• Report: #653390

Complaint Review: Joe Viglione

Thank You

Read how Ripoff Report saves consumers millions.

  • Submitted: Wed, October 20, 2010
  • Updated: Wed, December 19, 2012

  • Reported By: Boston Artist — Boston Massachusetts United States of America
Joe Viglione
Boston, Massachusetts United States of America

Joe Viglione Publicity Machine Exaggerates on what he can accomplish for the artist Boston, Massachusetts

*REBUTTAL Owner of company: Medford Community Cablevision, Inc. violating agreement

*REBUTTAL Owner of company: Medford Community Cablevision, Inc. violating agreement

*REBUTTAL Owner of company: Medford Community Cablevision, Inc. violating agreement

*UPDATE EX-employee responds: Viglione will sue and blog lies, and rip you off

*REBUTTAL Owner of company: "Phil C" is Medford Community Cablevision, Inc.'s Arthur Alan Deluca

*UPDATE EX-employee responds: Not surprised he is listed here on Ripoff Report !

*REBUTTAL Owner of company: This material is incorrect and is in violation of a judgment in Superior Court

*REBUTTAL Owner of company: BEWARE!!! ANOTHER INDEPENDENT REPORT ON JOE VIGLIONE ABUSES!

*General Comment: Joe Viglione

*REBUTTAL Individual responds: Former Business Partner filing defamatory lies

What's this?
What's this?
What's this?
Is this
Ripoff Report
About you?
Ripoff Report
A business' first
line of defense
on the Internet.
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

Does your business have a bad reputation?
Fix it the right way.
Corporate Advocacy Program™

SEO Reputation Management at its best!

For over 30 years this "music producer", promoter, publicist, promises the moon but only takes your cash.  When you realized that he is not going to what he says he can do and back out of working with him, you are $$$ in the hole with nothing to show for it.  Then he threatens to sue you.  There are a trail of bodies under his wheels in the Boston, MA, area.  Beware.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 10/20/2010 04:42 PM and is a permanent record located here: http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Joe-Viglione/Boston-Massachusetts-/Joe-Viglione-Publicity-Machine-Exaggerates-on-what-he-can-accomplish-for-the-artist-Boston-653390. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year.

Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report.

Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on Joe Viglione

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Search Tips
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?
REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author 3Consumer 7Employee/Owner
Updates & Rebuttals

#1 REBUTTAL Owner of company

Medford Community Cablevision, Inc. violating agreement

AUTHOR: publicity machine - (United States of America)

Dear Readers,

A year ago today a Superior Court judge awarded the victory to me, dismissing a case that cost the cable TV subscribers of Medford approximately $73,000.00 or more.  December 19, 2011 the Judge released his findings that this hard-working award-winning filmmaker faced malicious abuse of process by Medford Community Cablevision, Inc. and a Rhode Island filmmaker Dawn Natalia. 

Dawn Natalia lost the case.   The case was funded by Medford Community Cablevision, Inc.   One of the harassment techniques that TV 3 Medford uses to provoke people is for the TV3 staff and board or directors to write lies on Ripoff Report.com.   Any member of the Medford community  faces vandalism of their automobile, theft of their videotapes, attacks at City Hall (you read that correctly, three of them ganged up on one victim on April 26, 2010), censorship of their programs, as was stated in Superior Court they "brutalized" this victim.  Brutalized.   Even their own lawyer admitted defeat and told this victim outside the courtroom that he doesn't have to LIKE his clients to take a case.  It was an apology from the Mayor's cousin for years of harassment, AND the lawyer distancing himself from some very bad apples.

It is alleged that MCC TV3 Board of Directors  Harvey Alberg, Ronald Delucia, Arthur Alan Deluca and others from Medford Community Cablevision, Inc. awarded themselves Christmas bonuses this year.
Think about that.  They take advantage of the broadcast time to run unethical infomercials to promote their for-profit businesses (Alberg Financial, Medford; Ark Insurance of Stoneham) on public access tv, they allegedly dip their fingers into the cable tv subscriber's hard-earned monies for "Christmas bonuses", and you cannot find the minutes to their meetings anywhere on the web or even at City Hall.  Ever hear of a non-profit not being transparent with meeting minutes?  Now for the truth, not Arthur Deluca's blogs, just google "Medford Community Cablevision, Inc." and "Melanson Heath & Co PC" and read about the failure of the TV station to comply with a financial report to the citizens funding the station.  Put "Medford Community Cablevision, Inc." and "Performance Evaluation Hearing" in a google.   Even their own Mayoral Appointee to the Board of Directors told the judge at the Evaluation that for the health of the station Deluca, Delucia (no relation), Alberg and the gang needed to resign.  The woman's car was then vandalized, as mine was.  You can do a search and read what they did to that really nice, honest woman.

We are fighting the good fight.  The more they write on Ripoff.com the more rebuttal information will have to be posted to set the record straight about how the board of directors conduct themselves, the individuals from Alberg Financial of Medford, Ark Insurance of Stoneham (whose owner, Ronald Delucia, admitted to the City Council of Medford he engaged with his board of directors in "sloppy bookkeeping.  Ask Medford High School why Delucia is no longer a teacher there),  and each individual from MCC TV3 too cowardly to post their name on an attack comment on this site.   

A special needs person had a high-profile guest (now a national radio host) on the station. They bullied the special needs person, harassing him non-stop, costing him other guests.  I brought the fellow into Boston to get to speak with one of the guests that station cost him.  The individuals at Medford Community Cablevision, Inc. were furious that their victims are able to work together and produce our television programs at other stations.  You can find our good, honest work on YouTube and  you can find real quotes from real people acknowledging our hard work and honest volunteer efforts.  We do the work, we volunteer, they take our money and won't be held accountable for it. You do the math.

