Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #801242

Complaint Review: Dogs Deserve Better, Inc - Smithfield Virginia

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: RescueGoneBad — Pembroke Virginia United States of America
  • Author Not Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • Dogs Deserve Better, Inc 1915 Moonlight Dr. Smithfield, Virginia United States of America

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

To view complete article with evidence visit: http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=312784935415821

In 2009 I became a volunteer for Dogs Deserve Better and a year later was hired as their freelance National Rescue Coordinator. In mid-September, 2011 I resigned my position after learning of issues that were unethical and illegal.

Also in September, founder Tamira Ci Thayne (founder) and Deana Whitfield (facility manager) visited my home to assess their foster dogs. They took the three most adoptable back to the Good Newz Rehab Center with a promise to come back for the rest. I have not heard from them since.

In addition, in September, representative coordinator, Melody Whitworth, made a promise in an email that all vet bills will be paid and that DDB would relocate all foster dogs belonging to them.

In a certified letter written to DDB in early November, I demanded that all dogs be relocated by December 1st and that all vet bills be paid. I asked for a response of their intentions no later than November 15th. Myself and the dogs were again ignored. They have left me with no choice but to sue.

(see letter here http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=312784935415821)

Today is November 21st and I have not received a response

(Although today I did hear from Rep Coordinator Melody Whitworth stating that they were being bother by emails regarding my foster dogs and remove my old DDB email address from any dog listings)

In mid September I asked that all DDB foster dogs in my home be relocated. Because DDB has refused to assist with expenses for these dogs, I can no longer afford to keep them. In addition, I am now seeking a part time job in order to pay the thousands of dollars of vet bills that they left me with. A part time job will disable me from having the time to properly care for the foster dogs, and my resident dogs. One of my resident dogs in need of shoulder surgery which I now cannot afford since DDB has drained my bank account then "split".

Some of founder, Tamira Ci Thayne's response to my resignation and my response to her: (source http://lifeinthemansion.wordpress.com/2011/09/16/day-18-fighting-back/)

Thayne - "Ms. Allen, I would like to see the proof of your allegations against Dogs Deserve Better? I know you dont have any, but humor me, and show me where funds have been misused?"

Allen Response - It is not an allegation but fact that non-profits have to be registered in every state that they solicit and collect donations, otherwise those donations are not tax deductible. Unless someone can prove to me otherwise, as I have not been able to find it, DDB was not and still is not registered in the states they operate in.

From DDB, At this point, there will be no fundraising in any state unless your state is registered, even then all funding need to go into our chipin account only. DO NOT fundraise (of any kind) within your state without knowing if you are registered. If you wish to fundraise, do so through a chip in or firstgiving that will ONLY go directly through DDB national. This is for legal reasons. This was sent out in August 2011 after another foster bought to DDBs attention that they had to be registered in all states that they work in.

It is also a fact, not an allegation, that DDB admitted to missing funds in an email sent to reps: We will not tolerate theft of DDB funds any longer.

Thayne admitting to not being registered as a 501c3 and admitting that the $600,000 purchase of the Vick property was for publicity. http://www.wtkr.com/news/wtkr-founder-of-dogs-deserve-better-speaks-out-about-misuse-of-money-allegations--20110919,0,2004776.story

I was told by this dogs foster mom that SHE paid for his neuter and was never reimbursed by DDB yet WA DDB rep is seeking reimbursement for a bill that was paid by this dog's foster. (from DDB foster dog database) (see database entry here http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=312784935415821)

Thayne: Ms. Allen is upset that DDB is buying a carport for our dog yard for shade and cover for dogs. Yet the people who chipped in for this shade for our dogs have free will, and donated willingly to a project they were fully behind. How could that be considered a misuse of funds when the money is going for exactly what it was donated for? It cant be.

Is Ms. Allen saying our dogs dont DESERVE to have a shady area, or an area that would shield them from a sudden rain storm? Apparently those who donated $1000 for it feel differently.

Allen Response: Am I jealous of her carports? No, not really. Do I not think that the dogs at the center deserve shade? That is a silly accusation. Of course they deserve shade. So do all of the other DDB dogs in foster care. Do they get carports too Tami? My issue is less with the carports and more with the fact that I had just been chewed out for my absorbent vet bills when the fundraising began for the carports. And of course, everyone can choose to donate to whatever they would like. I had too been chewed out for vet bills even though my Chip Ins had reached their goals. Tami told me that this didnt matter, that people only have so much money and those who donated to my large bills were likely to not be able to afford to donate to other reps bills. That is an excellent point. People who donated to the carports and the center may no longer have the funds to donate to dogs who need medical care. So I guess it is up to the donor to decide: Do I help this dog who has a damaged spleen or do I donate for carport at the $600,000 center? But it is also up to Tami to decide what takes priority, carports or vet bills. As you can see the many Chip Ins that have not met their goals and right there in center of it all is the Chip In for Tamis carports. (see Chip Ins here http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=312784935415821)

Thayne: I do have a concern about theft of funds, though, as Ms. Allen now admits that she has been talking to Ms. Fiala for at least two weeks. Yet she still turned in an invoice to my organization for supposed work done during this period, a period when we saw very little of Ms. Allens efforts online for our dogs. In fact, in checking, during that two week period, I see only TWO Facebook notes created looking for help for dogs.

I would estimate that work for chained dogs to have taken a total of 2 hours, to be generous.

Did Ms. Allen bill us and cash our check knowing full well that she did not work 30 hours on Dogs Deserve Betters behalf in that two week period? If so, I would call that theft of organizational funds. As Ms. Allen was MIA most of that entire two weeks, DDB should not have been billed for work that was not accomplished on our behalf.

Allen Response: "Did I send in an invoice and cash my last paycheck? Yes. Did I only work 2 hours? No. A couple of months ago I sent an email to Deana Whitfield (foster coordinator) and Melody Whitworth (representative coordinator) articulating my frustration with Facebook as every time I posted for a dog in need I was met with the same question over and over, a question that I did not know how to answer, Why cant you take this dog at the center? Melody stated that we rescued before Facebook and we can rescue without Facebook. So my last 30 hour paycheck for 80 hours of work was well earned as I had been networking via phone and email for dogs in need. With only 25 reps and one rescue coordinator to fill in the spaces for the dogs that DDB was asked to help where there are no reps is an impossible task. Being the rescue coordinator I was the one who had to take a beating by telling people that although we just purchased a $600,000 house that we could no longer afford to rescue.

Thayne: Ms. Allen is correct about one thing; that I often told her she was fostering too many dogs. DDB doesnt want our reps to be hoarders. No one can handle that many big dogs on their own IN THE HOUSE and not have a ton of dog fights and a mental breakdown. Sixteen dogs? Just not feasible.

Heres my statement in regard to Ms. Allen:

Ms. Allen was with DDB as a volunteer area rep, and as a subcontractor for the position of Rescue Coordinator. In these efforts, and during her tenure, she did some great things for chained dogs, she got them into rescue, she got them off chains and into new, loving homes and families as she was paid to do.

On the flip side, she also regularly took in WAY too many dogs for one person to handle. Although I totally sympathized and empathized with her desire to save the world, and had been there many times myself, (which is why I wrote Scream Like Banshee: 29 Days of Tips and Tales to Keep your Sanity as a Doggie Foster Parent) our organization has attempted to make sure no foster home was overloaded with dogs for both emotional and safety reasons.

Allen Response: I would like to present an email from Tami approving vetting and thanking me for recently taking in 2 more foster dogs. This was mid August. I still have the same amount of foster dogs now, when I was called a hoarder, as then, when I was thanked. (I removed some of the content as to not reveal the original owner of these dogs). (see email here http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=312784935415821)

I do apologize that I did not blatantly and directly ask for help in placing these dogs. I apparently made the incorrect assumption that Deana, being DDBs foster coordinator, that this need was a given. The few foster homes that I do have have never asked me to try and get these dogs placed in forever homes as they know I am working to do that. It goes without saying. Tami mentions stressed out emails from me regarding the need to find placement for these dogs. Apparently those emails were not taken as a direct enough plea for assistance either. In addition I too have several emails asking Deana if there were ANY foster homes available that can take some of my dogs. Again, I apologize if that was not a direct enough request.. So I am blatantly and directly asking for help in placing these dogs and covering their bills that DDB promises to cover. (see post here http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=312784935415821)

Thayne: All reps were and are required to get pre-approval and an estimate of costs before vetting a dog. They also were advised and expected to start chip-ins for vet bills, and it was part of Shannons freelance duties to start these chip-ins not only for her dogs, but for other reps dogs as well.

Shannon rarely asked for pre-approval for vetting a dog.

She also regularly boarded dogs at the vet against organizational policy, and often used a very high priced vet to the tune of thousands of dollars in vet bills, sometimes for only ONE dog, even after we expressly insisted she find a vet more in line with our ability to pay.

Most recently we received in the mail a bill from this vet to the tune of $5000, and it again bore the Dogs Deserve Better name, even though we had insisted they remove us from her account as she continued to flout organizational policy. We knew NOTHING about these bills, and they had never been discussed with us by Shannon Allen.

When a rep could get the same services at 1/3 the cost, why would one continue to spend money that could be used for other dogs who are just as needy and deserving of rescue and veterinary care? I would allege that to be misuse of DDB funds by Ms. Allen.

We just paid said vet $1000, even though the two most recent Chip Ins Ms. Allen created to attempt to cover this $5000 vet bill brought in only $622.00.

