Report: #1013761

Complaint Review: Insolvency Guardian

  • Submitted: Wed, February 13, 2013
  • Updated: Wed, February 13, 2013
  • Reported By: Paul Klerck — Varsity Lakes Nationwide Australia
  • Insolvency Guardian
    Suite 1 Level 5 490 Upper Edward Street
    United States of America

Insolvency Guardian Jarrod Sierocki, Jarrod Sierocki One Again Playing The Victim, Not The Cause Of His Problems Spring Hill, Brisbane, Internet

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

My name is Paul K, I find it most disturbing that Jarrod Sierocki continues his personal and business attacks on me. Sure I was a partner of Jarrod Sierocki, sure I decided to pull out of Insolvency Guardian and sure I had issues with Jarrod and the ongoing daily dramas that surrounded having a business relationship with this guy and the way he acted in my opinion on a daily basis. Don't get me wrong there were some times that Jarrod acted perfect and other days totally crazy almost a Jeckyl and Hyde personality.
The defamatory claims Jarrod has posted up online about me and SK and Associates are not only slanderous and untrue but almost somewhat humorous. 
Jarrod wrote online at
We believe the reason for this behavior is to defame my good name and that of Insolvency Guardian and its community work. "What good name Jarrod have you spoken with your client base and ask them how they felt after dealing with Insolvency Guardian?"
You wrote: We also believe that this competitor is using emails that we believe have been illegally hacked/obtained from our Servers by him or them for the sole purpose of discrediting the company Insolvency Guardian and myself. "Jarrod this is another huge defamatory claim that you have made, if you believed you have been illegally hacked then report this to the police, you know this is more made up waffle just to try and cover you backside yet again, the information coming out about you is being posted by your Insolvency Guardian clients, not me. Any information I may have in my possession is being supplied to me for review not for opinion or consultation."
What you are publishing is more lies Jarrod to cover yourself.
Lets publish the real facts and the truth so we can clear the air once and for all, after Jarrod and I parted company we both agreed we would not do anything to hinder or cause harm, hindrance or malice towards each other. It was also stated in a legal binding agreement. I have attached a copy of this agreement clause.
As you will witness from what you read ahead Jarrod delivered the first low blow punch towards me was when he reported my new site to Google for black listing. See for yourself the facts don't lie.
2B. Acknowledgement by Sierocki
Sierocki, Insolvency Guardian and related entities expressly acknowledge that no restraint of trade applies to Klerck, his associates and related entities under this Deed. This means that Klerck and his associates and related entities may act in direct competition to Sierocki, Insolvency Guardian and related companies and any further business activities which may be perceived to be or is in direct competition to Insolvency Guardian. 
So what is the first attack against me and Insolvency Professionals.
Notice Unavailable DMCA (Copyright) Complaint to Google
Sent by: Insolvency Guardian Pty Ltd 