This is millions and millions of dollars  being taken from cable TV subscribers with no accountability by the station, no access TV and the threat of physical bodily harm.  The "Medford" station has a Boston resident with mob ties, which can be validated with a simple google search.  They keep up the harassment, every lurid detail of their dirty dealings will be posted in response.  They are the aggressors, we are a community of hard-working volunteer producers facing this garbage from an angry mob of unbalanced, dangerous individuals.   Notice how they attack and then say that you are litigating against them?   The court system is there to protect people from predators like the crowd at Medford Community Cablevision, Inc.   It was a year ago today they lost the lawsuit they filed. Do you think the public wanted monies appropriated for yet another lawsuit they lost?    Why do you think they are posting today?  They are livid that their lies did not have any effect with an honest judge.   They lost a year ago today, so they post lies a year after their defeat in a case THEY instituted against a producer they are jealous of. 

This is the kind of retaliation dozens and dozens of people have faced from Medford town crackpot Arthur Alan Deluca.  

Do a google on Non-profit ripoffs to see what the citizens of Medford are going through.

I fight for the rights of all Medford citizens to use their access TV station.  That is a good thing.  Thank God someone is fighting hard to protect the cable TV subscribers in Medford. 
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 REBUTTAL Owner of company

Medford Community Cablevision, Inc. violating agreement

AUTHOR: publicity machine - (United States of America)

Dear Readers,

A year ago today a Superior Court judge awarded the victory to me, dismissing a case that cost the cable TV subscribers of Medford approximately $73,000.00 or more.  December 19, 2011 the Judge released his findings that this hard-working award-winning filmmaker faced malicious abuse of process by Medford Community Cablevision, Inc. and a Rhode Island filmmaker Dawn Natalia. 

Dawn Natalia lost the case.   The case was funded by Medford Community Cablevision, Inc.   One of the harassment techniques that TV 3 Medford uses to provoke people is for the TV3 staff and board or directors to write lies on Ripoff Report.com.   Any member of the Medford community  faces vandalism of their automobile, theft of their videotapes, attacks at City Hall (you read that correctly, three of them ganged up on one victim on April 26, 2010), censorship of their programs, as was stated in Superior Court they "brutalized" this victim.  Brutalized.   Even their own lawyer admitted defeat and told this victim outside the courtroom that he doesn't have to LIKE his clients to take a case.  It was an apology from the Mayor's cousin for years of harassment, AND the lawyer distancing himself from some very bad apples.

It is alleged that MCC TV3 Board of Directors  Harvey Alberg, Ronald Delucia, Arthur Alan Deluca and others from Medford Community Cablevision, Inc. awarded themselves Christmas bonuses this year.
Think about that.  They take advantage of the broadcast time to run unethical infomercials to promote their for-profit businesses (Alberg Financial, Medford; Ark Insurance of Stoneham) on public access tv, they allegedly dip their fingers into the cable tv subscriber's hard-earned monies for "Christmas bonuses", and you cannot find the minutes to their meetings anywhere on the web or even at City Hall.  Ever hear of a non-profit not being transparent with meeting minutes?  Now for the truth, not Arthur Deluca's blogs, just google "Medford Community Cablevision, Inc." and "Melanson Heath & Co PC" and read about the failure of the TV station to comply with a financial report to the citizens funding the station.  Put "Medford Community Cablevision, Inc." and "Performance Evaluation Hearing" in a google.   Even their own Mayoral Appointee to the Board of Directors told the judge at the Evaluation that for the health of the station Deluca, Delucia (no relation), Alberg and the gang needed to resign.  The woman's car was then vandalized, as mine was.  You can do a search and read what they did to that really nice, honest woman.

We are fighting the good fight.  The more they write on Ripoff.com the more information will be posted about Alberg Financial of Medford, Ark Insurance of Stoneham (whose owner, Ronald Delucia, admitted to the City Council of Medford he engaged with his board of directors in "sloppy bookkeeping.  Ask Medford High School why Delucia is no longer a teacher there).   

A special needs person had a high-profile guest (now a national radio host) on the station. They bullied the special needs person, harassing him non-stop, costing him other guests.  I brought the fellow into Boston to get to speak with one of the guests that station cost him.  The individuals at Medford Community Cablevision, Inc. were furious that their victims are able to work together and produce our television programs at other stations.  You can find our good, honest work on YouTube and  you can find real quotes from real people acknowledging our hard work and honest volunteer efforts.  We do the work, we volunteer, they take our money and won't be held accountable for it. You do the math.

This is millions and millions of dollars  being taken from cable TV subscribers with no accountability by the station, no access TV and the threat of physical bodily harm.  The "Medford" station has a Boston resident with mob ties, which can be validated with a simple google search.  They keep up the harassment, every lurid detail of their dirty dealings will be posted in response.  They are the aggressors, we are a community of hard-working volunteer producers facing this garbage from an angry mob of unbalanced, dangerous individuals.   Notice how they attack and then say that you are litigating against them?   The court system is there to protect people from predators like the crowd at Medford Community Cablevision, Inc.   It was a year ago today they lost the lawsuit they filed. Do you think the public wanted monies appropriated for yet another lawsuit they lost?    Why do you think they are posting today?  They are livid that their lies did not have any effect with an honest judge.   They lost a year ago today, so they post lies a year after their defeat in a case THEY instituted against a producer they are jealous of. 

This is the kind of retaliation dozens and dozens of people have faced from Medford town crackpot Arthur Alan Deluca. 

Do a google on Non-profit ripoffs to see what the citizens of Medford are going through.

I fight for the rights of all Medford citizens to use their access TV station.  That is a good thing.  Thank God someone is fighting hard to protect the cable TV subscribers in Medford. 
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#3 REBUTTAL Owner of company

Medford Community Cablevision, Inc. violating agreement

AUTHOR: publicity machine - (United States of America)

Dear Readers,

A year ago today a Superior Court judge awarded the victory to me, dismissing a case that cost the cable TV subscribers of Medford approximately $73,000.00 or more.  December 19, 2011 the Judge released his findings that this hard-working award-winning filmmaker faced malicious abuse of process by Medford Community Cablevision, Inc. and a Rhode Island filmmaker Dawn Natalia. 