Allen Response: Vet bills, Pre-approval, and Boarding: Reps were told that if a dog was not entered into the database, then DDB would not pay for vet care for those dogs. All of my dogs were entered into the database. If Tami did not approve the dogs for which she is complaining about the vets bills for then why did she allow me to collect donations for those dog via Chip In with those funds going directly to DDB? And if she did not approve these dogs then why have they not been deleted from the DDB page, represented as DDB dogs? (see screenshot here http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=312784935415821)

If she did not approve these dogs then why has a payment been made on their bill? This bill is for Ismay and Indy (a parvo puppy that I picked up on 4th of July weekend from a pen where she lay dying, Indy passed away the next morning (see sreenshot here here http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=312784935415821)

You will also see that on July 6th this bill was in DDB's name. (see bill here here here http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=312784935415821)

But on September 1st, the bill is in my and my husbands name. The office manager at Town and Country had previously talked to Tami to get permission to put DDB dogs being vetted there in DDB's name. You will also see that DDB made a payment on Ismay's bill but then on September 1st Tami decided that Ismay was no longer a DDB dog and had the vet move the bill to my and my husbands name. Tami's story has changed as to why she had her bill put in my name. Version one, which she told to Town and Country, is that Ismay was my personal dog. Version two, is that I did not have permission to vet Ismay there. If either of these were true then why would Tami have made a partial payment on the bill? Why would she accept donations for Ismay if Ismay was my personal dog? (see bill here here here http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=312784935415821)

DDB promising to pay Ismay's bill at Town and Country which is still unpaid and still in my name

(see email here here here http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=312784935415821)

You will see below, that as of November 18th Ismay and her DDB Chip In are still listed on DDB's page. (see screenshot here here here http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=312784935415821)

Other dogs vetted at Town and Country and paid for by DDB were: Able, Katie, Perci, Belle, Indy, Vespa, and Poppy.

Ninety percent of the dogs I have rescued have gone to low cost clinics. There have been several cases of dogs that needed emergency or critical care. Yes these bills are high, not just for the dogs I have rescued but other dogs in the DDB program. Yet Tami only points out my bills. Below are Chip Ins for DDB dogs in the care of other reps. So are these reps too mis-using funds as Tami alleged that I did, or just me? (see donations here here here http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=312784935415821)

In 2 years and 50+ dogs saved I have only place 2 dogs in boarding: Able and Katie. These dogs were returned by their foster homes and I had no where for them to go despite begging Foster Coordinator Deana Whitfield to help me find places for these dogs. These two dogs were in boarding less than 3 weeks. I do not like boarding dogs so I picked them up and bought them both back to my house. I was set up to fail by DDB. What would you do in this situation? 2 returned fosters, cannot board, too many dogs at my house, and no one from DDB assisting with alternate placement. How could I have won? You will notice above a $2,000 Chip-In started for the Allegany, MD dogs. These 3 dogs were placed in boarding by Marie Belanger (former rep coordinator) and approved by Tami. Tami is right when she says that dogs do not need to be in boarding. I agree 100%. Tami states that boarding is not a place for dogs to learn to how live their life off of the chain. I agree 100%. Tami does not mention in her blog the other DDB dogs that have been in boarding for over a year. Why doesnt she mention them, because she is not footing the bill? A reasonable person can then conclude that according to Tami that long term boarding is fine as long as she doesnt have to pay for it otherwise it is cruel to the dogs.

One of those reps is Robin Budin who is well known for placing dogs in boarding for months upon months with Tami's blessing as Robin pays the boarding fees out of pocket, yet she has this to say about me, "And by the way, Shannon Allen had 9 fosters when I met her and now she has 16. This is a girl who doesnt know the word NO and if there is one thing I have learned since moving up here to MA 3 years ago, NO is an important word." and "It is stupid for people to keep dog aggressive dogs in their homes, in one room and close the door and open anotherits crazymaking." (source http://lifeinthemansion.wordpress.com/2011/09/16/day-18-fighting-back/) This coming from someone who at most fosters 2 dogs (only if perfectly behaved) at a time and sticks 'difficult' dogs in boarding. This comes from a woman that transferred one of her dogs to a rescue who kept their dogs in filthy outside pens. This is also a woman who called me frequently angrily saying, "Tami and Marie should go f&*% themselves." This comes from a woman who I witnessed do a one day adoption. How do you rescue a dog, do reference checks, do a home visit, and transport the dog all in one day? And this comes from another former DDB rep"the last thing I did was foster Hank for Robin Budin. Who I have to say is very irresponsible with adoptions- having him returned 3 times in 6 months while in my care. Did you know that she knew that previous adopters took Hank to to Kent County SPCA to be euthanized and never told me? I found out thru FB, pulled him from the SPCA and got him into an awesome rescue and Hank was successfully adopted in two months." So, Robin really doesn't have a leg to stand on when judging me.

(see database here here here http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=312784935415821)

Thayne: How much of these vet bills was from dog fights in her home?

I called the vets office to discuss with their office manager how much is still on Ms. Allens tab there and what each was for, but she is out of town until Monday. I will get to the bottom of that mystery.

Allen Response: Seven foster dogs and dog fights: Yes I do have 7 foster dogs. Is this an ideal situation? No. I do not want 7 foster dogs. I want these dogs to have forever homes. I would be more effective as a foster if I had no more than 3 foster dogs. Why do I have seven foster dogs? Primarily because people who promised to foster bailed on me and the dogs (including DDB reps who 'changed their minds') , and I dont bail on dogs. I have begged DDB to please help me find placement for these dogs. Not only have I received no help but other reps, most recently, Rep Coordinator Melody Whitworth, asked me to take her foster dog.

But if this is such a grave concern for Tami, I ask, when can I transport these dogs to the center Tami? If you are so worried about them being at my home why have you never offered to help them by accepting them at the center? While the situation with having 7 foster dogs is not perfect, these dogs have a two acre fenced yard to play in, they have an in-ground pool to swim in, they have all received and continue to receive professional training, they eat healthy meals, they each have their own beds, they are never locked in kennels, and they are loved for as many hours as the day allows.

Tami asks how many of my vet bills were a result of foster dog fights. One. In the many years of rescuing, with and without DDB, one dog fight that required veterinary care. Ismay and Hope got into a scuffle. Ismay sustained one puncture to her arm-pit. Hope was fine. I took Ismay to my low cost vet who prescribed her 14 days of antibiotics. I paid for this visit myself. Despite the antibiotics the wound became abscessed and ruptured. This happened on a Sunday, Ismay was taken to the only one of two ER clinics (this one being the cheapest).

Tami had previously set up an account with this clinic for DDB dogs. At Tamis demand this account has now been taken out of DDBs name and put into my name leaving me with a $2000 bill to pay. I did recently have two other of my own dogs get into an altercation.

This fight started because my pit bull Bisha has bursitis for which she just began laser treatments for. The other dog accidentally stepped on her shoulder. Both dogs are fine and laying right here beside me.

Again, Tami singles only me out. Here are other cases regarding similar situations of other DDB reps :

CA rep breaks up a foster dog fight sustaining major damages to her hands that required surgery. Tamis communication to the reps regarding this incident showed little compassion for this rep but rather reminded the reps that DDB is not responsible for our medical bills related to our rescue work.

Foster Coordinator Deana Whitfield foster dogs get into a fight, with one tearing a large chuck from the others neck. Vet bills exceeded $1,000. Deana was asked to not start a Chip In as it would make DDB look bad. Deana agreed to absorb the costs on her own.

Oklahoma foster dog, Lilly, escapes her fence, was found in a goat field with damage to her spleen, liver, esophagus, and trachea along with fluid in the abdomen, visible swelling on the left side of her head/face, her eye is sunken into her head, left pupil stayed dilated and not reactive, and neurological damage. Vet bills exceeded $1200.

In a stressed email from Elaine Peachy, DDB Office Manager at the center, she tells of a vicious fight between the Cane Corso and Beagle living there which Elaine described as horrible and scary. Of course we will never know who pre-approves Tami's vet bills since the board of directors is a few of her best friends.

Tamis foster dog Banshee nearly died after ingesting an entire bottle of Tylenol.

A dog placed in foster by Marie Belanger swallows a ping pong ball and becomes very ill.

Accidents happen. They are scary and make you feel as if you have failed your dogs, but they do happen. They have happened on my watch, they have happened on Tamis watch, and they have happened on the watch of many, many rescuers, foster homes, and adoptive homes. I do not begrudge Tami for the accidents that have happened with dogs in her care, but it is hypocritical for her to point out my situations without pointing out her own and others

Thayne: "Ms. Allen also fails to mention that the entire idea of buying the Vick property came from HER. And no, it wasnt a JOKE the way she is making it out to be. Luckily for me, I still have the e-mail filed away. And yet once we bought the place, she became so filled with jealousy that she jumped on the bandwagon to try to take us down? I dont understand. She never once came to see what we are doing, even though we are only four hours away, but she somehow feels she knows and can speak to what goes on there.

Allen Response: "No, the Vick property was NOT my idea. I did however bring the property to the reps attention in a joking manner. I did too get behind the purchase, donated $100, and support it as I thought Tami had a reasonable plan that did not hinge on the hope and a prayer of a very generous donor, nor did I think that the purchase of this property would inhibit our ability to rescue, which it did.

