Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #1226566

Complaint Review: troy doty pc principal broker/owner nw realty source.com - portland Oregon

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Richard — Tigard Oregon USA
  • Author Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • troy doty pc principal broker/owner nw realty source.com 224 sw hamilton st suite 202 portland, Oregon USA

SPECIFIC INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT WAS FOUND TO BE FALSE/DEFAMATORY BY A COURT. OUT OF RESPECT FOR THE JUDICIAL PROCESS, THE SPECIFIC INFORMATION THAT WAS FOUND FALSE/DEFAMATORY BY THE COURT HAS BEEN ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)) | ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER))? portland Oregon

*REBUTTAL Owner of company: Responce to Richard Waterson False Report

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

Editor’s Comment: 05/24/2017 -.  Ripoff Report believes in transparency and the more information the better.  In this instance, there has been court action regarding this subject Report.  We believe it important to note that not all Court Orders are alike.  Many court orders are absolutely legitimate and we make no representations about this court order situation However, we want our users to be aware that sometimes courts enter orders based upon default which typically means that the defendant didn’t show up.  Sometimes a defendant won’t show up because they didn’t even get notice of the case proceedings in the first place and other times defendants may not show up because they don’t necessarily have the knowledge and/or the financial resources to fight.  Still, in other instances, a defendant may simply appear only to stipulate (settle) the case by agreeing to stipulate to a court order because they are being bullied by the plaintiff and whether what they said was true or not, they just want the matter to go away so they can move on with life and make the plaintiff go away.  Again, we make no representations about this particular court order situation.  We are simply providing you with additional information so that you may be more informed and, coupled with any additional research you feel is necessary, may make your own informed decision regarding the validity of this Report.  As always, we encourage our readers to do their homework and not just rely on one single source for information.  Google, through the Lumen Database, has provided the following document relating to this subject Report: 

Troy D Doty and Troy D Doty PC v Richard Hall Waterson - Defendant Richard Hall Waterson Affidavit in Suppo... by Ripoff Report on Scribd

http://lumendatabase.org/notices/14368161

Editor’s Note (06/29/2017): The law protects and encourages Ripoff Report to make appropriate edits to Reports posted by third parties. Ripoff Report may use that editorial power to post findings from a court of law about the subject matter of Reports. In some cases, a Court may find that specific statements made by the author of a Ripoff Report are false and defamatory. When both sides of a dispute appear and contest the facts of a situation in court it is believed that the findings of the court are generally reliable and fair. Out of respect for the courts and the judicial process, Ripoff Report, upon request, may post that kind of finding with special prominence, and in some cases, may even redact the information specifically identified by the court as false from the original Report. In this instance, the Court Order combined with additional formal court documents received by Ripoff Report was specific enough regarding the statements made, and as such, the offending language has been (((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER))) by Ripoff Report.NOTE:Statements that have not been redacted may not have been specifically outlined in the Court Order and/or may have been considered statements of opinion. It is highly encouraged that consumers conduct their own additional research, from credible sources such as regulating authorities, prior to making any decisions on whether or not to do business with any individual or entity named as the information contained herein, and any negative inference derived from such information, may very well be false and misleading.

 

NOW TO THE EDITORIALLY REDACTED REPORT:

-------------------------------------------------------------------

I recently sold my house because the mortgage payments were deleting my meager savings. The real estate agent I used told me ro reduce the price by $15000 because on three sides of the house it was sided by a louisiana-pacific product. The house was built in 1994 and the siding still looked good. ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)). ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)).

((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)). I did so and give him a very glowing review that is still on his website. ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)). ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)). I waited for a month and wrote him an email mentioning the ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)) and asked him if there was something I missed? ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)).

I just figured that he felt he needed ((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER)) more than I did.  Me? I'm moving to a mobile home. I'm a retired senior on social security and a meager pension.

((REDACTED BASED ON FINDINGS VIA COURT ORDER))?

 

THE ORIGINAL REPORT IS UNDER THE LINE IMMEDIATELY BELOW 

____________________________________________________

I recently sold my house because the mortgage payments were deleting my meager savings. The real estate agent I used told me ro reduce the price by $15000 because on three sides of the house it was sided by a louisiana-pacific product. The house was built in 1994 and the siding still looked good. The agent told me he will "sweeten the deal" by giving me $2500 after closing. He even showed me a form with my name on it and refund $2500.

After the sale he asked me to write a recommendation for him on his website. I did so and give him a very glowing review that is still on his website. I never heard from him again. And no. no check for $2500. I waited for a month and wrote him an email mentioning the $2500 and asked him if there was something I missed? No response.

I just figured that he felt he needed the money more than I did.  Me? I'm moving to a mobile home. I'm a retired senior on social security and a meager pension.

Will there ever be justice for the lil guy who gets screwed by the big boys?

 

 

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 05/03/2015 02:38 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/troy-doty-pc-principal-brokerowner-nw-realty-sourcecom/portland-oregon-1226566. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author
0Consumer
1Employee/Owner

#1 REBUTTAL Owner of company

Responce to Richard Waterson False Report

AUTHOR: Troy Doty - (USA)

POSTED: Monday, July 06, 2015

This is in response to the complaint made by Richard Waterson.  I represented Richard in the sale of his home at (((Redacted))) Portland OR 
(((Redacted))).  During the sale it was brought to our attention by two home inspectors that the home has LP Siding that is failing on three sides of the home.  We also contracted a siding specialist to evaluate and provide an estimate for replacing the siding.  The first sale contract we had resulted in a terminated sale as the buyer was concerned about the siding and improper installation of Bamboo floors throughout the home.  We found a new buyer who was willing to take on the replacement of the siding and several other repairs with a $15,000 reduction in price.  I felt bad for Richard and offed to reduce my commission by $2500 to help with this unexpected situation.  Richard was very happy with the new offer and buyer and we had a very smooth closing.  After closing Richard wrote a very nice review and I though he was a very happy seller.  We have not received any calls or emails from Richard after closing in regards to the $2500 he thought his is still owed. Since receiving his complaint I have tried call Richard on his cell several times and left two messages.  I have not received any calls back from Richard.  We provided  documentation to Richard and the Real Estate Agency that shows the $2500 was credited to Richard at closing as promised. The Real Estate Agency has since dismissed the case and found that Richard has been making false accusations.

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now