John Bouzane Attorney at Law #079804 FAKE SUMMONS, DOCUMENTATIONS... UNLAWFUL EVICTIONS... Internet

Yes consumers beware.  I too was the victim of the false process serving by John Bouzane's company (see report #548208).  In my case they were bold enough to use a false address in their proof of service that did not exist when they submitted their proof of service. 

At the vacating of judgment (case # SMCDS902123) hearing Art Sanchez brought another proof in an effort to thwart the vacating request.  As that proof also referred to the fake address the court questioned how could the server, Rick Medina, speak to someone at a address that did not exist and then attempt to file a correction to his original proof of service over six months later.  The vacating of Art's judgment against me was granted.

I have also filed a complaint with the California State Bar and the San Bernardino Deputy Recorder office (as they are suppose to oversee the process servers who are registered in their jurisdiction).  The State Bar responded that their investigation found that the use of the "wrong address" was unintentional.  They, the State Bar, did not respond back to me when I wrote them asking how could one unintentionally submit a fake address and a follow-up proof of service that further stated that they went to that address (which does not exist) and obtain the correct address.  I also questioned how the State Bar could "ignore" the history of fraudulent process serving complaints that had been filed against John Bouzane.  The State Bar's actions really affirmed my confidence in the "system" protecting the consumer, not.  I am still waiting to hear back from the San Bernardino Deputy Recorder's office.

Fortunately for me the court did not fall for the "unintentional" excuse and the judgment that Art Sanchez obtained with the help of John Bouzane was vacated.  I subsequently got a judgment (case # SMCDS904460) against Art Sanchez (a Real Estate Broker and co-conspirator in the fraudulent process serving as he also used that fake address in his court filing to get the original judgment).  Art told me, at the follow-up hearing in which the vacating of his judgment was reaffirmed, good luck in getting my money.  Wow what nerve as he had already used the fraudulently obtained prior judgment to get the money released to him from escrow.  I plan on filing a complaint with the Department of Real Estate and all others that should be concerned with the matter.

Fight back legally, regardless of the frustration you will encounter.  Do not take the law into your own hands.  One day justice will prevail.

Yes consumers beware.  I too was the victim of the false process serving by John Bouzane's company (see report #548208).  In my case they were bold enough to use a false address in their proof of service that did not exist when they submitted their proof of service. 

At the vacating of judgment (case # SMCDS902123) hearing Art Sanchez brought another proof in an effort to thwart the vacating request.  As that proof also referred to the fake address the court questioned how could the server, Rick Medina, speak to someone at a address that did not exist and then attempt to file a correction to his original proof of service over six months later.  The vacating of Art's judgment against me was granted.

I have also filed a complaint with the California State Bar and the San Bernardino Deputy Recorder office (as they are suppose to oversee the process servers who are registered in their jurisdiction).  The State Bar responded that their investigation found that the use of the "wrong address" was unintentional.  They, the State Bar, did not respond back to me when I wrote them asking how could one unintentionally submit a fake address and a follow-up proof of service that further stated that they went to that address (which does not exist) and obtain the correct address.  I also questioned how the State Bar could "ignore" the history of fraudulent process serving complaints that had been filed against John Bouzane.  The State Bar's actions really affirmed my confidence in the "system" protecting the consumer, not.

Fortunately for me the court did not fall for the "unintentional" excuse and the judgment that Art Sanchez obtained with the help of John Bouzane was vacated.  I subsequently got a judgment (case # SMCDS904460) against Art Sanchez (a Real Estate Broker and co-conspirator in the fraudulent process serving as he also used that fake address in his court filing to get the original judgment).  Art told me, at the follow-up hearing in which the vacating of his judgment was reaffirmed, good luck in getting my money.  Wow what nerve as he had already used the fraudulently obtained prior judgment to get the money released to him from escrow.  I plan on filing a complaint with the Department of Real Estate and all others that should be concerned with the matter.

Fight back legally, regardless of the frustration you will encounter.  Do not take the law into your own hands.  One day justice will prevail.

Yes consumers beware.  I too was the victim of the false process serving by John Bouzane's company (see report #548208).  In my case they were bold enough to use a false address in their proof of service that did not exist when they submitted their proof of service. 

At the vacating of judgment (case # SMCDS902123) hearing Art Sanchez brought another proof in an effort to thwart the vacating request.  As that proof also referred to the fake address the court questioned how could the server, Rick Medina, speak to someone at a address that did not exist and then attempt to file a correction to his original proof of service over six months later.  The vacating of Art's judgment against me was granted.

I have also filed a complaint with the California State Bar and the San Bernardino Deputy Recorder office (as they are suppose to oversee the process servers who are registered in their jurisdiction).  The State Bar responded that their investigation found that the use of the "wrong address" was unintentional.  They, the State Bar, did not respond back to me when I wrote them asking how could one unintentionally submit a fake address and a follow-up proof of service that further stated that they went to that address (which does not exist) and obtain the correct address.  I also questioned how the State Bar could "ignore" the history of fraudulent process serving complaints that had been filed against John Bouzane.  The State Bar's actions really affirmed my confidence in the "system" protecting the consumer, not.

Fortunately for me the court did not fall for the "unintentional" excuse and the judgment that Art Sanchez obtained with the help of John Bouzane was vacated.  I subsequently got a judgment (case # SMCDS904460) against Art Sanchez (a Real Estate Broker and co-conspirator in the frauduelent process serving as he also used that fake address in his court filing to get the original judgment).  Art told me, at the follow-up hearing in which the vacating of his judgment was reaffirmed, good luck in getting my money.  Wow what nerve as he had already used the fraudulently obtained prior judgment to get the money released to him from escrow.  I plan on filing a complaint with the Department of Real Estate and all others that should be concerned with the matter.

Fight back legally, regardless of the frustration you will encounter.  Do not take the law into your own hands.  One day justice will prevail.