While Tami insists that the Vick house was my idea, I did not sign the contract, I was unaware that when the center fundraising began that we had expended our vetting budget, I did not have access to our fiscal records to know whether this was or was not a financially feasible venture. It is just my opinion, but Tami having known that our vetting funds were depleted, would it not have been more responsible to hold off on the Vick property and raise funds for vetting? Then once that budget was regenerated, continue fundraising for the center. Yes, the Vick house may no longer have been on the market but there are many affordable and wonderful commercial properties in Virginia zoned as agricultural/residential. I offered 2 such properties to Tami (one being my own land) and my offers were rejected.

Another one of Tamis typical responses to people who ask questions is that we are jealous of her. I dont really even know how to respond to that. The Vick house is beautiful, it really is. If I could afford a house that big, I would surely have one. I live in a lovely home, in the country, away from busy roads, 12 acres, I have wonderful neighbors, my dogs have a huge 2 acre yard, we have a large in-ground pool that I would like fill in due to the work involved in keeping it clean if the dogs didnt love it so much, I am very close to my parents who have been married for 30+ years, I have one sister and 4 nephews that I adore, I have an amazing husband who I met when I was 3 years old and have been married to for 16 years, and am grateful for everything I have and I wish I had more to give. So I am not sure what Tami has that I am so jealous of.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

DDB thinks that ignoring my requests for help for their dogs is 'getting back at me', but in reality, they are hurting the dogs.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

All of my foster dogs were entered into DDB's database per protocol. (see database here here here http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=312784935415821)

I also have surrender agreements for all dogs except those transferred to me by other reps, they have those surrender agreements. I will not post the surrender agreements to protect the privacy of the previous owners but the agreement does state: "..do hereby voluntarily and irrevocable give, donate, surrender, and release to Dogs Deserve Better, Inc the following dog. I hereby release and forever discharge DDB from all rights, claims, obligations, liabilities, and any causes of action whatsoever arising out of or relating to the ownership, possession, or disposition of the Dog. This is a legally binding contract for the irrevocable surrender of your animal to DDB. This contract and all transactions contemplated hereby, shall be governed by, construed and enforced in accordance with the laws in the State of -------." THIS SURRENDER IS AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE OWNER AND DDB, NOT THE OWNER AND ME. THESE DOGS LEGALLY BELONG TO DDB.

DDB has accepted donations for ALL of their seven foster dogs that they REFUSE to help. (see donations here here here http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=312784935415821)

Do you really want your money going to a rescue that bails on their fosters? Despite DDB's promise to cover ALL expenses for DDB foster dogs my requests for help have been ignored both while I was a rep and now that I am no longer a rep. (see donations here here here http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=312784935415821)

But these dogs still have to eat. In an effort to afford food for their foster dogs, I started a Chip In and started making jewelry, which has been sabotaged by DDB and their supporters. They will not help with the expenses for these dogs and are making it impossible for me to raise funds for these dogs: (see screenshots here here here http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=312784935415821)

These people are only reposting the lies being told to them by DDB. First, as long as I do not solicit donations as being tax-deductible or represent myself as non-profit then I do not need a 501c3. Second, I NEVER received a Cease and Desist letter from DDB. Just a small dose of the harassment you will receive if you try to speak out about wrong-doings within DDB: (see screenshots here here here http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=312784935415821)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Instead of DDB doing the right thing by their dogs they have embarked on a public 'smack down' if you will; calling me a hoarder, saying that I chain dogs, that I embezzled money from them, that stole services from them, that I am fat, crazy, unstable, that I hacked Tami's email account, that it was my fault that her bank wouldn't cash her check, etc; all of which are untrue. I was, according to DDB, a valued employee and volunteer, that is until I quit, then I became a monster.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

An example of DDB recently networking for a foster who, like me, is no longer able to foster yet they have not networked ANY of the dogs that I am fostering for them since I resigned.

(see screenshots here here here http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=312784935415821)

Punishing the dogs out of vengeance is their game.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Unfortunately these seven are not the first dogs that DDB has abandoned.

Here is the case of former rep, Rose and Levi: Levi was a DDB foster dog, fostered by former DDB rep Rose Gladish. Due to personal, health, and financial problems, Rose was no longer able to foster Levi for DDB. Rose called DDB founder, Tamira Ci Thayne, only to be hung up on. DDB states that Rose adopted Levi, but still, according to DDB's adoption contract if an adopted family can no longer keep their DDB dog, then that dog MUST be returned to DDB. Luckily another group stepped in and cleaned up yet another one of DDB's messes.

(see screenshots here here here http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=312784935415821) _____________

Another DDB dog in foster that DDB refused to assist. Rep and foster was no longer able to keep Kiddo due to personal and financial issues.

Conversation between DDB Foster Tiffany and DDB Founder Tamira Ci Thayne:

Tiffany: "Tami, I am going to get evicted from my house due to extreme financial hardship. As much as it breaks my heart, I have no rehome 3 of my dogs, one of which is DDB dog that I rescued in Nov 09. There is no affordable housing that will accept 4 dogs. Can DDB help me place Kiddo (formally Tiffany the Siberian Husky)? We really want to keep Kiddo but we have no idea where we will be living yet and I need to make sure all of my dogs are safe."

Tami: "Tiffany, if she's a biter as she seems to be, and that's why you want rid of her for the millionth time, then do the right thing and euthanize her. I heard you two are still misrepresenting yourself as DDB reps...I'm telling you now to cease and desist."

Tiffany: "Wish you all the best with your organization. I see that the easy answer is just to euthanize formally chained dogs that are hard adoptions. What would be the purpose of having a rehab center then???"

Tami: "When we have an actual facility, that won't be the case. However, right now we are working out of a HOUSE and we do not have ways to safely contain dogs from other dogs or people. So we won't take any biters here as it's not safe for other dogs or our guests.

And, I know for a fact that you and Sean where misrepresenting as DDB reps at a store near you, so please cut the act.

Tiffany: "So in the meantime, formally chained dogs that need rehab will be euthanized. I have expressed concerns in the past about Kiddo b/c of Trey's dog aggression toward her, and also because I have been experiencing financial hardship since my husband lost his job at Macy's in Feb 2010. The fact that I am now getting evicted from my home is a different situation and beyond my control. As a national non profit organization and Kiddo being DDB dog, my assumption would be at the very least help find a placement for her. Your response was very unprofessional and rude. Instead of making assumptions about kiddo, it would have been more appropriate to ask about her behavior and the progress she has made. Would I really be okay having Kiddo in my home if she was really a biter and be around my baby boy?? This is not the same dog I first met back in Nov 09. Kiddo has made lots of progress and has become very affectionate, even jumping in bed to cuddle up. I can say that Kiddo knows what it's like to be loved and I would do anything to save her. If I didn't lover her, kiddo would not have been with me this long. I just don't know where I am going to live and I need my dogs to be safe. I would take her back in heart beat and I hope that I am able to. But right now, I have a very uncertain future and doing the best that I can.

As far as misrepresenting DDB - the last thing I did was foster Hank for Robin Budin. Who I have to say is very irresponsible with adoptions- having him returned 3 times in 6 months while in my care. Did you know that she knew that previous adopters took Hank to to Kent County SPCA to be euthanized and never told me? I found out thru FB, pulled him from the SPCA and got him into an awesome rescue and Hank was successfully adopted in two months.

I have old DDB material that was left at store from over a year ago. There was no purpose of removing it because it is a resource for people to use to report chained / penned dogs even if there was no rep in Delaware. If you thought that I was misrepresenting DDB, the right thing to do would be to inquire with me, not make assumptions or chastise me. I'm not affiliated with any rescue organization, but I do support the organizations in Delaware. Right now, I have a baby boy and another on the way, The last thing on my mind is pretending to be a DDB rep, because I am loving just being a mom.

Again, I wish you the best of luck with your organization. I now see that DDB believes that the easiest option would be euthanizing formally chained dogs rather than trying to help find placement for DDB dogs.

I will seek help from reputable rescues that are really in it to help the dogs. Kiddo has needed dental work that was $500 since I rescued her and DDB didn't help. No donations were ever given for the chip ins created. I did one fundraiser and raised $46. DDB can't afford to help with a dog that is in dire need of care, but all the funds go toward a mansion rehab center.

Thanks anyway....." (see screenshots here here here http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=312784935415821) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

In addition, I am the second foster in one year to sue DDB:

Visit this site http://www.facebook.com/BringJoelHomeWA to learn of a DDB foster who was publicly promised an approved adoption until she spoke up about DDB's financial wrong-doings (just as I did). Her dog was repossessed from daycare out of revenge. The foster also never received reimbursement for her expenses (just like me).

"The Bring Joel Home community was started in April 2011 after Joel, an abused and starved pitbull that was brought back to life by his foster family and subsequently adopted, was 'repossessed' in an act of retribution by the rescue organization for which Dr. Suzanne Fiala volunteered.

Dr. Suzanne Fiala is a beloved community physician in Seattle Washington devoted to animal rights. She, along with her children, fostered 11 pitbull puppies and adult dogs with love and generosity for Dogs Deserve Better (known as DDB), a national 501C-3 rescue org for six months from October 2010 to April 2011. She was publicly praised for her work by the organization until, after discovering mismanagement of donations and illegal activities within the organization, she filed a public complaint against the organization on April 10. Four days later DDB took Joel back by seizing him from his doggie daycare without notice, and notified the doctor after his seizure that he had been 'rehomed' and that she and her family would never see him again. Dr. Fiala was contacted by DDB's lawyer that same day, and they have refused to speak to her since that time. She and her children have not seen Joel since the day he was seized. DDB has publicly attacked Dr. Fiala since that time questioning her mental health, professionalism, credibility, honesty and ethics and attempted to revoke her medical license.

