Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #1156493

Complaint Review: Judge Katherine Cabaniss, Judge Denise Bradley, Judge Vanessa Valasquez, Judge Bill Burke, Judge Bonnie Hellums - Houston Texas

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Crime Victim — Texas
  • Author Not Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • Judge Katherine Cabaniss, Judge Denise Bradley, Judge Vanessa Valasquez, Judge Bill Burke, Judge Bonnie Hellums Houston, Texas USA

Judge Katherine Cabaniss, Judge Denise Bradley, Judge Vanessa Valasquez, Judge Bill Burke, Judge Bonnie Hellums Hopuston's Judiciary Who Support Christian Coverups and Drug Addicts Over Crime Victims Houston Texas

*Author of original report: Drug Court Disaster Continued

*Consumer Comment: Lots of problems with your report

*General Comment: sounds

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

I am writing, as a drug court victim in Harris County, to publically admonish and highlight the judges in Harris County that support corruption, Christian cover-ups, and drug addicts over crime victims.  I would also ask Harris County voters, as a crime victim, NOT re-elect these judges in the upcoming elections.

DRUG COURT
Drug courts are special courtrooms that offer offenders arrested for crimes such as fraud, check fraud, credit card fraud, theft, prostitution, breaking and entering, forgery, etc., an intensely supervised probation and wrap around services (usually including Christian churches and AA) versus jail.  Separate, and certainly not equal, for the very same crimes.

FACTS ON DRUG COURT
- In the 5 years after Texas mandated drug courts in its 5 largest counties, representing 80% of its population, drug arrests jumped 50%. 
Similar results have occurred in other portions of the country, a phenomenon known as net widening.
- In the 5 years after Harris County added its STAR Drug Court, drug arrests jumped 60%.
- Drug arrest increased substantially more in the counties that added drug courts in the 3-5 trailing years than those that did not during the same timeframes.
- The leading public policy foundation in the county, The Brookings Institute, found that 86% of drug courts cost more to operate than they save in jail dollars.  Brookings found that the average drug court costs taxpayers $5,000 more to operate than saved via jail, after accounting for the cost of wrap around services and crimes committed while on release (costs blatantly ignored by drug court sponsored studies).  This is the most comprehensive (largest) meta-analysis done of drug courts to date. 
The Scottish and British Justice Ministries made similar findings.
- A recent GAO study found that just slightly more than 50% of drug courts actually reduce recidivism – meaning, nearly half are ineffective at lowering rearrest rates.
- While wrap around services providers and rehabs are benefitting to the tune of tens of millions a year in Texas, the average remuneration rate of drug offenders to victims is a measly 6%.  Shouldn’t some of these drug treatment funds instead be diverted to crime victims instead of rehab run by former addicts themselves??  Also, at pointed out by a lawyer friend of mine, it is easier for our good judges to get kickbacks from those rehabs they are routinely using on a regular basis, than public jails.

MY (OUR) CASE
In my case, I and my female roommate took in, and tried to help, the heroin addicted daughter of a man who ran a rehab located at a “recovery church,” Chapelwood/Mercy Street.  We (my roommate and I) have a combined 4 degrees, no arrest record, and have never been sued.  

We fed this girl, clothed her, convinced her to go to a rehab, drove her to it, paid for it, and reported and threatened her dealers.   We thought it was the right thing to do under the extensinuating circumstances of the fact her father ran a rehab at the church which helped other people’s kids – running it while hooked on pain pills himself, an issue neither the court system which does business with the church or church wants to speak about – and being prostituted at the club run by the former head of the NJ mafia.   

The girl ended up stealing my items, my friend/neighbors, and driving my car through my condo parking gate.  She was never ordered to pay a dollar in restitution.  She stole tens of thousands from another individual who tried to help her, and made another an unknowing getaway car in one of her crimes.

At the trial, per an internal affairs investigation by Harris County, the drug court manager entered to the courtroom to seek special treatment for the defendant.  Further, another crime victim, a credible working professional, stated he was threatened and thrown out of the courtroom, by  the ex-drug addict preacher who runs the drug church at which the defendant’s father ran the rehab while an addict at the same time.  The civil case, to reclaim damages, was in front of another judge from Chapelwood, the church in question, a clear conflict of interest.

