• Report: #992867
Complaint Review:

Shanda Lancaster

  • Submitted: Mon, January 07, 2013
  • Updated: Fri, January 18, 2013

  • Reported By: TownCryer — Connecticut United States of America
Shanda Lancaster
1523 Grab Creek Rd dickson, Tennessee United States of America

Shanda Lancaster ripoffhell.com, STALKER, BLAME, ATTACKING, LIBEL, LIAR dickson, Tennessee

*General Comment: Trevor

*General Comment: F**CKK OFFF TREVOR

*Consumer Comment: Yes

*Consumer Comment: Accuracy in Reporting

*Consumer Comment: A word to the wise

*REBUTTAL Individual responds: ....

*Consumer Comment: um no

*Consumer Comment: thats true

*Consumer Comment: Varoooooooom....

*REBUTTAL Individual responds: ...and so...

*REBUTTAL Individual responds: comment

REBUTTAL BOX™ | Respond to this Report! | Consumer Comment

What's this?
Corporate Advocacy Program

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

What's this?
What's this?
Is this
Ripoff Report
About you?
Ripoff Report
A business' first
line of defense
on the Internet.
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™

Set the record straight:
Arbitration Program

SEO Reputation Management at its best!

Seems Shanda cant make up her mind WHO wrote the hundreds upon hundreds of reports about her.

Right now, she's spreading libel about Diane saying it's her.

The Latest Reports
Misuse Of Rip Off Reporting, Pissed Consumer, Rip Off Report January
6, 2013 Leave a  comment

Apparently Diane Patchen was not pleased I disallowed
her verbal rantings toward me on my site here so she opened up a new pissed
consumer complaint.  What does this prove?  Read for  yourself:
Diane Patchen has also filed a report on rip off  report:
Her agenda is quite clear.  Unfortunately for  Diane, it not only proves my point, it also shows WHO was behind numerous UNTRUE  rip off postings about me.  It also demonstrates that rip off reporting  sites will allow ANYONE to post ANYTHING they want they do NOT give a d**n whatsoever.. [continued below]....

Before that, she attempted to lie and cheat her way into ruining a business because she was convinced this other person created 900 reports about her.  (At the time of this report, I have sent a pm asking J. Holland to use this information.  I do not think she will mind)

Shanda decided to attack Holland House Editing just for the helll of it.

She wrote to a company called Holland House Books and told the owner Robert
Peett that Holland House Editing stole his name and is pretending to be them.

Robert Peett
Hi, my name is Robert Peett and I run Holland House Books in the UK (oddly, where you use your name, I have used the name of my house!). We are a small publisher with 4 imprints. No problem, but I thought we should be aware of one another so that no confusion arises in the future. Someone just wrote to me and seemed to think you were pretending to own us! Best wishes, Robert

Holland House Editing
Lol. My last name is Holland. Lol By the way, was that persons name Shanda Lancaster?

Holland House Editing
I was a witness against her in a lawsuit along with a couple of other witnesses who also signed declarations against her. She has been harassing all of us online since that time. She is mentally ill. I am a small family owned editing company in the United States. I edit mostly indie authors and am slowly building this business. Best wishes to you too Robert and thanks for writing! If I can help you with anything in the future please let me know.

Robert Peett
Yes, it was her. I have replied politely to her to explain there is no problem. Thanks for letting me know about that - though it is sad and rather depressing.
Best wishes.

Then, she posted false reports on pisssedconsumer.com and told the public not to hire the company by lying.  This is the link.  Shanda posted some long past post saying Holland house wrote it, but she is lying.  Shanda "guesses" at everything and constantly changes her mind leaving a wake of hate in her path.


Then she stalked the editing company by following them to other web sites that the owner and staff participate in with their authors including Goodreads.com

Shanda sent this personal message that was received by their webmaster the day after Christmas

from:Shanda Lancaster

to:Holland House Editing

subject: You forgot to add...

message: ...in your profile that you are an Internet stalker and tend
to use the most horrible gutter language possible to defame people all
over by the Internet, Judy. Why not OWN your famous nic, ShapeShifter?

You probably think I'm an unforgiving person but you could not be more
wrong. I forgive you BUT I will not forget. How could I? There are
nearly 900 negative posts showing in Google for me.

I don't know why you did what you did and really do not care anymore. If you want to
clear your conscience I will be on the lookout for retractions and
apologies. Otherwise... live with what you've done... that is
punishment enough I think.

