WILLY WALT PRINTING Ripoff Reports, Complaints, Reviews, Scams, Lawsuits and Frauds Reported

Your Search: willy walt printing

There may be more reports for "willy walt printing"

For more results perform a general search for "willy walt printing"

Wondering if a report is missing? We DO NOT remove reports.

1, Report #1120481
Feb 03 2014
12:01 PM
Willy Walt Printing Missed critical deadline; terrible customer service St. Petersburg Florida
I ordered materials for a conference after I was assured on the phone and by email that the materials would be printed in a day and then shipped to me in time. When I did not receive them 24 hours before I needed them, I found out they had been produced but not shipped yet. Willy Walt could have sent them to me in time, but they refused to pay for the additional cost of ovenight shipping. They told me they would destroy the product and give me a refund, but would not meet the agreed-upon deadline by paying extra to get them to me on time!! Only if I paid the extra $50, would they send me the materials. On the phone, they made it seem like I was unreasonable for expecting them to meet their promised deadline. I would NEVER recommend this company to anyone.   
Entity: St. Petersburg, Florida
2, Report #1160837
Jul 09 2014
04:36 PM
Willy Walt, Willy Walt Printing Botched Addressing Caused Postcard Mailing Job to Fail Miserably St Petersburg Florida
On June 3rd of 2014, we submitted artwork and payment to Willy Walk for the production of approximately 4,000 postcards.  They were to print our graphic, address them using a list we provided, and then mail them.  On the same day we provided the address list showing: Addressee, Company Name, Address, and City/State/ZIP.  Their employee Jessica provided us with a sampling of the address information confirming all four address lines were present.  Based on that confirmation, we submitted additional payment on June 4th for the postage and approved going forward.Willy Walt produced the print job, but there was a serious error in the addressing function which caused the company name to not print. I know this because we had inserted a number of employees and family members into the list we had submitted, and 100% of those arrived wrong.  Their error in applying addresses made those mail pieces unprofessional and a large portion likely were undeliverable.We brought this to the attention of Willy Walt and asked them to reproduce the artwork, address it correctly this time, and send it out again at their expense.  They refused.  I spoke with a man named Scott who did not provide a direct phone, last name, or email for himself. Based on the way other employees referred to him, I think he may be a manager or owner.  Scott dismissed the fact that 1 of the four lines we requested, and were shown a proof of, did not print.  He argued that a large portion of the mail pieces probably got delivered.  I continued to protest, and he went on to argue that the only proof I had that the company name did not print was the bunch of cards that I had sent to myself and family members. He indicated that all the others were probably right.Talk about not accepting responsibility for your mistakes!  I guess he'd want me to go collect all 4,000 of the cards we paid to have sent correctly to convince him they were wrong. As I continued to protest that we were not being treated fairly, he then shifted his argument that all of the ones that I sent to myself, employees or family members got there, and in his opinion was proof that they got delivered....so again he felt Willy Walt was not at fault.This is about more than just whether a mail pieced got delivered, and they do not seem to understand or care about that.  We didn't get what we paid for. We selected Willy Walt for this special mailing because they promised that they could print our mailing list.  They even confirmed the layout!  This list was a delicate situation for us because we did not have the contact names of any people. Instead of addressing our pieces to a certain name, we had to address each piece to Compliance Director.  This can make a mail piece look more like junk mail, but our presumption was that this generic title IN COMBINATION with the formal company name we provided would help it to get there. We ordered:Compliance DirectorCOMPANY NAMEADDRESSCITY, STATE, ZIP We got:Compliance DirectorADDRESSCITY, STATE, ZIP We believe it makes a big difference, and we would have never paid to have them go out this way.  Too unprofessional. Evidence of this can be found in the dismal response we've received in comparison to other mailings. In an effort to get the situation resolved quickly, I modified my original request to have Willy Walt do it all over again at their expense.  I asked them to refund the print and addressing cost, and to give us a credit to be used towards a future order equal to 1/3 of the postage, but they refused.  They indicated that the addressing was the problem and offered to refund that amount of only about $200. No way!  Their botched addressing caused 100% of the printed pieces to be wrong, and 100% of the postage to be a waste in our opinion. We believe we are entitled to full refund of 100%.$1179.38 Postage$379.00 Print Cost$205.00 AddressingTOTAL:  $1,763.38
Entity: St Petersburg, Florida
3, Report #506138
Oct 08 2009
07:45 AM
Willywalt.com - Willy Walt - Willy Walt Printing Services Not a good business to work with. The owner is a jerk and wont take care of you if an issue arises. They also get so much business that your order/time isnt valuable to them. RIP OFF RIP OFF!!!!! st petersberg, Florida
Joey,   I understand there has been a situation that has occurred due to mis-communication. When we spoke, I told you I could place my order with another vendor within my time frame for delivery but I wanted to give you an opportunity to have the order as you worked so hard to get my account. And I appreciate it very much.   In offering you the job, it was understood that you could actually do the job within that time frame and cost. So I eagerly ran to the bank and back to make sure I had my order in my 6pm your time as I was instructed. I made that deadline, sent the order, got the proof, approved it and then received a call from Erica. Stating the job couldn't be done in that time frame unless I upgraded the shipping. I declined. Because I was told by you I was ok.   Quickly she stopped the sale so that I may place my order with my other vendor. Great idea in theory, not practical by any means for me. Why? Because they hold those funds for 7 business days and then release it. Now I am a very small business, single mother getting by. If I had a big bank account to cover this for 7days I would be ok. But I don't. which means something that is time sensitive will have to be pushed by a week. That's very bad for me. Like loose my client bad, all over a misunderstanding that trickled down.   I attached my bank recipt from after i made your withdrawl. notice theres just enough for one more order? So i cant just go place the order elsewhere, I am now either stuck with you or screwed. Refunding  it back messes it up and compermises my client agreements, my sched with workers and is a loss. I am showing you this so you can see what I am looking at. A mess!   I am very frustrated with this outcome, but I am also a smart business person. It's easier to compermise with you... get the order shipped and pay a little more.... than it is to take the job somewhere else, get my refund and not use you again. Mistakes happen for all of us. All I care about is my clients needs and the agreement I made with them. Please do right by me and do the same. I will pay for 1/2 the shipping upgrade. If i remember its $100? Lets get this job out and move onto the next.   I have to have this order ready for distribution by Friday Oct 16th and it would mean so much to me if we could just fix this and move on.      Their response:   We discussed turn around time and shipping time well before the order was placed. That order no longer exists. There is nothing that I can do at this point.Sincerely,Joey Richmond888 468 9258http://WillyWalt.com   Apparently they have so much business that my order and my business mean nothing.  The owner wouldnt talk to me or try to fix it. Instead I was told to take my business elsewhere.   DONT USE THEM!!! If you are looking for peace if mind, use printplace.com. Their cost is less and no problems.