A month and a half into the trial, after the family asked me to come to the trial and request leniency, I was stood up in a courtroom and told I was of bad character and ill repute by the judge.  She would never explain why, but later apologized to me through the court counsel.  I surmised via some very good evidence this was also the result of ex-addict preacher of the drug church.  I was told the order would be changed to victim, but could not be changed in the historical record.


HARRIS COUNTY JUDICIAL NATO AND THE ANATOMY OF A CHRISTIAN, RIGHT WING COVERUP INVOLVING GOOD CHRISTIAN VALUES

Judicial NATO – the premise that an attack on one Harris County judge or conflicts in the system is an attack on all.
 

Within a month of the release of an audio of Harris County’s lawyers apologizing and promising a “reassessment of the entire drug court model,” the defendant’s probation officer apologized to me, and worked to have her put back in jail.  I did not request this personally.  The PO was infuriated.  I later found out she made untrue, disparaging statements about me, so as far as I am concerned, she got what she deserved.  You have to be a real piece of crap to say anything negative about someone who took you in, fed you, clothed you, and paid for your rehab and literally saved your life, who you then victimized.

The judge who ordered the investigation, Stricklin, and the criminal court counsel who conducted it, both resigned/retired within a release of the audio.  Stricklin was replaced as administrative court judge by Mike Anderson, an original drug court judge.  Anderson, later elected DA, cancelled the existing investigation ordered by his predecessor while in a seemingly severely conflicted position to do so (as former drug court judge, and huge drug court advocate).  Rick Perry, a huge specialty court supporter, named Marc Brown to replace Stricklin on the bench – within a few months, Brown was a specialty court judge as well.

Oddly, within a month of the release of the audio, Bill Burke, an ex-alcoholic from Chapelwood Church, was named the new drug court judge – this was rather stunning, to say the least, since Harris County promised me action against Chapelwood and a “reassessment of the entire drug court model.” 

After I began emailing members of the Texas Senate and Representative criminal justice committees in the 2012 session, it seems Judge Campbell, mid-term, announced her “retirement” within a matter of weeks.  She stated in a Chron article she was quitting because of the cases that “did not work out.”  I am still wondering whether that retirement was due to her poor management of the case, or, stating via counsel that the drug court manager advocated for the defendant in the case.  Good old Rick, a big drug court supporter, replaced Campbell with Cabaniss, then a member of the Harris County Drug Court Foundation.  Rick can’t have his judges making negative comments about his marquee new criminal justice policy, such as they need to be “reassessed,” or associated, corrupt Protestant Christian Right-Wing organizations, run by a bunch of ex addicts and alcoholics.

When I sought an investigation of the case outside of Harris County (the AG office), it never happened.  One of Perry’s criminal justice staff members told me that they knew everyone in the AG’s office, and the case would go nowhere.  Federal investigations advised me this case was among the worst government ethics that they had seen regards conflicts, but that no federal laws were broken.


THE FOLLOWUP
In the 6 years since this case, there has been an explosion across this country of issues with the blind leading the blind.  According to tenant 12 of the 12 steps, addicts are supposed to help other addicts – this takes the form of provided wrap around services to the court and serving as judges, as well. 

Just in the last 2 years, there have been over a dozen issues.  As few examples.  In Florida, a drug court judge was forced to leave her courtroom after slurring on the bench drunk.  In Illinois, a drug court judge overdosed from drugs bought from his drug court probation officer.  He also released one of his dealers before the overdose.  In Tennessee, a drug court judge purchased drugs from and had sex with a drug court defendant in his courtroom.  In Colorado, a drug court judge crashed her car, drunk, into a fence. 

In our case, the offender’s deferred adjudication comes up for removal in a year and a half, 5 years post coming off probation.  At that time, I expect her to still have not apologized to me, or another other victims, per her strong Christian values she learned in Chapelwood Church.  I also expect Rick Perry’s newly appointed druggie court crony, and friend of most of the rest of the judges named herein, to clear off / seal her record without expecting the defendant to have every shown an ounce of remorse to the people who helped save her life, she victimized, and who she then defamed. 

If you support this, these judges need your vote for re-election. 