Then shanda went a step further with attempts at intimidation by stalking Holland house Editings authors.  Shanda has clicked on one of Holland Houses authors books and put on her list to "read"

Stalking at its best.

Because Holland House Editing has their credits inside these books, Shanda Lancaster posted comments about the Editing owner being a "black witch" and casting spells on her.

Ummmm, ok...Lol  (We'll leave THAT one for the professional mental doctors)

All of the information has been turned over to the attorney's for this case.

Thank you!

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 01/07/2013 02:47 PM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/shanda-lancaster/dickson-tennessee-37055/shanda-lancaster-ripoffhellcom-stalker-blame-attacking-libel-liar-dickson-tennesse-992867. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.

Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on Shanda Lancaster

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Search Tips
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?
0Author 8Consumer 3Employee/Owner
Updates & Rebuttals

#1 General Comment


AUTHOR: Bystander - (United States of America)

Yes, he is definitely going bald, no matter how he tries to conceal it with the comb-overs. It's sad that his intelligence doesn't come close to matching his arrogance - a little humility and humanity and he could have gone a long way.
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 General Comment


AUTHOR: evidenceforward - (Canada)

Youre a bald idiot.
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#3 Consumer Comment


AUTHOR: KarmaKollector - (United States of America)

Yes, that is true, the former plaintiff is still free to file new lawsuits in the former defendants jurisdictions. 


The judge when dismissing this case also had the option to transfer the claims of two of the former defendants to their home jurisdictions based on the federal rules of civil procedure 21 & 28. The judge considered if the transfer was warranted. He decided to deny the motion to sever, he explained why he made this decision, it was because it was not in the interest of justice, he also stated that it was not in the interest of justice, because it was frivolous.

When making this decision the judge looked at the complaints individually, he explained in great detail one by one why each complaint would not hold up in another jurisdiction. 

Any normal person would just accept this, they would not be going around throwing out threats of more lawsuits, or writing libelous complaints on sites like this one. However, it is testament to this former plaintiffs character that she continues her petty vendetta against these former defendants. It can only be seen now as harassment because she lost. She and her attorney now face a sanctions hearing, which is based on the fact that the complete lawsuit is frivolous.

Both plaintiff and defendants really should keep their mouths closed until this thing is settled, if the former plaintiff continues to act in the way she has been doing no court will ever take her seriously.


Respond to this report!
What's this?

#4 Consumer Comment

Accuracy in Reporting

AUTHOR: Bystander - (United States of America)

According to the court records, the lawsuit was dismissed from this court for jurisdiction and the plaintiff is free to file the case in the defendants' jurisdictions if she so desires. I would think both plaintiff and defendants would be wise to use caution in the comments they post publicly.
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#5 Consumer Comment

A word to the wise

AUTHOR: KarmaKollector - (United States of America)

Firstly, Shanda Lancaster is not a defendant, she was a defendant but the case was dismissed by the judge, not only did he dismiss it, he also deemed it frivolous. There are still things going on with this case, both the former plaintiff and her attorney now face sanctions from the court, they are now the defendants in this matter.

When one brings a lawsuit against another person, it is to their benefit that they tell the complete truth in the matter, it is to their benefit that they don't give false or misleading information, it is also to their benefit that they do not go around the internet typing false, malicious lies or have someone do it for them. It would be for their own benefit that they are not seen to be aggravating the situation. It is plain to see to anyone who cares to look, that the former plaintiff in this case thinks differently, she just cannot contain her hate.

When one is involved in a lawsuit, especially the person spending the dollars to do it, it really is not in their best interests that they file hundreds of complaints on these type of sites, it shows that they felt a need to back up their "apparent" facts, it shows a need to demean and disgrace other people, when, if their lawsuit had any backbone to begin with, they would not need to stoop to such low standards. No matter how many of these reports they write about these people, it changes nothing, the case will still be dismissed and the former plaintiff now a defendant will still be facing sanctions. It is apparent that she is ignoring this threat of sanctions that now hangs over her head, she prefers to spend her time writing libelous and malicious complaints on sites like this one.

She is making herself look like a complete fool, unable to stop her fingers from inflicting hate wherever she goes. She obviously has money to burn, as she cannot stop her threats of further lawsuits, even though the judge has told her himself that the outcome would not change.