Dawn Natalia lost the case.   The case was funded by Medford Community Cablevision, Inc.   One of the harassment techniques that TV 3 Medford uses to provoke people is for the TV3 staff and board or directors to write lies on Ripoff Report.com.   Any member of the Medford community  faces vandalism of their automobile, theft of their videotapes, attacks at City Hall (you read that correctly, three of them ganged up on one victim on April 26, 2010), censorship of their programs, as was stated in Superior Court they "brutalized" this victim.  Brutalized.   Even their own lawyer admitted defeat and told this victim outside the courtroom that he doesn't have to LIKE his clients to take a case.  It was an apology from the Mayor's cousin for years of harassment, AND the lawyer distancing himself from some very bad apples.

It is alleged that MCC TV3 Board of Directors  Harvey Alberg, Ronald Delucia, Arthur Alan Deluca and others from Medford Community Cablevision, Inc. awarded themselves Christmas bonuses this year.

Think about that.  They take advantage of the broadcast time to run unethical infomercials to promote their businesses on public access tv, which is immoral; they allegedly dip their fingers into the cable tv subscriber's hard-earned monies for "Christmas bonuses", and you cannot find the minutes to their meetings anywhere on the web or even at City Hall.  Ever hear of a non-profit not being transparent with meeting minutes.  Now for the truth, not Arthur Deluca's blogs, just google "Medford Community Cablevision, Inc." and "Melanson Heath & Co PC" and read about the failure of the TV station to comply with a financial report to the citizens funding the station.

We are fighting the good fight.  The more they write on Ripoff.com the more information will be posted about Alberg Financial of Medford, Ark Insurance of Stoneham (whose owner, Ronald Delucia, admitted to the City Council of Medford he engaged with his board of directors in "sloppy bookkeeping.  Ask Medford High School why Delucia is no longer a teacher there). 

This is millions and millions of dollars  being taken from cable TV subscribers with no accountability by the station, no access TV and the threat of physical bodily harm.  The "Medford" station has a Boston resident with mob ties, which can be validated with a simple google search.  They keep up the harassment, every lurid detail of their dirty dealings will be posted in response.  They are the aggressors, we are a community of hard-working volunteer producers facing this garbage from an angry mob of unbalanced, dangerous individuals.   Notice how they attack and then say that you are litigating against them?   The court system is there to protect people from predators like the crowd at Medford Community Cablevision, Inc.   It was a year ago today they lost the lawsuit they filed. Do you think the public wanted monies appropriated for yet another lawsuit they lost?    Why do you think they are posting today?  They are livid that their lies did not have any effect with an honest judge.   They lost a year ago today, so they post lies a year after their defeat in a case THEY instituted against a producer they are jealous of. 

This is the kind of retaliation dozens and dozens of people have faced from Medford town crackpot Arthur Alan Deluca. 

Do a google on Non-profit ripoffs to see what the citizens of Medford are going through.

I fight for the rights of all Medford citizens to use their access TV station.  That is a good thing.  Thank God someone is fighting hard to protect the cable TV subscribers in Medford. 
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#4 UPDATE EX-employee responds

Viglione will sue and blog lies, and rip you off

AUTHOR: Anisha - (United States of America)

Another set of lies by Joe Viglione.  He has filed MANY law cases in both civil in criminal courts all over Massachusetts - and he reports here:  That the District Attorney and Police are "helping him".  HA !  They, like the Mayor, City Solicitor, and local news outlets are sooooo tired of him.



He has zero credibility.  He was thrown out of a nonprofit for violating SEVERAL serious rules (feel free to ask the nonprofit.  which one? the one he complains about, see the motivation?), and then made-up lies about everyone involved in the nonprofit.  Even blogged and smeared a college student.  (although I must admit, I check his blog almost daily, as does my husband: it keeps him writing, and us laughing).  He made up lies and reported them to my employer---who lucky for me, was already well aware of his horrible rip-off reputation.  He smears the mayor, several city employees, and many local citizens.



Beware !  He preaches many accomplishments, but research shows no merit.  He preaches about judges, but a Massachusetts judge ruled that he isn't to be taken seriously/doesn't know what he is saying.  He preaches about others in the community, but has no support, family, or friends when he makes these wild accusations.  A man with no alies at his age, is a man that has burned many a bridge.



But do not take my "internet" word.  Just ask any the people he mentioned in his rebuttal above.  If you are able to share a coffee with ANYONE of them-they will tell you the same thing.  And definitely do not engage in any financial talks and/or offers to appear on his free shows.  You'll learn fast how they become not so free.  Media members beware - this man will rip you off
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#5 REBUTTAL Owner of company

"Phil C" is Medford Community Cablevision, Inc.'s Arthur Alan Deluca

AUTHOR: publicity machine - (United States of America)

"Phil C" is a nuisance known as Arthur Alan Deluca, a purported board member of Medford Community Cablevision, Inc.  The sick thing is that "Phil" claims you will get sued when the TV station misappropriated $73,000.00 to take me into court.  They lost.    I have been fighting for ten years, since December 10, 2002, against the corruption at the Medford  Massachusetts public access tv station, and if you sign up and fork over $30.00 or $50.00 or whatever they are asking this month, you too can find yourself on RipoffReport.com because dirty pool is what they are engaged in.  The culprits are Harvey Alberg and his wife Doria Pizzotti Alberg who  run a company known as Alberg Financial in Medford.  Problem is, Harvey Alberg's former business partner tipped me off that he also ran a company known as "Savant Technologies" and was attempting to get the website business from the non-profit, MCC TV 3, that Alberg sits on the board of.   The City Solicitor of Medford was notified and did nothing when a board meeting was held for an alleged "election" for the people of Medford.

Finally the District Attorney's office and the Medford Police Department got involved to help me and the TV station signed THREE DOCUMENTS in mediation agreeing to stop harassing me on the internet. Within 6 weeks, on or about August 1, 2012, Arthur Alan Deluca under the alias "Phil C" and Dareleen and a number of other aliases started posting information in violation of that mediated agreement.

