Complaint Review: Sprint
Sprint Nextel PCS Horrible Employer and Unethical Overland Park Kansas
Sprint missed payroll in August 2007 both in Kansas and in Reston VA. Sprint has often in the last 14 months failed to pay on time or in full. One commission check bounced in the amount of $3K causing great harm to my family. When confronted about late or non-existant pay they had the balls to tell employees in the call center that it was their fault for not "managing their finances better" and in VA even told one widow that she had better find someone with $$ to marry. They are forced to sign confidentiality affidavets and when trying to contact employment attorneys in KS to file suit for past-due wages and interest none of the attorneys would take the case because out of 13 firms contacted 11 of them already represented Sprint in some capacity.
Sprint cheats employees out of pay on time sheets either by altering submitted time sheets to reflect a straight 40 hour week or forcing employees to finish paperwork off the clock. Class Action suit already filed for this grievance. Stay far far far far far away from Sprint do not get takgled in their twisted web of poor practice and employee abuse.
My tag is Anonymous because of documented retaliatory practices against employees who "step out of line" or air dirty laundry.
Anonymous in kansas city
Kansas City, Missouri
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 11/20/2007 11:36 AM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/sprint/overland-park-kansas-64110/sprint-nextel-pcs-horrible-employer-and-unethical-overland-park-kansas-285693. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here: