(((NAME(S) REDACTED DUE TO PERCEIVED HARASSMENT / CYBERSTALKING / CYBERBULLYING / REVENGE POST))) | RIPOFF REPORT POST-PUBLICATION CONTENT REVIEW: EDITORIAL REDACTIONS |  Bank Fraud Mortgage Fraud Chula Vista, California

Editor’s Note:  We thank our users for considering Ripoff Report as a source for information and providing warnings to the general public.  That being said, sometimes, after a review of the text, our team will determined that the content filed by an author appears to be serious in nature and is therefore perceived to be questionable and, as such, the Report Posting is placed on hold for further investigations prior to publishing OR is otherwise flagged after publication and is placed into a Review Bin.  If and when Report Postings are flagged for these types of issues, especially when there are specific serious criminal allegations, we may, as we did here, try to follow up with the Author of the Posting to obtain more information.  Our Terms of Service require that information posted be truthful and not defamatory and we are in no position to determine what information is true or false; the author affirms the truth of a posting prior to posting.  We understand that allegations made by an author may very well be true, and we respect an author’s right to Free Speech, but in order for the information to be published once it has been flagged, or for the information to be later (((REDACTED))) once flagged after prior publication, Ripoff Report may ask the author to provide some form of explanation or documentation to support their position.  Depending on the circumstances, if the author fails to respond or timely provide adequate notification, at the sole discretion of Ripoff Report, the Report may be considered “incomplete” and may not be approved or may be (((REDACTED))) to remove the serious allegations or otherwise perceived questionable content from the Report and any Postings thereto that mention such information – more for the purposes of making sure the author is standing behind their Report as we are not a judge and jury to determine the accuracy of evidence.  Redactions below may be due to the author’s failure to adhere to our Terms of Service and/or because the author failed to timely respond with an appropriate response to our inquiry.

CONSUMERS:  Proceed with Caution when reviewing and relying on the subject Report Posting(s) below as it MAY BE FALSE and/or MISLEADING.  It is highly encouraged that you conduct additional research, from credible sources, before making any determination on whether or not to do business with the named individual(s) or business(es).

PLEASED TO SEE SUCH EFFORTS?  YOU CAN HELP RIPOFF REPORT COMBAT THESE TYPES OF ISSUES:  Ripoff Report, as resources allow, is working towards combatting Cyberharassment, Cyberstalking, Cyberbullying and/or other problems such as what is generically called “revenge posts” that can be riddled with personal commentary and/or allegations that can be serious.   Ripoff Report would love to be able to timely address each and every review request we receive, however, this takes resources.  If you think this is a worth-while endeavor, we encourage you to make a donation so that we can expand the resources that we can devote to this project.  You can make a non-tax deductible donation by visiting our “Donate to our Efforts” page and clicking on the PayPal icon near the bottom of the page.  The more resources we have, the more resources we can devote to this project and other forward thinking and positive initiatives like it.

Thank you!

~ Ripoff Report Team

NOW TO THE REPORT/POSTING(S) THAT HAS BEEN EDITORIALLY REDACTED:

(((REDACTED))) is the reason for the foreclosure crisis. (((REDACTED)))not only borrowed more than she could pay against real estate, but also committed (((REDACTED))). (((REDACTED))) purchased a home located at  (((REDACTED))) and then nearly simultaneously purchased another home on (((REDACTED))), Ca., and within the loan applications claimed to be Owner Occupying BOTH properties. This is a delineation of her crimes:

08/13/2003 purchased Breezewood

06/09/2005 Cash Out Breezewood $89,250 owner occupied loan

04/28/2006 Purchase Lamont $551,600 owner occupied loan Kathleen NEVER lived in this home

11/30/2006 Cash Out Refinance Lamont $564,000 owner occupied loan claimed owner occupancy

11/30/2006 Cash Out Refinance Lamont $70,500 owner occupied Second loan claimed owner occupancy

12/04/2006 Cashed Out Breezewood $712,000 new loan, owner occupancy claimed in loan docs

02/28/2007 Cashed Out Breezewood $125,000 new Second Loan, owner occupancy claimed in loan docs

She has a partnership and purchased Hawaii property during the above time frame with her partner (((REDACTED)))through (((REDACTED))), during this same time period once again using stated, owner occupied loans, and for nearly $1 million dollars! This is a person that makes over $10,000 monthly.

Notice the overlap in the dates? This is called (((REDACTED))). (((REDACTED)))loans were modified by the bank but she refused to pay. Now lets see if the debt forgiveness makes it onto the tax return as debt forgiven income. (((REDACTED)))