It takes courage to fight the good fight and go to the City Council and week after week bring information garnered from Public Records Requests to find out how the cable TV subscriber funds are being used.  There are no elections at TV 3 that the public can participate in.  They block people out, they circle the wagons, they make outrageous claims that they have fair and open elections, but if that's so why were they so terrified of having a city-wide election in 2008?  Why are the same old cronies getting "memberships for life" without paying a nickel, free bus passes as Deluca allegedly obtains, and according to the Solicitor's report, three of them received cash payments including Deluca/Phil C.

The above post from Phil C is in violation of a police agreement designed to protect the victim.  Have you ever heard of a public access TV station having to go into mediation three times?  Have you heard of a station taking monies designated for access TV and using 73K of those monies (plus an additional $13,900.00 in insurance monies) to sue a man who is an award-winning producer with a film out in worldwide distribution.   It is pure jealousy and envy.  If you sign up at Medford Community Cablevision, Inc. and pay them monies to be a "volunteer", you will be harassed, they will come to your home and take photos, vandalize your automobile, write on Ripoff Report.com and go to your places of employment to try to make your life miserable.  The police are afraid of Mayor Michael J. McGlynn, the 25 year incumbent who is terrified of Medford Community Cablevision, Inc., too terrified to pull the plug on him because he knows they will do to him what they do to their own members.   The Honorable Judge Marie O. Jackson-Thompson (retired) was hired by Michael J. McGlynn, the Mayor, at a fee of $3900.00 to right the ship.  The Judge's report was scathing and called for the Mayor to evaluate if he should go to the Attorney General or Secretary of State on Medford Community Cablevision, Inc.    Join the station, ask about the finances, and you will be dragged into court, have your own "Ripoff Report.com" site and find a 24 year old in your driveway taking pictures of your house and vandalizing your car.  It is TV 3 Medford that has filed multiple suits...they have sued the city, they filed a complaint on an 82 year old man and terrified him until his death, and they have lost in court repeatedly, including being found to have violated the anti-SLAPP statutes of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, the most egregious form of censorship.    On or about April 26, 2010 three members of TV 3 Medford attacked a man at City Hall, the police reporting noting the man was the "victim" and listing the names of the three perpetrators from Medford Community Cablevision, Inc.   The Honorable Judge Diane Kottmeyer gave a verbal order for the station to stop e mailing the victim.   Anyone who wants the truth about this only has to go to Medford City Hall at any Council meeting and hear what is really going on.   This "Ripoff Report" is nothing more than harassment aimed at a hard-working, award-winning producer that the station is envious of.
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#6 UPDATE EX-employee responds

Not surprised he is listed here on Ripoff Report !

AUTHOR: phil c - (United States of America)

Very similar story as the original posted.  He comes to the table and proclaims all sorts of credentials.     At some point he will engage you in talks about side-ventures.

BUT

the very minute things don't go EXACTLY his way....you'll end up in court.

http://www.tuftsdaily.com/2.5541/student-sued-after-june-wmfo-clash-1.608583

there are SEVERAL issues of this man suing different people and groups in court.

Ask yourself; how many times have you really sued someone?  Why can't this man resolve issues without courts, why he he not work well with others?

very angry, very dishonest, not very nice.   BEWARE
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#7 REBUTTAL Owner of company

This material is incorrect and is in violation of a judgment in Superior Court

AUTHOR: publicity machine - (United States of America)

     All the materials on this alleged "Report" as well as the photograph taken without authorization have been removed from other sites on the internet.   The individual who was posting them DEFAULTED in SUPERIOR COURT.  I also won a case in November/December 2011  in Superior Court against a frivolous action funded by the same individuals.    I believe I now have the right to sue for what is called "malicious abuse of process".

    There are Agreements those individuals made with the authorities to remove all offensive material on the internet.   This site has been reported to the authorities as of August 3, 2012 for violating those Agreements.

     I applied for a job at a company that is responsible for posting a lot of this information.  No one should put an application in and fear being harassed.
__________________________________________________________
     As for the individual who was a business associate of mine, I will be filing action in a court of law very soon to protect my interests.   He worked in concert with the individuals who denied me employment.   It was bullying, plain and simple, as is what they wrote on this site. Shame on them.

     That is all that I will say about these reports for now.  

     What is interesting is that my business has flourished since the removal of the unqualified and disruptive business partner.   That speaks volumes.   While I was doing the heavy lifting that individual was selling equipment.   Had he been honest and not had a million excuses for why he couldn't do the work he promised to perform things might have been different.   Or maybe I should consider myself lucky that I got away from him in time

___________________________________________________________

     A document was signed on July 23 2012 in Superior Court by another individual who caused a lot of these problems.   Another court case was heard on November 28, 29 and 30th in 2011 and in December the judge awarded the victory to me.   Three other documents were signed where these materials on the internet are supposed to be removed by the individuals who authored them.
  
     It is truly sad when you believe and trust someone and - after they take your money - they smash a clock, get violent and the police have to be notified.   That individual will be in court to talk to a judge about his conduct.     

     No names are being named here.   I will let the courts handle it.
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#8 REBUTTAL Owner of company

BEWARE!!! ANOTHER INDEPENDENT REPORT ON JOE VIGLIONE ABUSES!

AUTHOR: Kanavos Ken - (USA)

ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL VICTIMIZED BY JOE VIGLIONE: Slander Suit filed against Viglione who was found GULITY. Typical Chronic Shakedown he engages in!!! BEWARE! BEWARE! BEWARE!

There are MANY more Blogs & sites detailing his abuses that will be posted until he offers Me & Newbury Newbury Media a retraction of his scandalous allegations!!!