Dr. Fiala attempted to have Joel returned to her through legal avenues. She lost the initial hearings in court, and gave up the legal case in August of 2011. Because animals are considered simply a case of ownership of 'property' and because every single DDB witness perjured herself under oath, it became apparent that the likelihood of winning a legal battle was unlikely and financially prohibitive. Suzanne and her children recognized that it was time to find meaning in Joel's suffering, and brief loving relationship with their family, by moving forward to prevent the abuse of other animals by rescue organizations, and to expose corruption that exists in the world of animal rescue.

As of mid-August, the new goals of the Bring Joel Page and its 4200+ supporters were established. Our goals from this point forward are:

1) to advertise and support small, truly worthwhile animal rescue organizations doing good work.

2) to expose and eradicate corrupt animal rescue organizations.

3) to never stop believing in karma, in miracles, and that Joel will come home to the family that loves him.

We Believe: In the universal law of karma, in the ultimate victory of truth and goodness, in the power of individual voices, and in the strength of collective voices standing together to be empowered agents of change."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Just a word on the representative restructuring that occurred in July in which we were told to stop rescuing. This was not just a restructure but according to Tami, she didn't have time to deal with rep drama during her wedding and her move to Virginia, a time to weed out the bad apples. A couple of Tami's bad apples come to mind: Liesa Collier (still a rep) and Belen Brisco (thankfully Belen quit - she is top notch, too good for DDB).

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Tamis nature is to not answer questions but to malign the person asking as seen in her blog. When the Bring Joel Home page was created I asked Tami what was going on as I had no idea and did not know how to answer the questions being posted on DDBs Facebook page. Tami never explained the truth of the matter to me, she only responded to my direct question by saying that Dr. Fiala is crazy and included the link to Dr. Fialas article on Bi-polar Disorder. When concerns grew based on allegations from a former employee who witnessed Tami harming dogs, I again asked Tami what was going on. She neither denied nor confirmed the allegations but again called this person crazy and obsessed with her. So it is no surprise to me that Tami would deflect the questions asked by myself and others by trying to refocus the public on what a horrible person I am and we are. This can certainly explain why other reps are not speaking out.

The donors need to be aware of the amount of donations being used to fight the legal situations that DDB has gotten themselves into. How much donor money is DDB willing to use to shut the mouths of people telling the truth, money that could be used helping the foster dogs that they have bailed on?

Again, I was not fired. I only became this horrible person after leaving and raising these questions. And seriously Tami, telling people not to be my Facebook friend? How high-school does that sound? Of the current and former reps that contacted me after my resignation I never once encouraged them to leave DDB. I never asked anyone to join 'Team Shannon. I told them to know what they are supporting and ask questions. I would urge this of anyone working with a 501c3. If current reps want to remain friends, that is great! I will not bash Tami or DDB to them nor will I tolerate any bashing of Dr. Fiala and the Bring Joel Home folks. Most DDB reps are top notch, I am always available to help them or any rescuer with dogs in need.

My advice....STAY AWAY FROM DOGS DESERVE BETTER!

Tamira Thayne has no compassion for people or animals. She has no humility or gratitude towards her volunteers, supporters, and donors. In her twisted mind, DDB belongs to her, the mansion belongs to her, the donations belong to her. And if you cross her, BEWARE, she will spare no expense to take you down.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A taste of how you are treated if you volunteer for DDB (email from Tamira Ci Thayne, founder): (see email here http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=312784935415821)

A lot of reps quit after this. DDB is down from ~125 reps to ~25. Does that tell you something?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Some other disgruntled former reps and rescuers:

Phone message from CURRENT Foster Coordinator Shari Strader http://www.mediafire.com/?c77k0uv4am5yrhw (actual message) Dictated: Shannon this is Shari Strader in North Carolina calling you back..um..I promise I won't call you again, this will be my last message. I just saw your email I guess on Bring Joel Home about resigning and um, I just wanted to um I just really wanted to talk to you about it because um, I quit Dogs Deserve Better after Tami promised me that I would be the dog trainer there and I spent a lot of money. I wanted to be a dog trainer and address specific issues that chained dogs have. Then when I went there she basically um she basically just told me to go screw myself. Um anyway it has been really hard for me to defend Dogs Deserve Better lately you know with that in the back of my mind but you know I continue to think about how it is for the dogs and you know that is the most important thing. I don't care that much about myself just as long as the dogs are safe. Um, anyway, I just wanted to say um, that it has been really good working with you and keep me in your loop because I am going to be doing rescue and I am sure you will be too hopefully and um take care, bye.

Email message from former DDB Rep Holly Lyttle

Hey Shannon, Please call me. I respect you very much and the fact that you resigned today really makes me question why I am still supporting this group. I would love to be filled in on the truth as it stands. Please call me.

From former Regional Coordinator Katheryn Louise:

I just saw your resignation note. I am shocked to say the least. Kudos to you for seeing the light.

From former rep but current supporter Amanda Green: Hey! So Angela told me you resigned with DDB. The rescue world is quite a crazy place sometimes! You certainly don't owe me or anyone else an explanation regarding that. I was just wondering why you deleted me as a friend on FB. Angela read me your post on BJH while I was on my way home from work tonight. I share your concerns over how fundraising for the dogs went capute after the idea was put out there to buy the Vick house and how Tami showed very little support for the reps in the program. I just never knew both sides of the story with Joel and BJH and always felt attacked anytime I went to them seeking answers. You and DDB were the only ones providing solid proof as to what was going on. Also with the recent Two Loons issues of Irene and BJH, I thought there were issues there. But I have always, always respected you for how bad you worked your a*s off for DDB. This does not change that and it never will. Tami let me down when the April tornadoes came through Alabama and I was trying to get support from DDB, financially and a foster lined up for the dog that was chained up and everything around the dog was blown away by the tornadoes. I was told that I had to come up with the finances and everything for that dog. Do you remember that dog's picture? So I just want you to know that many aspects went into why I resigned from DDB, not just school and family, while they were the main reasons. I've got mad love for you girl!! So please add me back as a friend on FB or I'm gonna be sad!! :((

Former Rep Wishing To Remain Anonymous Hi Shannon, I'm sure you've heard this a lot, but I give you a lot of credit for standing up to DDB. I was a rep a few years ago, for a short time, when someone tried to destroy me and my reputation and sent staged photos of dogs in my rescue chained to a fence. I was humiliated, removed as a rep without even an email or phone call to check the validity and for a time black-balled by the rescue community. So when I see someone standing up for what's right for the dogs against DDB, I just have to say - Thank you!

Former Rep Wishing To Remain Anonymous good for you shannon!! I despise tami thayne and DDB!

From Former Rep Tiffany Citino Shannon, wish I could do more to help you!!! I was told to euthanize "Kiddo" (the husky I rescued in Nov 09) because she was a "biter." I'm so close to losing my house and hanging on by thread right now, but DDB doesn't care about that either. Kiddo has needed dental work since Nov 09 which is $500 and they contributed nothing.

From Former Rep Amanda Torbett It seems to me that this is a bit abrupt, and that as soon as the organization gets more "attention" and gets into that expensive property, we all get dumped! Please remove me from all future dogs deserve better emails. I thought I was doing a good thing, with a good group. I am up to my eyeballs with trying to help the dogs in my community and now you say oh well! This is all very fishy.

From Former Rep Holly Lyttle What exactly do we tell people who want our help, but our fundraising wont cover it? Im just curious to know if theres a chance the program is really going to be reinstated or if the focus will only be on the dogs in/near the property. Im also curious to know what the big donors will think to hear we can no longer rescue, but we just spent a lot of $$ on the property. Im wondering if the large sum of money would have been better spent on rescuing dogs across the nation versus purchasing a property that will benefit only the dogs that will get a chance to get into the house. These are just questions I have been pondering the last few days.

From Former OH Rep Wishing To Remain Anonymous Hey there. So you resigned?? Wow. That's not something I would have expected. Geesh. I'm so discouraged about DDB now. Where is the Rep program now? I'm not going back, but you were such an asset. Of course, there in lies the point. It is like everyone is coming to the same conclusion. I don't have any problems withe reps. I feel that dogs are falling through the the cracks and that is what kills me. I witnessed Tami trying to use DDB funds to take a group of us out to dinner when dinner was already made by another rep a block away. And now a mansion has taken over the rep program. And I hear if you question Tami about anything she blackballs you. I've tried to stay neutral but now the dogs are really the losers in this drama.

From a VA Rescuer Wishing To Remain Anonymous: Shannon: If you have a moment I would very much like to know what has happened with that group DDB. I have always had my suspicion about that woman. Right after I had my one and only phone conversation with her several years back. I would love to see Tami fry. She is a charlatan, and exploits people and animals.

From a Rescue Watchdog Group Wishing To Remain Anonymous: We have had our suspicions about Tami ever since she capitalized on the Doogie situation. I have never seen anybody that likes to talk about themselves, write about themselves, photograph themselves, and video themselves more than she does.

From a former DDB paid employee wishing to remain anonymous: I tried to message Shannon but wasn't able to. I wanted to let speak to her about her allegations of money misspent and incorrect donation solicitations. These are issues that I made Tami aware of in 2008 and that is why all the emails came from me regarding people not soliciting donations as they had done in the past. Tami told me that she didn't care what the law was and that they should be allowed to solicit as they always had. This was one of the reasons that Tami and I parted ways. She didn't want to hear what the laws were and that she was breaking them. She would not even let me approach the Treasurer about investigating the law. Could you let Shannon know that if she needs someone to back this up for legal purposes I might be willing to do so?

