Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #665421

Complaint Review: Martin Sir Attorney at Law - Nashville Tennessee

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: M — Nashville Tennessee United States of America
  • Author Not Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • Martin Sir Attorney at Law Nashville, Tennessee United States of America

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

Pro Se litigants beware of Martin SIR Attorney at Law in Nashville. Mr. Sir is abusing the system he is in by doctoring orders opposite of what judges state, and ONLY doing this to the opposing parties who are PRO SE.  His clients then are able to take this false, fraudulent orders and abuse the Pro SE litigant until they get what they want by THEFT.

This attorney has perpetuated on my family, and its time to expose.  When I realized in April 2009, what was transpiring, as a Pro Se litigant, I started obtaining the CD's of the hearings. I now have the evidence I need over the last year and a half and what has transpired in my own case to provide anyone that will help us a chance to expose this attorney for his ILLEGAL practices. 

THE poor deserve just as much say so in the system as the rich.  Mr. Sir will also call you to change a hearing date and send you an unsigned agreed order, then show up on the original date to get the motions you filed DISMISSED.  I have orders unsigned, opposite of what a judge said and it has enabled his clients to obtain people (yes people, as if they are property) by FRAUD.

My previous court appointed attorney, has notified me of a recent order that is NOT the one she signed.  I was informed there is another Pro Se litigant he is doing this to now.  If anyone has experienced anything with this corrupt attorney please post.  I am pursuing this legally with suit and would be happy to speak with you about your case as well. This attorney is EXPOSED.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 11/25/2010 01:27 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/martin-sir-attorney-at-law/nashville-tennessee-/martin-sir-attorney-at-law-pro-se-litigants-beware-in-nashville-nashville-tennessee-665421. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
4Author
3Consumer
1Employee/Owner

#8 Consumer Comment

Setting the Record Straight

AUTHOR: Pleased with Martin Sir, Attorney at Law - (USA)

POSTED: Friday, February 12, 2016

Dear Rip-off Report;

 
 I just read your "Pro-Se Litigant's report" in reference to Martin Sir, Attorney at Law, in Nashville, Tn.
   
I was appalled at the accusations thrown at Mr. Sir as I had an entirely different experience with him.  There were so many untruths said about Mr. Sir that I found it necessary to set this record straight.
 
 Before I engaged the services of Martin Sir & Associates, both my brother and I did extensive research trying to connect with the best attorney to represent me in my divorce case.  Not only did we find a very long list of satisfied clients that only had glowing remarks about Mr. Sir, but we also found that he is one of the most respected attorneys among his constituents and Judges, alike, in Nashville.  He has an AVVO score of 99, near perfection, and hundreds of highly complimentary comments and recommendations from his former clients.  His integrity is impeccable and his honestly is unquestionable.  He is also a devout Christian and it's not uncommon at all for him to bow his head in prayer and ask his clients to do the same during litigation.  
    
 Mr. Sir did not represent you, he represented your opposing party.  I would say he did his job well, he won the case!  The best interest of children in a case are always at the forefront of any case Mr. Sir represents.   Judges don't usually make a practice of taking children from Mothers unless they feel the situation is not conducive to the welfare of the child.  No Judge is going to sign an order that he has not read first and if it had been different than his ruling, a Judge simply would not sign it.
     
The outcome in the case would have been the same, even if you had gotten an attorney to represent you.  But to complain after the Judge made the ruling when you are a Pro Se litigant one needs only to refer to the adage "that a lawyer who represents himself has a fool for a client”.   Your outcome would not have been changed but your understanding of it might have been clearer if you had gotten a lawyer for yourself.  Don't question Mr. Sir's ability in representing the party that opposed you in court just because he won and you lost.
     
 
    
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#7 General Comment

Sir not Qualified to Litigate this Case

AUTHOR: Sarah - ()

POSTED: Sunday, December 22, 2013

Martin Sir is not qualified in family law. The client is at fault for selecting the wrong lawyer. Sir has a reputation as a bit of an ambulance chaser and will never turn down a client. He probably needs the business. So the case under discussion was a fiasco. But this should not be a surprise. Mr. Sir is not well versed in law.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#6 Author of original report

Children

AUTHOR: Sickoflies - (USA)

POSTED: Saturday, April 09, 2011

are not possessions, they are people, not to be bought or sold to the highest "bidder" in the system.  Being stolen is even worse.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#5 General Comment

And we all know that...