Please check this link: 
http://loserjosephviglione.blogspot.com/


Joseph Viglione: FAT - LOSER - IMBECILE255TUESDAY, APRIL 12, 2011ATTORNEY GENERAL COUNTING "THE COUNTS' LAWSUITSBREAKING NEWS: MASSACHUSETTS ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE LOOKING INTO VIGLIONE'S FRIVOLOUS LAWSUITS IN SUPERIOR AND DISTRICT COURT AFTER THE LOSS OF A RECENT LAWSUIT AGAINST DANIEL A. SARNO JR, A 23 YEAR OLD COLLEGE GRADUATE. 
The Facts: 

1. You can look up the case yourself in Superior Court, CIVIL DOCKET MICV2010-00831 
2. Hon. Bruce Henry DENIED all three motions by Viglione.
3. Sarno filed a motion for a restraining order against Viglione in 2010.
4. Judge ordered for Viglione to "take a break from [harassing] TV3."
5. Viglione then files a counterclaim against Sarno.
6. The counts on the claim: Threats to Kill, Malicious Business Interference, and Libel.
7. Because Viglione cannot afford an attorney and thinks he is smarter than one, he tries to file papers himself and messes up.
8. Sarno was not served properly.
9. Viglione files motion for a default judgment against Sarno for failing to answer interrogatories (which actually were not admissible in this type of suit... he filed for a TRO against Sarno which Sarno was then eligible to ANSWER the complaint.
10. A judge heard Viglione's case on April, 7, 2011. The following day, the judge DENIES Viglione.

Sarno discovers that Viglione has had countless lawsuits and claims against him over the past two decades, including suffering a libel/slander/defamation suit loss. 

Stay tuned for those Docket Numbers on this blog.

Viglione has also had TWO additional restraining orders on him by TWO different WOMEN! Is he a predator? 

Why does he write a blog about a 23 year old boy? Is he obsessed with him? Obsessed enough to attack this 23 year old boy like he has attacked these women?

ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE IS MADE WELL AWARE OF VIGLIONE. IN A WAY THEY LAUGHED WHEN THEY HEARD HIS NAME....MEANING THEY KNOW OF THIS PERSON AND HE IS NO GOOD.

COME BACK NEXT WEEK AFTER THE AUTHOR OF THIS BLOG (SARNO) HAS HIS MEETING WITH THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE (TUESDAY APRIL 19). Posted by Dasonras at 10:01 PM 0 comments Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookTUESDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 2011FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: JOE VIGLIONE IS AN UNKNOWN LOSER !Breaking News:  Joseph Viglione's  Wikipedia page was removed because he is an unknown loser! Don't take my word for it folks. This decision was made by an international peer review! That's right, people who don't even know Viglione think he is a LOSER! 
Here is what people had to say on Wikipedia: 

ORIGINAL REASON FOR JOE VIGLIONE DELETION:
"Page is entirely self promotion of an unknown person. Article does not contain proper or worthy citations. Dasonras (talk) 08:05, 24 January 2011 (UTC)"

OTHER PEER REVIEWERS' OPINIONS OF JOE VIGLIONE:


" It appears to be yet another spam/vanity article on a person who failed to attain any notability. -- Mecanismo | Talk"

" Has zero notability per WP:AUTHOR, WP:BK, or WP:BIO. Qworty (talk) 22:48, 26 January 2011 (UTC)"


"interviews with notable people does not necessarily make you notable. LibStar (talk) 23:13, 31 January 2011 (UTC)"

" I find no cited facts. I would put this up for BLPPROD, but it's already been prodded in the past, created prior to the BLPPROD start, and is conterversial I submit it to the standard battery of tests for an article. We have not seen any reliable sources come forward from Ed and Petition, who claim that they have references. Only reference on the page is the biography that the record company started (and probably still owned) by the subject which does not qualify as a independent 3rd party source. Hasteur (talk) 22:10, 31 January 2011 (UTC)" 

THIS IS NOT MADE UP! HERE, GO TO THE LINK YOURSELF:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Joe_Viglione

JOE VIGLIONE, YOU ARE A LOSER! YOUR TIME OF TELLING OTHER PEOPLE THAT THEY ARE HORRIBLE PEOPLE IS COMING TO AN END. YOU ARE THE BIGGEST LOSER IN MEDFORD. 


"Posted by Dasonras at 8:20 PM 0 comments Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookJUDGE CALLS VIGLIONE'S BLOGS "VULGAR, DESPICABLE and CHILDISH"Below is the "Summary of Evidence" accepted by the Judge in Sarno vs. Viglione. Judge determined the statements in Mr. Viglione's blogs (of which he swore under oath that he was indeed the author of) are "vulgar", "Despicable", and "Childish." 

Summary Of Evidence - Annexure 1-1 thru 1-74 & 2-1 thru 2-2
Pg. 1-1, Sec. 1 Joseph Viglione has claimed on a website that in my presence, the public will suffer death threats and that I am a station manager following [Viglione] aroundlike a sad puppy dogdesperate to be near [Viglione]. This statement is without merit and has caused me to suffer serious alarm and emotional distress. Viglione has devised this statement willfully and maliciously to besmirch my reputation in the City of Medford, my workplace, and has published this statement in order to intimidate and defame my name publicly.
Pg. 1-2, Sec. 2 Joseph Viglione has claimed on a website that I am a liar. He also claims that I consume alcohol with colleagues in my place of work.  This statement is without merit and has caused me to suffer serious alarm and emotional distress. Viglione has devised this statement willfully and maliciously to besmirch my reputation in the City of Medford, my workplace, and has published this statement in order to intimidate and defame my name publicly.
Pg. 1-2, Sec. 3 Joseph Viglione has inferred on a website that a private citizen, Gary Zappelli, is sexually pursuing me. This statement is without merit and has caused me to suffer serious alarm and emotional distress. This claim is not true and is devised by Viglione to intimidate me on a sexual nature.
Pg. 1-2, Sec. 4 Joseph Viglione has claimed that I am an imbalanced fruitcake from Station Landing. This statement is without merit and has caused me to suffer serious alarm and emotional distress.
Pg. 1-2, Sec. 5 Joseph Viglione has claimed on a website that Dan & Frank give youporno! This statement is without merit and has caused me to suffer serious alarm and emotional distress. At no time have I been involved in the creation or distribution of pornography, within or outside of my place of work. Viglione has devised this statement willfully and maliciously to besmirch my reputation in the City of Medford, my workplace, and has published this statement in order to intimidate and defame my name publicly.
Pg. 1-3, Sec. 6 Joseph Viglione has claimed on a website that Medford Community Cablevision, Inc. has a station manager suing! It is true that I have filed a claim against Viglione and only Viglione. The nature of this claim is for the purpose of obtaining a TRO and HRO for protecting myself against threats, harassment, and slander from Viglione.
Pg. 1-3, Sec. 7 Joseph Viglione has inferred on a website that my private online screen name is an anagram devised to deceive a private company Wikipedia and has inadvertently called me a jackass. This statement has caused me to suffer serious alarm and emotional distress.
Pg. 1-3, Sec. 8 Joseph Viglione has claimed on a website that I fail to understandthe First Amendment which [I] spit on. This statement is without merit and has caused me to suffer serious alarm and emotional distress. Viglione has devised this statement willfully and maliciously to besmirch my reputation in the City of Medford, my workplace, and has published this statement in order to intimidate and defame my name publicly.
Pg. 1-4, Sec. 9 Joseph Viglione has claimed on a website that if the public enters my place of business that they will harass you, molest your name and threaten to kill you. This statement is without merit and has caused me to suffer serious alarm and emotional distress. Viglione has devised this statement willfully and maliciously to besmirch my reputation in the City of Medford, my workplace, and has published this statement in order to intimidate and defame my name publicly.