Chapelwood Crackhead Cult Church is still associated with the court, 5 years after an independent internal investigation promised action against the church.  I have seen neither action, nor a reassessment of the entire drug court model.  The prizewinners associated with Chapelwood whose preachers threatened crime victims in my case include:

  • The ex-alcoholic head preacher of the church, Jim Jackson

  • The ex-crack using and thief founder of the drug mass at Chapelwood, Matt Russell, who threatened and threw one of our crime victims out of the courtroom

  • Bill Burke, an ex-alcoholic from the church who was mysteriously named the new drug court judge a matter of weeks after the internal affairs investigation promised action against Chapel in the Woods Drug Church

  • The Father who ran the rehab at Chapelwood Church while stung out on pills himself, both of whom’s daughters became drug addicts and strippers, and one of whom went on a yearlong crime spree causing tens of thousands in unanswered damage

  • Judge Ridgway, who did not recuse himself from the civil case (lawsuit) – another proud Chapelwood member

  • Bill Henderson, who was tasked to respond to me on behalf of Judge Emmett, yet another Chapel in the Woods member, has an impressive resume including a bankruptcy fraud arrest and indictment, an obstruction of justice conviction, and another arrest related to taking his car back personally from an impound yard while striking a worker there with the car.

The ethics at Chapelwood are quite impressive.  This organization, hosting quite a few members of “bad character and ill repute” seems to still maintain an association with our court system five years to the date we were promised action.   

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 06/21/2014 11:52 AM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/judge-katherine-cabaniss-judge-denise-bradley-judge-vanessa-valasquez-judge-bill-burke-judge-bonnie-hellums/houston-texas/judge-katherine-cabaniss-judge-denise-bradley-judge-vanessa-valasquez-judge-bill-burke-1156493. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
1Author
2Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#3 Author of original report

Drug Court Disaster Continued

AUTHOR: Crime Victim - ()

POSTED: Sunday, June 22, 2014

First, I am not going to waste my time responding to commentary from the entire drug addict (e.g. “recovery”) community of Houston, so this is likely my last response. 

Stacy:

First, I did take her for treatment within days of her moving in with us.  I also paid for it.  And when we continue to screw up, I forced her into inpatient, and arranged for insurance payment for that as well.  I didn’t attempt to treat her – I attempted to get her to treatment. 

Second, the Big Book is not a credible reference with anything.  It has no scientific basis.  As a matter of fact, a recent study looking at over 30 programs for addicts/alcoholics listed AA dead last in efficacy.  Its founder, Bill W., ended his life in a love triangle with two women, and left part of his money to each.  The man is hardly either a moral or psychological compass for anything. 

Third, my degrees are in economics and public policy.  And, I have served on a number of economic development and social missions in other countries.  A degree such as a LCDC is, in my opinion, woefully inadequate to treat significant psychological problems.   Therapists dealing with just general psychological issue usually must have at least a masters.  The LCDC requires a mere ASSOCIATES degrees, not even a bachelors, or what it should really require, a professional degree.  The result – a bunch of uneducated people, many of whom are ex-addicts themselves, who recovered just one or two years prior trying to help other addicts.  The offender’s father in my case was an LCDC who ran his rehab, for a period, while strung out himself – the core reason we all have the issue we are writing about today.  The mother now runs the chief training agency in Texas to provide education for the LCDC.  Yet, both of their daughters ended up heroin addicts.  The blind leading the blind….

Further, you make a good point about people doing work outside their field.  The recovery field keeps making assertions drug courts save money, yet are not economists, and do not know how to do proper cost analyses.  Their analyses repeatedly leave out the costs of surrounding rehabs, wrap around services, crime committed while on probation, etc.  When these are added in, drug courts are not found to be cost-negative.

Fourth- Everything posted herein is the truth, and can be backed up. 

The usual response of drug addict and ex drug addicts I have dealt with is a selfish one – focused only on themselves and their group of psychologically screwed up peers.  You seem to have ignored the thousands not repaid to me or other victims.  The lack of accountability or effort to issue an apology years later to any victims.  The poor CHOICE to use drug a first time.  The CHOICE to steal a car in the middle of the night, the CHOICE to buy drug using the car, and then to crash it.   The CHOICE to inappropriate association Christian religious organizations with our court system to tell drug offenders that they are forgiving by God, run in many cases, by recent addicts themselves – some of whom leverage their relationships with the court to manipulate the court trial. 

