PetSex.com AmsterdamTeens.com Refuse to properly investigate allegations of underage users Eindhoven, Internet

When I reported the presence of an underage user, the people running PetSex.com would not cooperate on any investigation. When I directed them to the comments he made (which they should've been able to find by themselves, just by using his user name in a search for certain activity on their sites) they didn't accept my suspicion, and proposed that the nature of the user's comments were explained by something that wasn't so (they claimed that the user wrote the comments the way he did because English was not his native language, even though he was obviously American: quote, "or he could simply be bad a the language, not everyone commands the english language as their mothers tongue", to which I responded "Check his nationality and don't jump to conclusions. Think of the law for once", something I shouldn't have to tell them). I'm pretty sure a site like this one is required by law to thoroughly investigate these kinds of cases.

I tried to get a hold of their webmasters & whatnot, with the help of the DomainTools webpage, and when I told them about this, they asked what the problem was, even though I told them in the first email. When I told them again, they asked again what was wrong. After the second time of telling them what was wrong, they stopped responding to my emails.

And then there's a discrepancy between the information I submitted in this report (which can be found at http://www.aboutus.org/Petsex.com#-) and what I found on the domain on DomainTools (http://whois.domaintools.com/petsex.com). I have no idea which of the information was real, which made it even harder when I tried to report them to their local authorities.