Pg. 1-4, Sec. 10 Joseph Viglione has claimed on a website that it is all about Dan Sarno and his exploits in pornography called Dirty Talk Live. This statement is without merit and has caused me to suffer serious alarm and emotional distress. At no time have I been involved in the creation or distribution of pornography, within or outside of my place of work. Viglione has devised this statement willfully and maliciously to besmirch my reputation in the City of Medford, my workplace, and has published this statement in order to intimidate and defame my name publicly.
Pg. 1-5, Sec. 11 Joseph Viglione has claimed on a website that FACT: Matthew Page-Lieberman, Gary Zappelli and Dan Sarno are all listed in a police report after victimizing a volunteer producer (Viglione). This is a false report filed by Viglione himself. At no time was I involved in the victimization of Viglione. This statement is without merit and has caused me to suffer serious alarm and emotional distress. Viglione has devised this statement willfully and maliciously to besmirch my reputation in the City of Medford, my workplace, and has published this statement in order to intimidate and defame my name publicly.
Pg. 1-5, Sec. 12 Jospeh Viglione has claimed on a website that an affidavit exists stating that Sarno and Page-Lieberman conspired months in advance to harass [Viglione]. This statement is without merit. The document that Viglione is speaking of is not an admissible form of evidence as the statements by John Byers have not been affirmed or sworn. In addition, the affidavit Viglione speaks of is entirely hearsay.
Pg. 1-9, Sec. 13 Joseph Viglione has claimed on a website that I am an unqualified college student. This statement is without merit and has caused me to suffer serious alarm and emotional distress.
Pg. 1-9, Sec. 14 Joseph Viglione has claimed on a website that I am responsible for a premeditated attack on [Viglion] and that I am jealous of [Viglione]. This statement is without merit. Viglione also claims that I have figuratively pulled down [my] pants on TV and exposed [myself] on a squirrel. This statement is without merit and has caused me to suffer serious alarm and emotional distress. The claim is of a sexually harassing nature regardless to whether this statement is a matter of fact, opinion, or belief.
Pg. 1-11, Sec. 15 withdrawn from evidence by plaintiff.
Pg. 1-15, Sec. 16 Joseph Viglione has claimed on a website that these blogs protect the citizens from Dan Sarnos twisted legal actions which are designed to censor and harass residents of this city. Sarno doesnt facilitate programming. This statement is without merit and has caused me to suffer serious alarm and emotional distress. Viglione has devised this statement willfully and maliciously to besmirch my reputation in the City of Medford, my workplace, and has published this statement in order to intimidate and defame my name publicly. I have only filed a lawsuit against Viglione for the purpose of protecting myself from the harassment and potentially threatening actions of Viglione. In no case ever presented in court was the matter of censorship discussed or brought as a claim.
Pg. 1-15, Sec. 17 Joseph Viglione has claimed on a website that Dan Sarno puts his face on tv and broadcasts fake applauseand if that isnt an admission of how fraudulent his work as operations manager, perhaps his lies to Judge Murtagh in Superior Court are. This statement is without merit and has caused me to suffer serious alarm and emotional distress. Viglione has devised this statement willfully and maliciously to besmirch my reputation in the City of Medford, my workplace, and has published this statement in order to intimidate and defame my name publicly. His libelous statement accuses me of fraud without merit. He also accuses me of lying under oath in Superior Court. This statement is also without merit.