From Peaceful Planet Pets I have removed myself from all things DDB. I am so disheartened by them.

From Former Rep Rose Gladish Thank you Shannon for sharing Levi's story. Its funny how reading all these comments, I was told the same exact things!! That I personally, not DDB, was giving up on on Levi. How I personally, not DDB, was abandoning him because I could not afford to care for him. I was also told to euthanize Levi because he bit someone and the "center" is only her home and they can't risk taking a biter in. I worked and tried to get the Chain off in Mentor Ohio 2 years ago at my then husbands work but was stalled and stalled repeatedly. Needless to say the chain off never happened. Valuable funds could have been raised for the dogs. I also was shocked when I tried to contact all my former reps and found that all had left DDB. These women and men worked hours and hours and to realize they were used and abandoned, shocked. Thank you from Levi, myself, and all other abandoned and euthanized dogs!!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

And if you leave DDB, then you can expect this from Tami's friends and supporters. Another small dose of the constant harassment, intimidation, and defamation you will receive if you question the great Tamira Ci Thayne. Also the reason that many former and current reps have asked me to keep their conversations regarding their disgust with DDB anonymous (hopefully they will find the courage to come forward): (see screenshots here here here http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=312784935415821)

This was posted after Barbara received a Cease and Desist order from me. Mind you, I have never met, spoken to, or seen these people. They have never been to my home: Barbara Bassett - one of Tami's friends who was charged with Unemployment Fraud, Miriam Hayes - you can find her all over Facebook stirring trouble, Angela Brown - Clueless, just started volunteering for DDB claims she wants to be just like Tami when she grows up and works for Portsmouth, VA Humane. (see screenshots here here here http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=312784935415821)

Zo-Jo is Zoey Jones, roommate of DDB Foster Coordinator Shari Strader. Click here to hear a phone message I received from Shari right after my resignation - http://www.mediafire.com/?c77k0uv4am5yrhw (dictation above) Apparently money changed Shari's mind as now she works for DDB.(see screenshots here here here http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=312784935415821)

After another foster questioned DDB's financial practices as she was never reimbursed for her expenses either then went on to sue DDB.

Tami asked her friends, volunteers, and employees to report this foster (who is a physician) to the medical review board out of pure vengeance. (see screenshots here here here http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=312784935415821)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

It is likely that once Thayne reads this note, instead of offering to assist their dogs in my care, she will again begin ranting about my misfortunes, my past, my mistakes. One in particular that has been DDB's 'golden ticket' is a 10 year old embezzlement charge (while working as a accountant at Virginia Tech) that I pled guilty to, made amends to the people I hurt, paid all money, served my probation and was released early. I am still friends with many of my former coworkers as well as the detective and probation officer. I even recruited my probation officer's son to play bag-pipes at our Relay for Life event. I also checked into a behavioral health facility for three months. To read more about my struggle with Obsessive Compulsive Disorder you can visit my blog - http://ocdunhinged.blogspot.com/

How does what I did ten years ago have any bearing on DDB not taking responsibility for the dogs the abandoned in my care? What about Tami's crimes?: theft, contempt of court, trespassing? At least I got help for my issue, Tami instead printed up thongs of her crime:

(see thongs http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=312784935415821)

(source: BE SURE TO READ HOW TAMI USED A SUFFERING DOG FOR PUBLICITY AND MONEY http://www.dogpolitics.com/my_weblog/2007/12/guilty-tammy-gr.html)

If thongs aren't your thing, how about some boxers with Tami's face right on the front! (see boxers http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=312784935415821)

I predict that if Tami does respond to this that she will be sure to bring this low point of my up life up to divert people's attention from the real issue, the issue of DDB being an unethical, uncaring organization. Tami's energy is spent saving face instead of saving dogs. Much of the accomplishments she takes credit for are the accomplishments of the reps. The organization would be nothing without the ever dwindling reps. DDB's message is one that I stand by, but Tamira Thayne is NO ONE that I would stand by. I think her hatred of me derives from me never proclaiming that I worked for HER....I work for the dogs, and only the dogs. I don't want DDB to crash and burn. If wishes came true, I would wish that Thayne step down and let someone worthy, compassionate, and ethical take over. But Tami will never give up her cash cow or the spotlight. Someone once told me that they have never come across anybody in rescue that likes to photograph them self, video them self, and talk about them self more than Tamira Ci Thayne. Check out their website (http://dogsdeservebetter.org) and see how many photos, articles, and videos there are of Tami as compared to the hard-working reps.

If you still are not convinced that Tami's DDB is a cash cow in a rescues clothing, let me share a conversation that I had with Tami. I had sent a message to the rep group asking that they please share my jewelry store as I was spending close to $400/mo on food, treats, toys, blankets for 10 DDB foster dogs, and gas for rescue travel, etc. as my jewelry sales would be very helpful to me in covering these expenses. I honestly didn't expect to hear anything back from Tami about this email, as she doesn't give a crap about her reps. But low and behold I did. Now wouldn't you expect a moral and humble person to say something like, "Hey thanks for using your jewelry money to cover these expenses, we are low on funds right now and it really helps the organization by not having to cover these expenses." ? But NO.... her response was, "Why are you spending $400/mo on those dogs? I haven't said anything about your jewelry because I suspected it was going to feed those dogs because I am sure as heck not seeing any of that money." I may be way off on this but it seems to me that Tami not only did not want to help with these expenses but she wanted a cut of my jewelry money, the money used to pay for HER organizations foster dogs. She forgets that I donated $100 of that jewelry money to the center. And my jewelry sales don't even come close to covering my monthly expenses for these foster dogs.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

What makes me the maddest is that Thayne sits in a $600,000 house, mortgage paid by donors, utilities paid donors, volunteers to clean her house, do the laundry, bathe the dogs, mow the yard, build donated fences, blankets from donors, treats and toys from donors, dog food from donors, a $40,000 salary paid by donors, 3 live in volunteers, and only 15 dogs. And with all of this she whines and complains in her blogs about how tough her life in a mansion is with 15 dogs.

In contrast, I sit here with 16 dogs, 7 belonging to DDB, a $200,000 house, I buy my own blankets, dog food, treats, fencing. I mow my own yard, clean my own house, do my own laundry, bathe all dogs myself, build my own fencing. I do all of this with no income and no help. With all of the resources DDB has, why do they continue to bail on their dogs?

Tami will sarcastically say, "Oh I am just filthy rich." But let me ask you this, does someone that lives in a mortgage free, utility free, $600,000 house with a $40,000 salary sound like an animal rescuer to you? Sounds more like B-list Hollywood to me.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 11/23/2011 12:45 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/dogs-deserve-better-inc/smithfield-virginia-23430/dogs-deserve-better-inc-tamira-ci-thayne-founder-and-ceo-collecting-donations-illegall-801242. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author
18Consumer
2Employee/Owner

#20 Consumer Comment

Hank Abandoned By Dogs Deserve Better

AUTHOR: Lumosity Stone - (United States of America)

POSTED: Sunday, February 24, 2013

Here is the synopsis on Hank as I have lived it. I stand behind what I put in writing and will defend if need be.  This is the truth as I know it.  

In July 2011, A Buddy For Life, Inc was contacted by Tiffany Citino, a former DDB rep from the state of Delaware, for help with placing a 4 year old Hound Mix named Hank.  Tiffany told us that she was going through some financial difficulties as well as being in the middle of a high risk pregnancy.  

When asked why she had not contacted DDB to take Hank back into their rescue, she said that she had asked them for help with a dog that she adopted from them years ago, (Kiddo) and that Tami Thayne emailed her and told her to euthanize said dog.  She said she already knew what Tamis answer would be, so she did not ask.  She also said that a DDB rep in MA approved a home for him who subsequently dumped him at Kent County SPCA in Delaware, our local high kill animal control facility.

Because of what she perceived to be this reps poor judgment in screening homes, she did not feel as though Hank would be safe if this DDB rep was involved with Hank anymore.  She told us that the DDB rep had given her permission to re-home Hank on her own.

A Buddy For Life, Inc, found a foster home for Hank at the end of July 2011.  He was in his foster home for approximately 2 months without incident.  He lived with two other dogs at that time, as well as a husband and wife and had a large back yard to run around in.  

In September 2011, A Buddy For Life, Inc, found an adoptive home for Hank.  His adoptive home was a previous adopter, as well as long time personal friends with one of the volunteers.   These people used to volunteer at a local no kill shelter, and have handled all types of dogs.  They are truly caring people who do right by any dog that comes their way.

After having Hank in their family for 5 months, Hank lunged, teeth showing, twice in a 10 minute time span at the woman.  There was nothing he was protecting (no bones, food, etc).  This came out of the blue, and startled me when I heard about this. Unfortunately, the couple decided that while they love Hank, they cannot have a dog that shows this kind of behavior unprovoked in their home. They had grandkids who visited often, and while they were always careful with the little ones and their dogs, they did not want to risk anyone getting hurt.

Little did I know what I was about to find out.

I picked Hank up from his adoptive home on February 15, 2012.  Hank was happy to see me, and went willingly with me to my car.  I emailed Tami Thayne, CEO/Founder of Dogs Deserve Better, on February 17, 2012 in regards to Hank.  I emailed her with the situation as I knew it, and requested that she take Hank back to her rescue/rehab sanctuary to work on his behaviors, as we are a small rescue who does not have the resources or money to work with a dog like Hank.