Entity: st petersberg, Florida
4, Report #1392974
Aug 15 2017
01:29 PM
Willy Walt Printing 204 37th Ave N #424 • St. Petersburg, FL 33704 Jessica LIED and said she would make sure my order was a custom order St. Petersburg Florida
Jessica contacted me from Willy Walt printing offering a 50% of brocuhre printing.  We discussed in great detail how I needed the brochures to be 4 inches wide and 11 inches high.  She said that would not be a problem.  Then I sent over the files.  At no time was I aware that Jessica DID NOT do her job and put them in as a regular order of which I have compared pricing and it was NOT 50% off as she did state over the phone.  I sent her the art work in pdf format and she said that we approved the artwork to be printed as cmyk not rgb.  Well I do believe she had that backwards as all the other printing companies I have used to print brochures, catalogs etc.  Never had a problem matching the colors as bad as Willy Walt Did. The boxes arrived today 15,000 brochures with the tape broke on each box and the brochures are TERRIBLE.  You can not even read the printing on the front side of the brochure. When asked what are they going to do about it.  She said well i'm sorry you clicked ok to approve.  Now here is the kicker Jessica was on the phone and going over that with me and said it's just a formality just click ok and everything will be taken care of on this end.  At no time was I led to believe that she was placing our order as a standard order. JESSICA I WILL TELL EVERYONE how you ripped us off, didn't do your job correctly and walked us through the Click ok to print Click ok to approve over the phone and what did we get in return, a terrible inferior product. Glad you love to rip people off Jessica.
Entity: St. Petersburg, Florida
5, Report #400027
Mar 12 2012
10:21 AM
Willywalt.com - Willy Walt - Willy Walt Printing Services Doesn't know the first thing about printing! St. Petersburg Florida
This company send me a simple 4/4 color print job of 1000 11x17 brochures that was missing magenta ink. CMYK printing requires all 4 colors, Cyan, Magenta, Yellow and Black. If one of those colors fails to print, the job is going to be seriously off color. I notified them of the bad job, and instead of going back to a print sample, they wanted me to send them samples of the job they'd shipped me. I asked them to pay for the return shipping, assuming that they'd see the lousy job they did and reprint it properly. Instead I got an argument, a refusal to pay the shipping charges and later, an accusation that I didn't know what I was talking about because there's a difference between RGB color space and CMYK color space--that they'd actually found a copy of the print job and deemed it was within standard printing industry variance of 20%. (Industry standard is 10%.) Then they told me they couldn't/wouldn't do anything about the lousy job unless I sent the whole thing back. So I did. After reporting them to my CC company and also to the BBB, they did refund my money, but not the shipping charges I incurred to send all their brochures back. They said, after sending an email stating that they would refund only if I sent the stuff back, that they wouldn't refund the shipping charges because I sent the stuff back at my own discretion. Is it possible that this company is so incompetent they can't even recognize when there is something radically wrong with their process? And they expect the customer to take responsibility for their mistakes. Kasey Johns Creek, GeorgiaU.S.A.
Entity: St. Petersburg, Florida
6, Report #651859
Oct 16 2010
11:00 PM
willy farah willy farah toke my money for invetment in stock and lost it all orlando, Florida
williy Farah toke my company and all the assets and invested it in the stock market ,with in two months of coming out of jail he sent me to bankruptcy,had to get food stamps he will lie to you to take your money and invest it and lose it all on his own stuff.he has been bard from the stock market but he still dose it in his farther name and royal realty group   
Entity: orlando, Florida
7, Report #1112555
Jul 12 2014
02:26 PM
Walt Reeder Entertainment Walt Stole money using wire transfer Jenkintown Pennsylvania
Walt Reeder is a scam artist. I wired $28,500 into his account for deposits on artists Avant, Keke Wyatt and KMichelle. None of the artist were ever notified of the deposits made nor were they even aware of a concert date. once the fraud was recognized he would say he making wire transfer back into my account, but never has. After about approximately 2 weeks of lies no one would answer the phones at his office. His associates are very much aware of  his scam. I am told from a reliable source that Walt resides mostly in Canada to deviate from being served court papers and criminal charges. As I read more of his obscure actions on this site. I am not understanding how the law, even in Canada has not convicted this man.