Pg. 1-16, Sec. 18 Joseph Viglione had claimed on a website that Our First Amendment rights have been shredded in Medford by an Operations Manager, Daniel A. Sarno Jr., who filed a frivolous complaint, was chastised by the Honorable Judge Murtagh, and continues his wrongful conduct This statement is without merit and has caused me to suffer serious alarm and emotional distress. Viglione has devised this statement willfully and maliciously to besmirch my reputation in the City of Medford, my workplace, and has published this statement in order to intimidate and defame my name publicly. There is no evidence to support that I had filed a frivolous complaint. There is no record of being chastised by Judge Murtagh. There is no evidence of wrongful conduct.
Pg. 1-17, Sec. 19 Joseph Viglione has claimed on a website that Medford, sign up at TV3 where you will have to kneel and genuflect before his highness, Frank Pilleri, the jackass of Medford, and his surrogate son, Danny Sarno. This statement is defamatory in nature and is devised to keep clients from doing business with me. Viglione has devised this statement willfully and maliciously to besmirch my reputation in the City of Medford, my workplace, and has published this statement in order to intimidate and defame my name publicly.
Pg. 1-18, Sec. 20 Joseph Viglione has claimed on a website that Dan Sarnowants to victimize you if you dare criticize his pathetic work ethic and vulgar tongue. This statement is without merit and has caused me to suffer serious alarm and emotional distress. Viglione has devised this statement willfully and maliciously to besmirch my reputation in the City of Medford, my workplace, and has published this statement in order to intimidate and defame my name publicly.
Pg. 1-20, Sec. 21 Joseph Viglione has claimed on a website that Dan Sarno should be fired, not because anyone is envious, as he falsely claims, but because of his poor judgment in programming pornography he created at an indecent hour, the harm he has done this community by his egotistical need to air that porno and his failure to facilitate programming. This statement is without merit and has caused me to suffer serious alarm and emotional distress. Viglione has devised this statement willfully and maliciously to besmirch my reputation in the City of Medford, my workplace, and has published this statement in order to intimidate and defame my name publicly. I have not created or distributed any form of pornography and it is not my decision when programming airs on TV3. There is no bylaw or corporate Policy & Procedure dictating the hours in which specific programming or genres of programming can or cannot air.
Pg. 1-21, Sec. 22 Joseph Viglione has claimed on a website that I am a selfish college student masquerading as a station manager. This statement is without merit and has caused me to suffer serious alarm and emotional distress. Viglione has devised this statement willfully and maliciously to besmirch my reputation in the City of Medford, my workplace, and has published this statement in order to intimidate and defame my name publicly.
Pg. 1-24, Sec. 23 Joseph Viglione has claimed on a website that Dan Sarno is the greatest threat to Free Speech in Medford. This statement is without merit and has caused me to suffer serious alarm and emotional distress. Viglione has devised this statement willfully and maliciously to besmirch my reputation in the City of Medford, my workplace, and has published this statement in order to intimidate and defame my name publicly.





Pg. 1-27, Sec. 24 Joseph Viglione has claimed on a website that [I] wont leave [Viglione] alone. Viglione is making this statement in attempt to claim that I am stalking Viglione. I attend City Council Meetings every Tuesday to discuss official matters with the City Council regarding public television. Truth of the matter is that I do not want anything to do with Viglione in any shape or form. I request that he stops his obsession with me. His statement has caused me to suffer serious alarm and emotional distress.
Pg. 1-29, Sec. 25 Joseph Viglione has claimed on a website that Matthew Page-Lieberman and Gary Zappelli harassed a veteran public access producer in concert with Dan Sarno. Dan was as active a participant as the other twoand the police did not let him go without writing his name down. This statement is without merit and has caused me to suffer serious alarm and emotional distress. There is no evidence to support that the so called harassment on Viglione was constructed, premeditated, or concerted by me. The Medford Police did not question or ask for Sarnos name at any time regarding Viglione.
Pg. 1-30, Sec. 26 Joseph Viglione has claimed on a website that Dan Sarno put an erect penis on a squirrel and broadcast it on TV3 instead of Medford and Winthrop Hockey. This statement is without merit and has caused me to suffer serious alarm and emotional distress. There is no evidence that suggests that I put a penis on a squirrel and broadcast this in lieu of a hockey game.
Pg. 1-30, Sec. 27 Joseph Viglione has claimed on a website that Dan Sarno told the City Council he was upset about the word penis envy on this blog. Obviously, thats proof positive that he has it, or it wouldnt have upset him? This statement has caused me to suffer serious alarm and emotional distress. His statement is of extreme sexually harassing nature and is unrelated to any political feud against him and TV3. He claims he is protected under the First Amendment to criticize a public station, however, under the First Amendment he is not protected to lie or make sexually derogatory claims against a person directly or indirectly.
Pg. 1-31, Sec. 28 Joseph Viglione has claimed on a website that I am a pathological liar and unqualified to run access TV in our city. Thats my professional opinion protected under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Viglione claims to be offering his professional opinion in that I am a pathological liar and unqualified to run access TV. Viglione is not a qualified professional to make this claim, therefore this claim has no merit and is considered libel. Viglione applied for Operations Manager job at TV3 and was rejected because he was deemed unqualified. He then filed with authorities for employment discrimination against TV3. Viglione himself was denied the job because he was not qualified for the position. The First Amendment does not protect someone from making false claims especially when claiming the statement is being offered by someone assuming the role of a professional who is deemed qualified to make such opinions a matter of truth. Viglione has devised this statement willfully and maliciously to besmirch my reputation in the City of Medford, my workplace, and has published this statement in order to intimidate and defame my name publicly.
Pg. 1-32, Sec. 29 Joseph Viglione had claimed on a website that Dan Sarno said horrible things about me at the City Council on January 18th and January 25th. To the best of my knowledge of fact and belief, the statements I made at these meetings were truthful.
Pg. 1-32, Sec. 30 Pg. 1-11, Sec. 15 withdrawn from evidence by plaintiff.



