- Report: #906290
Complaint Review: California Casualty (Mark Barteld)
| California Casualty (Mark Barteld) PO box 39706 Colorado Springs Co.
Internet United States of America |
|
California Casualty (Mark Barteld) A+ insurance Dropped my Coverage after filing a claim Internet
*Consumer Suggestion: Don't Take NO for an Answer
*General Comment: Another Adjuster Opinion Needed
Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 07/03/2012 12:42 PM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/California-Casualty-Mark-Barteld/internet/California-Casualty-Mark-Barteld-A-insurance-Dropped-my-Coverage-after-filing-a-claim-I-906290. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.
Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on California Casualty (Mark Barteld)
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:
Search Tips#1 Consumer Suggestion
Don't Take NO for an Answer
AUTHOR: ClaimAdvocate - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Monday, February 11, 2013
NOT SO FAST...THE POLICY DOES NOT DEFINE DAMAGE. Cosmetic damage is still damage. The granules are still damaged and the shingles will not last as long as expected and may even curl up on the ends in 2 yrs after the adjuster and circus all have left town. You only have one year to file suit or settle your claim from the date of loss in most states.
Yes you have coverage "but for" their expert statements that the hail did not cause structural damage, there is no coverage. They are making up the rules as they go in breach of the contract. Of course not, but the shingle is still damaged. The degree of damage is not defined by the policy ..yet. Some carriers are trying to insert a per cent of damage in the contract for the future wherein the damage must be 80% of the roof to have coverage. That is almost an inducement of fraud and has been rejected in most every state so far.
You need to hire an Advocate or Public Adjuster for 10-20% maximum fee of the recovery. If he fails it costs you nothing. You want to make sure to demand a cash out ACV settlement. Put the money in your pocket, not the insurance company contractor or hired gun. Its your right to be paid direct. You can then hire your own sub roofer and pay yourself as the General contractor 30-40% of the money. You may even have to demand appraisal under the policy but you will still win if they dont stack the deck against you in the selection of the umpire. Hiring a PA is still your best bet and settle on a cash out. Dont agree to make any repairs until the cash is in your hands.
The Advocate
#2 General Comment
Another Adjuster Opinion Needed
AUTHOR: 60HzEE-Retired - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Saturday, January 26, 2013

