Complaint Review: Asset Acceptance - Warren Michigan
- Asset Acceptance PO Box 2036 Warren, Michigan U.S.A.
- Phone:
- Web:
- Category: Collection Agency's
Asset Acceptance Fraudulent Lawsuit, Now Stalling during Validation attempt ripoff Warren Michigan
*Consumer Suggestion: You need to request discovery
*Author of original report: I will try and find another attorney
*Consumer Suggestion: Regarding WRITTEN CONTRACT and OPEN ENDED debt.
*Consumer Comment: I wouldn't
*Author of original report: Response
*Consumer Suggestion: Anthony, they know they cannot validate the debt.
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
Ripoff Report
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..
I got served in early Nov 2006 for a citibank credit card from the late 90's. The lawyers are Lloyd & McDaniels from Louisville, KY.
I immediately called my prepaid provider who researched the case and told me the old it's a written contract blah blah blah. I told him wrong and to refer me. Another lawyer told me the same thing, written contract blah blah blah.
I got the prepaid lawyer to send a validation letter to the plantiff and since I couldn't get any real help, I filed my own answer saying the lawsuit was frivolous and to be thrown out. Also included that if judge didn't throw it out I wanted complete validation. Sent copy to Lawyers and Asset Acceptance.
5 weeks later and Assets lawyers are asking for 30-60 more days to get info but at same time saying they would accept a settlement. The prepaid lawyer wants me to give them the time and consider a settlement since Asset is threatening endless discovery and litigation. I'm fed up that I can't find a legitimate lawyer to get this junk thrown out.
Anthony
berea, Kentucky
U.S.A.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 12/20/2006 06:18 AM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/asset-acceptance/warren-michigan/asset-acceptance-fraudulent-lawsuit-now-stalling-during-validation-attempt-ripoff-warren-226402. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:
#6 Consumer Suggestion
You need to request discovery
AUTHOR: J - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Friday, December 22, 2006
In your discovery request, did you ask for a copy of this payment they claimed was made?
Request the court not to give a continuance, to them, that they already had 5 week, and there request was made well after any deadline to file this request,
This is stalling on part of the plaintiff, keep up with all court dates and you file everything, within the time limits.
you should get another attorney, and you let the court know as to why, and file a complaint with the Ky bar. It sound from what your saying that your attorney would rather not piss off the collection agency, maybe wanting them to throw him some work. has he ever did any work for this collection agency?
All courts have civil rules, and in these rules, you have so many days to file your responds, you even have so many days to request a continuances,
you attorney should know this. you can't come weeks after that deadline and want more time, well if the court is not aware of this and your attorney is giving them the time, then there is nothing that can be done, your attorney is letting get away with this. You attorney is and must work, in what is in your best interest.
within the rules of court and law. He took a oath to that.
I'm not an attorney, but is sounds like the one you have isn't much of one either. You need to see if the court is aware of what is going on.
#5 Author of original report
I will try and find another attorney
AUTHOR: Anthony - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, December 21, 2006
I am going to try and get a referral to another attorney. This lawyer wants to wait until he hears back from them before doing any motions and he's pretty much set that it's a written agreement.
I just don't undestand why the attorney will not listen to me on this and file the motion to dismiss. I have told him all about AAC from what I have read here and hundreds of other places.
The AAC attorney even put a bogus date of last payment in the letter than actually SOL's the whole thing (march of 2001) and then said for us to avoid endless discovery and litigation, we should settle!!
#4 Consumer Suggestion
Regarding WRITTEN CONTRACT and OPEN ENDED debt.
AUTHOR: Steve - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, December 21, 2006
Anthony,
I have fought this battle several times. A written contract is almost always a fixed amount over a specified period of time with a fixed payment amount.
If they say it is a written contract, tell them you want to see the written contract.
Open ended is just that. No fixed payoff date. Revolving accounts are always open ended. Thats why they are called revolving accounts.
This is a simple argument to make in front of a judge.
And, they have already exposed their hand in offering you a deal after filing the lawsuit. They know they cannot win if you fight them. If they were confident they could win, AND actually get paid, they would never offer a deal.
Hammer them with validation requests and dispute every peice of validation they offer.
You CAN win this, even if you have to do it yourself.
#3 Consumer Comment
I wouldn't
AUTHOR: John - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, December 21, 2006
I wouldn't give them any time. These companies put the time restraints on people with paid off accounts unneccessarily in hopes of panic and unwarranted payment.
Hold them to the same 30 days they are holding you to for a response.
Aren't they REQUIRED to respond in 30 days anyway?
#2 Author of original report
Response
AUTHOR: Anthony - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, December 21, 2006
Steve,
The amount is $7,500. Yes this is a PPL lawyer and he suggested I give them the extra 30-60 days the AAC lawyers asked for. I told him to file a motion to dismiss but he wants to wait to give the AAC lawyers an opportunity to send documentation.
I used the NACA site and found 1 lawyer who is 90 miles away and left her a message. No call back after 2 days.
The few lawyers I have talked too all say it's a written contract. I haven't been able to find any with collection law experience.
#1 Consumer Suggestion
Anthony, they know they cannot validate the debt.
AUTHOR: Steve - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, December 20, 2006
Anthony,
Once a lawsuit is filed, sending letters does nothing at all. You must file motions.
I have to ask, what is a "prepaid lawyer"? Are you talking about a participating lawyer in the PPL network?
Your lawyer simply needs to file a DISCOVERY motion. OR..
The max SOL in KY is 15 years, however CC debt is considered an "open" account, meaning open ended. These are junk debt buyers who paid less than a penny on the dollar for this debt, and are trying to claim it is a written contract to get the max SOL. Your lawyer needs to file a Motion to Dismiss based on expired SOL of 5 years on an open account.
It is increasingly popular for credit cards to be treated as written contracts by the courts, instead of open accounts. Your state law will determine how it is treated. You may want to research other CC collections lawsuits and see how they were treated.
Your lawyer is an idiot if he suggests settlement. There are too many ways to easily beat this. Get a different lawyer.
It sounds as if your lawyer has no experience in collections, and does not know the difference between dealing with original creditors and junk debt buyers. Junk debt buyers are very easy to beat.
Go to budhibbs.com and click on the links tab to go to the NACA where you can get a lawyer referral in your area who specializes in collections matters.
And, you never said what the amount of the debt was. This is very important and is a determining factor as to whether they will proceed with the lawsuit or not, especially if they cannot document it.
Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.