I felt as though since we were never made aware of Hanks issues, it was only fair that DDB take him back into their care and work with him.  Hank is a liability, plain and simple.  Without intense training and the properly motivated home that is willing to follow the advice of a knowledgeable and competent trainer, he could possibly hurt someone in the future.  

Tami Thayne emailed me back, first telling me thank you for my civil tone and professionalism, and then in the next five paragraphs proceeds to slander Tiffany and Sean Citino.  I did not email Tami regarding the Citinos, I emailed her regarding Hank.  This was uncalled for and completely unprofessional in my opinion.  I did not respond to that part of her email.  

She also told me that her emails to me were to be kept confidential, again, I did not respond to that part.  I refused to respond to anything that didnt have to do with Hank.  While Tami may be pre-occupied with her reputation, I am more pre-occupied with the dog, Hank, which I believe they failed.

Tami said in her email to me and the MA rep for DDB, whom she ccd on my original email to her:

 *****, I'd like you to take responsibility for Hank, and if that means putting him down, then that's what it means. I know that he has had chance after chance and issue after issue. Let me know what you think. DDB will pay for the procedure if it needs to be done in DE, or whatever you think is best.

Tami suggestion was that I euthanize Hank, as the DDB Good News Kennel was in its infancy, and could not rehabilitate a dog like Hank at this time.  She said that DDB would pay for the euthanasia.  She also copied the MA rep on this, who agreed with the decision to euthanize Hank, and also made sure she had some bad things to say about the Citinos.  

The MA reps email was troubling, and is what was the biggest catalyst for me to open my eyes and see that DDB as an organization FAILED Hank, not once, but 6 times.  

From the DDB MA reps email:

I am the original rescuer for Hank Williamsjr, the dog we are discussing. Hank was with DDB-MA for over a year and had 4 adopters that returned him always within the first week due to a strange lunge he would do for no real reason. I do feel that you should have emailed me directly when this issue occured. This is not an issue for Tami Thayne. This is my issue. DDB in VA is full and unpredictable dogs cannot be adopted out and so I personally recommend euthanasia for Hank.

In the MA reps email to me, she disparaged the Citinos, admitted that she knew that Hank had lunged before, and that Hank had been in 6 different homes while with DDB.  None of this was ever relayed to me by the Citinos nor by the MA rep.  The MA rep knew that I had Hank as I had emailed her regarding his new home and our need for his microchip information in Sept 2011.  

 Had A Buddy For Life, Inc, known of Hanks aggression issues, we would have managed him differently and started looking at other optionswe never would have placed him into a home due to his unpredictability. The MA rep even disparages the Citinos for going to rescue Hank at the local kill shelter when the home she approved for him dumped him there when she told the new home that she was in MA and there was nothing she could do immediately for Hank. She told them to take Hank to the local humane society. Hank was instead dumped at a high kill animal control facility.

 She also lets me know that I never should have contacted Tami Thayne regarding this issue, and that it is her issue to deal with.  Tami is the founder/CEO of the organization, and so I felt she had every right to not only know what was going on, but also that she had a chance to address it.  DDB reps are all over the US representing her organization.

My responses to all emails were polite and firm. Once they requested euthanasia, I asked for Hank to be signed over legally to A Buddy For Life, Inc, as I wasnt going to fail him again.  Tami emailed me and the rep from MA and told her to sign him over to me, but I refused.  The MA rep is a volunteer within the organization who holds no official title that I am aware of.  Therefore, I requested that the surrender forms bear Tami Thaynes signature, which I did obtain on February 19, 2012.

 After posting a plea to raise money to send Hank to a life long care sanctuary, the MA rep felt the need to respond to the posting on A Buddy For Lifes Facebook page.  Among some of her comments were:
 
 a RESCUER HAS LIABILITY AND A RESPONSIBILITY TO HUMANS.  When asked by BJH why she agreed to euthanize Hank, she responded:  because I had no where to put him and he is a liability for a rescue since he is unpredictable. good rescuers dont adopt out unpredictable dogs however, she found him stable enough, by her own admission, to put him in at least 6 different homes while Hank was with DDB, and each time he was returned due to his unpredictable behavior.  

I used to have immense respect for DDB.  I participated in the Chain Off, and donated money over the years.  I still feel as though their mission is a noble oneto get dogs off of chains and into a home.  However, after my experience with Hank and DDB, I can no longer be sure of what is going on within the organization.  Do all organizations make mistakes?  Sure, none of us are perfect.  As long as we learn from our mistakes, they build character and give us good life lessons. Rescue is hard work.  It is a thankless job. However, Hank was not failed once, he was failed multiple times by the organization.

But that leaves Hank, who desperately needs your help.  After being failed by DDB 6 times, then sentenced to die by Tami and the rep from MA (Tami never even met or evaluated Hank) A Buddy For Life would like to send Hank to a lifelong care sanctuary in PA. The sanctuary is called Godot AnimalSanctuary, and it is run by a woman named Lana who I have personally met.  She has over 100 acres for the animals in her care, and she evaluates each dog to decide what pack they can go into.  One of our volunteers had to send her 10 cats their due to a personal hardship and can absolutely vouch for the organization.

 HANK'S CHIP IN - http://abuddyforlife.chipin.com/hank

 Godot Animal Sanctuary is a 501c3 nonprofit organization, and as such, requires a donation to help offset the care for life they give.  While $4000 seems like a lot, over the lifetime of a dog it really isnt.  Please help us to show Hank that even though a national organization with enough money to buy a $600K property gave up on him and suggested that we end his life, our small foster based rescue will not.

A Buddy for Life, Inc.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#19 Consumer Comment

Another Dog Abandoned By Dogs Deserve Better

AUTHOR: Lumosity Stone - (United States of America)

POSTED: Sunday, February 24, 2013

Mary Jane had previously been rescued by a former DDB rep and apparently placed in an unstable home in MS. When New Mexico Dogs Deserve Better (NOT afilliated with DDB) learned of the volatile situation Mary Jane was in, they contacted this former DDB rep and asked her to take her back. Mary Jane was in extreme danger. The former DDB rep responded that she was "not in rescue" anymore and could not take her. This former DDB rep stated she attempted to contact DDB to ask for help. According to this former rep, DDB responded that they "don't want her". Mary Jane is now ANOTHER
DDB dog, that has been abandoned by the same rescue that unchained it...

New Mexico Dogs Deserve Better jumped in and agreed to take Mary Jane because they could NOT leave her in the unstable environment she was in and because she was a former New Mexico chained dog. But MOST of all, they took her in because EVERYONE who Mary Jane had depended on, had bailed on her. NMDDB was not going to fail Mary Jane.

NMDDB opened their heart and their rescue to Mary Jane. She arrived safely Sunday.

Despite having abandoned Mary Jane, Dogs Deserve Better is still advertising Mary Jane and THEIR rescue and is still collecting donations for her. http://www.dogsdeservebetter.org/maryjane.html

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#18 General Comment

Fiala Lied

AUTHOR: Supporter - (United States of America)

POSTED: Friday, September 07, 2012

orwarded Message from Dr. Suzanne Fiala:

To the wonderful people who have supported me since I started the BJH page in April 2011:

I left this page some time ago, when emotions were high and legal actions were a daily occurrence. I have wanted to return to BJH recently to post an update as well as my gratitude for the love and support I have received. However the current BJH admins to whom I gave this page (who assured me I could return here if/when I chose to) have decided to keep me off of BJH for fear I may "say something too controversial."  Seems my own camp feels they have a right to dictate the words and
actions of one outspoken doctor who feels passionately and says what she
thinks. Shame on them.

I hate any banning of ones civil rights especially freedom of speech;even from people who have been my friends and supporters. I also view it as a sad statement about the stigma of mental illness that though I have 25 years of education and am an
esteemed member of my community, there are those that still feel I need a keeper.

I wanted to say this to the wonderful thousands who spoke up and stood by my dear Joely and myself since his abduction 17
months ago. Your love, kind words, compassion and good will kept me going through some very difficult times. I have cherished every single message, and I shall never forget you. During the worst of times you held me up and reminded me of the best of humanity. I read this page daily, and your kind words continue to warm my heart. Sharing my suffering and walking through the pain with me helped heal my broken heart. Thank You.

I also wanted to say that I know where Joely is (or was), and have known his whereabouts for over a year now since
Shannon Allen let me know.
The man who has cared for Joel appears to be a good man. And he deserves his privacy and should not be harassed or maligned in any way. His name and location are a secret I will not reveal. I remain hopeful that the day will come when he contacts me and allows my children and myself to see Joel. This would heal some of our painful memories, and I believe also unlock and heal some buried memories within Joely as well. Who knows? Anything is possible!

Though I am not welcome at the BJH page any longer, I live in Seattle and am not hard to find. I can also be PMd on my personal FB page. I plan to retreat from social media somewhat, I have to say I prefer looking people in the eye, giving hugs, and having real relationships.  My experience with this virtual world has left me rather battered. I welcome opportunities to speak formally about human rights, education and destigmatization about mental illness, my own journey of spirituality and of course animal advocacy. Stay in touch! Bless each of you who has touched my heart and my life. And please keep speaking up for those who have no voice Namaste and peace../ Suzanne Fiala, MD
Like 21 minutes ago

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#17 REBUTTAL Owner of company

More Epic Myth Making

AUTHOR: AnnC - (USA)

POSTED: Wednesday, December 21, 2011

"Let the public decide, let the IRS decide.......AUTHOR: Former DDB Rep - (United States of America)SUBMITTED: Wednesday, December 21, 2011We will just have agree to disagree. Let the public decide and let the IRS decide. Tammy Grimes/Tamira Thayne will be investigated. All eyes are on her and her failing organization. Merry Christmas!"