Every complaint written about these people has been calculated malicious lies, a bid to ruin their reputations and a bid to goad them into reacting in order to give the former plaintiff "something" to back up her lawsuit. It is malicious, it is libelous and it really should not be needed, because if these people were in fact as devious as the former plaintiff has said anywhere she could find to write it, then the judge in this case would not have dismissed this case. To carry on threatening and accusing is like saying the judge dealing with this matter has not done his job, he did do his job, he dismissed this case and saw through the former plaintiff. I feel sorry for the attorney now facing sanctions because of her, not only has she tried to ruin the lives of the four former defendants but a fifth casualty can now be added to the list, perhaps she is set on a road of self destruction also, it would seem so. Anyone who knows this woman or is close to her, should be telling her to stop, they should see the potential damage she is not only causing herself, but also to others, or perhaps they don't because they fear they may be next on her hit list, that I can believe. I would urge anyone associated with this woman to leave her to her own devices, do not do her dirty work, it may very well be you at the receiving end when you do not do what she wants. 

All of the time used to write these trash complaints could have been time better spent, what a waste, because in the end, the former plaintiff lost.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#6 REBUTTAL Individual responds


AUTHOR: Shanda Lancaster - (USA)

You two women are unbelievable... literally.  Continue ranting but I won't be here to read it anymore.
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#7 Consumer Comment

um no

AUTHOR: karmatimes3 - (United States of America)

the ripoffhell.com WAS about just a couple of people.  not in general.

you sent holland editing a nasty message by following them to goodreads and saying this person was responsible for 900 posts and reports about you so no.  ripoffhell is not and was never a "general" project

as far as your truths go.  you will have to be 100% correct AND can prove it in court.  every single time you accused someone of something you will have to prove it.  everytime you guessed about this person or that one, you will have to have your attorney subpoena the sites and get the authors information.  you will be wrong each and every time.  no one spending huge amounts of money spend time writing reports.  diane posts in her real name.
you are also shown to attack witnesses that have signed declarations against you by lying about their business.  purposely going to a similar named business and telling the guy holland house STOLE their name and is pretending to be them is a flat out lie and you know it.  what?  you have inside information that the editing company stole this guys name and was pretending to be them?
you will answer for all this in court and no snappy retorts here on these sites will get you out of that one.
 youv got people from ss or somewhere else f**kkking with you shanda.  you cant keep blaming one or two people for a thousand bad things said about you online.  youll just going to go to court for it each and every time.  other people are screwwing with you.

but please, come back here and say diane or judy or the cat in the hat are responsible for all 900 plus reports but please pick them apart and say who wrote who again ok?  will be easier for the lawyers.

chris has a cell phone?  wow.  didnt think you guys had enough bank for that.  I strongly suggest you do call the police.  making up more stories will only get you guys called fruitcake yet again..

pleaseeeeee call them.  go on.  call.
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#8 Consumer Comment

thats true

AUTHOR: karmatimes3 - (United States of America)

sending messages to a business and lying saying a company is pretending to be them and stealing their name is just plain flat out lying.  hiring a comapny for their editing services has nothing to do with you and creating false reports when your not an author will land you in huge trouble with the courts.

as a defendant you must prove anything you have posted in court as the truth.  that job falls on your shoulders.
your shown to accuse this person, and then when someone speaks to you online, you change your mind suddenly and say its now that person and so on and so on.  your a total wrecking ball on the internet and will be taken down.

you cant jus go to vourt and say "everything i said was the truth".  doesnt work like that.  you must prove it.  youre the defendant.

no one really cares about your garbage online anyways and everything you post in your real name is more evidence against you so keep it up.  its marvelous.

amazing actually.
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#9 Consumer Comment


AUTHOR: flewriteovru - (United States of America)

Well, the plane of knowledge and recognition zoomed right over your head once again.

You started a site to remove sites like this but YOU USED sites like these to smear others.  It was not the truth.

You purposely tried to ruin a business and attacking witnesses in a court case will be used against you in a court of law.


Not the other way around.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#10 REBUTTAL Individual responds

...and so...

AUTHOR: Shanda Lancaster - (USA)

This ripoff report confirms, at least to me, Diane and Judy have acted in concert to smear my reputation.  It seems, to them, their efforts have 'payed off' by the way they seem to congratulate one another and your "Let's get her!" attitude;  I personally see what everyone else sees: two bitter, hateful people set out to hurt another person.

