Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #165984

Complaint Review: Ameriquest - New London Connecticut

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Oakdale Connecticut
  • Author Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • Ameriquest www.ameriquest.com New London, Connecticut U.S.A.

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

I have to honestly say that our dealings with this mortgage company has been thoroughly stressful. The scum bags shorted us approximately $3,800.00 on our closing check. And that money came eleven days after the three day right to resind period policy.

These morons actually believed that they could fool my wife. I truly feel for those homeowners who have been living through this horrible crisis in mortgage brokering. I suggest that those of you who do not want to ripped off, get a lawyer immediately After signing the closing, actually, have your attorney ready and then bait these crooks into a extremely cheap mortgage. When we RE financed, of course, we were shorted on the closing check and then they didn't want to post our very first payment.

Within three months they were threatening us for late fees. The checks were in the local office, in the drop box before a late fee would have been assessed. Here is the beauty in our situation; we have not paid our mortgage in one year. HA HA. Our attorney believes there are forged documents in our closing. The judge granted our motion to leave the contract.

For some reason they are not willing to take this to depositions just yet. These scum bags must not want to lose a license in this state. If you Ameriquest employees are getting laid off maybe it's because your employer is a crook. it was strange to see how our computer was reacting when we began to fight them back.

It amazes me to this day how that remote access number got on our fax machine! It was being RE installed whenever I erased it.(for months!). Somehow they knew we were about to send them a fax because all of the sudden, the phone would ring, and it was "Mark" giving us an alternate fax number. You guys must think that Americans are here for you to abuse. I love having a free mortgage for now , but I would rather see to it that they receive public attention to Criminal activities in a court of law .

Be careful because they will try to transfer their interests out of this country to well known German Bank. Our attorney beat them to the punch by two days. Three attorney's devised our plan. and a fourth attorney executed one area while another went to district court. How do you corporate scumbags like it when we respond with a lawsuit? Go ahead and take us to court you morans. I want to see this case in the news.

For all of you victims out there I suggest that you use zonealarm's firewall software, because these people are criminals and they must be punished for thier actions. My wife is smarter than all their employees combined, My dog is smarter than the two brokers we signed with. I bet those idiots lost their jobs right quick. The best part is after 3 months we recieved the check, cashed it, and hired an attorney and still had $2800 left. We printed out literally 1,800 or more pages of intrusions from the zonealarm software. Gee, was that you ameriquest MORBID company? Thank you!

I love seeing other people's serial numbers being printed out. I would be nice to see some of the serial numbers on thier hardware! Maybe my wife and I will never know. We really want to tell more people other than a congressman. I highly recommend zone alarm to the world. My wife and I prayed for months and the GOD OF JUSTICE responded. Thank you Jesus!

CmsandJlsGOTUMback
Oakdale, Connecticut
U.S.A.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 11/27/2005 03:04 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/ameriquest/new-london-connecticut/ameriquest-morbid-company-tried-to-ripoff-my-wife-and-i-new-london-connecticut-165984. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author
1Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#1 Consumer Comment

Ameriquest >Outcome: JURY verdict was 1.94 Million Actual damage award; 3 Million punitives. Verdict was unanimous on actuals, 11-1 on punitives.

AUTHOR: Bill & Ted - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Tuesday, November 29, 2005

Date: 11/23/2005

Case Style: Melba M. Gillean v. Ameriquest Mortgage Company

Case Number: CJ-03-4426

Judge: Rebecca Brett Nightingale

Court: District Court, Tulsa County, Oklahoma

Defendant's Attorney:

Brain Rayment of Kivell, Rayment, Francis, Coulson and Heath, P.C., Tulsa, Oklahoma

Description:

Negligent mortage refinancing and tortious interference claims by Melba Gillean against Ameriquest Mortgage Corporation. The specifics of the claims made and defense asserted are not available at this time.

