Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #229850

Complaint Review: ASSET ACCEPTANCE - Brandon Florida

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Port St. Lucie Florida
  • Author Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • ASSET ACCEPTANCE 563 Lake Kathy Drive, Brandon, Florida U.S.A.

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

In November of 2006 I paid off a Judgement to Premium Asset Recovery Corp., Deerfield Beach in order to obtain a home equity loan.

On December 29, 2006, a Notice of Assignment of Judgement to Asset Acceptance LLC (by Premimum Asset Recovery Corp.)was filed with the Clerk of the Court in my County.

The Notice of Assignment says that on 08/01/2006 Premimum Asset Recovery Corp. assigned the judgement to Asset Acceptance LLC. and that a written notice of this assignment pursuant to FL Statutes was mailed to me (w/in 30 days). I NEVER RECEIVED A NOTIFICATION. If I had I certainly would not have paid the debt to Premium Asset Recovery Corp. in November as my Mortgage Company required.

Upon searching the public records of my county, I see that the satisfaction of judgement was never filed by Premium Asset Recovery Corp.

After reading other posts on this site I am very, very concerned about this assignment. What do I need to do to rectify this problem? Would sending a certified letter with the satisfaction be adequate? Should I contact Premium Asset Recovery or Asset Acceptance LLC, or both?

Pete
Port St. Lucie, Florida
U.S.A.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 01/10/2007 07:42 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/asset-acceptance/brandon-florida-34903/asset-acceptance-assignment-of-judgment-already-paid-brandon-florida-229850. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author
7Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#7 Consumer Suggestion

pete

AUTHOR: J - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Thursday, January 11, 2007

sorry for the typo's I was writing this on a lap top in a moving car at the time, if you need me to redo it, let me know

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#6 Consumer Suggestion

Pete, JUST SUE THEM!

AUTHOR: Steve [Not A Lawyer] - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Thursday, January 11, 2007

Pete,

They obviously caused you real damages due to their negligence in not filing the satisfaction of judgement as required by law, and then RESELLING a satisfied judgement! that is fraud.

I would go civil and criminal on this one. If enough people would sue these bottomfeeders every single time they violated the law, things would change.

Enough is enough! It's time to hold all bottomfeeders financially accountable.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#5 Consumer Suggestion

Pete

AUTHOR: J - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Wednesday, January 10, 2007

Title: VI, civil practice and procedure

Chapter 55 judgements

read 55.206(2), 55.204(4) and 55.202 some of this may apply, and may give you the answers your looking for.

If you have proof that the judgement was paid before, this new collection agency got it, contact the court, where the judgement was issues

Judgements are now, being bidded on by these collection agency, and that have to show proof of the sale

talk to the clerk of courts, first, then maybe file a motion for CLARIFICATION OF JUDGEMENT
explain in your motion, that1) Preminm Assest Recovery corp, was paid on this judgment in Nov. 2006(copies attachd A)

2)on or about DEc.,29,2006 anotice of assigement judgement to asset acceptance by premimum asset recovery corp) was filed with the clerk of court in my count

3)the noticed states that the assignment took place 08/01/06 (you) were never notified of this change

4)Judgement was paid to in full to, premimum assest, befor any agreement was told to me

5)Premimum asset know there was going to be an assignment to this judgement, before he took my payment

6) now asset acceptance has file the same judgement, i paid premium. and they are demanding i pay this same judgement twice

7) Premium asset recovery corp., has willfully, with malice failed to file with clerk of courts the satisfaction of judgerment, that they accept my money, but instead, illegally gave a paid debt, to another collection agenct to coolect

I'm not an attorney, you might need one to get this fix, but if you read what i gave you up top it will make it easy for you to do

also MOTIONS: CLARIFICATION OF JUDGEMENT
ORDER TO STAY AND RESTITUTION

FILE THIS SOON, YOU ONLY HAVE SO MANY DAYS, I GET STARTED, DO THE READING AND SEE IF YOU CAN HANDLE IN ON OYUR OWN

g**k LUCK

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#4 Consumer Suggestion

Pete

AUTHOR: J - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Wednesday, January 10, 2007

Title: VI, civil practice and procedure

Chapter 55 judgements

read 55.206(2), 55.204(4) and 55.202 some of this may apply, and may give you the answers your looking for.

If you have proof that the judgement was paid before, this new collection agency got it, contact the court, where the judgement was issues

Judgements are now, being bidded on by these collection agency, and that have to show proof of the sale

talk to the clerk of courts, first, then maybe file a motion for CLARIFICATION OF JUDGEMENT
explain in your motion, that1) Preminm Assest Recovery corp, was paid on this judgment in Nov. 2006(copies attachd A)

2)on or about DEc.,29,2006 anotice of assigement judgement to asset acceptance by premimum asset recovery corp) was filed with the clerk of court in my count

3)the noticed states that the assignment took place 08/01/06 (you) were never notified of this change

4)Judgement was paid to in full to, premimum assest, befor any agreement was told to me

5)Premimum asset know there was going to be an assignment to this judgement, before he took my payment

6) now asset acceptance has file the same judgement, i paid premium. and they are demanding i pay this same judgement twice