I have never denied making my own reports about Judy and Diane... I've never tried to keep it a mystery as it seems Judy and Diane have attempted to do... I post in my own name and with my own IP address.  The major difference?  I tell the TRUTH.  You can pontificate endlessly about how MY truths are lies but... I imagine your actions and words show the public MY truths are true!

Everyone knows the story by now, Diane.  Your frivolous lawsuit against me and other former defendants was dismissed.  The ruling judge basically called it 'a waste of the court's time'.  I completely agree.

The fact you have begun your smear campaign again clearly shows your hatred and belief that everything is all about YOU.  Why?  Because I opened ripoffhell.com?  Never once did I mention your name until you came onto the site and began to personally attack me.  By the way, thank you very much for the free advertising.  Now more people will read my site and know how serious the issue of rip off reporting can be... it is troubling... it is a form of cyber bullying when used the way you have used it.

You'll notice on ripoffhell.com I post about more than just what was done to me.  People getting caught in smear campaigns is not a new issue nor is it one people approve of.  There are thousands of victims out there... my site is a place for them to be heard.

I do not know nor do I care if you have obtained a new lawyer but... the clock is ticking... I think you should spend less time making a complete fool of yourself online and more time trying to figure out what you are going to do on February 14, 2013.

Oh, and one more thing... stop calling my husband's cell phone?  I don't want to have to file a police report on you for phone harassment but HE does.
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#11 REBUTTAL Individual responds


AUTHOR: Shanda Lancaster - (USA)

... yes, of course, Judy Holland is a poor, put upon victim.  Oh, but wait!  She is also the author of this verbal tirade to me (confirmed through IP address):

Public post to me from JaceyRae/Judy Holland/shapeshifter on SingSnap

ThenI will speak out against YOU Shanda, the biggest bully, the biggest  B*CH and the most insane person on the internet. No one even comes  close to your utter worthlessness. Shanda, you are the leader of the  pack on hate. Your statements and confessions and your massive bullsh* and lying have been plastered all over the internet. I hope you pay for what you've done and I truly believe you will. Your time is  growing short. You will have to answer for your crimes and if you
think Trevor will protect you when the s**t hits the fan, your are  sadly mistaken. He will throw you under the bus faster then you can say "I'm in my metaphor basement, getting far away from my pretend  husband". The people here? Only know one side of how deep your hate  really goes. They don't know you've been behind the scenes using fake
accounts to harass others. you pretend to be a bible thumping preacher spreading good will and scripture while all the time harassing people you dont know. People who have never hurt you. It's soon going to end for you. Actually, not just you. More. People are tired of you. Tired of your lying. Tired of your harassment. Tired of your trespassing.
Tired of your computer hacking. Tired of the false Christian behavior. Tired of your manic/depressive illness and whatever else has yet to be diagnosed. You're a complete failure and need to be removed from the internet. Whatever you touch? Turns black. Whoever you meet? Get's  hurt, used, or tormented in some way. You're a menace. You're  disgusting. You are a filthy vile vulgar criminal without an ounce of  compassion and without a drop of remorse for your crimes. Have you ever
stopped to think WHY people discuss you? I'm sure first of all they  don't really wish to but there's no choice. You're lying and harassment of others forces people to give their wholehearted opinions about your worthless a*s. Not once have you stopped your criminal actions.
not once have you ever sincerely tried to make amends for your actions. You're pompous, rude, but at the same time self loathing. You can't decide if you think you're wonderful or you're worthless. You fill up post pages with God only knows what making it up as you go along. When you're caught in a lie? You create yet another one and so on and so on. Everything you write is a vain attempt to make yourself sound better and then you create a fake acct to talk to yourself as if you're another whole person commenting on your other account! I don't think most people can keep up with your crap. Why do they even put up with you here? what DO you have on Trevor? I gotta hand it to you though. You're driving everyone away from these message boards and you're doing it all by your lonesome. Wow! Good work. You're a fake.
You're a phoney and a habitual chronic liar with multiple mental  illnesses. GET HELP. YOU'RE TERRIBLY SICK. The relief? Is knowing the  end for you is coming soon and I personally cannot wait for that. You  belong in a cell. You deserve to have everything taken away from you.
You deserve nothing. NOTHING. I hope they throw the book at you for what you've done. you do not and should not receive any breaks whatsoever. You're almost done Shanda. Have your fun now. You haven't heeded any warnings. you haven't been listening, but you should. These people are not lying to you and they're not joking. You're finished.
Do you hear me?
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?