Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #676696

Complaint Review: Manchanda Law Offices - New York New York

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Clinton — New York New York Canada
  • Author Not Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • Manchanda Law Offices 80 Wall Street Suite 705 New York, New York United States of America

Manchanda Law Offices Rahul Manchanda Report him immediately New York, New York

*Consumer Comment: Notice of Subpoena

*Consumer Comment: Notice of Court Proceeding

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

Do not pay him a penny. You should ask for a line-by-line analysis of EVERY charge on your file. If anything, he should pay you some money back from the 5k retainer, but as many people have reported, once you sign the retainer, you are telling him - here is my credit card number, go to town with it!

He HAS to send you all the charges. Don't worry, he cant call collection agency for this frivolous charge. Don't hire an attorney, just report him to the NY BAR anyway - whether he returns your money from 5k or not - something I should have done but was too tired at the end of my long ordeal.

He will threaten you that he will put you behind bar, or he will use his contacts in FBI to stalk you or he will deport you (if you are not a US Citizen yet). Do not let him scare you. He is a pr**k who feeds on the vulnerabilities of people in distress.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 12/29/2010 10:34 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/manchanda-law-offices/new-york-new-york-/manchanda-law-offices-rahul-manchanda-report-him-immediately-new-york-new-york-676696. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author
2Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#2 Consumer Comment

Notice of Subpoena

AUTHOR: MAN ESQ - ()

POSTED: Monday, October 27, 2014

Re:       MLO - v.- Younglawyer et al.

            New York State, Supreme Court, Kings County Index No.: 506175/2014

Please be advised that a court proceeding has been initiated regarding this posting in which the plaintiff seeks to learn the author’s identity by subpoena. The lawsuit is in the Supreme Court, State of New York, County of Kings, located at 360 Adams Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201. Any parties objecting to this request may do so anonymously by responding herein and must state the basis for such objection in accordance with applicable law. Objections made in bad faith or without merit may be subject to a motion for contempt of court, attorneys’ fees, or court ordered sanctions against the poster. The basis for the lawsuit is a defamation action against the defendants. 

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 Consumer Comment

Notice of Court Proceeding

AUTHOR: MAN ESQ - ()

POSTED: Tuesday, October 14, 2014

Please be advised that a court proceeding has been initiated regarding this posting in which the plaintiff seeks to learn the author’s identity. The lawsuit is in the Supreme Court, State of New York, County of Kings, located at 360 Adams Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201.

The caption is set forth below:

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

COUNTY OF KINGS

-------------------------------------------------------------------X

MLO,

 

Plaintiffs,

 

-against-

 

“YOUNGLAWYER”, “ANONYMOUS[1]”, “CLINTON”, “NYC ATTORNEY”, “DEEDEE”,

“GRACE W.”, “ANONYMOUS[2]”, “J.AHMEDI”, “STEVE B”, “MARYIO07”, and John Does 1-9, names fictitious representing the anonymous posters of

defamatory content described herein,

 

Defendants.

-------------------------------------------------------------------X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Index No.: 506175/2014

 

 

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now