- Report: #653411
Complaint Review: federal judge james m.moody& us gov"t us supreme court
| federal judge james m.moody& us gov"t us supreme court us district court eastern arkansas 600 west capite
little rock, Arkansas United States of America |
|
federal judge james m.moody& us gov"t us supreme court James Moody intervened on my case after Judge Reasoner died,dismissed a case that had a trial date. little rock, Arkansas
*Author of original report: CORRUPT JAMES Moody Arkansas federal judge
*Consumer Comment: Billy Joe Smitj, Did you know that "JUDGE POEM" is 'Consumer Comment #15' at Ripoff Report #502469? Simply type in 502469 at this site.....
*Consumer Comment: Now I have more...
*Consumer Comment: Oh boy!
*Author of original report: james moody us gov't and supreme court
*Consumer Comment: Proof?
*Author of original report: federal judge james m moody & us gov't us supreme court
*Consumer Comment: Where to start.
Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 10/20/2010 05:44 PM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/federal-judge-james-mmoody-us-govt-us-supreme-court/little-rock-Arkansas-72201-3325/federal-judge-james-mmoody-us-govt-us-supreme-court-James-Moody-intervened-on-my-case-653411. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.
Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.
Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on federal judge james m.moody& us gov"t us supreme court
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:
Search Tips#1 Author of original report
CORRUPT JAMES Moody Arkansas federal judge
AUTHOR: billy joe smitj - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, April 03, 2011
#2 Consumer Comment
Billy Joe Smitj, Did you know that "JUDGE POEM" is 'Consumer Comment #15' at Ripoff Report #502469? Simply type in 502469 at this site.....
AUTHOR: Karl - (USA)
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, October 27, 2010
Mincey v. Arizona addressed ONLY the admissibility of evidence and statements gathered in a particular homicide, finding that the searches and questioning of the badly injured suspect were inadmissible and essentially voiding Arizona's "homicide scene" exemption to warrantless searches. Don't see where, having read the 8th Circuit's description of your complaint, this has anything to do with your case. Your case seems to dwell entirely on the state's civil liability for items allegedly stolen during the processing of a crime scene as possible violations of 4th Amendment...which the Court found none. It looks like, based on the opinion of the Court, that your legal team completely botched the appeal...failing to assert things on the initial case, citing irrelevant case law.
Unfortunately, I cannot access PACER to read the entire case but in the opinion I see nothing related to this alleged cover up in your son's death.
Also, the whole "I'm not giving up evidence until I get into court" thing. Not the way it works. Cause then the other side can object to it. No wonder your lawyers didn't wanna see you. At the very least, you have to let your lawyers see the evidence to properly handle your case.
What was the court docket number for the original case that Judge Moody dismissed? I would like to see what is available on that. I can also find no record of your son's death, so care to share some details. Who do you allege killed him? Why?
http://www.uscourts.gov/court_locator.aspx
You will see that Arkansas and Missouri are both in the 8th Circuit. Now about your friend in Tennessee and his letter about similar cases and their value. Tennessee is in the 6th Circuit. Rulings in one Circuit do not set precedent for all Districts and only carry the weight of law in the Circuit of finding. They can certainly be introduced in another Circuit but that Court is not required to give them any more value.
So the police told you to record everything. Big whoop. Just because the deceased judges secretary says you have nothing worry about doesn't mean you don't have anything to worry about. Again, it has no evidential value in court because she has no standing to make you any guarantees/promises.
Incidentally, no I am not a lawyer. Just someone who happens to know some of the ins & outs of our Court system.
#5 Author of original report
james moody us gov't and supreme court
AUTHOR: billy joe smitj - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Tuesday, October 26, 2010
I wonder why the Newspapers and TV stations won't touch this story. Perhaps it is the feeling that this report may at the least be an exageration, at most an outright fabrication.
According to your claims, we have this case that was heard by the US Supreme Court and they ruled in his favor 9-0. Yet a Federal Judge decided on his own to overturn the ruling of the US Supreme Court.
But let's say that everything that was written here is true. Okay..then please provide the Docket and Court information for the case that the judge decided to overturn. While you are at it provide the Docket number for the Supreme Court hearing.
Oh and the only reason that RipOff Report "touched" your story is because you wrote it. See they post EVERYTHING, and it is their policy to not remove it.
#7 Author of original report
federal judge james m moody & us gov't us supreme court
AUTHOR: billy joe smitj - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Monday, October 25, 2010
2. What the deceased judge's secretary says means exactly squat to the new presiding judge and has no value in a court of law.
3. You filed some kind of complaint against a sitting Federal judge. As the other judges in the state were probably acquainted with him, it was proper for them to recuse themselves. The judge brought in from MO was perfectly allowable. As you state, Federal judges are appointed to districts and not states. As such, they may preside anywhere within their given district as needed. Had you bothered to research the matter, you would see that both AR and MO are in District 8...so there was nothing improper about bringing the MO judge in. Sounds like you need a new attorney cause he is clueless about Federal Courts procedure.

