Minc, Mondo, Haroon, Kamran Mahamood Fraud, Scam Internet

Hi,

My message was to establish if the individual who posted this had and would consider a case against this company.  I specifically chose to write to this particular message rather than the others regarding this company, as I felt this person was more likely to be genuine client.

I feel I have a responsibility to point out some legal issues to you, before you further discriminate yourself and ruin the chances of other, potentially real victims, to hold any case:

The US First Amendment makes it very clear that anonymous criticism and civil dissent are privileged (protected) forms of free speech. Notwithstanding, it is not absolute. If an anonymous blog author publishes statements that are malicious or otherwise directly with intent causing harm to individuals can be subject to a subpoena, the veil of anonymity can be traced, lifted and the perpetrator exposed.

This basically means that the people towards which you have chosen to launch this campaign and whom you have threatened, now have the legal right to subpoena this and any other websites, email providers or third-parties to disclose your personal information.  This is not limited to the information held in your account details but can also be IP, ISP and other traceable forms of tracking systems available on the net to find the information required.  

Further more, the courts are obliged to take the matter seriously, as to make threats to kill or harm an individual is a criminal offence since the enactment of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861, where it was an offence under section 16 to make threats to kill. This updated since is now replaced by Schedule 12 of the Criminal Law Act 1977: 

"(1) A person who without lawful excuse makes to another a threat, intending that the other would fear it would be carried out, to kill that other or a third person shall be guilty of an offence and liable on conviction on indictment to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years."

What this means is that it is not so much whether you intend to carry out the threats, but whether your intention is to put fear that the threats will be carried out.  This is what the courts and the legal system now looks at. if the matter is brought forward and you are found guilty at the Crown Court, there could be a very heavy sentence. 

On further examination of your posts, it is possible to see that you have disclosed one of the individuals personal home address; Article 17 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights of the United Nations of 1966 also protects privacy of the individuals who's information you have distributed on a public forum as: "No one shall be subjected to arbitrary or unlawful interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to unlawful attacks on his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks."

To explain this, by unlawfully (without consent) disclosing a persons family home address and details regarding their family members, you have breached Article 17, allowing these individuals to open another case against you.

You have also breached the Data Protection Act 1998.  "The DPA covers the use of personal data.  Information which does not relate to an individual, for example company information, is not personal data. But where a business is operated as a sole proprietorship, information about the affairs of the business will be personal data."  Your post on disclosing specific financial information on the business and its dealings holds you in breach of the data protection act as well as Freedom of Information act Article 4 which holds company financial information as: "confidential business information which is exempt from public information sharing without the consent of the information owner".  You could also be subjected to prosecution on the basis of Unlawful distribution of non-classified confidential business information since, "Employees automatically have a duty to not knowingly misuse or wrongfully disclose their employer's confidential information". 

In addition the category of communication which you have taken in your posts are covered by the Malicious Communications Act 1988 as expanded by the Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001 which covers "the sending, delivery or transmission of electronic communications or articles of any description" which are for the purpose of harassing an individual protected by the Harassment Act 1997.   The criminal Justice and Police Act 2001 now makes it clear that an individual from collective harassment by two or more people is covered by the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 (SOCPA) which could be argued against all of the individuals who have collectively participated in communication which could be described as harassment towards these people.   

Furthermore, reading your other posts shows that you claim to be an ex employee, then a client who lost money? which is it? You freely give out a number of individuals email and phone details including that of a Kahlid Mushtaq, for whom you claim to not have a contact number.  Later in a separate post you claim that the company you are now working with is called Kilmers, a Google search reveals a Khalid Mushtaq as a Management Level employee at Kilmers.  This shows your not a trustworthy source of information.  If your claims against these individuals were ever pursued and found to be false you could be in further breaches of defamation laws, potentially facing further fines, compensation and sentencing.  

Your posts are causing real harm to the cases of any individuals who may have a real legal case.  I am 100% behind people who have suffered fraud or theft to expose companies and to take legal action, however as a patron of the law I can not condone or have sympathy for individuals who make serious threats against peoples lives regardless of the crime they may or may not have committed.  We have a legal system for a purpose; it is to pursue companies such as the one you mention as well as to pursue individuals like yourself.    

The discrepancies in your posts, in addition to breaching several laws and potentially several more along side no longer having the right to your keep your identity under the internet identity protection laws, gives a strong legal case against you.

You have with intent put these individuals in harms way.  I can not see how case against you could be lost if it was ever opened.

Under these circumstances, I would not work on this case and seriously question the validity of your claims.

These individuals may not have been aware of their legal position.  Now that they are I do hope they allow someone in the profession to have a field day with this one.

 We have read all the reports against Kamran mahmood and tend to agree and feel sorry for all the people who have wrote in.

He needs to be shot dead as he has caused a lot of misery to so many peoples lives.

I have also suffered from Kamran Mahmood, he used to let and mange my flat in leman street E1.



He still owes me and my wife 12,943.00+ Interest for rent he has not paid despite promissing us that he will pay out of his own pocket. He was using my rent for his own pocket.



I am very lucky now I have a proper company looking after my flat called kilmers.

I would state to all landlords who have suffered from him , to collectively get a Lawyer and go after the dirt bag.

please look at all the reports as you can see nearly everyone is accusing the master mind Kamran Mahmood of running away with their money.

I and a few of my friends are waiting for a moment to get him when he leaves his house.

Why should I suffer for something I have not done wrong,

and he is enjoying an income and working for this company called Henly Homes, it has been known he will try and leave the country and go to his scum brother Haroon Mahmood.

Give back everyones money you have taken under faulse pretences.

 

Hi,

I'm a little shocked at the fact that you seemed to have missed the obvious solution of taking legal action! I would suggest this is a far more decent method of dealing with situations such as this.  Especially when it seem everyone knows at least one of the two CEO's address on another post on this site, from someone who is clearly not decent, but never the less, the information is there, all you need to do is give the details to a lawyer.

It would not only give you a better solution, but also help you legally claim what's yours.  Unfortunately lots of companies have gone bust in recent years in this industry, I doubt it is due to an actual 'rip off' but more due to circumstance.

If you property is in Dubai, legally you have even better chances, as people go to jail even for bounced cheques out there.

Not sure about the gathering proof section, I'm guessing if you are claiming they ripped you off, you should already have proof of this anyway.