Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #84712

Complaint Review: Pharmacy Cards - Nationwide

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Tacoma Washington
  • Author Not Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • Pharmacy Cards www.pharmacycards.com Nationwide U.S.A.

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

If it's not confusing enough that I thought I closed this account in late 2001 or mid 2002, this company wrote a check in my name for $149. They also used my husband's name for the signature.

The only information the bank could provide me with was www.pharmacycards.com and the phone number 866-467-3566 (which does not work). Further search lead me to this website.

Not only am I upset with www.pharmacycards.com , but why did Netbank allow someone else to sign my check, even electronically? Netbank did not know I was married or who I was married to.

I'm faxing my change of address, information on what I've discovered (thanks to this website), and a request to close my Netbank account (again) tonight.

Good luck anyone else.

Milissa
Tacoma, Washington
U.S.A.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 03/20/2004 08:17 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/pharmacy-cards/nationwide/pharmacy-cards-ripoff-pharmacycardscom-used-netbank-online-checking-account-internet-84712. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author
3Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#3 Consumer Suggestion

File a dispute If this was presented as an electronic check or ACH

AUTHOR: M - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Tuesday, March 15, 2005

If this was presented as an electronic check or ACH you can file a dispute. Just tell the bank the transaction was not authorized and you wish to dispute it. It is up to the merchant to prove the debit was authorized. It is possible to have your money back in as little as 10 business days. Federal regulation "E" requires all banks investigate unauthorized electronic debits.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 Consumer Suggestion

File a dispute If this was presented as an electronic check or ACH

AUTHOR: M - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Tuesday, March 15, 2005

If this was presented as an electronic check or ACH you can file a dispute. Just tell the bank the transaction was not authorized and you wish to dispute it. It is up to the merchant to prove the debit was authorized. It is possible to have your money back in as little as 10 business days. Federal regulation "E" requires all banks investigate unauthorized electronic debits.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 Consumer Suggestion

File a dispute If this was presented as an electronic check or ACH

AUTHOR: M - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Tuesday, March 15, 2005

If this was presented as an electronic check or ACH you can file a dispute. Just tell the bank the transaction was not authorized and you wish to dispute it. It is up to the merchant to prove the debit was authorized. It is possible to have your money back in as little as 10 business days. Federal regulation "E" requires all banks investigate unauthorized electronic debits.

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now