• Report: #563086

Complaint Review: CD2U - Cigarettes Direct To You

Thank You

Read how Ripoff Report saves consumers millions.

  • Submitted: Monday, February 01, 2010
  • Last Posting: Monday, February 08, 2010
  • Reported By: Jeanne — Rancho Cucamonga California United States of America
CD2U - Cigarettes Direct To You
926 Ulrich Ave. Louisville Kentucky 40219-1824 United States of America

CD2U - Cigarettes Direct To You I placed an order with this company on December 7th, 2009. $248.56 was deducted from our checking account the same day. One week later I called them and listened to a recording saying they were no lon Louisville, Kentucky

*Consumer Comment: no scam


1Author 1Consumer 0Employee/Owner

Respond to this Report

  • Respond to this report!
    What's this?
  • Also a victim?
    What's this?
  • Repair Your Reputation
    ...the right way!
    Corporate Advocacy Program
I PLACED AN ORDER WITH CD2U ON 12/7/09. $248.56 WAS DEDUCTED FROM OUR CHECKING ACCOUNT THAT DAY. AFTER NOT RECEIVING OUR CIGARETTES, I CALLED THE COMPANY ONE WEEK LATER AND LISTENED TO A MESSAGE THAT THEY WERE NOT ACCEPTING ANYMORE ORDERS. I WROTE THEM ON THE 14TH AND HAVE NOT RECEIVED A RESPONSE.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 2/1/2010 12:10:41 PM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/tobacco-companies/cd2u-cigarettes-dire/cd2u-cigarettes-direct-to-yo-854dc.htm.

Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.

Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on CD2U Cigarettes

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Search Tips
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?
REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
1Author 1Consumer 0Employee/Owner
Updates & Rebuttals

#1 Consumer Comment

no scam

AUTHOR: kitam11 - lodi (USA)



An online cigarette dealer is contesting federal search warrants that it says "decimated" the business by confiscating all inventory, supplies and bank accounts.



Chavez Inc., a Louisville, Ky.-based tobacco dealer, is asking a federal judge to unseal affidavits backing at least 20 search warrants, which were executed Dec. 8 on the company's Louisville, Stockton and Denver offices and on multiple banks where the business held accounts.



The company, run by Israel Chavez of Louisville and his ex-wife, Pam Chavez of Stockton, said the warrants, executed by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco Firearms and Explosives and U.S. Postal Service inspectors, effectively shut down the business.



Christie Moore, a Louisville attorney representing Chavez Inc., said the owners were "shocked and saddened" by the search and seizures.



"Chavez Inc. intends to challenge the government's unwarranted actions and hopes to once again open its doors, service its customers and provide employment to its employees," Moore said.



Moore said in court filings that federal investigators seized $4 million in tobacco products, along with the company's computers, business records, cars and bank accounts.



Moore said no indictment is expected until May or June at the earliest.



"Substantially all of the personal and business assets of Petitioners are now in the hands of the government," Moore said in the motion.



The federal government has cracked down in recent years on contraband cigarettes - those sold by people and businesses through illegitimate channels to avoid paying local, state and federal taxes. The company's Web site says it is "no longer conducting business." The Department of Justice, the ATF's parent agency, estimates that federal, state and local governments lose out on $5 billion annually in tax revenue from cigarettes sold through illegitimate channels.



In the motion, Moore said what is publicly known about the warrants is insufficient to justify the search and seizure of her clients' property.



"Indeed, the warrants contain nothing more than boilerplate language claiming that sealing the affidavits is necessary due to the potential that other co-conspirators may be identified," Moore wrote.


Respond to this report!
What's this?

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.