More epic myth making citing a largess public and even larger IRS, who are looming as the all seeing eye of Truth and Justice with a CAPITOL T and J!   Ohhhhhh "ALL EYES ARE ON HER" and not just her organization, but her "failing" organization.  Love how Former DDB Rep brings a larger than life pseudo epic truth to bear to her cause against the super mythical "evil DDB" aka Goliath.  

And to top it all off, a hearty "Merry Christmas!" Now that embodies the definition of disingenuous. 

disingenuous   [dis-in-jen-yoo-uhs]  adjective lacking in sincerity; falsely or hypocritically ingenuous;  insincere: Her excuse was rather disingenuous.

Former DDB Rep, you wish everyone a "Merry Christmas" as the tail end of your pathetic need to be right and win something, as if you might be taken as a real human being hailing peace and good will to your fellow human beings, yet you only succeed in prostituting the spirit of Christmas. 

You are a joke.  In your attempt to have the last word, you dare to wish those whom you consider your adversaries a "Merry Christmas"? Think about that! What a cheap shot at the spirit of Christmas.  

There is nothing to agree to disagree over. Don't flatter yourself. And quit patronizing your opposition. 

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#16 REBUTTAL Owner of company

To Shannon Allen

AUTHOR: Dog rescuer - (United States of America)

POSTED: Wednesday, December 21, 2011

DDB has not and will not be investigated but if they are, they have no worries as they have done nothing illegal or wrong. More of your lies. BTW, DDB is NOT failing. In fact they are doing better than ever now that they have gotten rid of their bad apples. You or no one else have been able to stop that, sorry Shannon, et al. The rescue world knows you, Fiala, and BJH very well and they think all of you are CRAZY. Have a Merry Christmas if you can and we hope your dogs are enjoying all their gifts from DDB.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#15 Consumer Comment

Let the public decide, let the IRS decide.......

AUTHOR: Former DDB Rep - (United States of America)

POSTED: Wednesday, December 21, 2011

We will just have agree to disagree. Let the public decide and let the IRS decide. Tammy Grimes/Tamira Thayne will be investigated. All eyes are on her and her failing organization. Merry Christmas!

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#14 General Comment

Re: Barbara Bassett by former ddb rep

AUTHOR: EvangelineQ - (United States of America)

POSTED: Wednesday, December 21, 2011

"You have nothing to do with DDB" Exactly. So why are you making your complaint about her? This is about DDB, correct? Or are you just using this as just  one more forum to vent your paranoid delusions. She has just as much right to post as you do and you don't get to tell anyone to go away. BTW, everyone isn't Barbara. I'm certainly not. Oh, and for anyone interested, all the 'anonymous' former reps quoted in Shannon's complaint are from the same person. It's one old post divided up to make it look like more. I know this because I saw the original post. You should also know that the lies Shannon are telling are a clear violation of the Cease and Desist letter sent to her. She says she has 3 lawyers and is suing multiple people but nobody has heard from her or them about anything. Shannon has a serious disconnect with reality

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#13 General Comment

Former DDB Rep; Classic Allen OCD,

AUTHOR: AnnC - (USA)

POSTED: Tuesday, December 20, 2011

Former DDB Rep, it is very sad that you have to make a post about yourself, to defend yourself, as you once again pretend to be a supporter of your own rants (and a thinly veiled attempt to hide your identity but your classic OCD is giving you away). To you others, who are not alter-egos, why is it OK when Former DDB Rep shares personal information, but when someone turns the focus back to her and brings to light her personal issues to prove a point, it is the worst thing in the world?? (A rhetorical question not meant to be answered, expressing a distinctly juvenile whine). Ms Allen posted this initial post, we agree on that. Former DDB has made all of the other posts, as a former DDB rep. Former DDB Rep cares very much about Shannon Allen's personal issues. Her personal issues have EVERYTHING to do with the myth being created about the things Grimes/Thayne has done. EVERYTHING! Why do you take the focus off of the obsessive myth making created about DDB issues? Former DDB, your rants are baseless, useless, pointless and a waste of everybody's time. You are making a fool of yourself. You have nothing to do with DDB. Go away and find another place to spread your hate.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#12 Consumer Comment

Barbara Bassett

AUTHOR: Former DDB Rep - (United States of America)

POSTED: Tuesday, December 20, 2011

Barbara, it is very sad that you have to make a post about yourself, to defend yourself, as you once again pretend to be a supporter of your own rants. To you others, who are not the Bassett alter-egos, why is it OK when Bassett shares personal information, but when someone turns the focus back to her and brings to light her personal issues to prove a point, it is the worst thing in the world?? Ms Allen posted this initial post, we agree on that. I have made all of the other posts, as a former DDB rep. I could care less about Shannon Allen's personal issues. Her personal issues have NOTHING to do with the things Grimes/Thayne has done. NOTHING! Why do you take the focus off of the DDB issues? Bassett, your rants are baseless, useless, pointless and a waste of everybody's time. You are making a fool of yourself. You have nothing to do with DDB. Go away and find another place to spread your hate.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#11 UPDATE EX-employee responds

Shannon Allen is not to be trusted

AUTHOR: Dog rescuer - (United States of America)

POSTED: Monday, December 19, 2011

Shannon Allen you should be ashamed of yourself. You are no better than pond scum. One day all the lies you have told will come back around on you. How do you, Shannon, Karleen Brigham and Fiala live with your sick selves? Maybe we should start posting where you all work, oh I forgot Shannon doesn't have a job. She embezzled $36,000 from Virginia Tech and no one will hire her. But Karleen WE do know where you work, the Seahawks Stadium. Oh and Shannon's husband is a police officer for Virginia tech I would think a police officers family should behave in a respectable manner. Shannon you are the biggest bully I have ever known. You are acting like a teenager. I guess it hurts to be nearly 40 and fat. Oh, and a hoarder too. Barbara Bassett has more class in her toenail clippings than any of you will ever have. I think maybe it's time you all seek professional help for all your serious issues and leave DDB alone.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#10 General Comment

Re: Barbara Bassett

AUTHOR: EvangelineQ - (United States of America)

POSTED: Monday, December 19, 2011

I don't care who you are. Barbara is not an employee or volunteer for DDB and her private life has no place in a complaint against them. So you don't like what she posts. Get over it. The internet isn't subject to your approval. Would you want your private life and your family's posted to *unrelated* sites all over the net? I think not. What makes you think you have any right to do that to someone else? BTW, there's no such thing as a "fake profile" on Ripoff Report. You can use any name, nickname or description you please.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#9 Consumer Comment

Anonymous Angela:

AUTHOR: Former DDB Rep - (United States of America)

POSTED: Monday, December 19, 2011

No Angela, I am not Heather either. You do not know me. You are a young, inexperienced DDB volunteer who at least has your heart in the right place. Thank you for your work in rescue. Tami has MANY past former DDB volunteers who have witnessed the dark side of Tami. She can't lie about all of us! I admire Shannon and Heather for not fearing the consequences of speaking out. I don't know the Fiala story, but I am sorry that got so ugly. We all knew Kelly was lying about several things. We were always cautious of Kelly and her practices. Stay on Tami's good side, Angela, don't question her motives and you will be able to keep her on the dubious pedestal you have her on. Non-profit groups are supposed to follow their own Bylaws. Tami knows she has broken the rules and she doesn't care. All of the former bookkeepers know the truth. Why do you think she as gone through so many bookkeepers? Why was Elaine so happy to go back home? It wont take long for Deana to head back home too. You are on the outside, Angela, which explains your devotion to Tami. You are the perfect person for Tami to manipulate. I admire your devotion and desire to protect her. But too many people are coming forward, Tami knows we are all telling the truth, and she needs people like you and Bassett to defend her. I meant just keep it up, in jest, because if you keep the silly ranting, YOU TWO are hurting DDB.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#8 General Comment

It's Heather, right?

AUTHOR: anonymous - (United States of America)

POSTED: Monday, December 19, 2011

Actually, you did waste MY time by reading your nonsense. ''Keep it up?'' Are YOU TOO threatening us like the rest of the sheep herd? I am not being ''manipulated'' by Tami. I actually volunteer at the rehab and work closely with Tami and see the real, kind hearted, dog loving person she really is. ALL OF YOU need to get a life. YOU ARE ALL narcissistic LIARS. Sorry Tami doesn't run HER organization the way you trolls think she should. Seeing that DDB has been rescuing for over 10 years, says A LOT about Tami. One day, IF you have your own ''rescue'', YOU can then ''make the rules''. ALL of you complain about DDB not doing this, orwhy they bought this, and blah blah blah. WHAT ARE YOU DOING? PLAYING ON FACEBOOK? PLAYING ON RIP OFF REPORT? As much as I'd LOVE to stay and play in the GUTTER with YOU, I actually have rescue dogs that need my help. You are dust in the wind.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#7 Consumer Comment

Re: Barbara Bassett

AUTHOR: Former DDB Rep - (United States of America)

POSTED: Monday, December 19, 2011

You are all mistaken. I am not Shannon Allen. I was a DDB rep before Ms. Allen, and I was witness to many of the same decisions from Tammy Grimes. (who changed her name to Tamira Thayne after HER arrests). I KNOW Allen is speaking the truth based on MY experience.