Entity: Jenkintown, Pennsylvania
9, Report #728666
May 12 2011
05:19 PM
Walt Winkelman/ Happiness360.org Dr. Walt, Walt Winkelman, Happiness360.org Internet Fraud, Business Fraud, Scam Artist Santa Fe, New Mexico
Dr. Walt Must be found and brought to justice. Dr. Walt Winkelman, Happiness 360, The Human Thriving Foundation are the names he uses. Dr. Walt promises payment, requires work, and wants business deals for free. If anyone has had dealings with him, join my law suit. He must be forced to pay. Currently money owed is $80,000. He will pop up somewhere with his humanitarian story. Then he will rip off others.
Entity: Santa Fe, New Mexico
10, Report #199105
Jul 01 2006
03:26 PM
William/ Willy puppy scammer claims to be a missionary in Africa Internet
I was looking for a french bulldog puppy on livedeal.com and found a cream female named Jesi. The price was very reasonable. The picture of the puppy was very small, so I e-mailed William/ Willy for new recent pictures. William sent new photos but they were still icon size and the picture looked as though a professional photographer had taken it. I then received an e-mail from livedeal.com that this persons account had been suspended and to dicontinue any contact with this person. Luckily I didn't loose any money but hope to help others identify a scam. This person says he's a missionary in Nigeria, Africa and the hot weather is too hard on his 10 week old french bulldog Jesi. He states she's can be over nighted via Delta first pet airline and all for $600. The price of the dog should raise the first red flag as these purebred dogs run $1000 to $3000. Be very careful when buying off the internet and insist on real life photos along with pictures of the parents if possible. The AKC lists reputable breeders. It is also safest to use a broker when possible or a credit card (so you can dispute the charge if items aren't received. I would never use a money order or cashiers check! Beth Atlanta, GeorgiaU.S.A.
Entity: Internet
11, Report #340008
Jun 13 2008
12:04 PM
Willy Trading-Von Ripped off by an internet scumbag!!! BelgiumAntwerp Internet
Stay away from someone by the name of Von!!! his email is Von156@hushmail.com. and he works for Willy Trading company. I found him on the site-http://www.sulekhab2b.com/. The first time I placed an order with him in came through fine. The next time, he took me for $350.00 not to mention the western union fee of $35. It has been almost 6 weeks since I placed my order with him and he refuses to return any emails!!! Stay away from this guy, he will rip you off BIG TIME!!!! He is located in Antwerp, Belgium! James Park Ridge, IllinoisU.S.A.
Entity: Antwerp, Internet
12, Report #833141
Feb 02 2012
09:16 PM
willy bulldogs zoin freight SMOOTH TALKIN SCAM ARTIST THAT PRAYS ON ANIMAL LOVERS Internet
Our story is EXACTLEY VERBATIM as the story for willy bulldogs rip off reported on here on 1/21/2012 only the DR. had a different name when our scam happend. So when i googled his name this site did not pop up to warn me about his scam. Thus being one reason i didnt put his email address or phone # on here is because i dont want him changing his name right away and hopefully my experience will save someone else from this piece of crap.He went by the name DR. MORETTI ROMA. Out of bismarck, North Dakota. my husband and i had been trying to conceive a child for over 3 years now without luck, so we had decided to adopt this beautiful puppy named cali to help fill the void. To our dismay i had sent the money to him and was supposed to be getting the puppy at my door in 9 hrs. The next morning i had received an email from the freight company saying that the crate that the dr had left was in too bad of condition for shipping and they also needed money for insurance because the puppy was under a year old. $690 extra is what they requested from me to finish the delivery of my puppy, that was fully refunded to me when the puppy arrived at my door less the cost of the $170 crate. I had contacted thedr to ask him about this insurance issue that no-one told me about previousley , and when i told him i had no more money to send him he kept emailing me back saying that he would take care of the crate if i could take care of the $520  insurance of which i said NO.... then another email that he would cover half the insurance if i could please send the other half right away so she could COME HOME. So finally I call his bluff and say why can't i just come and pick her up myself cause i dont mind the drive.......No response since!!   Sadly this just makes our current situation less barable but we hope that maybe we can at least save someone else from the same scam that just keeps getting reinvented to keep their scam a secret!!!!
Entity: , Internet
13, Report #652628
Oct 19 2010
07:38 AM
willy farah still ripping people off after all this time orlando, Florida
NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 04-1017 IN RE: WILLY FARAH, Debtor RAYMOND **** v. WILLY FARAH; PNC BANK, N.A. Raymond ****, Appellant APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY D.C. Civil No. 02-cv-01662 District Judge: The Honorable William J. Martini Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) November 1, 2004 Before: ALITO, BARRY, and FUENTES, Circuit Judges (Opinion Filed: March 22, 2005) OPINION Ten million of these twenty-six m 1 illion dollars appear to correspond with the amount Farah allegedly withdrew in violation of the investment agreement; it is unclear what the other sixteen million dollars in claimed damages is all about. 2 BARRY, Circuit Judge Appellant Raymond **** appeals the decision of the District Court for the District of New Jersey, which dismissed ****s appeal of a Bankruptcy Court order as untimely. Because of the unusual circumstances of this case, we will remand to the District Court with instructions to entertain ****s appeal. I. Background **** was a client of an attorney named Ivo G. Caytas. Caytas introduced **** to Willy Farah, a self-described international business investor and entrepreneur. **** became an investor with Farah, investing ten million dollars in a joint bank account Farah opened at a Mid-Atlantic Bank in Clifton, New Jersey. By 1997, Mid- Atlantic Bank had become PNC Bank. In the summer of that same year, **** learned that the funds he had deposited in the account he shared with Farah had been withdrawn. **** brought suit in the Superior Court of New Jersey. ****s first complaint was in four counts against Farah alone. That complaint, filed on August 21, 1997, was based on Farahs allegedly fraudulent act of withdrawing the money from the joint account, and demanded twenty-six million dollars in damages.1 Farah failed to defend, and a default judgment was entered against him on December 11, 1997. Under New Jersey Court Rule 4:43-2 2, a final judgment by default is a final resolution of a dispute between the parties involved. 3 New Jersey Court Rule 4:37-2(d) provides that a dismissal with prejudice constitutes an adjudication on the merits, making it a final determination on the claims that are dismissed. 4On February 29, 2000,**** filed another complaint against PNC based on information he obtained through discovery during Farahs bankruptcy proceedings. He claims, based on this new information, that PNC was negligent in its operation of the joint account. PNCs motion for summary judgment is pending before the Hon. William J. Martini. 