Sambala Developments Jonathan Grepne, Dominic McGlynn Conned, misled, deceived, ripped off Internet

What i can"t understand.

Is how can sambala developments ltd be exempt from a tax audit under section 477 of companies house act of 2006.
When they have sold over 600 properties to the value of over 100 Million.

Surely Dominic Mcglynn and Jonathan Grepne should be made to answer these question by the HMRC in a court of law.
The properties range in value from 100,000 up to 500,000,,the sums add up.

The sales team should be questioned about this, people like Phillip Watson,,Tamsin Burwell,
Ben Pedesta..

We want justice

The Sambala project is fraud on a massive scale. The initial report above would be libel if it were untrue. Grepne and McGlynn will have to raise this issue in the UK High Court but there is simply no chance of that. There is no way on earth they would want to bring any more attention to themselves and they would be up against hundreds of conned investors.

Time is running out for Grepne, his family and the McGlynns. They are desperately trying to rake in more money from investors to fund their massive salaries and lifestyles in Monaco. Grepne still lives there while claiming poverty to investors.

This year they are going to be hit hard by investors and the authorities. All the truth is about to come out very publicly about the recent sell-off of Sambala land, directors' associations, the fraud, the tax evasion - ALL of it!

Don't blame the investors for being stupid. People at all levels of society and intelligence get conned every day - even the most savvy of business people. Just look at Bernie Madoff's clients.

Good news is that Cape Verde has just joined the ICC so there is one less hiding place for the Grepnes and the McGlynns.

Much of what is written above would constitute libel under the law of England and Wales as the correspondent would be unable to prove his allegations, as would be required by the High Court, if the compay were to bring an action.  The plain fact is that the UK company Sambala Developments Ltd now has liabilities greater than its assets.  Whilst under British law this does not mean that it must immediately file for bankruptcy, it will be in a very difficult situation in terms of raising new finance. It also faces allegations as yet unproven of money laundering and tax avoidance in the Cape Verde islands.

The plain fact is that a company with no previous experience in resort development undertook a huge project in an extremely difficult environment. It has failed to reach its objectives within a reasonable delay and its future seems uncertain.  At best, perhaps a more competent group will take on the project and complete it.  It has also to be said that most investors paid over substantial funds without even bothering to visit the site and check on the veracity of the claims being made. You could say that fools rush in where angels fear to tread!