Pg. 1-33, Sec. 31 Joseph Viglione has claimed on a website that Dan Sarno and his cronies have written the most hideous blogs chock full of lies designed to inflict emotional distress. Not the funny humor that these blogs display to prove they are a bunch of jackasses. This statement is without merit and has caused me to suffer serious alarm and emotional distress. There is no evidence to support that I have ever written a blog of any nature mentioning Viglione. Viglione believes that the statements made in his blogs are full of funny humor I being the victim of this blog do not find his statements funny. His blog contains libelous statements written with malicious intent. His belief that what he states is funny, while at the same time besmirches my reputation and emotional wellbeing, supports Viglione as a Cyber Bully.
Pg. 1-35, Sec. 32 Joseph Viglione has claimed on a website that while trying to go to [Vigliones] car, Daniel Sarno was waiting for meand that is what I frightening. This statement is without merit and has caused me to suffer serious alarm and emotional distress. Viglione has devised this statement willfully and maliciously to besmirch my reputation in the City of Medford, my workplace, and has published this statement in order to intimidate and defame my name publicly. There is no evidence to support that I had waited for Viglione at his car.
Pg. 1-61, Sec. 33 Joseph Viglione has claimed on a website that [Sarno] took a gay male (Viglione) into court for a restraining order there is only one conclusion: THAT DAN SARNO IS JEALOUS! And possibly obsessed with a free spirit This statement is without merit and has caused me to suffer serious alarm and emotional distress. Viglione claims that I am obsessed with him. I filed a restraining order against Viglione to keep Viglione from contacting me. Viglione says I am jealous of him because I took him to court because I was afraid for my wellbeing. It is my opinion that Viglione is seriously confused about the timeline of events in our relationship. Viglione has devised this statement willfully and maliciously to besmirch my reputation in the City of Medford, my workplace, and has published this statement in order to intimidate and defame my name publicly. He is also trying to infer that I am intolerant to homosexuals which is not true.
Pg. 1-63, Sec. 34 evidence withdrawn by the Plaintiff.
Pg. 1-64, Sec. 35 evidence withdrawn by the Plaintiff.
Pg. 1-69, Sec. 36 Joseph Viglione makes certain claims speaking on behalf of what Dan Sarno thinks. No statement in what Viglione claims that I think is true.
Pg. 1-70, Sec. 37 Joseph Viglione has claimed on a website that You, Daniel A. Sarno Jr., are an embarrassment to Medford and to Emerson College. This statement has caused me to suffer serious alarm and emotional distress. Viglione has devised this statement willfully and maliciously to besmirch my reputation in the City of Medford, my workplace, and has published this statement in order to intimidate and defame my name publicly.
Pg. 1-73, Sec. 38 Joseph Viglione has claimed on a website that not only is [Sarno] envious of [Vigliones] work ethic. Its obvious penis envy as well. Of course, when Zapp Borat, the toothless fairy lives in your apartment complex and allegedly hits on you regularlyits no wonder you have fallen in love with the same gay guy Frankie and David are fixated on. This statement is without merit and has caused me to suffer serious alarm and emotional distress. Viglione has devised this statement willfully and maliciously to besmirch my reputation in the City of Medford, my workplace, and has published this statement in order to intimidate and defame my name publicly. This statement is purely sexually harassing in nature.

Pg. 1-74, Sec. 39 Joseph Viglione has claimed on a website that Sarno will get what he deserves some day hard in the *ss that creepy little ugly bug. Sarno thinks special needs people want to get arrested when Gary Zappelli sexually harasses them at Stop & Shop with his G-Spot fantasiesDan Sarno thinks people want to put up with the shit Doria Alberg spews from her vulgar mouth. This statement is without merit and has caused me to suffer serious alarm and emotional distress. His statements are of extreme sexually harassing nature. Viglione has devised this statement willfully and maliciously to besmirch my reputation in the City of Medford, my workplace, and has published this statement in order to intimidate and defame my name publicly.
Pg. 2-1, Sec. 40 Joseph Viglione has claimed in a letter to my college, Emerson College, accessible via his website that one of [Emersons] students is censoring every Medford resident from watching a producers hockey tape. This statement is without merit and has caused me to suffer serious alarm and emotional distress. Viglione has devised this statement willfully and maliciously to besmirch my reputation in the City of Medford, my workplace, and has published this statement in order to intimidate and defame my name publicly.
Pg. 2-2, Sec. 41 Joseph Viglione has claimed in a letter to my college, Emerson College, accessible via his website that Sarno wanted to chill [Vigliones] right to Free Speech by maliciously abusing Superior Court The purpose of my claim against Viglione in Superior Court was to obtain a TRO for harassment, not to censor his programming. There is no evidence to support that I abused the court system or intended to chill Vigliones free speech. This statement is without merit and has caused me to suffer serious alarm and emotional distress. Viglione has devised this statement willfully and maliciously to besmirch my reputation in the City of Medford, my workplace, and has published this statement in order to intimidate and defame my name publicly.Posted by Dasonras at 8:06 PM 0 comments Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookLabels: Childish, Court, Harassment, Joe Viglione, Summary of Evidence, VulgarHomeSubscribe to: Posts (Atom)FOLLOWERSABOUT MEDasonrasHarassed by Joseph Viglione on a daily basis, therefore, I have written these blogs to tell the real truth about Viglione.View my complete profileBLOG ARCHIVE?  2011 (3)?  April (1)ATTORNEY GENERAL COUNTING "THE COUNTS' LAWSUITS?  February (2)Simple template. Powered by Blogger.
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#9 General Comment

Joe Viglione

AUTHOR: Jeff - (U.S.A.)

Joe Viglione is an honest, hardworking individual who does a great job at what he knows best, the music industry. He has been a rock and music journalist for quite awhile now, and its a shame that certain people in Medford are slandering him for no reason other than he's trying to keep freedom of speech in public access television alive in the city of Medford which has been corrupted by city politicians and a tv studio that might as well be run by the local mafia. Its a shame when city residents can't speak freely about what they want to see on the air in the city of Medford and when they try to speak up the TV 3 management tries to scare them into submission. The TV 3 people in Medford have tried to tear Joe V down constantly, even threatened his life. They write derogatory comments about him and that is not who Joe V is. He's a kind, courteous individual who does nothing but help bands and people he interacts with get ahead in the business. He has many personal friends in the music industry, some well known, others not as well known, but he always is professional with whomever he meets. I hope this will lay to rest claims that Joe V is a scammer. He is nothing of the sort. He is a good friend and these posts are a great injustice to the chracter and personality of the Count aka Joe Viglione! 
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#10 REBUTTAL Individual responds

Former Business Partner filing defamatory lies

AUTHOR: publicity machine - (United States of America)

On October 28, 2010 I had to fire a former business partner because he was taking advantage of clients.  I have worked with many classic rock artists over the past three decades for long periods of time.  The individual in question, an engineer in Wilmington, Massachusetts, takes money from clients and refuses to do the work unless you allow him to be "co-producer."  He has a terrible work ethic and was an anchor for me and the artists I care about.

I stand by my work in the music industry.  It is sad that jealous people with nothing better to do will try to harm a man's reputation because they want his projects.

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.



Ripoff Report Legal Directory