Jio Lucci Jivanni Theft, Rent Evasion, Pay Per View Porn, Damage To Rental Property, Threats, Intimidation Beverly Hills, California

The above posters statement Parents Beware should not be ignored. Eight years ago the State of California found Coach Jio Lucci guilty of severe child abuse against his four daughters. All his daughters were removed from his home shortly before Christmas by the Beverly Hills Police Department and put into foster care where they have spent the last 8 years of their life. Jio Lucci has no contact with his daughters and has a restraining order against him not to go near them unless it is a supervised visit by a State welfare worker. This folks is only the tip of the iceberg and the additional facts surrounding this story and the abuse this horrific man inflicted on his poor helpless daughters is to graphic and vulgar to post on any internet site. My advice is to keep your kids safe and as far away from this child abuser as possible. Also the below post from an alleged Geiger Security is nothing more than a hoax posted by Jio Lucci himself. Try calling Geiger Security or even googling them they don’t exist. The facts posted regarding Jio Lucci are all true and can easily be verified. Just ask him next time you see him where are the quadruplet daughters you fathered and why were they removed from your home 8 years ago by the State and why only court monitored visitation. It will be interesting what fabricated story he comes up with.

If you hire Jio Lucci to train your kids Remember according to the above post "Your kids are being trained by a Rent Evader, Porn Purveyor and Thief", but most importantly an individual who can not spend a second of time with his own daughters unless it's monitored by the State of California.

Complaint 809015 SLANDER
AUTHOR: GEIGER Security/Internet - Monrovia (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, December 15, 2011
POSTED: Thursday, December 15, 2011


jio lucci 12-13 : Security/ Internet Court Judge view Malicious POSTS

Alert:internet:alert Jio Lucci Dec 13 2011 Court Judge Views Malicious Posts: Victim: Jio Lucci

CLAIM 802931  R.O.R. post, 12/13/2011 -

SECURITY:
223: Presented to a CA> Superior Ct Judge to View: DEFINITION:
SLANDER 56 posts all TAGGED : by INTERNET SECURITYVICTIM: Jio
Lucci(PERSON) definition: the one posting False written malice on the
internet (ID: PERSON) is in Violations of California and United States
Sections CodesPerson who is committing these malicious false posts was
ordered to stop: ContinuesPerson has violated acts of slander against:
Jio Lucci and used the internet as a toolBoth Civil and criminal
penalties will be sought after : the (PERSON)In the state of California
slander (California Civil Code 46) isrectified in civil court. The
tort test for slander is a simplefive-part examination that you apply to
your own circumstances todetermine of a case exists. This is the same
test that a jury wouldapply in considering a civil judgement: If posts
continue: criminal violations may apply1) Is there evidence that the
defendant made a false oral or spokenstatement concerning the plaintiff?
Yes Libel: written Posted on Internet 56 xsVICTIM: JIO LUCCI

12-13-20112)
Is there evidence that the statement was defamatory, i.e., that ithad
the capability of harming the plaintiff's reputation if it werebelieved?
YES: posted 56 malicious posts against Coach Jio LucciVICTIM: Jio Lucci
12-13-20113) Is there evidence that the defendant communicated that
statement toa person other than the plaintiff? YES: Used The INTERNET AS
A TOOL plus paid a Company to ADDITIONAL post and paid themVictim:
JioLucci 12-13-20114) Is there evidence that the defendant knew the
defamatory statementwas false, OR acted in reckless disregard as to
whether the statement were false or not? ALL Malicious Defamatory
statement: Per Section Code 46 Libel SlanderVictim: Jio Lucci
12-13-20115) Is there evidence that the plaintiff suffered actual harm
of apecuniary nature, i.e., suffered a financial loss, as a result of
thedefamatory statement being made and believed by a third person, OR
ifthere is no actual financial harm, does the slander take the form
ofeither
a) Statements imputing morally culpable criminal behavior . YES : The
(person) is attempting to harm, mislead Coach Jio Lucci Clients, harm
him
in the industry:Victim: Jio Lucci 12-13-2011ADDED: (PERSON) using
Falsified WORDS (BEYOND THE REALM of Dispute , if any)Identity Theft:
posted Jio Lucci personal information: (attached written
slander)ThiefTheftCon manP---FilthMore to be provided: Using "kids" as a
tool to DETOUR THE PARENT.PERSON now Identified as: SLANDERER evil and
unlawful act: to harm the reputation of Jio Lucci.......punitive
damages/ revenue damages

______________________________This
Person who is maliciously harassing Jio Lucci on the Internet Posts was
asked in a CIVIL MANNER to stop, remove. This was an attempt to give
the person a chance for all written posts removed and disolved. In any
DISPUTE ( IF ANY), no matter what the argument or situation is, THIS
PERSON IS IN TOTAL VIOLATION OF CA Section CODE 46 : Libel Slander. In
the event that the (PERSON) continues posts, it will be construded and
prosecuted as criminal addition to civil.Kent LLegal / Attorney

w/ Security/ Internet

GOOGGLE Assistance







Respond to this report!

What's this?