for the record as of 8-19-2013
4338 caliente #12 coe 8-8-2013
y chen recd her funds on 8-9-2013
l strasberg negotiated in it's entirety per email below between buyers agent and seller y chen the transaction at 4338 caliente #12
julie sokach the buyers agent for prestige telephoned me on 8-5-2013 and asked for $5K to be held in escrow after coe on 8-5-2013 to address the water spot seen in garage by tenant verified by plumber who went there 8-4-2013 who also checked the kitchen plumbing and all plumbing at which time it was indicated the kitchen sink was loosened creating the leak in kitchen and the water spot in garage was due to rains that occured for 3 days consecutively just that week
I strasberg suggested to y chen as a solution at 10 am on 8-5-2013 if the buyer prestige wishes to proceed with this transaction per y chen terms y chen to reduce the sales price to 74K and close 8-7-2013 as is to enable the buyer to make the repair to the ceiling after close of escrow at their own expense. [continued below]....
.......it was agreed by l starsberg and y chen on 8-5-2013 that to reduced the price by $2K from 76K should be adequate for the ceiling work
Y Chen agrees to offer a reduction in price of $2000 to enable your buyer to make the repairs to the roof and ceiling in garage after coe
buyer agreed and Julie buyers agent drew up an addendum stating
seller agrees to adjust the selling price to $74,000 coe 8-7-2013 as is where is
buyer to make roof repair and garage ceiling repair at their own expense after coe
if julies buyer didn't agree the deal was going to be off as y chen would not agree to 5k held in escrow after close
within moments of this negotiation to reduce sales price to $74K as is where is coe 8-7 buyers agent Julie sokach on 8-5-2013 drew up addendum indicating 74K price as is coe 8-7 and forwarded to me which then y chen executed and sent via kinko proof of which y chen has a receipt for forwarding the fully executed by seller addendum indicating such as attached that was then sent to joy turners office at which time I also requested that a new commisison instruction sheet be created by joy turner for julie and myself for k bovards signature. this new commission instruction sheet was not provided to me since requested. the commission check was sent to realty one group on 8-9 after the transaction was fundd on 8-8
an email from ron on 8-5-2013 at 4: 22 who I have never met who is not my sales manager of ROG as I'm an independenet contractor 100% agent of ROG was triggered when susan brock emailed ron at 4:04 on 8-5-2013 who made ron aware the transaction was successfully negotiated between buyers agent julie for prestige buyer and seller y chen by l strasberg
if ron is susan sales manager and susan is being asked to be included in a transaction that was already negotiated by the originating agent and the buyers agent who was introduced to this property on 7-17 when julie called me on pavia which by the way 57 agents were also introduced to caliente that day by l starsberg verbally and Julie was the only agent from another office that presented an offer at the acceptable sellers terms, no offers were presented on caliente by realty one group agents and there were at least 10 who were also given the info re caliente on 7-17-2013
Julie indicated to me on 7-17 she has a buyer for caliente and she will present their offer at 76K
Julie presented an offer at $76K as is where is on 7-19-2013 fully executed at 5PM with buyers pof ready to close on 7-20
l strasberg met julie at caliente #12 with her buyer maloof as tenant karen required 24 hours to view a which time I also met another investor there who also wanted the caliente at $76K as is as a back up should buyer prestige fail to perform to open escrow with their $1K emd on monday with joy turners office at chicago title
ron and susan brock threatened my friends and colleagues that I have known for three years that I have completed other transactions with getting them other deals, stating that l strasbergs completed transactions are not allowed to close unless duties owed for s brock is signed by sellers so that susan brock can claim my commissions to take credit for a transsaction taht she did nothing on except aggravate and delay it with addressing an area rug of teants to tell buyers agent it does not come with the unit!!!!
the lease agreement already indicated what comes with the unit and was already addressed on 7-19 and 7-20 during the home inspection
fyi...at joy turners office y chen on 8-6-2013 was asked to sign a duties owed for susan brock at which time y chen was told the transacion will not be allowed to be closed per kathryn bovard without y chen signign the duties owed for s brock
I have requested for the third time and again for k bovard to forward my 100% commission re 4338 caliente #12 to be sent to my new brokerage where i was told they don't treat agents this way.
my sellers when they have questions communicate with me on transactions opened at rog
if rog wishes to file a formal cease and desist communicating with my friends and sellers against linda strasberg
I have not recd my commission re 4338 caliente
not only did I list this but I had to deal with a tenant who was hostile who didn't allow showing since 3-4
the tenant wanted to purchase the unit herself but was not qualified but may be qualified in three years however y chen wanted to sell as of 3-4-2013
I have copies of numerous cash offers from March 2013 that were rejected by y chen as high as $73K as late as 7-2 at which point y chen indicated to me she will not take less than $76K at which time the listing was revised
where is my commission check 100% of it!!!
ROG asked me not to communicate with my sellers when they call me and have questions
I have asked them to please provide a formal cease and desist order evidenced to my sellers and friends issued by a court of law in nevada on my transactions re files open left against my will at rog
corporate managing broker Ms Bovard, one who obviously represents the
corporate philosphy seems to be refusing to cut me my rightful commissions due Linda Strasberg.
Is this common practice for Realty One Group?
Are these the instructions given from the top down
or is Ms Bovard enhancing Realty One Groups revenue streams
independently and without owners knowledge?
I have requested my commission check.
It was stated by kathryn bovard on 5-1-2012 when I agreed to hang my license at ROG at 100% commission structure that any and all my listings would be transferred should I leave and that I would receive my commissions due me within 24 hours of them being received by your brokerage from the escrow office aka title company.
as of on 7-19 under contract at ROG: Caliente 76K Pavia $141K Eaglepath $424L Heavenly $375K
another 2 listing not under contract at ROG totalling volume of 824K
2 buyers I wasn't able to write up offers for because I was restricted access to my glvar and mls that I pay for yet bovard failed to return my real estate license to the divison until 8-9-2013
she did not allow me to hand carry it even though she said she would and when I showed up with my new brokers transfer papers she said she will mail it tomorrow but never did.
Her assigned agent susan that she gave my files to and take 50% or more of my commissions said to me all agents when they leave have to sign the 50% referral agreement for susan or k bovard won't send their re license to the dvision. Susan then said I will call her in a few days. I refused to sign any referral agreements as I'm a 100% agent and was told my listings will go with me if I leave and I would receive my commissions within 24 hours...yet still no check shave been received
any assistance or advice is appreicated.
linda s (((REDACTED)))