7) Premium asset recovery corp., has willfully, with malice failed to file with clerk of courts the satisfaction of judgerment, that they accept my money, but instead, illegally gave a paid debt, to another collection agenct to coolect

I'm not an attorney, you might need one to get this fix, but if you read what i gave you up top it will make it easy for you to do

also MOTIONS: CLARIFICATION OF JUDGEMENT
ORDER TO STAY AND RESTITUTION

FILE THIS SOON, YOU ONLY HAVE SO MANY DAYS, I GET STARTED, DO THE READING AND SEE IF YOU CAN HANDLE IN ON OYUR OWN

g**k LUCK

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#3 Consumer Suggestion

Pete

AUTHOR: J - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Wednesday, January 10, 2007

Title: VI, civil practice and procedure

Chapter 55 judgements

read 55.206(2), 55.204(4) and 55.202 some of this may apply, and may give you the answers your looking for.

If you have proof that the judgement was paid before, this new collection agency got it, contact the court, where the judgement was issues

Judgements are now, being bidded on by these collection agency, and that have to show proof of the sale

talk to the clerk of courts, first, then maybe file a motion for CLARIFICATION OF JUDGEMENT
explain in your motion, that1) Preminm Assest Recovery corp, was paid on this judgment in Nov. 2006(copies attachd A)

2)on or about DEc.,29,2006 anotice of assigement judgement to asset acceptance by premimum asset recovery corp) was filed with the clerk of court in my count

3)the noticed states that the assignment took place 08/01/06 (you) were never notified of this change

4)Judgement was paid to in full to, premimum assest, befor any agreement was told to me

5)Premimum asset know there was going to be an assignment to this judgement, before he took my payment

6) now asset acceptance has file the same judgement, i paid premium. and they are demanding i pay this same judgement twice

7) Premium asset recovery corp., has willfully, with malice failed to file with clerk of courts the satisfaction of judgerment, that they accept my money, but instead, illegally gave a paid debt, to another collection agenct to coolect

I'm not an attorney, you might need one to get this fix, but if you read what i gave you up top it will make it easy for you to do

also MOTIONS: CLARIFICATION OF JUDGEMENT
ORDER TO STAY AND RESTITUTION

FILE THIS SOON, YOU ONLY HAVE SO MANY DAYS, I GET STARTED, DO THE READING AND SEE IF YOU CAN HANDLE IN ON OYUR OWN

g**k LUCK

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 Consumer Suggestion

Pete

AUTHOR: J - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Wednesday, January 10, 2007

Title: VI, civil practice and procedure

Chapter 55 judgements

read 55.206(2), 55.204(4) and 55.202 some of this may apply, and may give you the answers your looking for.

If you have proof that the judgement was paid before, this new collection agency got it, contact the court, where the judgement was issues

Judgements are now, being bidded on by these collection agency, and that have to show proof of the sale

talk to the clerk of courts, first, then maybe file a motion for CLARIFICATION OF JUDGEMENT
explain in your motion, that1) Preminm Assest Recovery corp, was paid on this judgment in Nov. 2006(copies attachd A)

2)on or about DEc.,29,2006 anotice of assigement judgement to asset acceptance by premimum asset recovery corp) was filed with the clerk of court in my count

3)the noticed states that the assignment took place 08/01/06 (you) were never notified of this change

4)Judgement was paid to in full to, premimum assest, befor any agreement was told to me

5)Premimum asset know there was going to be an assignment to this judgement, before he took my payment

6) now asset acceptance has file the same judgement, i paid premium. and they are demanding i pay this same judgement twice

7) Premium asset recovery corp., has willfully, with malice failed to file with clerk of courts the satisfaction of judgerment, that they accept my money, but instead, illegally gave a paid debt, to another collection agenct to coolect

I'm not an attorney, you might need one to get this fix, but if you read what i gave you up top it will make it easy for you to do

also MOTIONS: CLARIFICATION OF JUDGEMENT
ORDER TO STAY AND RESTITUTION

FILE THIS SOON, YOU ONLY HAVE SO MANY DAYS, I GET STARTED, DO THE READING AND SEE IF YOU CAN HANDLE IN ON OYUR OWN

g**k LUCK

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 Consumer Suggestion

Here's an idea

AUTHOR: Nikki - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Wednesday, January 10, 2007

I'm not sure who you should contact first between the two collections agencies. I would say contacting Asset Acceptance because if they bought debt from Premium, they're going to want their money from Premium or assign it back to Premium. You may get some advice from the other posters.

If the two collections agencies do not take care of this for you, you should get a copy of the original judgment order, signed by the Judge. Look on the top right of the order. If it says County Court, and the judge is still on the County Court bench, write a letter to the judge with a copy of the order and the proof you paid. If it says Circuit Court, and the judge is still on the Circuit Court bench, then do the same.

If the judge is not still on the bench in the required court, send your info to the head judge of either Circuit or County (whatever it states on the order). The judge may either file a Satisfaction of Judgement, or schedule a hearing.

You may also want to call the judge's secretary and explain to her. The phone numbers will either be on line or at the clerk's office. With the required proof, there should be no reason for you to get an attorney.

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now