Outcome: Jury verdict was 1.94 Million Actual damage award; 3 Million punitives. Verdict was unanimous on actuals, 11-1 on punitives.

Plaintiff's Experts: James Elliott CPA

Defendant's Experts: Unknown

Comments: Defendant offered $25,000 before trial and the demand was $150,000.00.

{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{

JUDGE: REBECCA B. NIGHTINGALE

CASE NO.CJ-03-4426
DATE NOVEMBER 28, 2005

MELBA GILLEAN VS. AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE COMPANY

CASE CALLED FOR JURY TRIAL. BOTH SIDES PRESENT IN OPEN COURT AND ANNOUNCE READY FOR TRIAL. PLAINTIFF PRESENT AND REPRESENTED BY DAVID HUMPHREYS AND LUKE WALLACE. DEFENDANT PRESENT AND REPRESENTED BY BRIAN RAYMENT.
THE JURORS ARE CALLED AND SWORN TO THEIR QUALIFICATIONS. THE JURY IS IMPANELED AND EXAMINED FOR CAUSE.

PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES
PLAINTIFF: (1)CYNTHIA DEW (2)AUDRA GUTMANN-JONES (3) MARGARET DUGGAN
DEFENDANT: (1)PAMELA BRANSTNER (2)KENNETH AMBER (3) MICHAEL COX

THE FOLLOWING JURORS ARE ACCEPTED AND SWORN TO TRY THE CAUSE:

1 TERRY CURTIS 8.KELLY BIFFLE
2 HEIDI REDDICK 9.GERALD MCCLOSKY
3.PATRICIA OSBY 10.SUZANNE CROLLEY
4.STEVEN SCHLICHT 11.MARY BECKLOFF GOSS
5.JAMES WILLMANN 12.SUZIE OMSTEAD
6.JACOB CROMER 13.JEANETTE JOHNSON
7.CHERYL ROBERTS

OPENING STATEMENTS ARE MADE. 7 WITNESSES SWORN. RULE WAS INVOKED. REPORTER ROBIN QUICK. THE SWEARING OF THE REPORTER IS WAIVED EXCEPT FOR TESTIMONY. PLAINTIFF PRESENTS EVIDENCE AND RESTS. DEFENDANT PRESENTS EVIDENCE AND RESTS. DEFENDANT MOVES FOR A DIRECTED VERDICT AND IS OVERRULED. BOTH SIDES REST.

THE JURY IS INSTRUCTED AS TO THE LAW. CLOSING ARGUMENTS ARE MADE. THE SWEARING OF THE BAILIFF IS WAIVED AND AT 12:30 PM THE JURY RETIRES FOR DELIBERATION IN CUSTODY OF THE BAILIFF. AT 3:45 PM THE JURY RETURNS INTO OPEN COURT WITH THEIR VERDICT, WHICH IS READ IN OPEN COURT, ORDERED RECORDED AND FILED, AND IS, TO WIT: WE, THE JURY, IMPANELED AND SWORN IN THE ABOVE ENTITLED CAUSE DO UPON OUR OATHS FIND THE ISSUES IN FAVOR OF THE PLAINTIFF, SHARI GARCIA AND FIX THE DOLLAR AMOUNT OF HER DAMAGES IN THE SUM OF $4,942,000.00 ($750,000.00 FOR NEGLIGENCE, $550,000.00 FOR DEFAMATION, $642,000.00 FOR TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE WITH PROSPECTIVE ECONOMIC ADVANTAGE AND $3,000,000.00 FOR PUNITIVE DAMAGES). JURORS CONCURRING SIGNED SUZIE OMSTEAD, FOREMAN. JURY DISCHARGED.

WITNESSES SWORN:
SHANE STAGNER, KURSTON MCMURRAY, SHERITA PULLEN, MAXWELL E. MEEK, MELBA GILLEAN, JAMES ELLIOTT (EXPERT), MARJORIE HOBBS

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now