Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #621970

Complaint Review: Manchanda Law Offices, Rahul Manchanda - NY New York

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Dennis — New Jersey U.S.A.
  • Author Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • Manchanda Law Offices, Rahul Manchanda 80 Wall Street, Suite 705 NY, New York United States of America

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

re: Attoney Rahul Manchanda of Manchanda Law Offices in NY on 80 Wall Street.  

AN ATTORNEY IN NY ON WALL STREET NAMED RAHUL MANCHANDA TOOK $5000.00 FROM ME UNDER FALSE PRETENSES. HE TOLD ME THAT HE CAN HELP ME, BUT LATER HIS FIRM SENT AN INTER-OFFICE MEMO AND CIRCULATED IT TO HIS STAFF STATING THAT THEY COULD NOT HELP ME WITH MY LEGAL PROBLEMS. AFTER I CONSULTED WITH THEM, I TOLD THEM TO WAIT UNTIL I TRANSFER MY MONEY TO ANOTHER ACCOUNT, RATHER THAN WAIT, THEY QUICKLY CASHED MY CHECK JUST IN CASE I CHANGED MY MIND AND THIS CAUSED ME TO INCUR A BANK FEE FOR NON SUFFICIENT FUNDS.

I TOOK RAHUL MANCHANDA TO COURT AND TWO OF HIS LAWYERS LEFT HIM IN THE PROCESS. HE THEN HAD NO CHOICE BUT TO HIRE HIS OWN STAFF TO DEFEND HIM. HE HAD ME SIGN A RETAINER AGREEMENT UNDER FALSE PRETENSES, SINCE THE LAWYERS THAT I INITIALLY CONSULTED WITH PROVIDED ME WITH MISLEADING LEGAL ADVICE TO INDUCE ME TO SIGN A RETAINER AGREEMENT. I SIGNED THE RETAINER AGREEMENT UNDER DURESS AND WITHOUT INFORMED CONSENT. THE LAWYERS THAT I RECEIVED ADVIcE FROM AT MANCHANDA LAW FIRM, WERE NOT EVEN LICENSED BY NJ BAR, FOR THE NJ MATTER THAT I HIRED THEM FOR. I HAVE BEEN FIGHTING MANCHANDA BY MYSELF IN NY CIVIL COURT WITHOUT SUCCESS, BECAUSE HE KEEPS FILING FRIVOLOUS PLEADINGS TO DELAY TRIAL, FOR THE LAST TWO YEARS.

If HE ISSUES ME A  FULL REFUND, I WILL REMOVE AND AMEND THIS AD.


IF ANYONE KNOWS OF A PRO BONO ATTORNEY in NY THAT CAN REPRESENT ME IN NY CIVIL COURT against Rahul Manchanda and the Manchanda Law firm to help me get my $5000.00 back, FEEL FREE TO EMAIL ME AT (((email redacted)))

CLICK here to see why Rip-off Report, as a matter of policy, deleted either a phone number, link or e-mail address from this Report.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 07/10/2010 10:30 AM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/manchanda-law-offices-rahul-manchanda/ny-new-york-10005/manchanda-law-offices-rahul-manchanda-manchanda-took-500000-from-me-under-false-preten-621970. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
2Author
4Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#6 Consumer Comment

Notice of Subpoena

AUTHOR: MAN ESQ - ()

POSTED: Monday, October 27, 2014

Re:       MLO - v.- Younglawyer et al.

            New York State, Supreme Court, Kings County Index No.: 506175/2014

Please be advised that a court proceeding has been initiated regarding this posting in which the plaintiff seeks to learn the author’s identity by subpoena. The lawsuit is in the Supreme Court, State of New York, County of Kings, located at 360 Adams Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201. Any parties objecting to this request may do so anonymously by responding herein and must state the basis for such objection in accordance with applicable law. Objections made in bad faith or without merit may be subject to a motion for contempt of court, attorneys’ fees, or court ordered sanctions against the poster. The basis for the lawsuit is a defamation action against the defendants. 

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#5 Consumer Comment

Notice of Court Proceeding

AUTHOR: MAN ESQ - ()

POSTED: Tuesday, October 14, 2014

Please be advised that a court proceeding has been initiated regarding this posting in which the plaintiff seeks to learn the author’s identity. The lawsuit is in the Supreme Court, State of New York, County of Kings, located at 360 Adams Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201.

