Complaint Review: Sin Perfect Medical Aesthetics - Walnut California
- Sin Perfect Medical Aesthetics 1569 S Fairway Dr #226 Walnut, California U.S.A.
- Phone: 909-839-0714
- Web:
- Category: Misc. Health Specialists
Sin Perfect Medical Aesthetics Ripoff Walnut California
*REBUTTAL Owner of company: Patient not telling truth
On 9-1-05 I paid $1800.00 for laser permanent hair removal on both of my legs. I have had over 10 treaments since then to this date and their has been no visible results. I still have alot of hair all over my legs nothing has changed this procedure didnt work at all. I told the owner/Doctor Gideon Kwok about this and that i wanted a refund, he stated that his office doesnt give refunds. This business is fradudelent because the treaments did nothing for my legs.
mae
walnut, California
U.S.A.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 11/30/2006 02:58 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/sin-perfect-medical-aesthetics/walnut-california-91789/sin-perfect-medical-aesthetics-ripoff-walnut-california-223093. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:
#1 REBUTTAL Owner of company
Patient not telling truth
AUTHOR: Skin Perfect Medical - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Friday, June 20, 2008
Patient did come in a pay for 6 treatments of laser hair removal of the full legs. She did not get 10 treatments as she said given that we only do laser hair removal on the legs every 2 months. She was a patient that had significant hair on her legs and we consulted that she was going to need a 6-10 treatments to get her 75-90% permanent hair reduction. She did have less hair growth but expected it to be 100 % gone. Because of this she sued us and got half her money back. She is not a good patient. She is demanding and rude and I am happy to not have her as a patient.
Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.