AUTHOR: Anonymous - (United States of America)

POSTED: Saturday, April 09, 2011

No respectable Judge has ever taken a bribe, and lawyers truly do care about people. Yeah right!  What's happened to the spirit of the law, they say the obey the letter, (not really, but they outwardly look like it). But they clearly forget the Spirit of the law, mercy, justice and faith, robbing the Poor and needy of their due rights.  And they think no one knows what they are doing.  Well, I can vouch for the poster, she knows, the Light was shown, and its nothing different than the same system our elder brother and the talmidim were up against, robbing widows and orphans, and committing crimes, while accusing others of doing the same thing. Hypocrites and blind guides. She will continue to show the robbery she has suffered.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#4 Author of original report

LOL

AUTHOR: Sickoflies - (USA)

POSTED: Saturday, April 09, 2011

She has not lost custody of her children, no one has custody right now,  another lie from opposing parties counsel. The 'adversary'  actually now has an order in her possession from another county in TN that states there is FRAUD in the Nashville Courts.

Mr. Sir, who do you think your kidding here? Judges do not look over their orders they trust YOU that they are correct. You have made Scott Rosenberg out to be a fool, unless there is some other funny business going on in this courtroom.

You have done so much damage to the household of Faith, you surely do not think that you won't ever be exposed do you? 

The language of the orders were changed from the beginning. Your clients new wife has a history of this sort of behavior against Pro SE litigants.

The 'adversary' was ROBBED. You can justify this all you want, but the "adversary" has the evidence in her possession.  Funny, you could careless two people getting along for their children, if you did, you wouldn't have a "business".  Hypocrites!

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#3 Author of original report

UNREAL

AUTHOR: Sickoflies - (USA)

POSTED: Saturday, April 09, 2011

how unfortunate that you feel the need to come on here and once again, expose yourself as to how you truly are.
the Pro Se litigant you were against has the CD's from the hearings, they have been heard, and compared to the orders, there is FRAUD.

Not to mention there is an email from her court appointed attorney stating the ORDER your client used to rob her of her children is NOT the one she agreed to or signed.

You do realize you are responsible for the destruction of not only her home, but the soul of your client? You are not above correction Mr. Sir. You will be exposed and made public.  This is nothing to do with an "adversary" YOU are the adversary, an enemy of the household of FAITH, and you will receive your due reward. 

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 REBUTTAL Owner of company

Response to the Complaint Submitted by an Adversary

AUTHOR: Martin Sir & Associates - (United States of America)

POSTED: Monday, January 17, 2011

Dear Rip-off Report;

Please accept this as my initial response to the complaint submitted by an adversary.

I am confident that if this adversary had kept her attorney, the result in her litigation would have been the same or similar because the judge who issued the orders she complains about is one of the most respected judges in Nashville.



The judge made sure that my adversary was treated fairly as a pro se (without an attorney) litigant.



This adversary complains about the judges order but forgets that the judge would not have signed the order if the contents of the order were different than his ruling in court.

I always tried to treat my adversary with respect. I never mislead her about court appearances or any other matter.

I understand my adversary is upset with the judge's orders because she ended up losing custody of her two young children to my client.

However, this result was necessary under the circumstances. I am hopeful that some day my adversary and my client can work together to respectfully co-parent their two children.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 Author of original report

Martin Sir Attorney At Law Nashville, Tennessee CORRUPT

AUTHOR: Sickoflies - (USA)

POSTED: Saturday, November 27, 2010

Pro Se litigants beware of Martin SIR Attorney at Law in Nashville. Mr. Sir is abusing the system he is in by doctoring orders opposite of what judges state, and ONLY doing this to the opposing parties who are PRO SE.  His clients then are able to take this false, fraudulent orders and abuse the Pro SE litigant until they get what they want by THEFT.

This attorney has perpetuated on my family, and its time to expose.  When I realized in April 2009, what was transpiring, as a Pro Se litigant, I started obtaining the CD's of the hearings. I now have the evidence I need over the last year and a half and what has transpired in my own case to provide anyone that will help us a chance to expose this attorney for his ILLEGAL practices.  THE poor deserve just as much say so in the system as the rich.  Mr. Sir will also call you to change a hearing date and send you an unsigned agreed order, then show up on the original date to get the motions you filed DISMISSED. 

I have orders unsigned, opposite of what a judge said and it has enabled his clients to obtain people (yes people, as if they are property) by FRAUD. My previous court appointed attorney, has notified me of a recent order that is NOT the one she signed.  I was informed there is another Pro Se litigant he is doing this to now.  If anyone has experienced anything with this corrupt attorney please post.  I am pursuing this legally with suit and would be happy to speak with you about your case as well. This attorney is EXPOSED.

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now