To: GoogleThe cease-and-desist or legal threat you requested is not yet available.Chilling Effects will post the notice after we process it.Question: Why does a web host, blogging service provider, or search engine get DMCA takedown notices?Answer: Many copyright claimants are making complaints under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, Section 512(c)' safe-harbor for hosts of "Information Residing on Systems or Networks At Direction of Users" or Section 512(d)'s safe-harbor for providers of "Information Location Tools." These safe harbors give providers immunity from liability for users' possible copyright infringement -- if they "expeditiously" remove material when they get complaints. Whether or not the provider would have been liable for infringement by users' materials it hosts or links to, the provider can avoid the possibility of a
lawsuit for money damages by following the DMCA's takedown procedure when it gets a complaint. The person whose information was removed can file a counter-notification if he or she believes the complaint was
So straight away Insolvency Guardian gets this activated and damages any chances of me attempting to make Insolvency Professionals a success.
In response to a complaint we received under the US Digital Millennium Copyright Act, we have removed 8 result(s) from this page. If you wish, you may read the DMCA complaint that caused the removal(s) at
I wont go into all the additional, childish behavior that I have had to endure. 
But as all the Insolvency Guardian unhappy customers begin to speak out Jarrod straight away goes on the attack against me, by filling a Supreme Court Action for defamation. Here is the reality Jarrod, it is only defamation if:
Defamation is a tort, or a civil wrong, which occurs when defamatory material relating to an individual is published. 
Material will be defamatory if it could: injure the reputation of the individual by exposing them to hatred, contempt or ridicule; cause people to shun or avoid the individual; or lower the individuals estimation by right thinking members of society.
For a defamation action to be successful, three elements must be satisfied: the information was communicated by the defendant to a third person other than the plaintiff (publication); the material identifies the plaintiff (identification); and the information/material contains matter that is defamatory, regardless of whether the material was intentionally published or not (defamatory matter). Provided that no defences are applicable, if the elements are satisfied then the defendant will be liable to pay damages to the plaintiff to compensate him or her for the damage caused to his or her reputation.
Both are actionable, and I can assure you if you don't file a notice of discontinuance, post public apologies to me and my companies, agree to a cease and desist order I will use that Amex Black of mine and slam you with the best legal representation money can buy. I will not be relying on a Bartercard funded legal representation. I know I will never get anything out of you, because you have to have something in the first place. I will get a surety for costs against you and Insolvency Guardian because your claim is false and unproven.
But at the end of the day I will prove my credibility over yours this will be determined by the 18 signed affidavits I now hold in my possession with more coming one of these comes from a gentleman called Praveen Raghuhbar he has provided me with so many emails from you as well as recordings of threatening phone calls where you racially abused both Praveen and Scott Briggs in an attempt to extort more money from them. Maybe a Podcast would be appropriate in this case. The interesting factor with all these affidavits is they all make reference and claims of you being a Barrister and or Forensic Accountant. I have also managed to track down proof that you stood up at a Bartercard breakfast and advised all attendees that you were in fact a Barrister. Will Jamieson has also sworn out an affidavit that you advised him in front of a Justice of the Peace at Vincents chartered accountants in Brisbane that you are a Barrister. The same as you told Scott Donald, Nick Ray, Mick James, Michael and Kerri-Anne Benton, Brent Thompson, Kurt Frazer, Drew Hankin, Tony Atkins a police officer from Kingscliff and the list goes on and on.
This has been reported to the Legal Services Commission, ASIC and ITSA in sworn affidavits.
Here is a copy of the text used in your email to Praveen Raghuhbar.
12 September 2011
Praveen Raghubar
Scott Briggs
 10 Fisher Parade
Dear Sirs
Re: Outstanding Monies due and payable
We refer to the amount outstanding and further, your attempt to travel
to China tomorrow the 13th September 2011.
We advise that there is an amount outstanding of $7,700.00 which was demanded on Wednesday the 7th September 2011.
We advise that we have stopped your ability to travel to China or leave Australia on the premise that you are a director of a company that we believe has committed a range of offences.
We will be proceeding to investigate this further and issuing you a statement of claim in both names as
we believe that Mr Briggs was acting at all times as a shadow director.
Jarrod Sierocki
Insolvency Guardian Pty Ltd 

When both Praveen and Scott had enough backbone to dispute or question your service, motives and billing. What did you do to them both? You defaulted both of them on Veda you screwed their credit rating for 7 years each. Classy Work Jarrod, I think not. You will be stopped.

Veda Advantage Information Services and Solutions Ltd
ABN 26 000 602 862
Service Request ID: 110925-W103Q-002HV
Client Charge Back No:
Report date: 25 Sep 2011

Veda Advantage Information Services and Solutions Ltd
ABN 26 000 602 862
Service Request ID: 110925-W103Q-002HN
Client Charge Back No:
Report date: 25 Sep 2011

Neither Praveen or Scott deserved this Jarrod and if you had any real empathy left you would have this removed and contact them both to apologise.

Now tell me or the world Jarrod that this is more lies posted as a part of an ongoing smear campaign, Praveen has also signed a statement as to what you did to him at a trade show, you came up to him and abused, threatened him and yelled at him that he was scum, just like Paul Klerck. Seriously, Jarrod you still have not learned to control yourself, this was my biggest concern with you and to publicly blurt this out was not going to go on unchecked or observed.
Why don't we both agree to a video recorded polygraph test and the place the results online or better still webcast the actual test? I am ready whenever you say lets go do this i am ready wiling and able. This way will see who is smearing who. 
Your Supreme Court Defamation case is just another attempt to bully and attack, always on the attack without any right or reason that is who you are Jarrod. 
So I guess Jarrod lets look at all the facts you started the attack against me and SK and Associates along time before you started making false claims and accusations against me and my companies. Just like you posted up a vulgar untruth about me back in December 2011 under an ex employees name Mick. Jarrod I know Mick never posted this and so do you, don't you? You are always so jealous of what you don't have never happy with what you do have. A beautiful wife and two awesome little children that crave their dads love and attention. Jarrod stop wasting money on lawyers and get some real help, some professional medical help. 
Jarrod I am giving you an opportunity to save face and stop all this rubbish now or you will become a victim of what you proclaim you protect people from "Bankruptcy" but we both know you are always to quick to advise everyone to either liquidate or file for bankruptcy and if they don't need to they will once they sign an Insolvency Guardian service agreement.
Is this Ripoff Report About you?
Ripoff Report A business' first line of defense on the Internet.
If your business is willing to make a commitment to customer satisfaction Click here now..

Does your business have a bad reputation? Fix it the right way. Corporate Advocacy Program™

Set the record straight: Arbitration Program

SEO Reputation Management at its best!

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 02/13/2013 03:58 PM and is a permanent record located here: The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
Also a victim?
Repair Your Reputation!
Ripoff Report Recommends
ZipBooks Accounting Software

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.