The information that was mentioned in my rebuttal was available on Bassett's online blog and everything else was easily found on the internet JUST like how Ms. Bassett found the information on Ms. Allen.

How does it feel Barbara?

You all need to realize that Grimes/Thayne is taking advantage of your passion for animals. She is a noted sociopath who is extremely savvy in her manipulative skills.

I ask this of you... Take a step back... WHY would people be willing to expose their own personal issues by telling these stories? Is it possible these allegations are true?? Most people are agreeing with Allen because of YOUR actions. Keep it up! You are really NOT helping DDB by your responses. I know I am wasting my time with you, but you are making fools of yourself.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#6 General Comment

Re: Barbara Bassett

AUTHOR: EvangelineQ - (United States of America)

POSTED: Monday, December 19, 2011

Ms. Bassett is not an employee, volunteer or spokesperson for DDB or Tamira Thane. Why is she being cyber-stalked and dragged into what is essentially a consumer complaint about DDB? For some mad reason, the originator of this report has been posting Bassetts personal information and contact info all over social media and the blogosphere and encouraging other people to do the same and to call her employer and get her fired from her job for posting things they disagree with. Cyber-stalking is a dangerous road to take and I suggest Ms. Allen reconsider it. I realize this is being used as a revenge site but try to stick to one person at a time.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#5 Consumer Comment

Shannon Allen is showing her true character

AUTHOR: dogxprt - (USA)

POSTED: Sunday, December 18, 2011

To think that someone would write a nasty comment about the death of someone's family member is just about as low as someone can stoop.  Shannon Eaton Allen has done just that and that alone, not counting all the lies she posted about Dogs Deserve Better in her original report, is a true statement of her character. Shannon Allen, Fiala, Karleen, and all the other cronies from Bring Joel Home are nothing but a bunch of losers who have no life and want to try to destroy the reputation of hard working rescue groups.  They brag about how they love to hurt reputable 501(c)3 animal rescue groups.  They are sick individuals. Shannon Allen says DDB abandoned dogs but that is not true.  The animals she rescued were not approved by DDB. She, and Fiala, have set up chip-ins trying to bilk money from unsuspecting people. Shannon Allen cries about not getting help from DDB when the truth is, DDB has taken 2 of her un-approved dogs, is taking a 3rd, and is giving her $700 worth of PetCo gift cards as well as dog food. Not because these are DDB dogs, but because they are trying to help this sick individual.  The Bring Joel Home facebook page consists of convicted animal abusers, dog chainers, hoarders, thieves, convicted embezzlers, and the rest are just gullible.  These are dangerous, evil people and my advice would be to steer clear of them at all costs.  Whatever you do, don't adopt a dog to them, don't let them rescue a dog from you. 

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#4 General Comment

The ONLY one ripping anyone off is SHANNON ALLEN.

AUTHOR: anonymous - (United States of America)

POSTED: Sunday, December 18, 2011

Let's not forget Shannon Allen is a convicted EMBEZZLER who STOLE (she claims she ''borrowed'' the money) $36,000 from Va. Tech. Shannon Allen took in dogs WITHOUT approval from Dogs Deserve Better after she was warned MORE THAN ONCE to slow down or stop because the funds were not there for DDB to cover these dogs financially, she did it anyway-she had upwards of 19 dogs, in HER home. She vetted HER dogs under DDB's account name without DDB being aware they even existed. She is now accusing Tami (The founder/CEO of DDB) of being a DOG ABUSER. In the SAME LETTER she accuses Tami of such horrific acts, she also complains that Tami won't take any of HER dogs. Why would Shannon Allen beg an ''animal abuser'' to take her dogs and care for them? Because Shannon Allen is a LIAR. Shannon Allen has openly admitted, and even casually blogged about her mental illness and OCD, and how she checked herself into a Mental Health Clinic after drowning her poor husband in debt from her compulsive buying of cleaning products and first aid supplies. Shannon Allen has spammed every website she can get her hands on, smearing DDB. If you take the time to read Shannon's babble, you will notice many contradictions. Shannon Allen also uses fake names and profiles on facebook. She'll write this long, sad and drawn out ''Good Bye'' letter (2 to date), have everyone gushing over her and feeling sorry for her because SHE is a ''victim'' of mental illness and ''it's not her fault'', then she'll be back in a week, starting up more drama. She is a lonely person on the inside. Shannon Allen LIVES for this type of stuff. It is impossible for her to stop. If this were any other rescue organization, they'd be feeling her wrath just like DDB. While Shannon Allen sets up ChipIn accounts and ''tries'' to collect money for the dogs in her care, that she claims she can not afford, she is still taking in more dogs! She JUST pulled ANOTHER little Pit Bull from the Giles County Animal Shelter 3 days ago. Shannon Allen is not a ''rescuer'' she is a HOARDER. HELLO? It's pretty black and white. Shannon Allen is the ONLY one RIPPING PEOPLE OFF.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#3 General Comment

Former DDB Rep post is pure defamation

AUTHOR: AnnC - (USA)

POSTED: Sunday, December 18, 2011

The posting by former DDB Rep is purely defamatory having nothing to do with the context of the original ripoff report and rebuttal by the CEO on this ripoff report site. It is purely hate filled and defamatory, seeking to cause pain to the attacked party Ms. Bassett. 

Upon reading such malicious words, one has to question the mental state of the former DDB Rep. What would motivate this person to make public another individuals place of employment as well as defaming their family history? A  mentally unbalanced individual--regardless of the cause to which they have attached themselves.  No cause merits this level of response. Take a good look at yourself former DDB Rep. Your hurtful words express who you are, their intent to inflict harm shapes your heart, your thoughts have run away with your soul. 

Your post crosses a line. Your actions are disgusting. If you think no one knows who you are, your mistaken. The energy you put out will return to you. If you send out hate, it will come back to you. When your perspective is lost, the mirror of life will bring it back.  

Do you like what you see?

Let me remind you of the definition of Libel;

libel [lahy-buhl]    

noun, verb, -beled, -beling or ( especially British ) -belled, -

belling.noun1
Law .a.defamation by written or printed words, pictures, or inany form other than by spoken words or gestures.b.the act or crime of publishing it.c.a formal written declaration or statement, as onecontaining the allegations of a plaintiff or the grounds ofa charge.

2.anything that is defamatory or that maliciously or damagingly misrepresents.

NOTE: Although libel is defined under state case law or statute,the U.S. Supreme Court has enumerated some First Amendmentprotections that apply to matters of public concern. In New YorkTimes Company v. Sullivan , the Court held that in order torecover damages a public person (as a celebrity or politician who alleges libel (as by a newspaper) has to prove that thestatement was made with actual malice  that is, withknowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard ofwhether it was false or not in order to recover damages. TheCourt has also held that the states cannot allow a privateperson to recover damages for libel against a media defendantwithout a showing of fault (as negligence) on the defendant'spart. These protections do not apply to matters that are not ofpublic concern (as an individual's credit report) and that are notpublished by a member of the mass media. A libel plaintiff mustgenerally establish that the alleged libel refers to him or herspecifically, that it was published to others, and that some injury(as to reputation) occurred that gives him or her a right torecover damages (as actual, general, presumed, or specialdamages). The defendant may plead and establish the truth ofthe statements as a defense. Criminal libel may have additionalelements, as in tending to provoke a breach of peace or inblackening the memory of someone who is dead, and may nothave to be published to someone other than the person libeled.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 Consumer Comment

Barbara Bassett has fraudulently filed this rebuttal under a fake profile.

AUTHOR: Former DDB Rep - (United States of America)

POSTED: Friday, December 16, 2011

Barbara Bassett has been one of the most vocally abusive Dog Deserve Better fanatics to hit the Sacramento area!  

She has been reported to her employer and to the police.  She is now using fake names and fake Facebook profiles.  She is uninformed and does NOT have all of the facts.   

Her full name is Barbara Jo Bassett and she lives in the Sacramento, CA area. 

Barbara Bassett was sued by the State of California, Sacremento county, for unemployment fraud.

Her older brother suffers from dementia and a younger brother committed suicide years back so her family does suffer from mental illnesses. Her posts represent a disturbed personality. 

She also has a very unstable employment history. Since the early 90's, she has not held a job for longer than 3 - 3 1/2 years. She currently works at the California Crop Improvement Association, as a bookkeeper.

Now does her post make more sense?  

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 General Comment

Shannon Allan is a liar

AUTHOR: Marty - (United States of America)

POSTED: Wednesday, November 30, 2011

It is amazing to me how one OCD, suicidal convicted embezler can go onto multiple websites and degrade a fine rescue organization with no proof except made up letters, innuendos and lies.

This same person sided against Suzanne Fiala at trial, then suddenly quit Dogs Deserve Better and claimed that she was stuck with vet bills, when the dogs weren't approved to be taken in.

She claims Tami is a dog abuser, but her biggest complaint is that Tami won't take her own dogs into her shelter.

Anyone who posts as Jeff Thomas, Warrior, A Volunteer or who posts private emails is Shannon Allen. You can check out how OCD she is by the amount she posts and the amount of websites she floods.

Before you take ANY of what she says seriously, check out Shannon's criminal record. Dr. Fiala is being investigated by the medical board for her postings about DDB.

There are people on facebook who believe anything and march behind Shannon and Fiala without thinking. They are called fools.

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now