The Court's Own Lawyers Apologizing to Me Regarding my Case: youtube.com/watch?v=xVAgDhiHihE

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 Consumer Comment

Lots of problems with your report

AUTHOR: Stacey - ()

POSTED: Saturday, June 21, 2014

 First, you took in an active heroin user ie: ACTIVE.  How were you going to detox this individual??? Are you a Doctor??? I suspect not so therefore you set yourself up to be robbed and used because any active user is gonna do what they have to to get their next fix (been there, done that).

Second, the Big Book states "Having had a spiritual awakening as the result of these steps, we tried to carry this message to alcoholics and to practice these principles in all our affairs'. I am certain this does not mean to take in addicts/alcoholics to "save them" from themselves.  That is for professionals who are trained and experienced in the field.

Third - as for your "degrees" - are you or your roommate an LPC, LSW, LCSW, LCDC, etc etc?? First step when you are a "Professional" is that you adhere to your ethics and help your client by utilizing services such as Detox in a MEDICAL FACILITY.

Fourth - by posting this report you are indeed subject to legal action by anyone you refererenced in this report without PROOF that what you stated is 100% true and honest.  Therefore, your report is nothing more than a vendetta.

You can put any statistic or published statement you want - not gonna help.

 

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 General Comment

sounds

AUTHOR: Tyg - ()

POSTED: Saturday, June 21, 2014

 Sounds like YOU have a few issues yourself. YOU seem to have issues with people who USED to be addicts. I can only guess at your profession. One would think that you would be slightly proud of those people who are EX-ADDICTS as they got clean. Why would you bash people who have cleaned up their lives?? Like I said, YOU have some issues that need to be dealt with at some point. While I sympathize with your plight of attempting to help an addict, that doesn't give you the right to bash ANYONE that was an addict. THAT IS WHAT YOU ARE DOING!!! Just because YOU had an issue with attempting to help out an addict doesn't mean that every person who had an addiction is going to do the same thing to you. Its basically classic transference. I myself have been screwed over attempting to help a friend who was addicted. I lost THOUSANDS!! I lost my car due to this person. I lost quite a few friends who thought that the person I was helping wasn't worth the effort. But I stuck with it and I got him off of the meth. It took almost 3 years but we were successful in our plan to clean him up. Now you would THINK that since I lost so much trying to help him that I wouldn't put myself out there like that or put my family at risk to help someone else, but you would be wrong. The person YOU were dealing with was AN ADDICT!!! Which means that they just were not thinking straight. YOU are expecting some form of apology from the person you attempted to help. This means that YOU didn't do this to actually help that person, no you had different reasons for doing so. Which means that YOUR motivation was selfish at some point. Im also betting youre one of those "stand on principle" kinda people. Which means that you are expecting an apology because of EVERYTHING YOU DID. You don't go trying to help all the while looking for some form of "ata boy" for doing it. Lastly, I find YOUR dismissal and disrespect of those people who got themselves cleaned up to be highly disturbing. Unless YOU have been an addict, then YOU have no basis or idea as to what they had to do to get clean. YOU don't know how much they suffered from withdrawl. YOU were not the one who had to wake up in the middle of the night with the shakes because of system withdrawl. Since you have no experience with addiction personally, how can you sit there and look down your nose at these people? You cant. You are acting like your gods gift to sobriety and youre condemning anyone else who had a problem. Until you walk a few miles in THIER shoes, what gives you the right to bash them?? While your writing style shows a bit of intelligence, the content shows that to be "book learning". Which means while you may be smart enough to make a post, you obviously cant grasp when YOU are screwing YOURSELF!! Heres a little bit of knowledge for YOU. Since THIS is a PUBLIC FORUM, what you have done is slander and defamation of character. Since the web is a media outlet what YOU have done can get your sued for presenting YOUR OPINIONS as fact. Theres two groups you MUST be very careful when you slander them. That's Doctors or Lawyers. And a Judge is just another lawyer. Im sure you would ask why? Because Doctors live off of their reputation and have the money to toss lots of lawyers at a problem and Lawyers because they have IMMEDIATE access to the people that they need to sue YOU. And EVERY courthouse in America is a good ole boy situation. The judges, DA, PD ect ect ect all work together EVERYDAY!!! So good luck in the future. If they find THIS report I expect that they WILL go after you in a civil proceeding. YOU deserve it though due mainly to your intolerance and and inability to think past your little rant. One day though, YOU will be an addict and I cant WAIT to see how you spin YOUR addiction. You are self-important and self-entitled and deserved to be knocked down a few pegs.

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now