The caption is set forth below:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

COUNTY OF KINGS

-------------------------------------------------------------------X

MLO,

 

Plaintiffs,

 

-against-

 

“YOUNGLAWYER”, “ANONYMOUS[1]”, “CLINTON”, “NYC ATTORNEY”, “DEEDEE”,

“GRACE W.”, “ANONYMOUS[2]”, “J.AHMEDI”, “STEVE B”, “MARYIO07”, and John Does 1-9, names fictitious representing the anonymous posters of

defamatory content described herein,

 

Defendants.

-------------------------------------------------------------------X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Index No.: 506175/2014

 

 

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#4 Consumer Comment

please help me, i want to find a petition

AUTHOR: anonymous - (Virgin Islands (US))

POSTED: Monday, October 18, 2010

please help me, i want to find a petition. He stole to me 20,000 $ . please help me. 


I am afraid , who can i contact?
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#3 Author of original report

BEST ATTORNEY MUST BE EARNED

AUTHOR: Fairtreatment - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Saturday, July 17, 2010

HEY DAN,

I did file a complaint with the First Department Disciplinary Committee.

It is amazing how NY Bar Association has not caught on to Rahul Manchanda's pattern of unethical law practices and it is even more amazing that this attorney is still in active practice and not in jail. This guy is giving a bad name to the Ivy league schools that he allegedly attended, in my opinion.

Dennis

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 Consumer Comment

Always the Same Story with Manchanda!

AUTHOR: Dan fl - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Saturday, July 17, 2010

 

It is always disheartening to click on Rip off Report.com and see more of the same filings about how Rahul Manchanda has stolen more innocent peoples hard earned money.  It is always the same old story, they give him a $5000 retainer and he does nothing for them.  He makes false bills not and steals their money.  Those are his real credentials, MASTER THEIF AND LIAR!

  I believe that if someone actually subpoenaed his records they could easily prove that he falsified the same hours on the same days to many poor people.

The rebuttals on this site are always the same, as if written by the Czar himself, Manchanda is the Best!   Yes he is the Best!

  He is the best scumbag rip off lawyer in New York, maybe country wide.

The exact same thing happened to me, he stole my money!  He falsified bills just so he could keep the entire retainer.

 I took him to the Joint Committee on Fee Disputes and Conciliation, who after arbitration ruled in my favor.  Their address is: 14 Vesey Street, NY, NY 10007 Phone 212-267-6646 ext 207 Fax is 212-406-9252.

Of course after the ruling Manchanda decided that they were wrong and that he was not going to follow their orders or return the money that he stole from me. The moron actually hired a collection attorney to try and collect the money that the court awarded to me! 

But dont let that stop you, file complaints!     They have to look into them and they will help!

  If your retainer agreement was signed under false pretenses you could have an ethics claim with the Dept. Disciplinary Committee, Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Judicial Dept, 61 Broadway, NY, NY 10006 . Phone 212-401-0800 fax 212-401-0810.

 

Please people, file your complaints.  You dont need a lawyer to file them!

 I think we should get together and start a website where all of the Manchanda Victims can unite.  Power is in the numbers. Then we can each put some money in, hire a real attorney and finally get rid of this guy.  He must have malpractice insurance that we could collect on!

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 Author of original report

GIVE ME MY FULL REFUND RAHUL MANCHANDA

AUTHOR: Fairtreatment - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Thursday, July 15, 2010

I personally found in my opinion, the Manchanda law firm as a law firm that preys on unsuspecting clients, such as myself at the time in March 2008. I am not impressed by his credentials. Credentials do not conceal the truth about how he really treats his clients. If he was so good, he would not have more unfavorable complaints lodged against him on ripoffreport.com than favorable complaints. He tried to sue Ripoffreport.com in District Court before a Federal judge because ripoffreport provided a medium for his consumers to file complaints against the Manchanda firm, for uncovering the truth of their experiences with the Manchanda law firm, but he lost. This should serve as a message to proceed with caution and at your own risk with this firm, based on my own unfavorable experience with this firm. He took $5200.00 from me under false pretenses.
 Rahul Manchanda had a duty to send me a $2800.00 refund, but instead he created a second fraudulent billing invoice statement and created some additional charges and billed me for them, rather than return to me the refund that I was due from the original billing invoice. Rather than one copy of a billing invoice, I was sent two billing invoices, which his third attorney try to say it was a continuation of the original billing invoice, I have evidence to prove that this was not the case. None of his two other attorneys raised this explanation prior to the third Attorney. It was not believable or credible for the third attorney that works at the Manchanda law firm, to make this wild contention. He has not explained why I have two different retainer agreements, one that I signed and dated under duress and with lack of informed consent without an attorneys signature and the retainer agreement that he sent me a year later that was signed and dated after the fact, by an Attorney that they fail to disclose???

Dennis

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now