Complaint Review: Wiggin Out Salons - charlotte North Carolina
- Wiggin Out Salons 2727 Selwyn Avenue charlotte, North Carolina United States of America
- Phone: 704-334-7676
- Web: www.wiggin-out-salon.com
- Category: Beauty Salons
Wiggin Out Salons Comments: MY TESTIMONY WITH WIGGIN OUT: THIS COMPANY IS A SCAM...THEY TAKE YOUR MONEY AND NEVER DELIVER A PRODUCT...THE LIE LIE LIE charlotte, North Carolina
*REBUTTAL Owner of company: Not All Our Clients Can Be Angels! 1 out of 50 (remeber that number)
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
Ripoff Report
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..
Comments: MY TESTIMONY WITH WIGGIN OUT:
I purchased a hair piece back in September 2009 of last year. I paid almost $4500.00. The piece came in and it was wrong and wasn\'t anything like I had asked for. I sent the hair piece back and still have not received my hair piece and its the middle of March 2010. I have called and asked for my money back and they have chosen to ignore my request only to tell me every time I call and email that to just give them two more weeks, two more weeks. They are a scam and I am so pissed that I waisted all that money and to this day i have nothing to show for it. I have never gotten my hair piece and they haven\'t responded to my request of a refund. I am in the process of turning this over to the attorney generals office for consumer fraud. I would beware. I can back up all my statements in this review with emails and facts....
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 03/17/2010 03:29 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/wiggin-out-salons/charlotte-north-carolina-28209/wiggin-out-salons-comments-my-testimony-with-wiggin-out-this-company-is-a-scamthey-t-582198. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:
#1 REBUTTAL Owner of company
Not All Our Clients Can Be Angels! 1 out of 50 (remeber that number)
AUTHOR: Wiggin Out - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, April 01, 2010
1 out of 50 clients that we serve that tend not to be the most sane consumer. We cant expect everyone to be like our amazing beautiful God loving client that we care about so deeply. But we will promise our clients this. If they are not happy we go above and beyond to help them. Sometimes it takes longer than usual to have a piece made or repaired. We have no control over what order your wig or piece is in. If your buying a custom wig off the shelf remember: "its impossible to make a custom wig in one day" IF you think that it was, then maybe its time to check the old IQ and return to reality to see if that would be even possible? Common sense tells you that no one is able to make a all hand tied custom wig for a client in the span of 1 hr of the consultation. For redesigns, guess what? you may be waiting longer than 4 months especially if you have natural platinum blond hair! So please everyone reading this, we have enough reviews that will tell you what an amazing group of staff memebers we have and they will all tell you, "if something goes wrong WE ALWAYS MAKE IT RIGHT AND THEN SOME!" God Bless You All! | |
Report: |
Here we gooooooo! Making this short and sweet. MC C ordered a custom piece in NC. Michelle's piece came in and she paid the balance due had her item cut colored /altered, then 4 weeks later wanted more hair added to the front. So.....out of the goodness of our hearts, we found a young college student with natural platinum blond hair and paid $2,000. to cut her hair off for Michelles piece. We did not charge her for this. We just wanted to keep Michelle long term as a client. Well it does take a while to find a girl willing to loose her locks for money but we did it. now her piece was in line to be altered and redesigned according to MC's requests. So....its taking a lot longer than usual. But thats the life of a custom piece or wig. Some take shorter some take longer, that is why she signed a paper that states time frames are approximate. (see dictionary for approximate) we have been recieving harrassing phone calls and emails even text messages from MC to our staff. Police report has been filed and we are now waiting for the next email or phone call from MC to make our already strong case complete. MC piece WILL be in. It WILL be delivered. And we will have a follow up story for you all with lots of juicy drama. We again are disapointed at the lengths humans will go through if they are not getting their way exactly when THEY want it. Sometimes I feel like we are managing 3 year old that wants their ooompa loompa now daddy! Okay. so go to our website at wiggin-out-salon.com and see our wonderful work our policies and our testemonials. We have plenty more where that came from. If you are the negative high strung , impatient type then our salon is not for you. You will need an instant gratification salon where you new do is "right off the shelf" Well we have to go now. Positive thoughts and wonderful people needed to be attended to! Everyone have a great day!!!!!