3 For some reason, five days later the Hon. Jack B. Kirsten, the Superior Court Judge to whom the case was assigned, allowed **** to file an amended complaint adding a fifth count sounding in negligence and naming PNC as the defendant in that count.2 The negligence claim alleged that PNC had allowed Farah to open the joint account in a way that did not comply with ****s and Farahs investment agreement, or with customary banking practices. **** sought damages in the amount of ten million dollars, the amount of money **** had initially deposited in the bank and Farah had allegedly withdrawn. On February 27, 1998, PNC moved for summary judgment. The Superior Court granted PNCs motion on both procedural and substantive grounds, dismissing ****s complaint against PNC with prejudice on April 23, 1998 (April 98 order).3 **** moved for reconsideration, but his motion was denied on July 7, 1998. He filed a timely notice of appeal with the New Jersey Appellate Division on August 2, 1998.4 Backtracking for a moment to May 5, 1998, three months before this appeal of the 4 April 98 order was taken, Farah filed a motion to vacate the default judgment entered against him. Surprisingly, **** did not oppose Farahs motion. On September 29, 1998, the Superior Court opened the default judgment to give Farah the opportunity to try to prove a meritorious defense; however, **** could still enforce the judgment, which had not been vacated. **** began to levy against Farahs assets. On November 19, 1998, Farah filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition in the District of New Jersey and, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1452, removed all remaining claims against him, including ****s suit against PNC, to the District of New Jersey on that same day. The petition and all claims were referred to the Bankruptcy Court. One day after removal, on November 20, 1998, the Appellate Division dismissed ****s appeal of the April 98 order. The Court stated, without elaboration, that an appeal of that order would be interlocutory. From this point on, the action shifts entirely to the federal courts. Adversary proceedings against Farah went forward in the Bankruptcy Court. On April 19, 2000, **** filed a motion, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b), seeking review of the April 98 order based on what he claimed was newly-discovered evidence. The Bankruptcy Judge, the Hon. Novalyn L. Winfield, denied that motion on June 19, 2001, a pivotal date in this case. Then, on July 16, 2001, Judge Winfield denied Farahs request for relief from the twenty-six million dollar default judgment entered against him in Superior Court in 1997. 5 On July 24, 2001, **** filed a notice of appeal of the July 16, 2001 order in this Court, in the District of New Jersey, and in the Superior Court, all seeking review of the April 98 order on the ground that, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b), it was interlocutory and non-appealable until July 16, 2001. He subsequently moved to transfer the appeal before this Court to the District of New Jersey, and the motion was granted. **** withdrew his appeal to the Superior Court. The District Court Judge, the Hon. William J. Martini, first decided that there was no jurisdiction to review the April 98 order. **** had argued, and continues to argue, that he was entitled to an appeal as of right because, when Farah removed these proceedings, the order granting summary judgment became federalized, pointing to Tehan v. Disability Management Servs., Inc., 111 F. Supp. 2d 542 (D.N.J. 2000), as authority. Judge Martini held that Tehan was inapplicable and concluded that Judge Winfield correctly treated Richardss appeal of the April 98 order, at the Bankruptcy Court level, as a Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b) motion. Then, when on June 19, 2001, she issued an order denying that motion, **** could have appealed that order to the District Court. Judge Martini reasoned that the only order **** could properly appeal was one issued by Judge Winfield. In order to determine whether it was the June 19, 2001 or the July 16, 2001 order **** had appealed, Judge Martini looked at the issues that **** had briefed and determined that it was indeed the June 19, 2001 order, which 6 denied the 54(b) motion for review of the April 98 order, that had been appealed. Having determined what was on appeal, Judge Martini turned to when **** took that appeal and whether the appeal was timely. A notice of appeal must be filed within ten days of the order the party seeks to appeal. Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8002(a). Here, Judge Martini concluded, **** did not file his appeal until July 24, 2001, more than one month after the June 19, 2001 order. ****s only response to this conclusion was to argue that the June 19, 2001 order did not become final, and therefore appealable, until Judge Winfields July 16, 2001 order and, thus, an appeal filed on July 24, 2001 was within the ten-day window. Judge Martini found, though, that the concept of finality is more fluid in the bankruptcy context than it is in the context of traditional civil litigation. Thus, because the June 19 order resolved a discrete dispute, he held that it was final and that ****s July 24, 2001 appeal thereof to the District Court was untimely. On December 3, 2003, Judge Martini dismissed the appeal. **** timely filed the appeal now before us. II. Jurisdiction and Standard of Review This case was properly removed under the bankruptcy removal statute. 28 U.S.C. 1452(a) ([a] party may remove any claim or cause of action in a civil action . . . to the district court for the district where such civil action is pending, if such district court has jurisdiction of such claim or cause of action under section 1334 of this title.); see also Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9027. The District Court had jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1334(b) In Northern Pipeline Constr. 5 Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co., 458 U.S. 50 (1982), the Supreme Court found the statutory provisions relating venue and removal in bankruptcy proceedings to be unconstitutional. Just after the Pacor controversy arose, Congress enacted the Bankruptcy Amendments and Federal Judgeship Act of 1984 in order to comply with the Marathon decision. That legislation gave the district courts the jurisdiction that bankruptcy courts had previously enjoyed, and resulted in a renumbering of the relevant statutory provisions; however, the substance of those sections was not altered. See Pacor, 458 U.S. at 987 n.4. Specifically, Pacors 1471 is todays 1334; 1478 is 1452; and 1293 is 158. 