

*Author of original report: Alan Haarbuger- Introducer

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

Jonathan Cannon, and his representative Alan Haarburger, totally misreprsented an investment opportunity. They blatantly lied saying they had a proven opportunity which would provide significant returns within 2 weeks. $90,000. was wired to the provided banking coordinates with the promise of huge returns in 2 weeks.

I have requested a refund many times with never-ending excuses. I have waited one year and 4 months now for either a refund or performance. Neither has been provided. Jonathan is terrible with communication; and lies when he does communicate.

Jonathan misreprsented that he is a so-called "monetizer" with a proven track record. He is no such thing.

Please beware. This guy (and his rep., Alan) should be in prison! Don't even consider doing business with these theives! 

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 10/29/2017 09:06 AM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/jonathan-cannon/new-york/jonathan-cannon-rising-sun-corp-limited-blatant-liar-thief-stole-90000-misreprese-1409260. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
2Author
0Consumer
1Employee/Owner

#3 Author of original report

What a Joke Rebuttal from Jonathan!

AUTHOR: MMCC - (United States)

POSTED: Tuesday, October 31, 2017

Jonathan should have never offered or promoted the leased funds program as a "proven" opportunity. Using a non-rated bank (Soleil) was a surprise but we moved forward based on assurances that "everything was in place". The Brexit excuse was very convenient but Jonathan assured us that he would definitely line up a different Receiving Bank, (within weeks), which never happened.

As far as a "bribe", are you kidding me??? I simply stated that I had lost my patience and if he did not reimburse us, I would post on Ripoff Report. This was simply a last ditch effort to find out if he would finally provide a refund (as previously promised); since he failed miserably for one year and 4 months. He never even responded to our emails. Now, he decides to respond on Ripoff Report.

Again, I warn you to stay away from this fraudster! You can't trust anything Jonathan says.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 REBUTTAL Owner of company

COMPLETELY FALSE STORY

AUTHOR: Jonathan Cannon - (USA)

POSTED: Monday, October 30, 2017

I strongly 100% deny the allegations in this report.  The client paid his fees directly to the Issuing Bank and not to me or anyone associated with me.    We collected and received NO fees whatsoever, not one penny?

We had worked with the client on a monetization of a Non-rated bank instrument in June of 2016.  The receiving bank that we were utilizing was located in the UK.   When Brexit was announced unexpectedly, this bank decided that they would no longer provide monetization for this type of instrument.  The client already paid the fees directly to the Issuing bank and we attempted to send the instrument to a different bank and were unsuccessful. We are still attempting to get this done for the client and were shocked by this post.

There were NO lies or excuses ever used, we were very transparent and honest with the client the whole time giving updates whenever there was one to give. I understand the frustration in tying up your funds for a period of time, but this story is just NOT true and is a TOTAL fabrication. The client sent us a threatening email demanding his money back or he would go online and slander us. If we received the money from him we would have refunded long ago, BUT he sent it DIRECTLY to the Bank?

I believe the only one doing anything illegal, is the client sending us threatening emails and trying to bribe us to pay him his tied up money. He knows the risks in this business, he claims he represents a Trading Platform himself.

We have spent hundreds of hours on this deal trying to help Mark & David, the clients, and this is how they respond? These NON- Rated bank instruments CANNOT be monetized by normal banking procedures, they need to be used for a Commodities transaction. They are very hard to find and are very time sensitive, in essence very difficult to get done. 

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 Author of original report

Alan Haarbuger- Introducer

AUTHOR: - ()

POSTED: Monday, October 30, 2017

To clarify, Alan Haarburger introduced me as an investor to Jonathan Cannon. Alan has continued to defend Jonathan for the last year and 4 months. However, it is Jonathan that is to blame for non-performance, theft, misrepresentations, and awful communication skills. I believe Alan had "good intentions" but he affiliated himself with Jonathan which has turned out to be a big mistake. After all this time, Alan has learned he should not deal with Jonathan any more. In fact, Alan may actually reimburse the $90,000. investment. This would show Alan to be a "man of honor" if he is able to follow through on this commitment. Hopefully Alan will be able to resolve this nightmare.

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now