Complaint Review: Andrew Spinnell - deception - New York New York
Ripoff Report on CBS 19
Ripoff Report on CBS 19 - Global Marketing Alliance
Ripoff Report on ABC 15 - Smart Shopper
Ripoff Report - Girls Gone Wild
Ripoff Report on Fox 11 - Car Repair
- Author Not Confirmed
- Andrew Spinnell - deception 295 Madison Avenue New York, New York USA
- Phone:
- Web: www.andrewjspinnell.com
- Category: Attorneys & Legal Services
Andrew Spinnell - deception Andrew Spinnell - deception - attorney Andrew J. Spinnell - deception continues on his website New York New York
*REBUTTAL Owner of company: Anonymous Fraud
*REBUTTAL Individual responds: Another Fabrication By Philip Seldon
*Author of original report: Andrew J. Spinnell - Internet Fraud Report
Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
Ripoff Report
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..
It has been three weeks since Andrew J. Spinnell was exposed on the Internet as deceiving the Internet community with a twenty-five year old or so photograph of himself in his forties which hardly resembles him when he is 67 years old and is quite unattractive and he has not replaced this deceptive photograph. He persists in this deception - if this is not deception then what is? It's been three weeks since the posting titled "Andrew J. Spinnell - Internet Fraud" and the photo remains.
Andrew wrote that he does not engage in deceit and deception and that he is not a dishonest lawyer. Andrew cites his distinguished rating in Martindale Hubbell as demonstrating that he is an honest attorney. This rating is a peer review from other attorneys. Would these attorneys give him this rating if they know that he was disciplined for unethical conduct and was sued three times for legal malpractice and was not insured for at least two of the cases and the he was recently asked in writing if he had legal malpractice insurance and failed to answer?
How many lawyers have been sued for legal malpractice three times?
And would they have voted for him if they knew that Andrew J. Spinnell was reprimanded by the State of Connecticut for unethical conduct?
And would they have voted for him if they knew that he was sanctioned in the amount of $5,000 by Judge Martin for frivolous motion practice in Federal Court?
And would they have voted for him if they knew that he was sanctioned in New York State Supreme Court?
And would they have voted for him if they knew that he was found by the Appellate Court to have not paid his employee's unemployment insurance taxes?
The point is that Andrew J. Spinnell persists in his deception in displaying a photograph of himself on his website www.andrewjspinnell.com that does not resemble what he looks like now. It is a photograph of him from years ago when he was good looking and not like he looks like today at 67 yeas old when he is ugly and in dire need of a cosmetic surgeon.
Andrew J. Spinnell is a very bad man.
I wouldn't use him as my attorney, particularly since he was sued for legal malpractice three times. Nor should you.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 05/19/2013 09:40 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/andrew-spinnell-deception/new-york-new-york/andrew-spinnell-deception-andrew-spinnell-deception-attorney-andrew-j-spinnell-1052210. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:
#3 REBUTTAL Owner of company
Anonymous Fraud
AUTHOR: Honestlawyer - ()
SUBMITTED: Saturday, November 09, 2013
No one but Philip Seldon would write a review of a lawyer based on a photo which in my case was taken by my web site company a few years ago. A Reviewer who hides his identity behind the name anonymous is a true fraud, especially when the false allegations that he makes come from his own frivolous suits against me--all of which were dismissed (all 4 of them!). Mr. Seldon is a bad loser in every sense of the word. He cannot let go and move on.He craves litigation so another case against him will have to be commenced. Apparently he has nothing better to do with his money than to have another judgment of $500,000 entered against him.
#2 REBUTTAL Individual responds
Another Fabrication By Philip Seldon
AUTHOR: Honestlawyer - ()
SUBMITTED: Thursday, August 15, 2013
This Report and the others were authored by Philip Seldon, a former disgruntled client whom i sued for defamation and won a judgment against him for $500,000. These reports are his way of trying to obtain revenge because his appeals in court totally failed. These reports are fabrications by him who is a depressed and obsessed individual.
His "anonymous" signature is an example of his cowardice.
Andrew Spinnell, Esq.
#1 Author of original report
Andrew J. Spinnell - Internet Fraud Report
AUTHOR: Anonymous - ()
SUBMITTED: Sunday, May 19, 2013
The report cited in the report above is a RipOffReport.com posting about Andrew J. Spinnell titled Andrew J. Spinnell - Internet Fraud which described his posting on his website, www.andrewjspinnell.com of a twenty-five year old or so photo of himself that does not resemble what he looks like today. That was depicted as deception. View the complete report by searching this website for Andrew Spinnell and looking for the report titled Andrew Spinnell - Internet Fraud.
Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.