7 because the Richards-PNC matter was sufficiently related to Farahs case under title 11. See In re Pacor, Inc., 743 F.2d 984 (3d Cir. 1984) (explaining that related to jurisdiction depends on whether the outcome of that proceeding could conceivably have any effect on the estate being administered in bankruptcy.), revd on other grounds, Things Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca, 516 U.S. 124 (1995).5 The District Court also acted properly when it referred the case, after removal, to the Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey. See 28 U.S.C. 157(a). Thereafter, the District Court appropriately acted in an appellate capacity when it reviewed the final judgments, orders, and decrees of the Bankruptcy Court. See id. at 158(a). We have jurisdiction over the District Courts order under 28 U.S.C. 158(d). We review any factual findings under a clearly erroneous standard, and exercise plenary review over legal issues. In re Montgomery Ward Holding Corp., 326 F.3d 383, 397 (3d Cir. 2003); see also Universal Minerals, Inc. v. C. A. Hughes & Co., 669 F.2d 98, 102 (3d Cir. 1981) (We are in as good a position as the district court to review the findings of the bankruptcy court, so we review the bankruptcy courts findings by the standards the It is important 6 to note that the federalization concept has no bearing on the jurisdiction of the state court vis-a-vis the federal court when a case is removed. This point is relevant here because one day after Farah removed the case to the District of New Jersey, the Appellate Division denied ****s appeal from the April 98 order, deeming it interlocutory. This ruling is a nullity, as the state courts were immediately stripped of jurisdiction when Farah filed his notice of removal. See In re Diet Drugs Prods. Liab. Litig., 282 F.3d at 231 n.6. 8 district court should employ, to determine whether the district court erred in its review.). III. Reviewability of ****s Appeal As explained above, the substance of Richardss appeal to the District Court was the April 98 order of the Superior Court that granted summary judgment in favor of PNC. Properly presenting that issue in federal court was complicated by two concepts: federalization and finality. 1. Federalization of the April 98 Order **** has continuously argued that the April 98 order was federalized as soon as Farah removed the case to federal court. The federalization concept has been well-established in the non-bankruptcy removal context. See, e.g., In re Diet Drugs Prods. Liab. Litig., 282 F.3d 220, 231-32 (3d Cir. 2002). This transformation occurs by virtue of 28 U.S.C. 1450. See id. at 232 n.7 ([w]henever a case is removed, interlocutory state court orders are transformed . . . into orders of the federal district court to which the action is removed. The district court is thereupon free to treat the order as it would any such interlocutory order it might itself have entered.) (internal citations omitted).6 99 We have not decided whether section 1450 has the same transformative effect when removal is effected under section 1452, which deals solely with removal in bankruptcy cases. Nonetheless, the similarities between the general removal procedures of 28 U.S.C. 1441-46 and the removal procedures in bankruptcy would indicate that the effect should be the same. Certainly, the Supreme Court has concluded that other non-bankruptcy removal procedures can comfortably coexist with the bankruptcy removal procedures. See Petrarca, 516 U.S. at 129. We decline to resolve the issue here, however, and include this discussion only to indicate that we understand the basis for ****s argument. 2. Finality Although **** argued in the District Court that he was appealing the federalized April 98 order, he also argued that his appeal of the Bankruptcy Courts order of July 16, 2001 was timely and, therefore, properly before the District Court. We agree with the District Court, though, that **** should have appealed the Bankruptcy Courts earlier order of June 19, 2001, which denied his motion to review the April 98 order. We base this conclusion on the fact that [a] bankruptcy court order ending a separate adversary proceeding is appealable as a final order even though that order does not conclude the entire bankruptcy case. In re Professional Ins. Mgmt., 285 F.3d 268, 281 (3d Cir. 2002). Here, the June 19, 2001 order disposed of ****s claim against PNC; the July 16, 2001 order dealt with Farahs request for relief from the default Of course, if **** was appealing a federalized A 7 pril 98 order in se, his appeal would also have been untimely. 1100 judgment entered against him. Therefore, the clock for ****s appeal as to his claim against PNC began running on June 19, 2001 and expired on June 29, 2001. See Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8002(a). Because **** did not appeal until July 24, 2001, his appeal was untimely.7 Despite this, we recognize some confusion surrounding removal proceedings, especially in the bankruptcy context. Thus, as we have done before, and given the circumstances of this particular case, we will do some field engineering in light of the lack of specificity in the statute about removal of appealed cases [that] poses substantial procedural problems here for both parties. See Resolution Trust Corp. v. Nernberg, 3 F.3d 62, 67 (3d Cir. 1993). More specifically, because neither the Bankruptcy Court nor the District Court ruled on the finality of the various orders in this case, including the April 98 order, **** could not necessarily have known when the finality clock began to tick. Therefore, guided by the underlying principles at work in Nernberg, we will deem his June 19, 2001 appeal timely and will remand to the District Court with instructions to consider the April 98 order on the merits. IV. Conclusion The December 3, 2003 order of the District Court will be reversed and this matter will be remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. 1111
Entity: orlando, Florida
14, Report #649145
Oct 09 2010
09:02 AM
WILLY HEROLD AUTOMOTIVE Deceptive, Lies, Fraudulent, columbus, Georgia
Willy Herold had a car on there website that looked like a good buy. I went and talked to a dealer and as i looked under hood I asked the dealer has their been any engine work i see something that looks like sealant. Dealer replied no engine work has been done great car.     Dealer also verbally told me if anything is wrong we will fix no problem. So I asked If the miles are correct and took a very short test drive.I agreed to purchase car on conditions that they would fix what was wrong with speedometer cable and the smoke i noticed.          Dealer said no problem but can you get the cv joint fixed. I agreed and left car there for repairs.         After 3days I returned and they said there service department is busy and I would have to get an appointment with the service department. My mistake was to believe and accept that.     After  I left i drove car home and passerby's were blowing there horn alerting me to vast amounts of smoke. Nevertheless I called them and I returned the car for it's appointment without driving it only to this appointment. I left it there they never fixed it and i ended up going through BBB which they pay to purge the records.                                          They of course had other complaints that were also purged from the BBB and i don't believe they were resolved . I had to scrap the car after I got home, a mechanic looked at it and told me they sold me scrap. 150 dollars compared to what I lost is terrible. Don't buy there if you need a good used car Veterans stay away they will rip you off like they did me. 