The law of Defamation has come under renewed scrutiny with the advent of the Internet. This is largely because it is the nature of the Internet to give the average, anonymous person an opportunity to express their opinion well-beyond any previously defined venue. Consider the fact that a person of modest means now has the ability to publish a statement, article, or news item across the world in an instant, without an editor checking the facts. Thereafter, the item will linger on the 'Net for months, or even years, impossible to recover and amend, if the "facts" are erroneous. Therefore, it is inevitable that problems are going to arise. The main issue to remember when dealing with the Internet is that people still have their basic legal rights intact on the Net, and - likewise - the Internet is not as completely anonymous as the typical person may presumes. What is Defamation? Generally, persons defined as "Public Figures," have a higher threshold in proving someone committed Defamation against them; that is, the statement must have been made maliciously. There are also four subjects that if falsely dispersed as a fact about another person, are actionable on their face: Attacking a person's professional character /standing; Alleging an unmarried person is unchaste; Claims a person is infected with a sexually transmitted, or loathsome disease; Claims a person has committed a crime of moral turpitude. Is Internet Defamation Defined as Slander, Libel or Both? Myers claimed Pivar is a "classic crackpot" on his http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula website. In response, the lawsuit complaint states, "Myer's defamatory remarks were made with actual malice; Myers called Plaintiff "a classic crackpot" fully knowing that statement to be false as a statement of fact and in reckless disregard of the truth about Plaintiff because Myer's knew full well, the time of publishing his defamatory statement that no scientist holding the international reputation of any of Hazen, Sasselov, Goodwin or Tyson would endorse or review the work of a crackpot." The complaint claims Myers caused "considerable mental and emotional distress," tortious interference with the plaintiff's business relationships as a "scientist and scientific editor," and "loss of book sales and diminished returns on ten years of funded scientific research in special damages" exceeding $5 million. Can a Blog Be Sued for Defamation; Isn't It All Free Speech? For bloggers, all Defamation legal rules apply to their posts. But there are many complications in applying them. First, many people who post online comments, and probably those tending to make the most inflammatory and false statements, will do so anonymously, for obvious reasons. So the first threshold is identifying the blogger making Defamatory claims. Several things make this difficult, as well. Since the blogger probably will not identify themselves when the issue comes to light, there needs to be a legal process that allows identification. They can be traced by high-tech means, but a court must agree via summary judgment that all the elements of Defamation have been met. This technology does have some limits, as well, as it can be stymied through use of "Proxies," which mask the true origin of the blogger. Also, the website owner may not cooperate in the search, as well. A recent case showed how powerful Defamation laws, applied online, can be. In November 2006, a Florida woman, Sue Scheff, was awarded $11.3 million in damages in Broward County Circuit Court, in one of the biggest awards ever tolled. The suit was filed for Internet defamation, and the jury found a Louisiana woman had posted caustic messages against the Scheff and her company, claiming she was a "con artist" and "fraud". The jury found the charges were completely false, so the Louisiana woman had no defense. Interestingly, Scheff's attorney had offered to settle the case for $35,000 before it went before the jury.
For All of your business that have been malicously attacked by a client and is using false malicous statements that may or may not hurt your outstanding reputation: The law of Defamation has come under renewed scrutiny with the advent of the Internet. This is largely because it is the nature of the Internet to give the average, anonymous person an opportunity to express their opinion well-beyond any previously defined venue. Consider the fact that a person of modest means now has the ability to publish a statement, article, or news item across the world in an instant, without an editor checking the facts. Thereafter, the item will linger on the 'Net for months, or even years, impossible to recover and amend, if the "facts" are erroneous. Therefore, it is inevitable that problems are going to arise. The main issue to remember when dealing with the Internet is that people still have their basic legal rights intact on the Net, and - likewise - the Internet is not as completely anonymous as the typical person may presumes. What is Defamation? Generally, persons defined as "Public Figures," have a higher threshold in proving someone committed Defamation against them; that is, the statement must have been made maliciously. There are also four subjects that if falsely dispersed as a fact about another person, are actionable on their face: Attacking a person's professional character /standing; Alleging an unmarried person is unchaste; Claims a person is infected with a sexually transmitted, or loathsome disease; Claims a person has committed a crime of moral turpitude. Is Internet Defamation Defined as Slander, Libel or Both? Myers claimed Pivar is a "classic crackpot" on his http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula website. In response, the lawsuit complaint states, "Myer's defamatory remarks were made with actual malice; Myers called Plaintiff "a classic crackpot" fully knowing that statement to be false as a statement of fact and in reckless disregard of the truth about Plaintiff because Myer's knew full well, the time of publishing his defamatory statement that no scientist holding the international reputation of any of Hazen, Sasselov, Goodwin or Tyson would endorse or review the work of a crackpot." The complaint claims Myers caused "considerable mental and emotional distress," tortious interference with the plaintiff's business relationships as a "scientist and scientific editor," and "loss of book sales and diminished returns on ten years of funded scientific research in special damages" exceeding $5 million. Can a Blog Be Sued for Defamation; Isn't It All Free Speech? For bloggers, all Defamation legal rules apply to their posts. But there are many complications in applying them. First, many people who post online comments, and probably those tending to make the most inflammatory and false statements, will do so anonymously, for obvious reasons. So the first threshold is identifying the blogger making Defamatory claims. Several things make this difficult, as well. Since the blogger probably will not identify themselves when the issue comes to light, there needs to be a legal process that allows identification. They can be traced by high-tech means, but a court must agree via summary judgment that all the elements of Defamation have been met. This technology does have some limits, as well, as it can be stymied through use of "Proxies," which mask the true origin of the blogger. Also, the website owner may not cooperate in the search, as well. A recent case showed how powerful Defamation laws, applied online, can be. In November 2006, a Florida woman, Sue Scheff, was awarded $11.3 million in damages in Broward County Circuit Court, in one of the biggest awards ever tolled. The suit was filed for Internet defamation, and the jury found a Louisiana woman had posted caustic messages against the Scheff and her company, claiming she was a "con artist" and "fraud". The jury found the charges were completely false, so the Louisiana woman had no defense. Interestingly, Scheff's attorney had offered to settle the case for $35,000 before it went before the jury.
|
Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.