Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #792405

Complaint Review: vWorker - none Internet

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: jercol — Wilkes Barre Pennsylvania United States of America
  • Author Not Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • vWorker Internet United States of America

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

I have been working on vWorker for a bout 4 months, in that time every one of my projects has been successful, I have quickly risen to one of the highest ranked workers (rated higher than 99.5% of all there workers) and I have earned several thoulsand dollars and paid several hundred in fees.

I had taken a job from a buyer and completed it in 11 days. 30 days after completing the work the buyer still had not accepted the project as complete so I put the project into arbitration.

While in arbitration the buyer and I argued quite a bid and were both warned not to do so in the future. Technical Arbitration began to test if my code was correct and if I should be paid.

During arbitration I noticed that the buyer had made 2 statements that were contradictory to each other. I posted a message to the arbitrator saying this. An excerpt is below:

1) FACT: On September 21s the buyer said he tested the paypal system, this was after the start of arbitration.
2) FACT: On October 3rd. he stated he stopped testing once arbitration began.
3) FACT: On October 19th, he stated he was testing after arbitration started.
4) FACT: Statements 1 and 3 agree, Statements 1,3 are contradictory to statement 2
5) FACT: Since the buyers statements contradict only one can be true, the other must be false.
6) FACT: The buyer has made a false statement.
7) FACT: The word blatant is a synonym for the word undeniable.
8) FACT: The buyer has made a blatant false statement.


The arbitrators response was:
"You are stating that they made false statements. If you had said that the statements were inconsistent -this would be a fact. You are arguing what you think they (the employer) were
doing or what you think they (the employer) intended."

He then forfeited me from the arbitration for stating an opinion in arbitration and not sticking to facts.

My response:

"Saying the buyer has made a false statement" does
NOT argue what I think they were doing or what they intended. Had I
said "The buyer is trying do deceive you" this would have been an
opinion is Im stating the opinion that the buyer is trying to be
deceptive, however simply saying "The buyer made a false statement" is a
verifiable fact with no implication as to intent or reason."

He then stated:
"What you are stating is your opinion about the statements Cyrus made. Even if you believe the
statements to be facts, you are phrasing this in a way to insinuate that
the buyer is lying. Since you were warned previously regarding
opinions, you forfeited. Rule #1 specifically states "what you think
they intended""

I pointed out that he is in fact the one making an opinion by guessing what I implied or what I meant or wanted to say without saying. I reminded him that vWorkers own definition of a fact is something that can be verified, he cant verify what I wanted to imply he can only guess at it, there own definition of guessing at intent is to call it unprofessional there for the arbitrator acted unprofessional based on there own definitions.

The arbitrators answer to this was to threaten to close my account. There rules dictate that if my account is closed they can keep my earnings, currently I have over $500 in balance with them, and over $3000 in projects in progress. All this would be forfit if they closed my account. Because of this I did not argue any further.

SO: The net result of this arbitration was:

1) Buyer made a false statement and I forfeit arbitration for pointing it out.

2) Arbitrator makes a guess at what I meant by my wording instead of just taking them at the litteral meaning, he then uses this guess as a reason to not pay me.

3) Even after I was determined to be the one to loose the arbitration vWorker still allowed my code to be downloaded by the buyer, this is AFTER they decided I would not be paid.

4) I get paid nothing, the buyer can download my code for free.

I have worked on all the freelance sites, and direct with people, in 4 years of doing this full time for my entire living the only time I have ever done work and not been paid was when I decided to do work through vWorker and ask for arbitration.

I will chalk this up to the cost of doing business and intend to finish my current work on vWorker however it should be noted that there arbitration process is a pure insult.

They make up rules as they go, the threaten to close your account (and possibly keep your money) many times, I have been threatened a total of 9 times with account closer in this single arbitration. These threats were the result of things like asking for a review of the decision that I lost. If I ask for the review and the person doing the review does not agree with me I loose my account (and possibly my money that they didnt yet pay out to me)

If your going to work on vWorker do everything you can to avoid arbitration.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 10/26/2011 12:59 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/vworker/internet/vworker-rent-a-code-vworker-did-not-follow-there-own-rules-of-arbitration-made-up-rules-792405. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
1Author
3Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#4 Consumer Comment

VWorker is fair

AUTHOR: Luis Alberto Veras - (United States of America)

POSTED: Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Wow! Never had any problem with arbitration-- been of both sides, and always decision seemed right. 

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#3 UPDATE Employee

RE: Arbitration on "PHP/MySQL Website design, coding, completion"

AUTHOR: Rodsmithrac - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Thursday, December 29, 2011

Jeremy,

Your arbitration has been made public at the following link: http://arbitration.vworker.com/2011/12/jeremycollins-forfeits-arbitration-for.html. Please post any additional comments to the arbitration blog so this issue can be discussed transparently and openly.

Thanks for your cooperation.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 Author of original report

Are you kidding me?

AUTHOR: jercol - (United States of America)

POSTED: Friday, December 02, 2011

Do you guys even know what a fact is.

Saying that someone made a false statement is not an opinion, it does not imply that they are lying. It does not imply there intent at all. It simply states that something is false.

If you ask me what 2+3 is and I say 7 and you say "Jeremy that is false" are you implying that I am lying? No your just stating a fact, the statement 2+3=7 is false.

 If you ask me 2x what my first name is and I first say it is Jeremy and the second time I say Tom, and you say "One of those statements is false." then are you are not stating an opinion you are simply stating a fact, both can not be correct as I only have 1 first name, so one must be false. Your not implying I lied, your not implying that I made a mistake, your not implying anything, your simply stating the fact that 2 directly contradicting staments can not both be true so one must be false.

This is the same with my arbitration, I did not imply anything, I simply stated that the buyer made 2 statements that contradict so one must be false.

You say I insinuate .. just by sating I insinuate your agreeing that I did not SAY, insinuate is open for interpretation, its akin to a feeling, it in short means what you felt I meant. So you forit me for what you felt I meant. You guessed at my intentions and cost me money based on your guess. So much for an arbitration being about verifiable FACTS, I guess that sticking to the facts does not pertain the vWorker.

I was offered a review but threatened that I would loose my account, the decision as to if I had a good reason to ask for the review would be up to vWorker. Given the fact that you guys use guesses about meaning to not pay workers and that you cant tell the difference between a fact and an opinion also the fact that you dont give in the vWorker agreement any solid definition as to what a good reason is, I chose not to take the risk. Your lack of integrity and your threats bullied me into not asking for a review.

The deliverable were available to the buyer to download for several days after it was decided I lost the arbitration. So for several days vWorker was offering my copyrighted works to the customers (the buyer) without my consent for free.

In the arbitration I clearly asked the arbitrator if she could guarantee that she would not amend or add new rules durring the process. She responded that she could not guarantee this. Also the rule about for fitting your account when asking for a review, actually for fitting your account when doing just about anything, is not in the employer agreement, it is only introduced when the situation comes up, (as in you make rules up as your go, .. as the process goes you add rules), I like how you make a pathetic attempt to belittle me by stating that I didnt read the rules of arbitration or the worker agreement though.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 UPDATE Employee

RE: Arbitration on "PHP/MySQL Website design, coding, completion"

AUTHOR: Rodsmithrac - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Monday, November 21, 2011

I wanted to make sure there wasnt a problem we needed to correct with our arbitration process, so I did some research and was able to find your arbitration.

I believe this is Jeremy Collins, referring to the following project: https://www.vworker.com/RentACoder/misc/BidRequests/s****.>

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now