Entity: columbus, Georgia
15, Report #651860
Oct 16 2010
11:01 PM
willy farah royal realty group inc investment ripoff orlando, Florida
willy farah it trying to get investers to buy into his company to go public ,and doble there money .it is a ripp off the will be no property bort and he will transfer the funds befor you know it he has done this scam befor in New York ,he gets away with it if you think of investing in willy farah you will lose you money ,he is black listest as a stock broker
Entity: orlando, Florida
16, Report #651863
Oct 16 2010
11:02 PM
willy farah FCA Solutions loan modification rip off orlando, Florida
willy farah will take your money for a loan modification and the you will get nothing in retern ,you have to go to the atterny general and file a complaint against willy farah he just cam out of jail and is in probation ,and alredy ripping people off ,he will not return your money and he dosent pay his emploees what the deserve,then he offerd me a invetment scam buying propertys and waiting for them to go up in a year ,you will never see your money again you will lose everything you invest in willy farah
Entity: orlando, Florida
17, Report #652959
Oct 19 2010
05:39 PM
willy farah dosent return upfront charges to his clients orlando, Florida
willy Farah toke upfront payments for my modification,when it was not correct the he whont give it back he hids in the building even thu we know he has a white mercedes down stairs
Entity: orlando, Florida
18, Report #1297605
Apr 21 2016
12:32 PM
WILLY LEMOINE GLOBAL TRADING SERVICES AFRICA METAL sarl LIAR, THIEF, TIME WASTER COTONOU Internet
This person is a big LIAR with only one target, STEAL money from buyers in all manners. He's sending stupid documents hoping somebody will trust him. Be very carefull and don't start any business with this person. he's offering gold from Africa and of course has nothing for sale. Don't waste your ime with this guy.
Entity: COTONOU, Internet
19, Report #199501
Jul 05 2006
07:29 AM
Walt Dinsey World Misleading Reservation Confirmations ripoff Orlando Florida
We recently made reservations for 15 people and my honeymoon at Disney World. They were made using the free dinning package, one of my aunts was not with us at the time to pay off her package. She recieved the confirmation of the reservations in the mail and according to the front of the reservation it says total due 06July06. She called on the 4th to pay it off and they had cancelled her reservations on the 3rd because there was no deposit recieved. They so far have done nothing to fix the problem we are admitting part of it is our fault because the back was not read but on the front it says total due by July 6th. I think they need to reformat their reservations so if no deposit is paid at the time of booking that it says it is due on the front and not in fine print on the back. I have been to Disney 23 times and am very disappointed to see how their customer service is turning out. If anyone would like to see how a copy of their reservations look please feel free to email me. I hope other people will see that they are misleading and something needs to be done. Nichole North Street, MichiganU.S.A.
Entity: Orlando, Florida
20, Report #493554
Sep 11 2009
03:06 PM
Walt Hommerding Wally, Wallace BLACK HEART HOMMERDING DEADBEAT DAD Newport Beach, Nationwide
WALT STILL DID NOT REMIT HIS CHILD SUPPORT ARREARS AND NOW IS FACED WITH A FELONY FEDERAL PROSECUTION UNDER THE DEADBEAT PARENT'S PUNSIHMENT ACT. WALT IS A SOCIOPATH AND DOES NOT HAVE ANY MORALITY, REPSECT FOR THE LAW, NOR RESPECT FOR HIS OWN SON.  
