Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #1236516

Complaint Review: VISION BANCORP - Internet

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: A.R. — New York New York USA
  • Author Not Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • VISION BANCORP Internet USA

VISION BANCORP | Notice: Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration Decision: A neutral and independent Arbitrator has determined that the following Report contained one or more false statements of facts. The false statements have been redacted as ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). | ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)) New York New York

*UPDATE Employee: Re: Anthony Hruska's Extortion & Blackmail

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

RIPOFF REPORT VIP ARBITRATION

SUMMARY OF ARBITRATOR’S DECISION

Vision Bancorp, AG, Complainant

v.

Anonymous, Author of Report #1236516,

________________________________________________________________________

Complainant Vision Bancorp, AG (the “Complainant”) has challenged the truthfulness of certain specific statements (each, a “Statement”) posted by Author Anonymous (the “Author”) on the Ripoff Report website at www.ripoffreport.com as Ripoff Report #1236516 (the “Report”). The Author accused the Complainant of conspiracy. The Complainant denies the allegations. The Author did not provide a response to this matter. Therefore, in accordance with the Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration Rules (the “Rules), the Author waived their right to participate in this Arbitration. By submitting a Report and a Complaint on the Ripoff Report websites, both the Complainant and the Author have agreed to submit the dispute to the Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration Program.

In accordance with the Rules, the Arbitrator was asked to decide whether the challenged Statements were an opinion or a fact. If, and only if, the Statement was determined to be a statement of fact, the Arbitrator was asked to further decided if, by a preponderance of the evidence, to determine if the Statement was true or false. If the statement identified by the Complainant is determined to be an opinion, no determination will be made as to that particular Statement because an opinion cannot be determined to be true nor false.

In this case, the Arbitrator had only the evidence submitted by the Complainant to consider. The evidence submitted included Ripoff Report #1236516, Complainant’s Arbitration Statement, Complainant’s Witness Statements, and supporting documentation.

Each Statement challenged by the Complainant has been considered, together with any Witness Statements and Documents provided by the Complainant for determination of the truth or falsity of the Statement. The Author did not provide a response to the Complaint.

The Arbitrator determined that the certain statements challenged in the Report were false. Therefore, according to the VIP Arbitration Rules, those statements have been redacted.

Decided February 20, 2017,

Sandra J. Franklin, Arbitrator

* A copy of the full Arbitrator’s Decision is available upon request. Please e-mail arbitration@ripoffreport.com with the name of the Complainant and Report number.

________________________________________________________________________

((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)).

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 06/18/2015 02:21 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/vision-bancorp/internet/vision-bancorp-notice-ripoff-report-vip-arbitration-decision-a-neutral-and-independent-1236516. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author
1Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#1 UPDATE Employee

Re: Anthony Hruska's Extortion & Blackmail

AUTHOR: VB - (Switzerland)

POSTED: Friday, June 19, 2015

Dear Mr. Anthony Hruska, Director at LNBG, LLC and SFBBL, AG.

I am a member of VB's legal team in Switzerland and I can assure you that VB has not stolen anybody's money. Moreover, I am also aware of the facts of this case, including the legal chain of causality that triggered the dispute, which began when your company defaulted on its contract obligations to VB. You and your LNBG partners knew that specific contract terms were absolutely necessary to properly conduct the business described in the private contract that you and your company executed with VB. You and your partners misrepresented your position in several material ways, which resulted in significant and irreparable harm to VB long before you attempted to make any of your recent claims.

As a result of your company's original contract default and fraudulent misrepresentations, which have been clearly documented, and now this defamatory Internet attack, VB has several legal remedies that the company is currently pursuing. As soon as VB's legal team has completed its investigation of all available legal remedies, one of two things will occur:

(a) Your company will receive all of the disputed funds currently in escrow; or

(b)(i) VB will file a formal legal action against you and all relevant parties in LNBG, LLC to recover losses directly caused by LNBG's original contract default, which triggered the entire chain of events that led to the current dispute; (ii) VB will take legal action to compel you to remove the false, defamatory information from this website and hold you and LNBG, LLC accountable for all direct, indirect, and consequential damages caused thereby.

Please also be advised: Publicly making false accusations and libellous written statements (or any publicly dishonoring statements prior to an official court judgement) are criminal acts under Articles 173-1, 174, 175, 176 and 177 of the Swiss Penal Code and corresponding international laws.

You are well aware of VB's ongoing communications between members of your LNBG Board of Directors, your attorney, and VB's legal counsel and relevant VB employees. You are also well aware that VB ceased all communications with you, Anthony Hruska, directly because of your belligerent, abusive, and unprofessional communications after VB formally notified you of your company's original default of the contract between VB and LNBG.

You are also well aware that VB is a Swiss company and the jurisdiction of VB's contract with your company is Switzerland, which is clearly stated on the loan agreement. Thus, neither CFTC, SEC, nor any other U.S. regulatory agency would have the authority, jurisdiction, nor justification to pursue any investigation against VB.

As several board members in your company have already been in ongoing direct communications with the relevant parties at VB and VB's legal counsel (and they have all been communicating in good faith), you are legally required to cease and desist your malicious and defamatory activities on this website and remove this false report from the World Wide Web. If you do not comply, you are wilfully exposing yourself and your company to serious further legal actions.

Good day Sir.

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now