Entity: Newport Beach, Nationwide
21, Report #621959
Jul 10 2010
10:07 AM
Wallace Walt Hommerding CRIMINAL NON SUPPORT WOMEN ABUSER BLACKHEART THIEF Newport Beach, California
WALLACE J HOMMERDING works for WELLS FARGO as a WEALTH MANAGER in NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA.WALT is a deadbeat dad, in the 5% class of dispicable men who have had the means but willfully have withheld for his own son born to him in 1987.WALT is a psychopath, has used the child support money that was court ordered since 1988, for the betterment of his own very shallow, materialistic valueless lifestyle.WALT lacks integrity, values, ethics, morals and is a heartless, merciless criminal and failed on all levels as a father, as a supporter for his baby, child, teenager, and now young gentleman in 4th year University.WALT abused the mother of his ONLY CHILD to the point that she fled and the courts refused him any access to his child, as his physical, psychological and financial abuse of both mother and son were INHUMANE.WALT is a spinmaster, a bold faced liar, who refuses to be held accountible for many incidences of extreme abuse and cruelty while the mother of his unborn son was 8-9 months pregnant. HE PUNCHED HER IN THE STOMACH at 8 months term, threw her out of his home without any money, car, nor support and she had to live with pure strangers hand to mouth.He assaulted her when she was even in labor, making her walk four blocks in the night telling her she was faking it.He spit in her face, threw her out of his car and told her she was nothing but a slut because she was making him late for a dinner meeting while she was in labor.HE NEXT DAY HE CAME TO THE HOSPITAL WITH ROSES AND A TEDDY BEAR CRYING WITH GUILT FOR HIS MERCILESS TREATMENT OF HER AND HIS SON.THE ABUSE CONTINUED, including him throwing her out with his then newborn son at 3am, with no car, no money, no support including attacking her while she held her newborn baby many times and screaming like a nutcase so loud in front of his infant son for NOTHING AT ALL.WALT then stalked her to the place where two very kindhearted strangers took her in, and would call her on their phone calling her a slut and that HOW COULD SHE COOK DINNER FOR THE MAN? as he had been hiding outside in theri bushes watching her inside their home. He also put a poloroid photo of her giving im head when they lived together in Dallas in their mailbox on her birthday.AFTER HE HAD THROWN BOTH HER AND HIS OWN BABY OUT WITHOUT ANY LIFE SUSTENANCE, WALT TRIED TO RUIN WHATEVER SUPPORT SHE ATTAINED WITH PURE STRANGERS BECAUSE HE IS A VERY SICK TWISTED ABUSER, WANTING TO DEGRADE, DEBASE, DEMORALIZE AND CONTINUE TO REVICTIMIZE HER because WALT feeds off of her being totally vulnerable.HIS POWER PLAYS OVER HER DURING THE MOST VULNERABLE TIME OF ANY WOMAN'S LIFE ARE UNCONSCIENABLE.HE STALKED HER TO ALBERTSONS IN NEWPORT BEACH AND CAME UP BEHIND HER AND GRABBED HER HAIR NEAR TO BREAKING HER NECK AND SMASHED HER HEAD INTO THE ICECREAM COOLER.THIS WAS WITNESSED BY THREE UNBIASED STRANGERS.WALT WAS ARRESTED AND PUT ON BAIL CONDITIONS TO STAY AWAY, BY THE NEWPORT BEACH POLICE, BUT HE REFUSED, AND CONTINUED TO ASSAULT HER AND THEN CO ERCED HER TO MAKE THE DA DROP THE CHARGES BY BUYING A CASE OF BABY FORMULA FOR HIS SON AND PLAYPEN. HE PLAYED ON THE PURE POVERTY AND DESPERATION OF HIS VICTIM ONCE AGAIN IN LIEU OF A CRIMINAL RECORD OF HIS ABUSE.HE TOTALLY EXPLOITED THE MOTHER OF HIS SON, ABUSED HER TO HORRIFIC DEGREES ALL THE WHILE POURING THROUGH THE NIGHTCLUBS OF NEWPORT BEACH ENGAGING IN MANY OTHER RELATIONS, SPENDING THE CHILD SUPPORT MONEY ON OTHER WOMEN.THE COURT ORDERED A CHILD SUPPORT ORDER FOR 34% of HIS NET BUT HE PAID NEXT TO NOTHING AND USED IT AS A TOOL TO CONTINUE TO REVICTIMIZE HER BY MAKING HER CALL FOR IT EVERY SINGLE MONTH.HE WOULD SCREAM OBSCENITIES N THE PHONE, HANG UP ON HER, REROUTE THE CALL TO HIS OTHER MANAGERS AND PARTNERS WHO WOULD THEN HANG UP AND BASICALLY MOCK HER AND RIDICULE HER IMPOVERSIHED SITUATION.WALT WOULD ALSO LIE BOLD FACED SAYING HE WAS TOO BROKE TO PAY ANYTHING, WOULD HAVE TO BORROW MONEY FROM HIS MOTHER, WAS ALSWYAS IN CHAPTER 11 EVERY OTHER MONTH, OR HAVING ILLNESSES< EMOTIONAL PROBLEMS, FRIENDS WITH EMOTIONAL PROBLEMS THAT HE HAD TO TEND TO FIRST, OR THAT HE WAS GETTING MARRIED AND ALL OF THE MONEY WAS GONE TO PAY FOR HIS WEDDING TO JENNIFER LYNN SCUMMINGS.SHE WEARS A DIAMOND RING AND HAD HER FANTASY WEDDING WHILE WALT IS IN CONTEMPT OF COURT AND IS BEING PROSECUTED FOR FELONY FEDERAL NON SUPPORT.WALT IS A REAL BIG PHONEY, PRE-OCCUPIED WITH HIS LOOKS, MAINTAINING HIS FALSE FRONTS, INCLUDING DONATING CHILD SUPPORT TO OTHER CHILDREN CHARITIES IN NEWPORT BEACH WHILE HIS OWN SON WENT WITHHOUT.THE MOTHER OF HIS SON IS OWED 34% of HIS NET, pLuS HALF THE EXPENSES AND HE FAILS TO REPLY, REMIT, FAILS PARENTAGE ON ALL LEVELS.HE DENIES THE ABUSE THOUGH THERE ARE MANY WITNESSES, POLICE INCIDENT REPORTS, HIS DROPPED CHARGES (BEFORE THE DA CHANGED DOMESTIC ABUSE LAWS ALLOWING THE VICTIM TO BE INVOLVED TO PUT THEMSELVES IN MORE GRAVE DANGER).MANY F THESE BLOG SITES ARE REMOVED BY WALT AS HE IS MORE CONCERNED FOR HIS OWN EMBARRASSMENT THANT THE SUFFERING OF TWO HUMAN BEINGS, INCLUDING HIS OWN SON.WALT IS A SICK MAN, DO NOT INVEST WITH HIM, BECAUSE HE ALSO LIED SAYING HE WOULD HAVE A COLLEGE FUND FOR HIS SON, AND SET UP AN ACCOUNT FOR HIS SON, BUT NOW SAYS THERE ISNT'T ONE.THOUGH WALT PLANS EDUCATIONAL SAVINGS FOR UNSUSPECTING FAMILIES OF NEWPORT BEACH, WHILE EITHER STEALING HIS OWN SONS SAVINGS) OR NOT EVER CARING ONE SECOND FOR HIS SON.IT IS OUR CONTENTION THAT WALT HOMMERDING IS A CLASSLESS MORALLESS SNIVELLING GREASY WEASEL SWINE AND AN OUTRIGHT UNCONSCIENABLE SELFISH SOCIAL DEViANT, BU TMORE SO, ORANGE COUNTIES BIGGEST DEADBEADT DADS.THE ORDER STANDS, HE REFUSES TO PAY UNTIL THEY DRAG HIM TO JAIL.GUYS LIKE WALT HAVE NO EXCUSE, REAPING THE BENEFITS FOR OVER TWENTY YEARS OF BIG SOLID CORPORATIONS SUCH AS SHEARSON LEHMAN, PRUDENTIAL, UBS, PAINE WEBBER, WACHOVIA AND NOW WELLS FARGO. WALT IS HIGHLY EDUCATED FROM ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY IN CHICAGO, HAS HIS CA, SERIES 6 LICENSES, COMES FORM TWO SETS OF DIVORCED BOTH WEALTHY PARENTS, HAS SOLIDITY IN ONE COMMUNITY FOR TWENTY YEARS< HAS WEALTHY FRIENDS, CLIENTS, CREDIT CARDS AND ALL THE PERKS OF MALE BONDING AND GOOD LOOKS AND HEALTH OPENING ALL FO THE DOORS FOR HIM TO CREATE A LIFE OF ABUNDANCE AND PROSPERITY.THIS IS AN EXAMPLE OF A VERY PERVERSE, SELF-CENTERED MAN, WHO HAD THE MEANS BUT WILLFULLY WITHHELD ALL OF THE COURT ORDERED BASIC CHILD SUPPORT FOR HIS SON IN A PITIFUL BUT SHAMELESS WAY, INCLUDING NEVER SENDING A CHRISTMAS PRESENT TO HIS CHILD WHILE PARTICIPATING IN TOYS FOR TOTS FUND DRIVE AND OTHER CHILREN'S CHARITIES IN A VERY HYPOCRITICAL WAY.WALT HOMMERDING IS A SPINELESS, WHINER, AND SPINMASTER, NOW COMPLAINING THAT HE IS EXPOSED FOR 25 YEARS OF PURE OUTRIGHT VICTIMIZATION OF THE MOTHER OF HIS ONLY SON.WALT IS VERY VERY SICK AND HAS NO REGARD FOR HIS OBLIGATIONS AND HIS RESPONSIBILITIES.THIS MAN IS THE EPITOME OF AMERICAN SCUM OUT FOR HIMSELF WITH NO REGARD FOR HIS OWN FLESH AND BLOOD.SIGNED THE MOTHER OF YOUR SON!
Entity: Newport Beach, California
22, Report #712475
Mar 31 2011
02:57 PM
happiness360 walt winkelman, dr. walt, dr. walt winkelman Same old story , Internet
Walt Winkelman has been pulling such scams for years.  It is a way of life for him.  I find it hard to believe so many have fell victim to his dealings.  There is so much information out there on the internet,   please people be smart about dealing with this con artist.  What goes around comes around Mr. Winkelman.  First Chicago, then Santa Fe.  Where will you turn up next?  I am so thankful you are no longer in my state. 
Entity: Internet, Internet
23, Report #543204
Dec 21 2009
03:19 PM
Walt Disney DVDs Orders DVD from company never received DVD Internet
I ordered a DVD from this company on December 03,2009 and paid for the 3-5 buisness day shipping and here it is December 21, 2009 and I still have not recieved anything. I have tried emailing and writting this company over 4 times and still no response. Also, I have called the number on my reciept and still no answers the phone. I have sent them message after message demanding my money back and still nothing. Their website gives you a place where you can leave a message and someone is supposed to get back with you in 24 hours, but no one has every gotten back with me.
Entity: Internet, Internet
24, Report #549257
Jan 03 2010
10:08 PM
Walt Disney DVDs NEVER SENT THE DVD! Internet
I purchased a dvd from Walt Disney DVDs on December 4, 2009. Here it is, January 4 and I still have not received anything. I sent them a nasty complaint letter and the lame, disgusting response that I received did nothing but place the blame on the shipping company. Bill from the company told me that all I can do is wait because Walt Disney DVDs lost all of the tracking information from the orders online, therefore there is no way to track the packages. They are doing nothing to fix the situation, all they are doing is making me more angry. DO NOT BUY FROM WALT DISNEY DVDS!
Entity: , Internet
25, Report #547916
Dec 31 2009
05:34 AM
Walt Disney DVDs rip-off, scam, never received items Decatur, Georgia
I ordered 2 DVDs from this company on December 6, 2009, for a total of around $40. They were intended to be Christmas presents for family and friends. On December 15, I received an automated email saying they had been shipped. Over 2 weeks later and well past Christmas, they still had not arrived.Despite the advertisements on their site indicating they answer emails within 24 hours, they never even responded once to any of my several inquiries and complaints over the past week. They did not provide me with a tracking number or anything. They completely ignored me. To summarize: complete rip-off.
Entity: Decatur, Georgia

Approximately 2,898 Reports Found

Showing 1-25 | Showing Page 1 of 116

Legend
NewNew UpdatedUpdated RebutalRebuttal PhotoPhoto
Ripoff Report Recommends
ZipBooks Accounting Software

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.